Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Microstructural Heterogeneities and Fatigue Anisotropy of Forged Steels - Pessard2011
Microstructural Heterogeneities and Fatigue Anisotropy of Forged Steels - Pessard2011
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: In this study, various experimental methods are employed to determine the anisotropic fatigue behavior
Received 28 April 2011 of a 25MnCrSiVB6 forged steel (Metasco MC). This material has a bainitic microstructure and contains
Received in revised form 23 August 2011 many elongated non-metallic inclusions in the rolled direction, which are grouped into clusters. Speci-
Accepted 9 September 2011
mens with different orientations relative to the rolling direction have been extracted from a hot rolled
Available online 16 September 2011
bar and the ability of certain experimental techniques to capture the fatigue anisotropy has been tested.
Results obtained from monotonic tensile tests and Charpy impact tests show that the material has
Keywords:
isotropic fracture strength and anisotropic ductility. The influence of the “inclusion clusters” is clearly
Anisotropy
Forged steel
demonstrated via observation of the fracture surfaces.
Manganese sulfide inclusions Concerning the fatigue behavior, results from a classical staircase experimental procedure are com-
High cycle fatigue pared to results from self-heating fatigue tests. For specimens orientated at 0◦ relative to the rolled
Self-heating direction, microcrack initiation is controlled by the material matrix and the prediction of the fatigue
strength with the self-heating method has been observed to be correct. For specimens orientated at 45◦
and 90◦ , the elongated manganese sulfide inclusion clusters are the origin of crack initiation and the
fatigue strength drops significantly. For this case, it appears that the self-heating method has difficulty
predicting the fatigue behavior.
© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0921-5093/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.msea.2011.09.031
290 E. Pessard et al. / Materials Science and Engineering A 529 (2011) 289–299
Table 1
Chemical composition of the Metasco MC.
Element C Mn Si Cr S Mo V Ti
Weight (%) 0.255 1.30 0.9 0.8 0.075 0.075 0.185 0.025
Table 2
Nomenclature Diameter of inclusions alone and inclusions bands.
Fig. 1. (a) Microstructure of the Metasco MC, (b) extraction of the samples, (c) elongated manganese sulfide inclusion.
E. Pessard et al. / Materials Science and Engineering A 529 (2011) 289–299 291
Fig. 2. (a) Phase map (red = austenite, blue = ferrite) and (b) Euler map of retained austenite. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is
referred to the web version of the article.)
slightly higher for a fibering oriented at 0◦ and equal for orientation the inclusion the fracture surface indicates a brittle failure mode
at 45◦ and 90◦ . The tensile elongation shows greater dependence (Fig. 5(c) and (f)). This analysis of the failure surface is in accordance
on the fibering angle and decreases with increasing fibering orien- with the quantitative results presented in Table 3.
tation angle.
For specimens with a fibering orientation of 0◦ , examination 3.2. Toughness of the bainitic forged steel
of the fracture surfaces of failed tensile specimens showed that
the fracture mode was ductile: microscopic ductile dimples local- The toughness of the steel has been measured by the Charpy
ized near the specimen surface can be observed (Fig. 5(a) and V-notch (CVN) impact energy in accordance with the standard NF
(b)). For specimens with a fibering orientation of 45◦ and 90◦ , EN 10045 1. Fig. 6 shows the impact energy plotted as a function of
ductile dimples are observed only around inclusions. Far from temperature to observe the ductile to brittle transition. This type
Table 3
Diameter of inclusions alone and inclusions bands.
Orientation (◦ ) Yield stress (MPa) Ultimate tensile stress (MPa) Tensile elongation (%)
0◦ 755 1180 25
45◦ 710 1127 14
90◦ 750 1130 5
292 E. Pessard et al. / Materials Science and Engineering A 529 (2011) 289–299
Fig. 4. 3D Geometry of MnS inclusion after tomography observation (a) several inclusions and (b) inclusion band isolated.
of test is sometimes used to detect the effect of inclusions on the Crack initiation for fibering orientations of 45◦ and 90◦ is localized
mechanical behavior of steels [9]. For the specimens with a fibering at inclusions bands (Fig. 7(b) and (c)), whereas at 0◦ cracks appear
orientation of 0◦ the fracture toughness increases with the tem- to initiate from the bainitic matrix (Fig. 7(a)). At 20 ◦ C the results
perature: a ductile to brittle transition is observed. For 45◦ and 90◦ are very different: the fracture surface is ductile for fibering ori-
specimens the fracture toughness is effectively independent of the entations of 0◦ but brittle for specimens at 45◦ and 90◦ . At 20 ◦ C,
temperature. the evolution of the mechanisms with respect to the fibering ori-
Examination of the fracture surfaces of broken Charpy impact entation explains the anisotropic fracture toughness observed in
specimens at −40 ◦ C showed that the fracture mode was brittle. Fig. 6.
Fig. 5. Fracture surface of specimens broken during monotonic tensile test: (a) and (b) fibering at 0◦ , (c) and (d) fibering at 45◦ , (e) and (f) fibering at 90◦ .
E. Pessard et al. / Materials Science and Engineering A 529 (2011) 289–299 293
Table 4
Push pull fatigue test results.
Orientation (◦ ) Average fatigue strength S−1 Standard deviation S−1 Covariance Cov = S−1 /S−1
◦
0 476 ±20 0.042
45◦ 453 ±8 0.0018
90◦ 415 ±11 0.026
Fig. 6. Evolution of the fracture toughness with the temperature for different fiber-
ing orientations. Fig. 8. Geometry of fatigue specimens used: (a) for stair case and (b) for observation
and self-heating tests (units in mm).
3.3. Anisotropic fatigue behavior is controlled by defects, the fatigue limit (or fatigue strength at
2 × 106 cycles) is highest for an orientation of 0◦ and lowest at 90◦ .
3.3.1. Conventional fatigue tests Note that the decrease of the fatigue strength is accompanied by
Push–pull (R = − 1) fatigue tests were performed using a servo a reduction of the standard deviation. This result follows the same
hydraulic Instron testing machine at a frequency of 25 Hz. The trend as those obtained by Temmel et al. [12] for a 50CrMo4 steel.
geometry of the non-standard fatigue specimens are presented in Examination of the fracture surfaces of broken fatigue speci-
Fig. 8. The fatigue limits at 2 × 106 cycles were evaluated using the mens showed that the origin of fracture depends on the fibering
staircase method. All tests were carried out at room temperature orientation. Crack initiation for a fibering orientation of 45◦ and
and 15 specimens for each orientation have been used to define the 90◦ is localized at inclusions bands (Fig. 10(d) and (f)), and for an
average fatigue limit and the scatter. orientation of 0◦ it seems to be initiated from the bainitic matrix
The results obtained are presented in Fig. 9 and Table 4. As (Fig. 10(b)). For this case, the origin of fracture is similar to those
observed in the literature [9,12] for steels whose fatigue behavior shown by the Charpy tests at 20 ◦ C.
Fig. 7. Fracture surface of specimens broken during impact tests: (a), (b) and (c) Charpy tests at −40 ◦ C, (d), (e) and (f) Charpy tests at 20 ◦ C.
294 E. Pessard et al. / Materials Science and Engineering A 529 (2011) 289–299
Fig. 10. Fracture surface of specimens broken during push pull fatigue test: (a) and (b) fibering at 0◦ , (c) and (d) fibering at 45◦ , (e) and (f) fibering at 90◦ .
Fig. 11. Fibering oriented at 0◦ , microcrack in the bainite, effect of microstructure on the growth on the specimen surface.
E. Pessard et al. / Materials Science and Engineering A 529 (2011) 289–299 295
Temperature °C
Temperature °C
Temperature °C
Cycles number Cycles number Cycles number
Fig. 14. Temperature evolution during 4000 cycles for different stress amplitudes using the Metasco MC, fibering orientated at 45◦ , f = 10 Hz, R = − 1, (a) 0 = 200 MPa, (b)
0 = 460 MPa and (c) 0 = 560 MPa.
CREAS batch3 45 °
1 1
0.5 0.5
0 0
0 200 400 600 0 200 400 600
AppliedStress Σ0 (MPa) Applied Stress Σ0 (MPa)
Fig. 15. Comparison of the self-heating curves for different fibering orientations, R = − 1, f = 10 Hz, (a) measured by the LAMPA laboratory and (b) measured by the CREAS
laboratory.
from the self-heating tests and from the staircase method the spec- of the self-heating curves measured by the CREAS and the LAMPA
imen geometries used are very similar (Fig. 8(a) and (b)). laboratories. The curves obtained are similar and have the same
The evolution of the temperature on the specimen surface for trend, note that all the curves obtained by CREAS show slightly
different stress amplitudes is shown in Fig. 14. For low stress lower temperatures than the LAMPA curves. The curves of the two
amplitudes ( ≤ 500 MPa) the temperature stabilizes quickly, after batches of tests realized by LAMPA are identical.
1000 cycles (Fig. 14(a) and (b)). For higher applied stress ampli-
tude ( ≥ 500 MPa) the stabilization is not clearly observed and 3.4.2. Prediction of fatigue properties
after 1000 cycles the temperature continues to slowly increase To estimate the average fatigue limit, the iteration procedure
(Fig. 14(c)). developed by Cura et al. [17] is used. This method is based on the
Fig. 15 shows the self-heating curves for different fibering ori- graphical representation described by Luong [16]. The fatigue limit
entations. The curves are very similar and seem to be independent is defining as the intersection of the two straight lines interpolating
of the fibering orientation. Fig. 15(a) and (b) shows a comparison the experimental data (see Fig. 16(a)). This iteration method allows
3 3 m=11, k=1.E-34
Delta temperature (Δθ C)
m=20, k=1.E-56
2.5 2.5
2 2
1.5 1.5
1 1
m
0.5 0.5
0 0
0 200 σ
400 600 0 200 400 600
Applied Stress Σ0 (MPa) Applied Stress Σ 0 (MPa)
Fig. 16. (a) Estimation of the fatigue limit using the Cura method [17] and (b) estimation of the m exponent using Doudard method [19] .
E. Pessard et al. / Materials Science and Engineering A 529 (2011) 289–299 297
Table 5
Comparison between results from self-heating and staircase methods.
Orientation LAMPA results (2 specimens for CREAS results (1 specimen for each Staircase results (15 specimens for
each orientation) orientation) each orientation)
a rapid evaluation of the intersection point, when the fatigue limit In this experimental investigation, the material, the frequency
is, a priori, unknown. and the thermal boundary conditions are the same and therefore
To estimate the scatter, the probabilistic model of Doudard the three quantities can be considered to be constant. Hence Eq. (5)
[18,19] is used. The microscopic yield stress is considered as a prob- can be simplified as:
abilistic variable. The authors define the notion of an active site
= Km+2 (7)
where micro-plasticity and heat generation occurs. The apparition 0
of these sites is supposed to follow a specific Poisson point process Within the weakest link theory [22], the failure probability PF of
(PPP). The probability of finding k active sites in a domain of volume a domain of volume V under a homogeneous stress amplitude
V is given by: 0 is equal to the probability of finding at least one active inclusion
in the volume V . Using these hypotheses the failure probability
[−N()]k
Pk () = exp[−N()] (1) obtained is finally a Weibull law:
k!
V
m
0
where N() is the average number of activated sites in the PF = 1 − exp (8)
domain defined by: V0 S0
N() = V (2) where V0 S0m is a material parameter. To obtain the Weibull expo-
nent of the Doudard model, the self-heating curve is approximated
with the intensity of the process also equal to the density of by expression Eq. (7). The experimental Weibull exponent can also
active sites. The authors [18,19] chose a power law of the applied be directly determined by using the staircase results [19], using the
stress amplitude to define the process intensity: mean fatigue limit S−1 and the corresponding variance S−1 :
1
m
0
(0 ) = (3) 1+ 2
− 2 1 + 1
V0 S0 S−1 m m
CV = = 1
(9)
where S0 is a scale factor and m is the Weibull exponent reflect- S−1 1+ m
ing the scatter in micro-plasticity activity. ∞
where (t) = 0 xt−1 e−x is the gamma function [23] and CV is
The plastic strain energy at a site and in the domain of volume
the covariance.
V are estimated by using the concepts of continuum thermody-
Table 5 shows the comparison of the mean fatigue limit and the
namics and by estimating the number of activated sites by means
Weibull exponent estimated using the staircase method and the
of the Poisson point process. A Kröner type localization rule [20]
self-heating method. The predictions from tests performed in the
together with a plastic material model including combined kine-
LAMPA and the CREAS laboratories are very close, which validates
matic and isotropic hardening, allow the evaluation of the plastic
the experimental protocol. In the following it is assumed that the
energy at a site. The temperature evolution can be determined by
correct result is obtained by the staircase method. For a fibering ori-
analyzing the heat transfer during the cyclic loading. The heat con-
entation of 0◦ , the mean fatigue limit is correctly estimated by the
duction equation [18] can be written as:
self-heating method with an error of 5%. The Weibull exponent esti-
fr mated from the self-heating test is consistently lower (>100%) than
˙ + = (4)
eq c the value obtained from the staircase method. The most important
conclusion that can be made from Table 5 is that the self-heating
where eq is a constant depending on the heat transfer boundary method does not appear to be able to detect the anisotropic fatigue
conditions, c is the specific heat capacity and fr the cyclic load fre- behavior of the Metasco MC steel. In fact, the mean fatigue limit
quency. Eq. (4) shows that the global dissipated energy density per and the corresponding Weibull exponent remain constant for all
cycle , influences directly the average temperature evolution. The fibering orientations.
resolution of the heat equation (4) leads to the evolution of the sta-
bilized temperature, as a function of the applied stress amplitude,
4. Discussions
0 [21]. When the temperature stabilizes, (i.e. the dissipation per
cycle is constant), the change of the steady state temperature
The experimental tests discussed in this article can all be used
with the stress amplitude is calculated by solving Eq. (4):
for the mechanical characterization of steel materials. However, the
fr eq m m+2 focus of this work is to investigate the ability of these tests to predict
=
c
=
V0
(m + 1)(m + 2)
0
m (5) the anisotropic nature of a particular forged steel (which is primar-
1/m
S0 V0 ily due to elongated MnS inclusions). Concerning the monotonic
tensile tests, the yield stress and the ultimate tensile strength are
1/m not really affected by the inclusion orientation, whereas the tensile
Hence, the model depends on three quantities, S0 V0 (a scale
parameter of the Weibull model), m (the Weibull exponent) and elongation percent is strongly affected. The fracture toughness (or
V0 (the scale parameter of the temperature variation) with: Charpy energy) is the material parameter that is the most sensitive
to the inclusion orientation, which is in agreement with the results
4fr eq published by Wilson [3]. The inclusion orientation can facilitate
= (6)
hc crack propagation, decrease the ductility, the fracture toughness
298 E. Pessard et al. / Materials Science and Engineering A 529 (2011) 289–299
and the mean fatigue limit. These conclusions lead to greater under- work, the global dissipated energy per cycle is now the sum of the
standing of the effect of elongated inclusions on the mechanical contributions from the matrix and the inclusions.
behavior of steels and maybe useful for other applications where
it is possible to observe the same type of mechanisms (low car- = 1 + 2 (11)
bon steels [24], railway wheels [25], high strength steels for gears
50CrMo4 [13] and 30CrNiMo8 [26]). In the particular case of constant isotropic hardening, Doudard
Concerning the self-heating tests, the empirical technique pro- et al. [18,19] proposed an expression for the global dissipated
posed by Luong [16] and Cura [17] to estimate the average fatigue energy density per cycle , for a site volume VS :
limit seems to provide satisfactory results only when the non-
metallic inclusions do not participate in the local fatigue damage 4VS m m+2
mechanisms. It has been shown in Section 3.3.2 that the crack ini- =
h (m + 1)(m + 2)
0
m (12)
1/m
tiation mechanism does not remain the same when the fibering S0 V0
orientation with respect to the loading direction changes. For the
90◦ orientation, a competition between crack initiation from inclu- where h is the hardening modulus which is considered constant.
sion clusters and initiation from the bainitic matrix occurs. While Using the heat equation (4) and the global dissipated energy den-
for the 0◦ orientation, crack initiation is only controlled by the sity per cycle (12) for each mechanism, a new expression for the
matrix. The results from the staircase method highlight that this stabilized temperature can be proposed:
change in crack initiation mechanism is associated with a decrease
in the average fatigue limit and standard deviation. The role of m1 01m1 +2
the inclusion clusters become more pronounced when they are =
V0
(m1 + 1)(m1 + 2) S01 V 1/m1 m1
properly oriented to the loading axis and this leads to a detri- 0
mental effect on the fatigue strength. This detrimental influence is m2 02m2 +2
not captured by the self-heating measurements since the curves +
V0
(13)
(m2 + 1)(m2 + 2) S02 V 1/m2 m2
for the three fibering orientations are effectively superimposed 0
(see Fig. 15). Therefore, the method estimates very similar aver-
age fatigue limits for each orientation. One possible reason for this where 01 , 02 , (m1 , S01 V01/m1 ) and (m2 , S02 V01/m2 ) are respec-
incapacity to reflect the anisotropic behavior is the simultaneous tively the two equivalent stresses, the Weibull exponents and the
occurrence of crack initiation sites of different natures. Indeed, scale parameters related to the two observed mechanisms.
even for the 90◦ fibering orientation and despite the lowest applied The estimation of the dissipated plastic energy due to the inclu-
stress level close to the fatigue limit, micro-plasticity in the bainitic sion clusters cannot be determined by the first model proposed
microstructure is still active. This activity leads to plastic dissi- by Doudard. Indeed, Doudard assumed that the representative ele-
pation resulting in a temperature increase and self-heating. The mentary volume (REV) contains a set of elasto-plastic inclusions,
other initiation sites, (i.e. initiation from inclusion clusters), consti- or sites, randomly distributed within an elastic matrix. A Her-
tute other sources of plastic dissipation but do not seem to modify shey Kröner type localization rule makes it possible to estimate
the overall dissipation captured through the temperature measure- the stress and strain fields in this elasto-plastic inclusion. For the
ment. However, these inclusions seem to be at the origin of the case of an inclusion clusters, this approach seems inappropriate
fatal crack leading to failure. Figs. 12 and 13 clearly show that the to describe the stress and strain fields around the non-metallic
cracks, after their initiations at inclusion clusters, grow perpen- inclusions and to compute the related dissipated energy. Another
dicular to the specimen axis (in mode I) inside the cluster before approach is hence necessary. A recent model proposed as an
attaining a size sufficiently large to cross the microstructural bar- extension of Doudard work, for cast copper aluminum alloy [28]
riers of the bainitic microstructure (lattes of bainite and austenite appears interesting along with experimental techniques developed
grain boundaries). The capacity of the initiated crack to cross these for measuring the temperature at the local scale with infrared ther-
barriers is then made easier by the presence of the inclusions. Note mography [29].
that Baudry [27] obtained the same type of results for a 100Cr6 Nevertheless, since the self-heating measurements do not
martensitic steel in Torsion. In this study, the estimation of the detect crack initiation from inclusion clusters, it is natural to con-
fatigue limit with the self-heating method is 20% higher than the clude that the corresponding dissipated energy 2 is much smaller
estimation with the staircase method. For these authors the self- than the energy due to the matrix 1 . In order to apply the proposed
heating method is only suitable for estimating the fatigue strength model (Eq. (13)) it is necessary to be able to measure the thermal
of the material matrix and for a 100Cr6 with crack initiation from dissipation due to the inclusions. This work is in progress and is
inclusion the method overestimates the fatigue limit. If the acti- based on the use of infra red thermal measurements to quantify
vation scenario proposed by Doudard et al. [18,19] is employed to the local dissipation at the mesoscopic scale.
model this material, it is incorrect to use only one Poisson point Finally by using the weakest link theory and considering that
process to reflect the probability of finding active sites in a volume. the two types of initiation event are totally independent, the total
According to our observations, two processes should be used. One failure probability is equal to the probability of finding at least one
for the bainitic matrix and the other one for the inclusion clusters. active site either in the matrix or in the inclusion clusters.
Of course, the corresponding intensities should not be described by
V m1 m2
the same power law. In the following, two process intensities are 01 02
PF = P(N > 1) = 1 − exp − + (14)
proposed and given by: V0 S01 S02
[−N1 ()]k1
Pk1 () = exp[−N1 ()] This relation is simply a bimodal Weibull model. It perfectly
k1 ! reflects the competition between the two mechanisms. When the
[−N2 ()]k2 fibering orientation is 0◦ to the loading axis, the first intensity is
Pk2 () = exp[−N2 ()] (10)
k2 ! much larger than the second and it becomes:
V m1
k1 and k2 are respectively the number of active sites in the PF = 1 − exp − 01
(15)
bainitic matrix and around inclusion clusters. Following Doudard’s V0 S01
E. Pessard et al. / Materials Science and Engineering A 529 (2011) 289–299 299
When the fibering orientation is 90◦ and when the inclusion Acknowledgements
clusters are large, the second mechanism is predominant and the
failure probability is: This work has been performed within the ANR (National
V m2
Research Agency) Optiforge project, in a partnership including
02
PF = 1 − exp − (16) several industrial (Ascometal, Cetim, PSA, Setforge, Transvalor,
V0 S02
Ascoforge) and academic (INSA Lyon MATEIS, ENSMP CEMEF, Arts
This simple model can take into account the change of mecha- et Métiers ParisTech LAMPA) institutions.
nism, the evolution of the fatigue limit and the associated scatter
[14]. References