ABSTRACT

A sales and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) is an agreement born due to the

open characteristic of legal agreement in Book Ill of the Civil Code. PPJB causes
many legal issues, particularly the default committed by one of the parties that
causes PPJB cannot be continued tobecome AJB. The problems of this research
namely the form of legal protection for the party whois harmed by the occurrence of
a default under the PPJB deed toward the right on land, the role of the notary in
providing legal protection for both parties under Land Sales and
PurchaseAgreement, and analysis of the panel of judges' basis of legal consideration
in Medan High Court Ruling Number 304/Pd/2018/Pt. Man on the default committed
by one of the parties in the PPJB Deed.
This is normative legal research which is supported by field data obtained
through interviews with an informant namely Adi Pinem S.H. as the Notary in
Medan. Data analysis is conducted by selecting secondary data obtained from
library research.
The result indicates that legal protection for parties for the default action committed
formulated in PP JB is referred to the provision under Article 1267 of the Civil Code.
The liabilityof a notary in PPJB whose object is in dispute is to perform their duties
and responsibilities by complying with the applicable laws and regulations. Adi
Pinem S.H., as the Notary, thereof, has performed his duties and responsibilities in
accordance with the applied provisions. The analysis on the basis of the Panel of
Judges' Legal Consideration based on Medan High Court Ruling Number
304/Pdt/2018/Pt.Mdn, has been correct. From the researcher's point of view, the
Plaintiffs are the heirs of Bias Bars, and a quo disputed land based on the informatio
from the witnesses of this case is the possession of Bias Barus. However, the disputed
land has been sold to the Defendant by Biasa Bars and the payment has been made
although it has not been paid in full due to some circumstances as mentioned.

Keywords : defaulft, PPJB, notary, responsibility