“Pp The State Intellectual Property Office of People’s Republic of China 510000 Issuing Date: PRET HL AER BSA 11 HR 2306, ‘#586019 (13729817285) Application No. or Publication No.:201811181195.9 Issue No.s Applicant or Patentee: Guangzhou Ring Dosing Research Institute, Inc. Title of Invention: ‘Smoke Washwater Treatment Technology First Office Action 1,Billpon the request of substantive examination of the applicant, in accordance with Article 35.1 of the Patent Lav, the State Intellectual Property Office per‘ examination for the aforesaid application for a patent for invention. Gln accordance with Article 35.2 of the Patent Law, the State Intellectual Property Office proceeds to examine the aforesaid application for a patent for invention as to its substance rms the substantive on its own initiative. 2. OThe applicant requests on the basis of: Othe applicant has submitted the copy of previous application documents for the first filed, which has been verified by the original receiving organization. Othe applicant has not submitted the copy of previous application documents for the first filed, which has been verified by the original receiving organization, In accordance with Article 30 of the Patent Law, the claim to the right of priority shall be deemed not to have been made. 3. QQUpon examination, the amenduent submitted by the applicant on___,shall not be accepted for not in conformity with Rule 51.1 of the Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law. 4. Application files for examination Boriginal application documents. Documents submitted on the date of submission of divisional application. OFollowing application documents: 5. fhe decision of this Office Action has been made without sear BEhe decision of this Office Action has been made based on search. ®he following reference documents are cited in this Office Action (the serial number(s) of which will be used in follow-on examination) = Xo, | Pocument nunber or Document publication date sith tannlication date of the conflict 1 ¢N 2051519661) 20160413 210401 2010.24p The State Intellectual Property Office of People’s Republic of China Gee ae nn rae 3 CN 1014020064 20090408 6. Conclusive opinions of the examination: About the description: ithe application falls into the scope of subject matter vhich is nonpatentable according to Article 5 of the Patent Law, the deseription fails to comply with the pro Othe description fails to comply with the provisions of Article 33 of the Patent Lav. sions of article 26.3 of the Patent Law. Othe drafting of the description fails to comply with Rule 17 of the Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law, o About the claims Othe claim(s) fail(s) to comply with the provisions of Article 2.2 of the Patent Law, Othe claim(s) fail(s) to comply with the provisions of Article 9.1 of the Patent Law, the claim(s) fail(s) to comply with the novelty requested by Article 22.2 of the Patent Lax. Othe claims) fail(s) to comply with the inventive steps requested by Article 22.3 of the Patent Law. Othe claim(s) fail(s) to comply with the applicability requested by Article 22.4 of the Patent Lax, Othe claims) fall(s) into the scope of subject matter which is nonpatentable according to Article 25 of the Patent Law. BAhe claim(s)_1-8 fail(s) to comply with the provisions of Article 26, Law. of the Patent Othe claim(s) fail(s) to comply with the provisions of Article 31.1 of the Patent Law. Othe claim(s). fail(s) to comply with the provisions of Article 33 of the Patent Law, Othe claim(s) fail(s) to comply with the provisions of Rule 19 of the Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law. the claim(s) fail(s) to comply with the provisions of Rule 20 of the Implement ing Regulations of the Patent Law Othe claims) fail(s) to comply with the provisions of Rule 21 of the Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law. Othe claims) fail(s) to comply with the provisions of Rule 22 of the Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law. a Che application fails to comply with the provisions of Article 26.5 of the Patent Law or Rule 26 of its Implementing Regulations. the application fails to comply with the provisions of Article 20.1 of the Patent Law. Othe divisional application fails to comply with the provisions of Rule 43.1 of the 210401 2010.2“Pp The State Intellectual Property Office of People’s Republic of China Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law. ‘The detailed analyses of the above conclusive opinions refer to the text of this Office Action, the basis of the conclusive opinions, the examiner suggests: the applicant should amend the application documents according to the text of this Office Action, the applicant should state the reasons why the patent application should be granted in the observation, and amend the part which fails to comply with the provisions according to this Office Action, otherwise the patent application should not be granted. Bilhe substantive content that might be granted can not be found in the application, if the applicant does not state the reasons or the stated reasons are not sufficient, the application shall be rejected. oO 8. The applicant should pay attention to the followings statements: (1) In accordance with Article 37 of the Patent Law, the applicant should submit the written opinion within four months from the date of receipt of this Office Action, If, without any justified reason, the time limit for reply is not met, the application shall be deemed to have been withdrawn, (2) The amendment of the application document by the applicant should be in conformity with Article 33 of the Patent Lax, and it should not exceed the scope specified in the initial description and claims, Meanwhile, the amendment of the application document by applicant should be in conformity with Rule 51.3 of the Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law, and in accordance with this Office Action, (3) The written opinion and/or amendment document of the applicant should be sent by mail or submitted directly to the Receiving Division of the Patent Office of the State Intellectual Property Office, otherwise it will be considered to have no legal effect. (4) Without appointment, the applicant and/or the agent should not come to the Patent Office of the State Intellectual Property Office to have an interview with the examiner. 9.The text of this Office Action has2 pages, and the attachments are as follons Bllhe total number of copies of the reference documents cited is3copies and 19 pages, a Name of the Examiner: 2 Tel: 010-53962775 Examination Department: # Fifi #EUM EE ePaly PS LARD AD 210401 2010.2. iP The State Intellectual Property Office of People’s Republic of China The First Office Action Application Number :2018111811 is reviewed, and the following review is now presented: cone, Claims 1-8 Novel in accordance with Clause 26 of Patent law, Section 4 The subject titles of claims 1-8 each refer to "a soot wash wastewater treatment technology”, which does not clearly indicate whether the type of claim is a method claim or a product claim, resulting in the claims being unclear and not complying with the provisions of Article 26 of Patent law, Article 4. Applicants shall make modifications, ‘ovo, assuming Applicant modifies the subject matter name: "A soot wash wastewater treatment system", claims 1-3 do not meet the provisions under Article 22, Article 2 of the Patent lav, and claims 4-8 do not meet the provisions under Article 22, Article 3 of the Patent law 1, claim 1 claiming a soot wash wastewater treatment system, comparative document 1 (CN205151966U) discloses a soot wash wastewater reeycling treatment system: see figure 1 comprising a cooler 1. a conditioning tank 2, a reaction tank, a settling tank, a neutralization tank 5, a filtration device 6, a fresh tank 7, an ultrafiltration devi 8, a reverse osmosis device 9 connected in sequence: the settling pond may be connected back to the conditioning pond 2 via a sludge thickening pond 11, which is also connected to a sludge dewater 12, which is connected back to the conditioning pond 2. The filtration apparatus, ultrafiltration apparatus 8 and reverse osmosis apparatus 9 respectively loop back into the conditioning basin 2; the fresh tank 7 is further piped in connection with a filtration device, respectively an ultrafiltration device 8, forming a backwash line. The reverse osmosis device tail is also provided back to the use tank 10 (ie., the use back system) (see paragraph [0016] of the specification and FIG. 1). In connection with Figure 1, the cooler, the conditioning basin and the pump between the conditioning basin and the first reaction basin of Figure | constitute a cooling system, the reaction basin and the settling basin constitute a mixed settling reaction system, the neutralization basin, the filtration means, the fresh water tank, the ultrafiltration means and the reverse osmosis means constitute a charging system, the sludge pump, the sludge concentration basin, the sludge dewater constitute a sludge treatment system. It follows that comparative document 1 already discloses all the technical features of claim 1 and that the technical solution disclosed by comparative document 1 belongs to the same technical field as the technical solution claimed by claim 1, solves the same technical problems with the same technical means and produces the same technical effects. Accordingly, Claim 1 has no novelty as specified in clause 22, clause 2 of the patent lav 2, respectively, claims 2-3 as further defined in claim I, As can be seen from Figure 1 of Comparative Document 1, the water pump of the cooling system is connected to the conditioning basin and the first reaction basin. Paragraph [0017] of the specification of Comparative Document 1 also discloses that the reaction cell comprises a 210401 2010.2“Pp The State Intellectual Property Office of People’s Republic of China first reaction cell and a second reaction cell and the settling cell comprises a first settling cell and a second settling cell, Thus, fo the extent that the claims to which they are cited do not have novelty, either claim 2 or 3 has novelty as set forth in clause 22 of the patent law, clause 2. 3. As for claim 4, itis well known in the art that mechani lly stirred reaction cells are typically provided with 3-4 agitators per cel in a mixing apparatus, separated by partitions between the agitators to prevent short circuits (see evidence of common general knowledge 1-Comp. 2: Eco Foundation, Liu et al.. Medium Mine University Press, page 75, 20130131). That is, common general knowledge evidence discloses that a reaction cell is provided with 4 sequentially connected spaces inside, and that a reaction cell provided with 2 connected spaces is also a routine choice made by a person skilled in the art according to processing needs, With respect to claims 5-6, as can be seen from Figure 1 of Comparative Document 1. the sludge thickening basin is in communication with a sludge pump between the first and second clarifier basins, and the sludge dewater is used to carry out the cake afer treatment. Two clarifier sets up 2 drain pumps, sludge basins and supply pumps, and sludge yards are all equipment in the configuration of sludge handling systems conventional in the art, and those skilled in the art will readily select settings based on sludge handling needs. It is also conventional in the art for 2 drain pumps to connect two settling tanks with sludge thickening tanks, respectively. For claim 7. the solution claimed in claim 7 is distinguished by the fact that the medication system of claim 7 further comprises a filtered raw water basin after the neutralization basin, ‘an ultrasonic filter before the reverse osmosis filter, a backwash pump between the quartz sand filter and the activated carbon filter, and a blower connected to the quartz sand filter: comparative document 1 does not disclose some of the above features and the reverse osmosis filter is preceded by an ultrafiltration device and is also provided ‘with a fresh tank and an ultrafiltration production tank. The technical effect that can be achieved on the basis of the above distinguishing features can be determined that the technical problem actually solved by Claim I with respect to Comparative Document 1 is to improve the process of deep treatment of soot washing waste water. As regards the distinguishing features described above, it is easy for a person skilled in the art to sclect the filtration raw basin and the absence of fresh and ultrafiltration production tanks depending on the amount of water treated by the different devices, with the resulting technical effects being expected. Figure | of Comparative Document | discloses that both the quartz sand filter and the activated carbon filter have backwash lines, the provision of a backwash pump in between is also a conventional arrangement of backwash equipment in a backwash process. One skilled in the art would readily envision providing a fan for improved accommodation of few filters. As regards ultrasonic filters Comparative Document 3 (CN101402006A) discloses an ultrasonic filter capable of enhancing water quality treatment and efficiently removing debris such as suspended matter, bacteria, water algae, scale rust and the like in 210401 2010.2“Pp The State Intellectual Property Office of People’s Republic of China water, which can be used in rural feed water, domestic water, industrial process water, boiler system water and swimming pool water (see page 1, paragraphs 2-3 of the specification). And its role in Comparative Document 2 is the same as its role in the present application to solve its technical problem. all for improving the water quality treatment effect, that is to say that Comp Document 2 gives the implication of using the technical features described above for this Comp Document 1 to solve the technical problem thereof, replacing the ultrafiltration device in Comp Document 1 with an ultrasonic filer when necessary, depending on the treatment needs and the actual treatment effect, easily by a person skilled in the art. Thus, on the basis of Comparative Document |. it is obvious to a person skilled in the art to combine Comparative Document 3 with the above-mentioned conventional options in order to obtain the solution claimed in Claim 7. For claim 8, Figure 1 of Comparative Document 1 discloses that the neutralization basin of the charging system is connected to the second settling basin of the coagulated precipitation reaction system, and the reverse osmosis filter of the charging system is connected to the return water tank Accordingly, to the extent that a claim to which it is dependent is not novel or inventive, neither is claims 4-8 inventive as specified in clause 22, clause 3 of the patent lav This application does not have authorization prospects. In case you doubt about review comments, a reviewer phone 010-53962775 may be dialed, or a on-duty phone (10-53962706 may also feed back comments through the mailbox. sxbjzx_vijian@enipagov.cn Note: The content of mailbox feedback is not legally valid, please submit formal Opinion Statements and/or Modification texts to the Patent Office Reception department within defined terms, EE ES RE aH A AACS: 816687 210401 2010.2