Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PROFESORADO DE INGLÉS
COMISIONES: 2º B Y E
CÁTEDRA:
Cursada: 2021
ISP JVG- Phonetics & Phonology II- Streams B & E
Lecturer: Prof. Lic. Andrea Perticone
2
INDEX
Contenidos ................................................................................................................................................. 5
Metodología de trabajo .............................................................................................................................. 8
Actividades ................................................................................................................................................ 8
Bibliografía obligatoria.............................................................................................................................. 9
Bibliografía complementaria ................................................................................................................... 10
Sitios y Recursos de Internet para consulta y práctica de percepción auditiva ................................... 10
COURSE REGULATIONS..................................................................................................................... 10
List of Acronyms used in this course ...................................................................................................... 13
Tonality or chunking ............................................................................................................................... 14
Intonation Phrases (IPs) or tone units ...................................................................................................... 15
To chunk or not to chunk... And where to chunk ................................................................................ 16
Tonality: practice exercises. Internal criteria. .......................................................................................... 21
Tonicity: Inside the Intonation Phrase .................................................................................................... 22
FOCUS and domain or scope of focus: awareness activities .................................................................. 23
Focus and scope of focus: broad and narrow focus ............................................................. 25
What about function words? ................................................................................................................... 25
When is information ‘new1’? ................................................................................................................... 26
Types of old information: verbatim, paraphrastic, physical evidence, given or implied by context. ...... 26
Reaccentuation of old information: when? .............................................................................................. 28
Prominence from a perceptual point of view ........................................................................................... 29
Prominence, sense selection, predictability and focus: The discoursal approach from a cognitive point
of view ..................................................................................................................................................... 30
Relationship with the concept of “Old Information” by A. Cruttenden .................................................. 42
Practice: sense selection and unpredictability ......................................................................................... 43
More on tonicity and nucleus placement ................................................................................................. 45
Hypernyms, hyponyms, old information and narrow focus. ................................................................... 48
Diálogos en español para reconocimiento de foco y núcleo .................................................................... 52
Tonicity: Exceptions to the LLI Rule. ELLIRs. Awareness activity ....................................................... 53
ELLIRs: Exceptions to the Last Lexical Item Rule ................................................................................. 55
An algorithm for the determination of onset and nucleus placement. ..................................................... 61
Tonicity and ELLIRS: Non –nuclear or non-tonic expressions .............................................................. 62
Tonicity: ELLIRS- practice exercises. From Dickerson. ........................................................................ 65
Dialogues for transcription. Mark onset and nucleus. From Dickerson. ................................................. 66
More dialogues for transcription (Dickerson) ......................................................................................... 67
ELLIRs: Practice. Tonicity in Causative have/get................................................................................... 68
ELLIRs: Practice. Tonicity in Noun+ short, predictable Rel Cl .............................................................. 69
ELLIRs: Practice. Tonicity in Existential constructions ......................................................................... 69
ELLIRs: Practice. Tonicity in structures with Wh-Adjectival+Direct Object ......................................... 70
ISP JVG- Phonetics & Phonology II- Streams B & E
Lecturer: Prof. Lic. Andrea Perticone
3
STUDY GUIDE: Questions for revision and exam preparation. .......................................................... 139
Prominence ........................................................................................................................................ 139
Prominence in the word..................................................................................................................... 140
Discourse analysis ............................................................................................................................. 141
Questions on Brown & Yule (see Bibliography) .............................................................................. 141
Cruttenden, Intonation, Chapter 4 ..................................................................................................... 141
The structure of spoken discourse. Mc Carthy (see Bibliography) ................................................... 142
Word stress ........................................................................................................................................ 142
Features of spoken discourse: elements of Conversation analysis. (Yule)........................................ 143
The tone unit (O'Connor vs. Brazil) .................................................................................................. 143
Paul Tench, The Intonation Systems of English, Chapters 1-3 ......................................................... 143
The fall (all three approaches) ........................................................................................................... 144
The rise (ditto) ................................................................................................................................... 144
The fall- rise ...................................................................................................................................... 144
Key and termination .......................................................................................................................... 145
Intonation of questions ...................................................................................................................... 145
Orientation......................................................................................................................................... 145
Contenidos
1.c Acentuación de palabras compuestas. Principales reglas y sus excepciones. Stress shift.
Compuestos comunes en los libros de enseñanza elementales.
Acentuación post-léxica. Grados de prominencia y su distribución en la emisión. Ritmo. Diferencias
entre el inglés (isocronicidad) y el español. Interacción entre la isocronicidad y el proceso de
gradación.
Bibliografía: Ortiz Lira, págs 30-47; Wells, págs. 100-105
Actividades de práctica: Hewings, págs. 38-47
Bibliografía: Brazil (1997) Cap 2; Perticone (2016) (ver el artículo en cuadernillo de cátedra)
Actividades de práctica: Bradford, Unidad 1. Brazil(1994) Unidad 7.
3.c Foco. Definición de foco. Dominio y su relación con grados de prominencia. Foco amplio y
foco estrecho. Foco contrastivo. Estado de la información: nueva y dada o predecible (old) ó
recuperable a través del contexto o co-texto. Relaciones de sinonimia existencial, hiponimia,
perífrasis, repetición verbatim. Evidencia física. End-weight and end-focus principles. Acentuación
de information dada: insists and counterpresuppositionals.
Bibliografía: Cruttenden, p. 75-95; Tench Cap 3; Hurford & Heasley, Units 9-10-11.
3.d Tonicidad: definición. Emplazamiento de la sílaba nuclear o tónica. Regla del foco amplio o
último elemento lexical. (LLIR) La estructura de la frase tonal según O’Connor y Arnold. Tonicidad
marcada y no marcada.
Excepciones a la regla de foco amplio:
Acentuación primaria de la frase nominal en event sentences, explanation sentences.
Deacentuación de estructuras verbales de baja carga semántica o recuperables a través del
contexto. Marcadores discursivos textuales, interpersonales e ideacionales. Adverbiales
contextuales, vocativos y apelativos en posición final. Ítems de baja carga semántica: pronombres
reflexivos, adverbs of proper functioning, nouns of general reference, nouns of wide denotation y
otros elementos deacentuados.
Acentuación contrastiva; reactivación de la información dada.
Tonicidad en foco lexical: el caso de los ítems enough, again, one, so, too, as well, indeed,
instead, either, at all, anyway.
Foco y estructura gramatical: anticipación (even), anticipatory it, cleft and pseudo-cleft sentences.
Bibliografía: Tench, Cap 3; Wells, Cap 3 (págs 93-184), Ortiz Lira, págs 54-73.
Actividades de práctica: Cuadernillo de cátedra (Dickerson); ejercicios en Wells, Cap. 3; Hewings págs. 72-83.
Bibliografía: McCarthy, Caps 1 y 5; Widdowson, cap. 6; Yule, Cap. 7; Hurford & Heasley, caps. 1-3 y 6-7.
Actividades de práctica: Cuadernillo de cátedra.
Clave alta, media y baja. Funciones textuales de la clave alta: apertura de la secuencia tonal;
cambio de tópico o de estadío en la transacción; contraste: contradicción, oposición binaria,
particularización. Clave media: adición. Clave baja: cierre de secuencia; función de igualización:
reformulación, efecto, consecuencia lógica o por implicación; función restrictiva: frases nominales
apositivas, proposiciones relativas.
Bibliografía: Brazil (1997) cap 3. Brazil, Coulthard y Johns, cap. 2; Brazil &Sinclair, Caps. 22,23,24,25.
Actividades de práctica: Bradford, unidades 6 y 7. Cuadernillo de cátedra.
Estructura de la secuencia tonal: paratono. Clave de terminación: alta, media y baja y sus funciones
interpersonales. Clave alta: adjudicación; clave media: concurrencia; clave baja: cierre de secuencia;
ausencia de constreñimiento de la reacción del interlocutor.
Concordancia tonal (Pitch concord). Ruptura de la concordancia. El rol organizador de la secuencia tonal en
el discurso.
Bibliografía: Brazil, Coulthard y Johns, cap. 5; Brazil &Sinclair, Cap. 26.
Actividades de práctica: Cuadernillo de cátedra.
Orientación directa y oblicua. El tono de sustentación (tono “cero”). La entonación del discurso en
la enseñanza de la lengua inglesa. Prosodia y estructura discursiva de la interacción en el aula. La
entonación en el lenguaje de aula. La entonación en el relato de narrativas.
Bibliografía: Brazil, CV, cap 8; Brazil, Coulthard y Johns, cap. 7
Actividades de práctica: Cuadernillo de cátedra. Brazil PALE, Unidad 9.
Metodología de trabajo
Se intentará promover una construcción significativa de los nuevos aprendizajes dentro de un enfoque
pedagógico centrado en el alumno. Para ello se enfatizará la participación y responsabilidad del alumno/a
como principal protagonista del proceso de aprendizaje. Se asume que para que sea significativo, el proceso
de aprendizaje debe ser auto-iniciado y auto-gestionado; por lo tanto, se alentará a los alumnos/as para que
participen activamente en el descubrimiento y construcción de conocimientos y habilidades en vez de
recibirlos directamente de la docente.
Se pondrá énfasis en el aprendizaje como proceso, y no como mero producto. El foco estará en el desarrollo
paulatino de las habilidades lingüístico- fonológicas y la adquisición de estrategias de aprendizaje. Se
alentará a los alumnos para que desarrollen la propiopercepción y el monitoreo de la producción propia.
Se le dará importancia tanto al enfoque tradicional (gramatical-actitudinal) y al discursivo, tomando de cada
uno los aspectos que mejor contribuyen a la formación del futuro docente. En cuanto al enfoque discursivo
de la entonación, se incluirán algunas nociones básicas de pragmática, análisis del discurso y análisis de la
conversación. Se estimulará a los alumnos para que vean la entonación como una elección que hace el
hablante entre los distintos recursos que ofrece un sistema para transmitir su mensaje, el cual es no sólo un
código lingüístico sino también la resultante de la interacción entre variables individuales, contextuales y
sociales.
Actividades
Recursos didácticos
Todos los alumnos deberán registrarse en el aula virtual. El nombre de usuario deberá ser el primer nombre y
el apellido. Sus perfiles deberán incluir una foto tipo DNI. Deberán configurar sus cuentas para permitir que
Edmodo les envíe notificaciones a sus casillas de correo electrónico cuando algún miembro publique ó suba
material al sitio. Los alumnos/as serán responsables de entrar al grupo de Edmodo frecuentemente y
mantenerse al tanto de cualquier anuncio, novedad o material subido por la profesora ó compañeros/as de
curso.
Bibliografía obligatoria
Hewings, M. (2007). English Pronunciation in Use Advanced with Answers. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press
Lee, W.R. (1963). An English Intonation Reader. London: Macmillan.
McCarthy, M. (1991) Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
O’Connor, J.D. & Arnold, G.F. (1972). Intonation of Colloquial English. London: Longman
Ortiz Lira, H. (2008) Word stress and sentence accent. Cuaderno de la Facultad Nº 16, Serie Monografías
Temáticas. Santiago: Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la Educación.
Tench (1992) Tone and the Status of Information. En Tench (1992) (Ed) Studies in Systemic Phonology.
London: St Martin's Press.
Tench, P. (1996). The Intonation Systems of English. London: Casell.
Wells, J.C. (2006) English intonation: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Widdowson, H (2007). Discourse Analysis. Oxford: OUP.
Yule, G. (1996) Pragmatics (Oxford Introductions to Language Study). Ed. H. Widdowson. Oxford: OUP.
Bibliografía complementaria
COURSE REGULATIONS
1. provide syllabus contents and bibliography; as well as material for home dictations and
transcriptions, with and without key;
2. provide a set of home assignments; in the case of home dictations and transcriptions, the scripts must
be corrected by you (in colour) and uploaded to the assigned Google Drive, for teacher revision;
4. present most (not all- see students’ duties below) of the theory and, based on your previous reading
of it, encourage you to make connections, reach conclusions, etc.
5. check that you have read (=studied) and check comprehension of the topics, especially home
readings and how your understanding of the theory is manifested in your application to the
practice; she will clarify any theoretical issues which may crop up as a result of your previous
and posterior readings.
Bear in mind that the class will be given on the assumption that you have
c) revised the theory taught in previous classes. You must always be responsible for keeping up to date with
the topics and skills already taught.
a) Always know what s/he is expected to do before and after each class;
b) Bring the necessary materials for each class;
e) let the teacher know about their difficulties and accomplishments in the subject.
f) Study on his/her own certain aspects of the theory that will not be presented by the teacher.
g) become familiar with the contents of the Edmodo group folders: books and their authors; book
chapters, lecturer's notes, class notes by classmates, links, audio, etc.
h) Be responsible for being up-to-date as regards posts and new uploads in Edmodo.
MOST IMPORTANT:
The following is the key to success in this course:
You are here as a future professional. You want to become qualified for a future job and a profession.
Therefore, it is necessary that you assume responsibility for your academic development and your learning
process. The teacher will act as a facilitator, clarifying any theoretical concepts, suggesting sequencing of
readings and asking you questions to make you think. You will read, think, compare, contrast, organise,
systematise, make mind maps, tables, charts, and whatever is compatible with your cognitive and learning
styles and may promote your development.
ISP JVG- Phonetics & Phonology II- Streams B & E
Lecturer: Prof. Lic. Andrea Perticone
12
Course tasks
You will be doing the following:
HOME READINGS
There will be a theory lesson every week and you will be expected to read the topic in the bibliography
before and after the class;
DICTATION PRACTICE
There will be dictation practice to consolidate your acquisition of the English sounds and promote your
acquisition of basic intonation patterns. There will be dictations in class (as TPs with a mark). This practice
should be continued at home with the aid of recorded material, which will be available on Edmodo.
TRANSCRIPTION PRACTICE
The transcriptions are opportunities to practise predicting possible intonation patterns, based on your
knowledge of the theory. There will be transcriptions in class (as Tps, with a mark) and at home.
Assignments will help you systematise the topics dealt with in class and provide further practice to keep you
up-to-date. There will be a lot of work to be done at home. Home assignments consist of dictations,
transcriptions, questionnaires, outlines, synopsis, etc. The hand-in dates will be announced by the teacher
ahead; therefore, assignments must be handed in on the appointed date, to ensure prompt correction. If you
have to miss class, you should send the assignment with a classmate. Not turning in the assignment on time
will impair your percentage of TP’s. Late assignments unduly justified will not be accepted.
CLASS WORK
Discussion of the theory topics covered so far and assigned ad home readings.
If you happen to be absent from class, you are encouraged to post to the group, asking your fellow students
to tell you what was dealt with in class and what homework was set.
ISP JVG- Phonetics & Phonology II- Streams B & E
Lecturer: Prof. Lic. Andrea Perticone
13
BF Broad Focus
Cf. Confere (Latin) = compare
CS Context-Setting
CVIE The Communicative Value of Intonation in English (bibliography)
DILT Discourse Intonation and Language Teaching (bibliography)
DO Direct Object
ELLIR Exception to the Last Lexical Item Rule
FCSAP Final Context Setting Adverbial of Place. Final: refers to unmarked position; Context-setting refers
to discoursal function
FCSAT Final Context Setting Adverbial of Time Final: refers to unmarked position; Context-setting
refers to discoursal function
FTFA Final Time Focusing Adverbial
H Head
HK High Key
IOI Implied Old Information
IP Intonation Phrase
LK Low Key
LLI Last Lexical Item ( = BR Rule)
LLI(R) Last Lexical Item (Rule)
MK Mid Key
N or Nuc Nucleus
NB Note Bene (latin) = note
NF Narrow Focus
O Onset
OI Old Information
p tone proclaiming tone (fall)
p+ tone dominant proclaiming tone (rise-fall)
PE Physical Evidence
pH pre-Head
POI Paraphrastic Old Information
r tone referring tone (fall-rise)
r+ tone dominant referring tone (rise)
Rel Cl Relative Clause
T Tail
TF Time Focusing
usu usually
VOI Verbatim Old Information
θ role theta role
0 tone zero tone (mid level)
A=P+S Accent is the combination of pitch height or pitch change and stress (loudness+duration)
ISP JVG- Phonetics & Phonology II- Streams B & E
Lecturer: Prof. Lic. Andrea Perticone
14
Tonality or chunking
Track C1
As we speak, we group words into prosodic units depending on meaning. Listen and notice how this
speaker divides up what he is saying:
// I can remember as children// we were rather naughty// once// we stuck a picture// of an elephant// on the
back of Dad's coat// before he went out// of course he couldn't see it// so he didn't know why everyone was
laughing at him/ until he got to work// and took it off//
Track C7
Listen to the recording as many times as you need, and mark the boundaries ( // or /, depending on the degree
of disjunction) between IPs within these extracts. The first one has been done for you .
1 That's the main thing // and then If you've got any questions afterwards/ hopefully we'll still have time to
go through a few of them is that okay
2 She'd left when she had a baby and then decided not to go back although the job had been kept open for her
3 Tom dear where's the advert for this calculator because I don't know the address and I don't know who I've
got to make the cheque payable to
ISP JVG- Phonetics & Phonology II- Streams B & E
Lecturer: Prof. Lic. Andrea Perticone
15
How do we identify intonation phrases (= tone units)? There are two kinds of criteria: external (auditory) and
internal (based on grammatical units).
External criteria: are based on clues perceived AUDITORILY. These clues can be given by the following
devices:
2) Anacrusis: the rapid articulation of a number of unstressed syllables, e.g. and then there’s a in the
example below:
1 2 3
Óne twó thrée
One and two and three
One and a two and a three
One and then a two and them a three
One and then there’s a two and then there’s a three
4) Changes in pitch direction. More technically, an obtrusion of pitch (the most prominent marker of
intonation group boundary)
Practice exercise: detecting prosodic boundaries and marking IPs following external (auditory) criteria.
Each of these extracts consists of three IPs. Put / in two of the four spaces to show where you expect the
speech unit boundaries to be.
EXAMPLE
when you read it carefully // it doesn't say anything // that's very critical
Now listen to Audio Track C8 and check your answers. Then read the extracts aloud . Put short breaks
between IPs and link the words within them smoothly together without silent pauses.
ISP JVG- Phonetics & Phonology II- Streams B & E
Lecturer: Prof. Lic. Andrea Perticone
16
IMPORTANT: We are going to use these criteria to chunk written texts. We may chunk subject, predicate,
adverbial adjuncts, non-defining relative clauses, and others. But this is not automatic; not every syntactic or
grammatical boundary may be chunked. Everything depends on the utterance we're analysing.
Although we're going to use grammatical criteria, we should bear in mind that we're going to analyse spoken
discourse. The unit of speech is the utterance, not the sentence.
1- FRONTED ADVERBIALS: when any adverbial is fronted in the sentence, it deserves a separate IP
Chunk after the adverbial.
3- INITIAL VOCATIVES: when fronted, vocatives / / constitute a separate IP. This is done
in order to highlight the vocative, which otherwise would be in its unmarked or canonical position, i.e.,
final.
NO chunking WHEN VOCATIVES ARE FINAL (though later on, we shall see an alternative analysis of final
vocatives):
4- TOPICALIZATION OF A DIRECT OBJECT. One way of marking information as the topic consists
in placing it in a position that is NOT the usual one for that particular constituent. For example, the
canonical or unmarked position for a DO (Direct Object) is after the transitive verb, as in:
Fronting of the direct object allows us to highlight the items ‘chocolate’ and veggies’, i.e. these DOs can be
made the topic or can be topicalised by placing them at the beginning of the sentence, a position which is
marked for the DO. This will require chunking of the fronted constituents.
||Chocolates/ I love/| but veggies/ I hate.|| notice how the fronting allows us to highlight the direct objects:
chocolate, veggies.
||His explanations I find unacceptable. || The DO is fronted or topicalized; therefore, it deserves a
separate unit.
ISP JVG- Phonetics & Phonology II- Streams B & E
Lecturer: Prof. Lic. Andrea Perticone
17
For example, the canonical or unmarked position for a subject is the initial position, as in :
These chocolates are very fattening. We may choose to say this sentence as one IP or two IPs.
|| These chocolates | are very fattening|| 2 IPs (but usually there will be NO silent pause fater ‘chocolates’)
6- When the REFERENT of a pronoun is introduced later in the sent (informal, colloquial style):
7- COORDINATE CLAUSES
Cf:
||She got her degree and we all celebrated. || (= Not only did she... but also we ...)
When the strong form of the coordinating conj. is used, its meaning changes ant it belongs to the 1 st. IP.
2) So far we have referred to clauses. Now we are going to refer to other types of grammatical units.
First we have to apply the criterion of MAJOR CONSTITUENTS. The Subj. here is a pronoun. There is no
chunking after a pronoun so the suitable place for a chunk is that AFTER THE ADVERBIAL.
Peter, of course, earns a lot of money.--> admits two possible treatments of tonality.
The Subj. and the disjunct are both very short so, in this case, the disjunct can be assigned to one or the other
IG:
ISP JVG- Phonetics & Phonology II- Streams B & E
Lecturer: Prof. Lic. Andrea Perticone
18
OR:
‘Officially’ is not qualifying ‘resigned’; it is not an adverbial adjunct of manner. It is a disjunct reflecting
how the speaker got to know the news, or how the news was broken out, (with an official status) so it
qualifies the whole sentence. It may be fronted:
Another example:
As can be seen above, the disjunct can be placed at the beginning of the sentence, after the Subject or at the
end; in any case, a disjunct modifies the whole sentence, so it deserves a separate IP.
In the example above, ‘incidentally’ may form IPs in the way ‘of course’ does. But ‘of course’ is more of a
speech filler, whereas ‘incidentally’ does have a meaning of its own (=’by the way’). Therefore,
‘incidentally’ is more deserving of a separate intonation phrase than ‘of course’.
2-d) PSEUDO-CLEFT SENTENCES: the copulative verb can be attached to either part of the sentence
because the verb is simply linking the clauses.
2-e) MEDIALLY-PLACED VOCATIVES: attach vocative to first unit (the vocative here is final in the
Subj.)
2-f) NON DEFINING RELATIVE CLAUSES TAKE chunking before & after.
||Workers, | whose wages have not been raised, | demand more benefits||
Both the head and the appositive have the same intonation pattern, since they refer to the same thing. The
appositive provides further information on the head.
2-h) CHUNKING FOR EMPHATIC PURPOSES: some sentences, although short, may require chunking
for emphatic purposes.
|| I | beg | your | pardon|| (This type of chunking shows irritation, since every single word is highlighted)
|| But above all, / in formal sessions at ‘Downing Street, / in long private talks, / right through the evening, /
lasting far into the night,/ we discussed the ‘war problem||
All the FRONTED adjuncts are Prepositional Phrases. They are PARALLEL STRUCTURES in that they
exploit the same grammatical form.
2-J) PASSIVE VOICE: INFORMATIVE AGENT. We don’t normally chunk the agent if he/she/it is
predictable, but when it is pre- ir post –modified by semantically rich lexical items, we chunk them off, to
highlight the semantic content.
A declarative sentence and a tag, both with the same intonation pattern (fall) show that the speaker only
expects confirmation, is ascertaining / / a fact.
Either a) ||He’s passed / hasn’t he|| The speaker is almost certain and expects the listener’s
confirmation of this fact. (Notice the comma and other punctuation marks are not shown because the unit of
analysis is the utterance and not the sentence)
OR b) ||He’s passed hasn’t he|| No chunking; the tone is in the sentence, not in the tag.
ISP JVG- Phonetics & Phonology II- Streams B & E
Lecturer: Prof. Lic. Andrea Perticone
20
|| He’s passed / hasn’t he?|| This is in fact a checking question. The speaker expects an answer.
In this case there is only one possibility: chunking.
There is REVERSED POLARITY: neg/aff, aff/ neg. (Read more on polarity in Wells).
2-L) LONG GRAMMATICAL UNITS: Usually, into units have at the most 5-6 words, 6-7syllables.
||John explained / that it would be better to take precautions / before we sign the contract||
The that-clause is the DO to the verb ‘explained’. Within the DO, and Adverbial Adjunt of time is nested.
When the reporting clause is fronted, we may or may not chunk, depending on the length of the phrase.
||Peter said, / ‘I can’t come’|| Chunking here is made in order to highlight what Peter said.
||‘I can’t come’, Peter said.|| NO chunking. The Reporting Clause forms part of previous unit.
(Punctuation marks are shown only for illustrative purposes, but as stated above, they do not participate in an
analysis of the intonation. The correlate of stops, commas, question marks, etc., are represented by the tone).
|| I will if I can.|| NO chunking; although there is a conditional clause, it is too short to be chunked,
and the speaker utters is in one go.
|| If it rains, / I’ll stay at home.|| Adverbial of concession is fronted so as to highlight the condition under
which I’ll stay at home)
********************************************************************************
ISP JVG- Phonetics & Phonology II- Streams B & E
Lecturer: Prof. Lic. Andrea Perticone
21
Chunk the following texts wherever possible. When is it necessary to go against the guidelines on tonality?
Why?
1 Lost in London.
2 When the train reached London the young man left his carriage then stopped for a moment and glanced at
3 his diary to find the name of the hotel where he was booked to stay having gathered the necessary
4 information he signalled for a taxi jumped in and was taken through a maze of streets to a small hotel
5 somewhat off the beaten track he had never been to the city before and was thrilled with the novelty of
6 visiting it. after being shown to his room he changed his clothes and set out on a journey of exploration
7 growing tired he decided to return but he could not remember the name of his hotel nor even the street it
8 was in and he could not consult his diary because he had left it in the hotel he walked around miserably for
9 hours until he was almost in despair then he looked up and saw his hotel facing him
10
11 Buying a saw
12 I had needed some new bookshelves for a long time so during my holiday I decided to tackle the job
13 myself not that I am very clever with my hands but it did not seem too difficult and as I had already said
14 that we could not afford to go away I thought it would be prudent not to spend money having it done
15 professionally I bought the wood at the local handicraft shop and I had plenty of screws but I found that my
16 old saw which had been left behind by the previous owner of the house was not good enough and I decided
17 to buy a new one that was my first mistake my second was to go t the biggest ironmonger in London and
18 ask for a saw you would think it was simple wouldn’t you to buy a saw but it is not I said to the man
19 behind the counter I want a saw he was a nice man and did his best for me yes sir what kind of saw oh a
20 saw for cutting wood yes sir but we have fifteen different kinds for different jobs what did you want it for I
21 explained about my bookshelves and felt like an ignorant fool in a world of experts which was true. He saw
22 that I was a novice and was very kind he told me what I should need and advised me to have a ladies’ size
23 easier to manage for the beginner sir he was not being nasty just helpful and I was grateful to him he also
24 sold me a book on woodwork for schoolboys I and I’ve been reading it with great interest the next time I’m
25 on holiday I shall start on the shelves
More exercises on tonality
Track C9
Give special prominence to the words in bold by assigning an IP domain to each one. Read the
extracts aloud and then compare your rendering with the recording .
Follow up: Record a short extract (about 15 seconds) from a radio or TV programme. Write out what was said
and then try to mark IP boundaries in the text. Listen to the recording as many times as necessary.
The brackets mean that constituent is optional.--> An IP must have at least a Nuclear syllable (primary
accent, i.e. the most prominent accent in the IP).
The beginning of the Head is the Onset syllable. The head may contain other syllables, stressed
or unstressed, but all heads must have an Onset syllable)
The nucleus or Tonic syllable is the most prominent syllable in the IP. All IPs must have
a nucleus. No nucleus, no IP.
IP
Nucleus or Tonic
(preH) ( Onset+…..) syllable-
+ + + (Tail)
obligatory
Some of the IPs in these extracts have one prominent word (Nucleus or Tonic) and others have two (Onset and
Nucleus/tonic).
Track C15 : Listen and mark the words which are made prominent. Use a raised (‘) to mark the onset
syllable and a \ to mark the tonic syllable.
NB tonetic marks are placed BEFORE the prominent syllable, e.g. a ' beautiful \elephant; long a \go; go a
\way; under \stand; over \do; get \up; evalu \ation; pro nunci \ation.
1 // we've had wonderful weather// for the last two weeks// but Adam and Emma// have been up in Scotland//
where they've had heavy rain// and even flooding// in the western parts of the country//
2 // I was thinking of buying/ a second-hand car/ from this garage/ but because I don't know
anything about cars/ I paid for the AA/ to inspect it/ and they found all kinds of things wrong// so of course// I
didn't buy it//
Answer:
Do all the IPs you heard have a nucleus?
Do all the IPs you heard have an onset?
Do all the IPs have a Head?
Do all the IPs have a preHead? A Tail?
Track C19 Listen and mark the words which are made prominent. Use a raised (‘) to mark the onset
syllable and a \ to mark the tonic syllable.
Answer:
Which IPs you heard have a nucleus?
Which IPs you heard have an onset?
Which IPs have a Head?
Which IPs have a preHead? A Tail?
Track C 20
A: Why don't you come and see us ?
B: Where do you live ?
A: In an old house by the river.
B: I'd probably come by train.
A: It's only a short walk from the station.
B: And if I came by bus ?
A: It's five minutes from the bus stop.
B: It's in Mill Lane, isn't it? Where exactly?
A: The first house on the left.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Focus and scope of focus: broad and narrow focus
Focus is the concentration of attention on a particular part of the message. The speaker highlights one
or more items in the IP because they are important to convey the message.
When all the matter in the IP is brought into focus, we say that the focus is BROAD.
When the attention is narrowed down to only a part of the IP, leaving some of the matter out of the focus as
OLD Information, we say that the IP is in NARROW focus.
Example: the Ip // we've had \wonderful weather// is in narrow focus (henceforth, NF), because the
item ‘weather’ is old information. The topic of the weather was mentioned previously.
If the speaker had begun talking out of the blue, i.e. with no previous interaction or no previous
mention or implication of the weather, she would have said //we’ve had wonderful \weather //, with
the nucleus on ‘weather’. In this case, the IP would have been on broad focus (henceforth BF) because
all the items are new1, unpredictable by the listener.
But in NF, // we've had \wonderful weather//, part of the information in the IP is old. This Ip can be
though ot as a reply to What was the weather like?
There is an opposition new1 versus old information. In other words, information (the (lexical ) items)
may adopt one of two possible states. Remember that ‘old’ means that the item is predictable by the
listener and can therefore be retrieved somehow.
Because old information is predictable by the listener, the speaker does not need to accent (make
prominent) that item. In English, whatever is predictable by the listener is deaccented. We may say
that lack of accentuation is an indicator of predictability.
In the following IP, all the lexical information has been brought into focus, because all the lexical
items are new1, unpredictable by the listener:
If function words have a deictic function, then they’re old information. In the example above, ‘we’
refers back to a specific group of people and the listener knows who are being referred to, so there is
no need to make ‘we’ prominent (= no need to accent the pronoun).
In other cases, as we shall see in the section on Prominence, the function words are predictable (and
therefore, old information) either from the knowledge of the grammar of the language (we know
which words may come after certain words), from the context of the interaction (the world of
circumstances surrounding and impinging on the verbal interaction), or a combination of both. This
shall be tackled in more depth when we deal with the discoursal approach to prominence.
When is information ‘new1’?
In the literature, the term ‘new1’ is used with two different but specific meanings. The first sense of
‘new’ is related to the scope of focus. An item is new when it cannot be predicted by the listener, nor
retrieved from the context or previous knowledge.
An IP is in broad focus (BF) when none of the LEXICAL items in it can be predicted by the listener.
Predictability means given or recoverable from various sources, e.g. from the speaker’s knowledge of
the world, from the context, from what is directly visible to the listener, etc.
According to Cruttenden (2007), information is said to be old when it can be predicted, retrieved or
recovered by the listener, in different ways, e.g.
a) it has been mentioned before in exactly the same words. This is known as verbatim old
information.
In A’s utterance, all lexical items are new1, i.e. UNPREDICTABLE. The listener does not know and has no way of
predicting or guessing what items the speaker is going to utter until the actual utterance is made.
However, once the items have been mentioned, they’re recent enough to be stored in memory, so it may be said
that B’s utterance contains old information. The item ‘three’ is old in the second IP because it’s been
mentioned verbatim by the first speaker. Therefore, the second speaker does not need to accent ‘three’, as
the listener can retrieve this information form the context of interaction, i.e. what has been said before.
Information that can be retrieved or guessed by the listener is said to be predictable by the listener (and
by anyone listening to what A has just said.)
The fact that we can omit ‘she’s got three’ without losing nor changing the content of the message is proof that
‘she’s got three’ can be retrieved by the listener. The old, predictable information could have been left out by
the speaker without causing misinterpretation. For some reason, speakers still will utter old information, but
they will show that it is old, predictable by deaccenting it, by not making it prominent. DEACCENTUATION is a
way of removing an item from the focus of attention so that the listener is made to pay full attention to what is
new1 and therefore unpredictable.
b) Another case of old, predictable information is that in which the item has been mentioned
before, but in other words, i.e. a paraphrase. This is known as paraphrastic old information.
Paraphrastic old information is predictable, recoverable from a non- verbatim previous
mention.
A: || I was in the middle of giving a conference | when I realised I had a huge LADDER in my
pantyhose|| (=Sp. Me di cuenta de que se me había corrido la media)
B: Oh, how awful. || I wouldn’t know where to \HIDE if I there was a flaw in mine.||
But in cases of synonyms, only hypernyms can become old information. Hyponyms are new
information (why?), and therefore, are accented. Compare:
BUT
For more on synonyms and focus, see Wells, 3.7 and the Section on hypernyms, hyponyms and
narrow focus.
c) When the information has been implied before, not as in a) or b) but somehow it is ‘in play’ in
the conversation.
A: I was in the middle of giving a conference when I realised I had a huge ladder in my pantyhose.
B: Oh, how awful. I wouldn’t know where to hide if I was in such an embarrassing situation.
The fact that A was in an embarrassing situation is implicit in ‘I had a huge ladder…’, so such an
embarrassing situation will be deaccented. In other words, it will be left outside the scope of focus.
Remember: Normally Old Information will not be made prominent. I other words, it won’t receive accents,
since it is left outside the focus of the information.
NB that the terminology used here is, as stated above, the one proposed by Cruttenden (2007). In Tench (1996),
the term ‘old’ is not used. Tench uses the term ‘given’, or ‘recoverable’. It is important that you understand that
regardless of the different labels, the concepts are the same.
Practice: Go back on the exercises above and decide which information is old, and what type, according to
Cruttenden’s classification.
Decide whether there’s any old information in these IPs, and what type, according to Cruttenden’s
classification. Specify the type of focus.
Sometimes we accent OI, material that has already been mentioned or negotiated earlier in the interaction. This
is called reactivation of old information, or re-accenting, or recycling. Whichever we call it, it is important to
bear in mind that for this to happen, there’s got to be a good reason that justifies accenting old information.
One common example of reactivation/accentuation of old information is the case of echo questions, where the
second speaker repeats verbatim what the previous speaker has said, only that this time the tone is a rise:
Another example is the repetition of something that has been said. This treatment of the old information can
sometimes denote annoyance, irritation.
Old Lady: Are you the manager? I asked to speak to the manager.
Mr. Fawlty: I’M the manager, madam. Can I help you?
Old lady: What?
Mr. Fawlty: I said I’m the manager.
Old lady: What??
Mr. Fawlty: I AM THE MANAGER!
For more details on accentuation of old information, see Wells, Chapter 3: Tonicity.
***********************************
Prominence from a perceptual point of view
Prominence is what makes a syllable stand out from other syllables. By extension, a word can be highlighted
and therefore be made to stand out from other words, from a perceptual (i.e. auditory) point of view. We may
also describe this process by stating that it is the speaker who decides to make some syllables in some words
PROMINENT.
ACCENT AND STRESS: acoustic - articulatory phenomena (what the speaker produces using organs of
speech)
How is prominence achieved prosodically by the speaker? (i.e. acoustically?) By using two or more of the
following prosodic features.
Pitch movement
Pitch height
Stress (perceived as loudness by the listener)
Duration also known as quantity (perceived as length),
Quality of the sound segments involved in the prominent syllable
The distribution of prominence(s) in the utterance signals the domain or scope of focus.
FOCUS and domain or scope of focus: The relationship between prominence and focus marking: awareness
activities
Note focus is pronounced
Match up each set of questions and replies (by Anne Campbell, 1995). Then, mark the domain of focus using
square brackets [ ]
b. The film was interesting, wasn’t it? 2. //p YES // p VERy INTeresting//
Double underline the last prominent word in each of the answers. Then, mark the domain of focus using square
brackets [ ]
A. Is your mother going to California? No, my mother’s gone to California.
B. Has your mother gone to New York? No, my mother’s gone to California.
2. Did you watch a love story? I watched a horror film last Saturday.
3. Did you watch a film last Saturday? I watched a horror film last Saturday.
Prominence, sense selection, predictability and focus: The discoursal approach
from a cognitive point of view
Key phrases:
Prominence and tonicity as percepts. Systems and paradigms.
Sense selection as a cognitive process reflecting the speaker’s apprehension of the world.
Predictability in one- item sets. Predictability and focus.
Accentuation as articulatory correlate of a cognitive process: to convey the speaker’s sense
selections.
Likewise, the nucleus is defined phonetically as that syllable which initiates an obtrusion of pitch
(Cruttenden, 2007). However, observation of spoken language shows that accentuation is not
directly tied to word category or syntactic function (Brazil, 1997). Rather, whether an item is made
prominent or not, depends to a large extent to conditions which lie outside language. Some of these
may be present in the context within which the verbal interaction takes place; others, however, have
to do with the speaker’s intentionality, and the speaker’s moment-by-moment assessment of the
world and assumed state of convergence between speaker and listener (Brazil, op.cit.).
In this article I will put forward the idea that the concepts of prominence and sense selection
proposed by Brazil (19972) in his discoursal approach to intonation can be regarded as being of a
cognitive3 nature. I will relate prominence and sense selection to the degree of predictability
associated with a specific linguistic item, and then consider predictability as a determiner of the
scope of focus. Put more plainly, I argue that the degree to which an item may be predicted by a
listener, as assessed by the speaker, is the source of the speaker’s act of sense selection and also
of the speaker’s accentuation of that item.
I will regard acts of sense selection as mental events which the speaker makes perceptually (i.e.)
auditorily prominent in order to convey his/her choice of items to the listener. The speaker uses
accentuation, a constellation of articulatory gestures, to render the act of sense selection (a
cognitive process) into something physical, objectively measurable (sound waves) which can be
perceived as prominence, a percept also in the realm of the cognitive, by a potential listener.
I will also argue that the notion of focus can be regarded as a cognitive process as well, since in
selecting items from a paradigm, the speaker reflects how the mind segregates the foreground (i.e.
the scope of focus) from the background.4
The starting point of this exposition will be an adaptation of a sample exchange considered by Brazil
(op. cit. p. 22). Brazil resorts to the context of a poker game to refer to the process of sense
selection and the phenomenon of prominence. I will use the same context to explore both the
process and the phenomenon. Within the context of the game each, each card constitutes an option
2 Brazil , D. (1997) The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP. Chapter 2.
3 Cognition is "the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the
senses." www.oxforddictionaries.com. Retrieved 9/4/2017.
4 I shall develop this issue further in a forthcoming article, where I refer to the choice of tone as a cognitive mode.
available to a player. Let us analyse a variation of the exchange in Brazil’s discussion of sense
selection (op. cit.)
Each card referred to is the result of the speaker’s choice of two variables: number and suit.
The full pack showing the system of numbers (1 to 13) and the system of suits (4). A stands for Ace
(the number one card); J for Jack; Q for Queen; K for King.
A SYSTEM IS a limited set of options available where the selection of one member entails the
exclusion of all other possible members of the same set. The poker card pack comprises two
subsystems: the card number and the card suit. Each of these are sets of limited, finite options; i.e.,
they constitute systems.
The poker game and all the events that take place during the game, plus the participants, constitute
the context of situation. Each player represents a speaker-hearer.
This means that a set of infinite number of members does not constitute a system. For example,
cardinal numbers cannot be regarded as a system, according to this definition. (you can count from
zero to a number as high as you like)
Going back to the notion of system, here is an example: choosing the suit spade excludes diamonds,
spades and clubs; choosing card number 7 excludes the ace, 2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10, the Jack, the Queen and
the King. We may say then that the act of choosing the variables 7 and spade refer to an object:
and so does the string of words (or syntagm) “the seven of spades”, which of course has as its
referent a card like the one shown.
There are different types of systems. Binary systems are the most frequent.
Binary system: any system that has two members. Examples: Yes/no, on/off, inside/outside
(depending on the context of situation); upstairs/downstairs (normally, in a two storey house, you go
upstairs or downstairs, but not “sidestairs”, unless you’re drunk!). State of (non) pregnancy: either
you are or you aren’t! Polarity: affirmative-negative.
Ternary systems: The primary colour system: blue, red and yellow. The set of traffic lights: green,
yellow and green.
In order to account for the distribution of prominence in utterances, it is necessary first to handle
the concept of grammar of speech, i.e. the order in which words may be used and the idea that the
sequential nature of speech places constraints and decision-taking moments as speech is uttered.
These decision points involve different types of choices that the speaker will make depending on the
message s/he intends to convey.
Speech is, by nature, a sequential process. Speakers utter their messages word by word, across a
temporal dimension, articulating and uttering syllable after syllable, forming strings of words. A
string of words which are related to one another by certain positional rules is a syntagm. To put it
simply, a syntagmatic relationship is that which is established by a word and the words which can
follow it. This is why some authors refer to it as a ‘horizontal’ relationship. For instance, the
determiner the automatically determines the grammatical categories which can follow; we may say:
the queen,
the lovely queen,
the queen of Spain,
the lovely queen of Spain,
the queen you saw in People magazine, etc.
but the to be, the for, the have, the slowly, are clearly ungrammatical combinations which we cannot
use to form a syntactic subject or object.
If a speaker opens her mouth and utters: “The day …..”, and stops short of completing her utterance,
listeners cannot guess the semantic content of what is to come, but they certainly expect certain
linguistic items according to the grammar of the language.
Now let’s suppose the speaker has the pronoun they in mind, so she utters:
What words could come after they while forming a grammatical structure? How much can the
listener predict? As we know that they is a subjective pronoun, we expect it to be followed by a
limited number of grammatical categories: a lexical verb, an auxiliary verb, an adverb. If the
speaker selects finally , we may expect this word to be followed by a verb; if the verb chosen is
decide, we expect a to-infinitive, or a prepositional phrase on +object, since it’s also possible that
the utterance may continue “they decide on something/ doing something…”, and so on.
Again, our knowledge of the grammar of the language allows us to restrict the number of possible
grammatical categories that may come after a certain word, so after to we expect an infinitive; after
a transitive verb, we expect an object, and so on.
At each point in the utterance, the language system offers a model, or paradigm, of possible
combinations of words, i.e. possible word(s) that may follow a certain word in a grammatical
utterance. Brazil (op. cit. xxx) refers to this model as the GENERAL PARADIGM, and defines it as “the
options available to the speaker [which are] licensed by the rules of the language.”
If a speaker interrupts her message, or is interrupted, her hearers won’t be able to predict what exactly she
was going to say next; the general paradigm only offers a limited set of possibilities as regards the part of
speech or syntactic constituent which can follow a given word. This is connected with the concept of old
information and narrow focus (Cruttenden, 2007, ch. 4). I shall enlarge on this later on in this article.
There is a further paradigm available at each point in the utterance. This time, the choice must be
not only grammatical, but must reflect the speaker’s idea. Notice the number of ways in which the
original phrase may be continued:
The act of sense selection within a context of situation: paradigmatic relationships afforded by
existential paradigms.
Whereas the general paradigm offers us a limited set of grammatical categories to choose from, the
very situation we’re in, the cognitive structures which represent real or imagined objects, people
and events, all combine to restrict the number of possibilities actually available at a given moment.
If I’m playing poker, and my interlocutor knows I got a queen, and asks me what queen I’ve got in my
hand (and I tell the truth), s/he may predict that my answer will be one of the following: hearts,
diamonds, spades or clubs. In real life, and in the context of a poker game, the set of possibilities is
made up of four members, and in order to identify which of the four queens I got, I’ll have to choose
one of those four items that constitute the suit set.
The set of options available for selection in the general paradigm is then narrowed down by the
options available in the ‘vertical’ set, known as the existential paradigm It is called existential
because it is determined by the situation the participants are in, or the activity they are engaged in,
or the actual words they have used at a given point in an interaction.
General paradigm for the slot after “the queen of __________ “ : a noun
Existential paradigm: The four suits, so not all nouns will be included in this
existential paradigm. The set is narrowed down to the following four options:
hearts, diamonds, spades or clubs.
How does the speaker signal to the listener that she’s chosen queen from the set of four suits? By
making it prominent. But prominence is a perceptual construct. It is not a property inherent to
words. There is nothing in the meaning or composition of the word that tells us whether that word
will be prominent or not in discourse. As a matter of fact, prominence can be said to be a cognitive
entity we construct from a percept. We perceive that, for some reason or other, one word is much
more prominent than the others when in the example under issue, the player with the card replies “I
got the queen of HEARTS.” To que question “Which queen did you get?”
It is interesting to compare this line of thought with the view of prominence afforded by grammar
based models (Kingdon, 1958). Both queen and hearts are lexical items, and therefore predicted to
be prominent in the light of such models. However, the reply under consideration, “The queen of
HEARTS.” clearly shows that in spoken discourse, prominence may be something quite different
from what it is claimed to be if the only criteria adopted is the distinction lexical words versus
function words.
There is the added complication that the term prominence has often been used interchangeably with
the terms ‘accent’ and ‘stress’ (Brinton, L. & D. Brinton, 20105 ). A further issue to be considered is
the fact that, if prominence is used to refer to a perceptual effect, it would be a misdemeanour to
claim that a speaker ‘uses’ prominence. Speakers speak, and all they can do to convey their views
5
Brinton, L. & D. Brinton, (2010). The linguistic structure of modern English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins publishing.
of the world orally is articulate sounds in well-formed syllables blended in connected speech. In
order to render a word (or more precisely, a syllable) more prominent than others to the listener’s
ears, the speaker employs a number of articulatory resources, mainly pitch height, pitch movement
and stress, such that the perceptual result is that of prominence. The speaker then, signals his/her
choice of item by accenting it.
Accenting means making an item prominent, and this in turn is the signal that tells the listener that
the speaker has chosen that item from a closed set of other items that could have been chosen, but
were not, because the speaker wishes to signify that item and not any other that potentially could
have been a good candidate.
In B’s response, QUEEN and HEARTS are the only two items which need highlighting, or need to be
made prominent, in order to let the listener identify exactly what card the speaker got.
Why is it necessary to make both words prominent? Because both are necessary for the correct
identification of the card the speaker has in mind. It may be assumed that the speaker has no way of
predicting the two variables which can in themselves identify the card in question. If the speakers
fails to accent them, they will not be prominent for the listener.
Why isn’t it necessary to make the determiner the and the preposition of prominent? Because they
can be retrieved by the listener from their own knowledge of the English language. In other words,
the listener can guess, or ‘fill in the gaps’ with the right words. More on this will be explained later
on.
From a grammatical approach, it could be said that determiners and prepositions are unaccented by
default, since they are function words. However, this approach does not take the context into
account. From a cognitive standpoint, prominence, or the lack of it, is not an inherent property of
language, but something that a speaker does to language and something which a listener perceives
in speech.
Hence my proposal to characterise the act of sense selection from a paradigm as a cognitive
process, i.e. a mental operation which occurs in the speaker’s mind before the act of uttering each
IP. Let’s examine the act of sense-selection in the context under discussion, i.e. the poker game;
this time in more detail.
As stated above, any card in the poker pack can be identified using two features:
a) Number: from Ace (1) to the King (the 13th card): there are 13 different options.
b) Suit: there are 4 possible options: spades, hearts, diamonds or clubs.
In the context of poker cards and games, the number of options available does not depend on the
language you speak, but on the constitution of the pack of cards itself. This set of available options,
made of 4 suits and 12 numbers for each suit, totalling 4x13= 52 combinations, constitute what Brazil
calls the EXISTENTIAL PARADIGM.
Ace
2
3 spades
. diamonds
. hearts
The . of clubs
Queen
King
For the first slot in the syntagm, there are 13 items available to choose from: the ace/ two/
three/…./queen/king. For the second slot, the paradigm provides only 4 options: spades, hearts,
diamonds or clubs.
Let’s suppose that Speaker B wants to communicate that she got the following card:
What the speaker has in mind is the concept, or the cognitive structure which in language is
referred to by the syntagm ‘queen of hearts’. In order to convey a reflection of this cognitive
structure (in more traditional terms, her message) she has to choose the two lexical items that
together will identify the card. So she chooses ‘queen’ from the paradigm of 13 numbers and ‘hearts’
from the paradigm of suits.
B: …. QUEEN …… HEARTS. This is the semantic content. Speaker B needs two senses, or meanings, to
represent the card she’s got in mind.
What about the other items that enter into the syntagmatic relationship ‘the queen of hearts’?
The listener (A) can retrieve the missing words (the, of) because she knows the grammar of the
language. She knows which words can come before and after certain words. She knows how words
collocate with one another. The set of options she chooses from in order to fill in the gaps belong in
the GENERAL PARADIGM.
More on how the general paradigm and existential paradigm interact to restrict the number of
options available to the speaker.
You would know that the only words that can fit the respective slots are to, a, of.
We cannot say ‘I’m going for have the cup from coffee’ or ’I going a have an cup the coffee’, etc.
We may say then that, in this case, the general paradigm offers us only one option for each blank. In
other words, there’s only one member in the set. When we use the only candidate available, we’re
not really choosing. It’s like politics: countries that have a one-party system only have polls because
they want to make you believe that you’re choosing, but actually, they have already chosen for you.
It’s like dancing with the only lad/girl available. Not much of a choice there.
In the GENERAL PARADIGM, the paradigm offered by the rules of the language, the language system
chooses for you in terms of which grammatical category or categories may follow a certain item
(noun, adverb, infinitive, and so on) or syntactic function(s) (clause, phrase, adverbial, and so on).
The general paradigm offers one choice for the following example: a verb (or verb form).
What will the existential paradigm offer? Whether the event is in the present, in the past or in the
future; or whether there is a change of stated involved; or an agent is present.
What determines whether the past or the present is suitable? The existential paradigm, which in
turn is given by the context. If you’re talking about something that once happened, you’ll obviously
have only the past tense at your disposal.
In some other cases, the existential paradigm provides a set of what we would normally call
function words, although the following example makes it clear that prepositions are not in fact
devoid of semantic content.
Set of options available to the speaker, given by the GENERAL paradigm: preposition. If we assume
that only one word can fit in the slot, the general paradigm does not license items such as verbs,
adverbs nor conjunctions.
Set of options determined by the EXISTENTIAL paradigm: On, under, beside, next to, near, in front of,
opposite, behind...
Within a given context of situation, such as the one you can see in the picture below, only ONE of
these items will reflect the reality or fact the speaker wants to convey. If she were to describe the
cat in this context of situation, the speaker will have to select under. All the other items are
discarded because their sense does not match the situation the speaker wants to describe.
Now let’s consider B’s second speech act, the question ‘ What did YOU get?’
Speaker B is aware that A asked what card she’d got, so when B asks, the items what, card, did and
get are not made prominent. From an articulatory and an acoustic point of view, A can perceive this
as these items have not been accented. This is the way in which speaker B lets listener A know that
B assumes that what, did, get are predictable items. Predictable, of course, by virtue of their just
having been mentioned. These items can be retrieved from the context of interaction. In this case,
what the speaker assumes coincides with reality, but as we shall see later on, sometimes speakers
make assumptions as to what items are retrievable or predictable by their hearers without any
identifiable grounds. This, in turn, explains why a function word is accented: you is set in opposition
to all the other members of the set ‘subjective pronouns’ (I, he, she, they, we…). This type of
accentuation is known as contrastive accentuation and contrastive focus.
In more general terms, we may state that, depending on the context of situation, only one of the
items will be chosen by the speaker from the existential paradigm to reflect the idea she intends to
convey. When this happens, when we are making a choice out of other possible options, we say that
we’re making an act of sense selection. We may also say that the item is sense- selective. Sense
here means ‘meaning’.
Where the square brackets [ ] show the scope of focus, i.e. the scope of new information, items
which need accenting since they cannot be predicted by the listener, according to the speaker’s
assumptions.
Notice that in the reply, although queen is a lexical item, it does not receive an accent from speaker
B. The lack of accentuation is the signal that the speaker sends to the listener to tell him/her that
the unaccented item is predictable by the listener. The lack of accentuation also signals that the
speaker has not chosen the word queen from a set of other alternatives, because at that point in the
syntagm, the context of interaction has left only one member in the set. When a set contains only
one member, the mention of the item does not constitute a choice, and as a consequence, this
member can be predicted by the listener before it is uttered. More than that, if the sole member of
the set available was not uttered at all, the reply would still convey the same message:
How predictability of an item determines (scope of) focus (and the other way around)
I mentioned before that Cruttenden’s (op. cit.) concept of old information and his treatment of focus
can be related with my view that sense-selection is a cognitive process.
If scope of focus refers to the items which are new, unpredictable for the listener, it is clear that if
there is any predictable material within the intonation phrase, this material will not require
accentuation, as the speaker will not wish the listener to process old, predictable information as if it
were new.
In the example above, B’s answer, I got the queen of [ HEARTS ], shows that the speaker has chosen
not to accent (or to deaccent) two lexical items: got and queen. The domain of focus is on HEARTS.
The rest of the items have been left outside the scope of focus. Hence the label ‘narrow focus’ often
used to describe cases such as this one. We now know the factors that produce such an outcome.
What is important at this point is to acknowledge that the point(s) of focal interest, or the scope
covered by the new, unpredictable information, the ‘scope or domain of focus’ are all cognitive
processes. If sense selection is cognitive in nature, the choice of one or more new, unpredictable
items to mark off the information which we want to place at the foreground in the listener’s mind
constitutes a cognitive process. It is clear by now that predictability, or the degree to which a
listener may predict what word will come next, cannot be any other than a cognitive process
anchored in a given situation, and not a property of the word itself.
Can Anne guess, at this point, what item Jane has selected in her mind? Definitely not, and Jane
knows this, so if her choice is unpredictable for Anne, she will have to accent the next item. For
example:
Most probably, the accent on wonderful will be the first one in the IP; i.e. it will be the onset. Anne,
her listener, will realise that Jane has chosen the sense wonderful from among a list of other
possible adjectives, such as great, incredible, unforgettable, etc. It’ is highly unlikely, Anne knows,
that Jane would have chosen senses such as horrible, terrible, awful, etc. because she’s just said
that things are fine (unless she intends to create a comic, ironic effect). In other words, at this point
the conjunction of general and existential paradigm precludes the choice of certain senses.
Perceptually speaking, Anne (listener) will know that wonderful constitutes an act of sense
selection on Jane (speaker)’s part because the syllable won- will be set at a pitch higher or lower
than that in the previous syllable and it will be longer and louder. The combination of all these
factors is what we call accent6. That is to say, there will be a step-up in pitch which announces to
the listener that the following item is accented, since it has been chosen from a set of several
options.
As the grammar of speech is sequential, while wonderful is being said, Anne, the listener, may have
an idea of what follows, but is also aware that there is more than one option. A wonderful what? A
wonderful day? Weekend? Trip? Stay? Experience? Visitor? Birthday party? Meal?
The large number of possible responses shows the set of options available to the speaker for the
second slot in the example above contains more than one member and therefore, Anne, the listener,
is in no position to predict which of these putative alternatives will fill the slot until Jane utters her
choice. Jane will give an accent to this item, and if it happens to be the last item which cannot be
predicted by Anne, Jane will also assign a tone to it, thus making it the nucleus.
Deaccentuation and narrow focus: tricks for the determination of nucleus placement and focus.
The procedure described in the previous section may be used as a test of sorts to ascertain whether
an accent has been assigned properly. In order to decide whether the nucleus falls on a particular
item within an IP, the student should decide whether the item at issue is predictable for the listener.
If the item were to be removed, would a putative listener be able to guess the item the speaker is
just about to utter? If the item is predictable, then it is what Cruttenden calls old information, and as
such, it does not need accenting. If the item cannot be predicted, it constitutes new1 information, and
because the speaker will select one item from a set of at least two members, s/he will allocate an
accent to that item, to convey to the listener that that is his/her choice of sense, and that s/he thinks
the listener cannot predict it.
The example above shows that Jane takes the item trip as an existential synonym of experience.
The way she communicates this to her listener is by treating experience as old information in her IP.
If for some reason Jane conceptualised experience as something very different from a trip, she
might have said . We had a [ WONDerfuL EXPERIENCE], thus widening the scope of focus. But in the
context of two friends that meet after the absence of one of them, we might surmise that trip and
experience are almost equivalent in this context. In this case, the number of options in the paradigm
is reduced to only one member for the last slot. When this happens, the speaker does not make an
6
Accent= Pitch (height or change) + stress (loudness)+ duration (length)
act of selection, and experience being the only possible option, the speaker assumes that the
listener can retrieve or predict the item in that slot. Again, items which can be retrieved, predicted
by the listener, are not accented by the speaker.
The fact that the IP with ‘him’ conveys the same message as I’ve never liked the bastard shows that
the bastard is old information, i.e. presented as if it were the only member available, and therefore,
predictable.
The following example demonstrates that had and eat are existential synonyms in this context of
interaction, and therefore, had in B’s response does not need accenting. The fact that had can be
omitted from the response without changing the meaning of B’s response is proof that had is old
information.
To conclude, a practical test which can be carried out in order to decide whether an item or a string
of items constitutes old information, consists in omitting this part of the IP, and examining whether
the message conveyed remains the same. If the omission does not alter meaning, the focus is
narrow, and the omitted item(s) will not be accented, which means that the item will be neither an
onset nor a nucleus.
****************
2. An item is sense-selective when it cannot be predicted by the listener (or at least, the
speaker thinks that this is the case).
3. A sense-selective item is, by definition, prominent (=accented; the item will contain either
the onset syllable, the nuclear syllable, or a tertiary prominence)
4. A non-selective item does not realize an act of sense selection, as it can be predicted by
the listener. Therefore, non-selective items are non-prominent (unaccented).
5. Accenting is the result of the speaker’s act of sense selection from a set of possible
alternatives. Alternatively, accenting may be conceptualised as the act of giving
prominence to an item which has just been selected, an item which would otherwise not
be predictable by the listener.
What is the relationship between sense selection, prosodic features and prominence?
Acts of selection are mental events. How does the speaker convey his/her choice of items to the listener? By
highlighting certain items, that is, by making the chosen items auditorily prominent. The speaker uses the
prosodic features we discussed above to make something mental (a cognitive entity) into something physical
(sound waves) that can be heard by a listener. That’s how the speaker communicates to the listener her acts of
selection.
Prominence: perceptual
How does the speaker highlight words? Articulatory gestures: effort (stress); rate of vocal fold vibration;
changes in rate (F0) prosodic features
QUEEN is the first prominent syllable: the syllable where some significant change in pitch HEIGHT occurs (a
step up; NOT A pitch movement). This is the ONSET SYLLABLE.
HEARTS is the last prominent syllable. It is the INITIATOR of PITCH DIRECTION CHANGE or PITCH MOVEMENT.
The concept of selectivity, paradigmatic relationships, context of situation, of interaction, etc. are used by
Brazil. In this course we’re going to establish correspondences between approaches and authors. It is important
that you learn to recognise which author is responsible for a give term or account. It is crucial that you abstract
generalities from particular cases (deduction) so that you can make connections between different concepts and
approaches.
For example: We saw before the term OI (old information) used and defined by Cruttenden. How does the
definition of Cruttenden’s OI mesh with Brazil’s sense-selection?
References
Brazil, D. (1997). The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Connor, J.D. & Arnold, G.F. (1972). Intonation of Colloquial English. London: Longman
Wells, J.C. (2006) English intonation: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Practice: sense selection and unpredictability
A- How many members can the existential paradigm (the vertical set) have in the following sentences?
Take them without assuming a context of situation, i.e. without considering the existential paradigm.
Give examples of possible items. The first one is done for you.
1. You ought to be __________________ of yourself. (ashamed, proud,..)
4. (At a travel agency) Customer: Good morning. Could you tell me how much the city tours ______,
please?
B- How does the discoursal approach to prominence account for the prominences in the following
exchanges? Read the examples aloud and compare the two answers.
1. A: What heart did you get?
B: The QUEEN of hearts.
C- Decide how many possible options are available in the following existential paradigms. Which ones
constitute binary sets?
2. Gender:
5. Music volume
Predictability of items: decide if the missing item is predictable (and therefore, it needs to be made prominent)
Decide how many different endings the following beginnings may have.
Example:
hear
pay attention to her
imagine such a horrible thing
figure out why he had done it
believe it
get close enough to hear properly
dance?
Pick my nose?
Smile?
I put my mobile…………..
In my handbag
On the table
In my pocket
In the microwave?
On the floor?
On? Up?
More on tonicity and nucleus placement
LLI Rule or Rule of broad focus: where does the nucleus fall?
The rule of broad focus (henceforth, BF) determines that when all the material in the IP is
brought into focus, the Nucleus falls on the last content word, often referred to as the LAST
LEXICAL ITEM (LLI) in the IP. We shall call this the LLIR (LLI rule).
Narrow focus or NF: part of the information in the IP is said to be out of focus because it is
old. This means that it has been mentioned before, explicitly or implicitly, or that both speaker
and hearer have visual access to the referent of the information, i.e. the referent is physically
present.
A: (Showing book to friend). This is an INTERESTING book. You should read it.
It is important to bear in mind that in IPs which are in NF, the nucleus falls on the LLI in
focus. The part which is out of focus (OF) is old information, and can be omitted, but the
message will still be clear.
Example:
A: Had Martin had a few drinks last night? B: [A lot of] drinks.
In the second IP (the answer), only ‘a lot’ in in focus. The IP is in NF. ‘drinks’ has become
verbatim old information and is therefore outside the scope of focus. Evidence of this is given
by the fact that if the old information is omitted, the message does not change in meaning:
Notice that OI may occur anywhere within the IP, and not only in final position, as in the
following example, where there is VOI before and after the new1 item:
A: Did Caroline buy a new dress yesterday? B: She bought [several ] dresses. = B: Several.
B2: I [hear] she bought [several] dresses
= B2: hear several.
As can be seen in the example above, focus is not tied to a specific location within the IP, and it
may even be ‘split’ into two or more parts, as in ‘I hear she bought several dresses’.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A: Did the Robinsons lose anything in the burglary? B: They lost everything in the burglary.
A: I hear Laura’s inherited a little money. B: She’s inherited a great deal of money.
A: Jim’s been out with quite a few of the girls in the B: Oh, he’s been out with all the girls in the village.
village, hasn’t he?
A: Have the Smiths spent any of that money they B: Oh, they’ve spent all the money they won.
won?
A: Does anyone know about you and Pete yet? B: Oh, everyone knows.
Practice: predict the location of the nucleus in the following passages. Then, listen
to the audio track and see if you were right. The first ones are done for you,
assuming the discourse begins in medias res, i.e. not out of the blue. What context
can you imagine for each speaker’s move?
Audio Track C13- These extracts are divided into IPs, each containing one prominent
word. Listen to the extracts as many times as you need and place a \ mark before the
stressed syllable in the prominent word in each IP. This syllable is called “Tonic” or
“nuclear syllable”.
1 // most of the time/ we advertise jobs/ in national newspapers/ and on our website//
occasionally however / we might approach someone / to see if they're interested//
someone we might really want//
2 // when we ran out of money/ we worked for a bit/ and then got a train/ somewhere
else/ and eventually we ended up/ in a little village/ in the Andes/ way up high//
Now read the extracts aloud, making sure you do not introduce silent pauses within each
IP. Then, read aloud again, this time linking the end of an IP with the beginning of the
next one. Yes, you may pause to breathe in from time to time!
1 should the government pay 11 for health care or do you think it's the individual's
responsibility to save money for when they need treatment my personal view is that we
should pay for our own treatment
2 I'm impressed with your cooking Annie that was very nice I particularly liked how
you did the rice I'd really like the recipe sometime if you could write it down for me
Hypernyms, hyponyms, old information and narrow focus.
In this section, I’m going to explain why paraphrasing a referring expression triggers
the narrowing down of the scope of focus. I will first provide a summary of the topic of
hypernyms and hyponyms, and then I will show the effects on focus and nucleus
placement when an entity is referred to via a hypernym. You can find more details and
examples in Wells, Section 3.7, Synonyms. Be careful, though as Wells uses the term
‘given’ whereas in this course, we use the term ‘old’, in line with Cruttenden (2007, see
Bibliography). In order to understand the relationships between hypernyms and
hyponyms, and semantic features, look for these topics in Hurford & Heasley,
Semantics. (see Bibliography).
Semantic features
Semantic features are theoretical units of meaning-holding components which are used
for representing word meaning. These features play a vital role in determining the kind
of lexical relation which exists between words in a language.
The semantic features of a word can be notated using a binary feature notation. A
semantic property is specified in square brackets and a plus or minus sign indicates the
existence or non-existence of that property.
Examples:
The word cat is the result of a bundle of features which all together define what the
referent in the real world is:
[+animate],
[+domesticated],
[+feline]
However, if we change one of the features, we may get a different meaning or word
sense:
The category animal includes a large number of terms. Animal is the hypernym or superordinate
term (also referred to as ‘umbrella’ term) while each individual type of animal is a hyponym of
animal.
‘Animal ‘is a hypernym of ‘cat, tiger, dog, wolf, platypus, horse, coral, snake, beetle…
‘Cat’ is a hyponym of ‘animal’; ‘tiger’ is a hyponym of ‘animal’, etc.
ANIMAL
(hypernym)
Notice that in Greek, the prefix hypo- means ‘below’ and the prefix hyper- means ‘above’. For
example, some people suffer from hypotension, because their blood pressure is below the normal
range; those who suffer from hypertension have a blood pressure which is higher than the normal,
healthy blood pressure range. Hence, the terms HYPERnym (superordinate) and HYPOnym
(subordinate): they both point to a hierarchy in the semantic feature category range.
A hypernym has fewer semantic features than a hyponym. In other words, the sense (or
meaning) of the hypernym is always broader, more general, than the meaning of the
hyponym, which is more specific.
Consider how the presence of a larger number of semantic features results in a more specific
meaning or sense of a word:
Dog: + animal, +mammal, -beak, -lives in water …
Platypus:
+ animal, + furry, +tail
+cuadruped
-mammal,
+beak,
+lives in water….
50
Each hyponym may be the hypernym of a number of several hyponyms, as seen in this graph:
Dog is a hyponym of animal, but a hypernym of the breed terrier. Likewise, there are several
subtypes of terrier dogs: terrier is a hypernym of Jack Russel terrier, Airedale terrier, Irish terrier,
etc., and each of these terrier subtypes is a hyponym to terrier. The graph below shows only four of
several hyponyms of terrier and some of their semantic features.
Terrier
Jack Russell
Irish
Long-haired Airedale
+animal
+dog
+terrier +animal
+white +dog
+short hair +terrier
+short legs -English
etc +animal +animal origin
+dog +dog +long(er) hair
+terrier +terrier -white
+long(er) hair +English - short legs
+short legs origin -heavy
etc +long(er) hair weight
-white -pet friendly
- short legs etc
+heavy
weight
+pet friendly
etc
51
Since hyponyms are more specific than their hypernyms (because they contain more semantic
features in their sense), when these two types of items are used in context, the tendency will be for
the hypernym, the more general term, to be accented if it is mentioned after the mention of the
hyponym.
The reverse situation changes the focus. When a more specific word, a hyponym, is introduced in
the interaction after the hypernym has been used, not all the features in the hyponym are old. Some
of them, which differentiate ‘terrier’ from ‘dog’, will be new features. Therefore, when the
hypernym is the first mention, the hyponym receives the nucleus:
C: Are you a dog person or a cat person?
D: I like TERRIERS.
Cases of POI may be analysed as hyponymy-hypernymy relationships. You can make a word
become a virtual synonym, particularly a hyponym, of any other word, as long as there is a suitable
context. This means the words become existential synonyms by virtue of the context.
G: I saw Tony at the night club last Saturday.
H: I can’t STAND the idiot.
The journey was fraught with problems. A tyre burst, there was no signal, and nobody turned up to
help. When we eventually did get a tow, OTHER problems cropped up.
52
– Te compré un libro.
– ¡Me encantan los libros! ¿Por qué se te ocurrió comprarme un libro?
– Fui a la librería. Vi tantos libros que sabía te gustarían, que me dije “Le tengo que comprar un libro”.
– Voy al correo.
– Tengo una carta para el correo. ¿Me despacharías esta carta?
– ¿Cómo mando la carta, simple o certificada?
– Me interesa que llegue, la carta, entonces mandala certificada.
o As we’ve seen before, some words are semantically empty because they refer to
something or someone that has already been mentioned. They are old information (OI)
Examples:
-Gail talked to me about Oscar as if I knew him well, although I 've never MET her brother. ( 'her
brother' is paraphrastic old information= Oscar) her brother is POI
-He's always asking my advice on what flowers to plant, even though I don't know anything aBOUT
gardening. ( 'gardening' paraphrase of = what flowers to plant) gardening is IOI
I thought Hiroshi lived in the north of Tokyo, but in fact he lives on the OTHer side of the city. (the
city is POI; 'the north of Tokyo' implies 'one [the north] side of the city' this is POI or IOI
But: How are THINGS? (= How’s life? things not of wide denotation but concrete denotation, as it denotes
‘your life’)
Well I don’t like him as a PERSON, but professionally, he’s very good.
(Teacher to class): Today I’m going to show you a special PLACE. You have to guess what or where it is.
Track C33
A: I’ve got some apple juice. Do you want some? B: No, I can’t STAND the stuff.
Jack seems to spend all his time in his bedroom. Never LEAVES the place.
Before we could use the laboratory, we had to learn about safety and all THAT sort of stuff.
The book ‘s about corruption in sport – taking bribes, placing illegal bets and all THIS sort of thing.
When we were in Rome we were taken to museums, art galleries and THOSE sorts of places.
But sometimes the LLI is semantically rich but non-nuclear. In all the cases below, the IPs are in
broad focus; however, the nucleus does not fall on the stressed syllable of the LLI. We call these
‘exceptions’ to the rule of BF, or ELLIRs for short.
54
1. Who left the TAP running ? running is the LLI but it does not receive the nucleus. Why?
2. I must get my HAIR cut.
3. She says she can't come out. She's got a n ESsay to write.
'running', 'cut', 'to write', and 'to do' are predictable meanings in these contexts
4. I ' ll see you in about an hour. First, I've got some SHOPping to do.
'now' and 'here' are the usual points of reference in contexts like this
or they may be empty because their meaning is obvious in the particular context in which they
occur:
Recap: the BROAD FOCUS RULE is also kown as the LLI Rule, because in BF, the Nuc tends to
fall on the LLI.
In some special cases- though quite common in everyday English- an IP may be in BF but the Nuc
is found not on the LLI but earlier in the string of words contained in the IP. These are, then,
exceptions to the rule of the last lexical item (ELLIRs)
In the following IPs in BF, the Nucleus does not fall on the LLI. They fall on the noun phrase acting
as subject of the sentence.
NB: Underlining shows Focus. DO: direct object; Rel Cl: Relative clause
Usu: usually; NB: (lat) note bene (note); Cf.: (lat) confere (compare)
1- EVENT SENTENCES: the theta role of the NP in the syntactic subject is that of theme
Traditional ‘accounts’ of this (to us) unusual accentuation are grammar-based (Wells, Ortiz Lira).
However, grammar /syntax does not determine prosody; the speaker does. Anyway, because they’re
easy to grasp, these pseudo accounts listed below, with examples. Remember that underlining
signals focus, and event utterances are always in BF.
Note: The CHICKEN’S burning. but Something’s BURNING. The use of the indefinite pronoun
makes the Nucleus fall on the verb.
Notice that this intonation pattern is not possible if the subject is a pronoun. A pronoun is a
grammatical item and at the same time it indicates that the Subj. is no longer part of the focus. The
Nucleus falls on the last lexical item in the predicate.
Notice also that if the predicate is modified by a highly informative adverb, the Nucleus falls on the
verb:
A very common intonation pattern will involve two IPs and hence two nuclei:
The \ PRISONER / narrowly E\SCAPED. (But only if a FALLING tone is used in the first IP)
Notice that in Spanish, the nucleus also falls on the NP / subject to the verb:
Se me rompió la NOTEbook.
SE CAYÓ EL WIFI!!!
In all these cases, the Subject to the verb has the semantic role of Theme,
understood as an entity which suffers a change of state, condition, or location
(normally from the normal state to the unexpected, or undesired state). Therefore,
THIS WILL BE OUR PREFERRED ACCOUNT OF THIS CASE OF TONICITY.
57
2- “Explanation” sentences: when giving the reason why with a sentence with the structure:
noun + adjective (usually with verb ‘be’)
Why did you trim your skirt? It was lovely long as it was.
Yes, but the HEM was getting frayed.
I’m sorry I can’t come to your party, but I’ve got A PHONE call to make, a DINNER to make, and
a BABY to attend to.
NB that in the so-called “event sentences” AND ALSO in combinations of N+V (items 1 and 3 on
this list), the noun phrase that receives the nuclear accent has the theta role of affected theme. The
main idea is that something has happened to the theme, or that the theme has undergone some type
of change of state. For instance, in sentences with verbs denoting appearance, like ‘Your
MOTHEr’s just arrived’ or ‘The TAXI’s waiting’, the theme was not present before, and after a
certain moment, the theme has become present; we might say that going from the state of ‘absent’
to ‘present’ is a change of state.
Likewise, if a car breaks down, the car (theme) can be said to have undergone a change of state: it
worked before, but now it doesn’t. In ‘The KETTLE’S boiling’, the ‘kettle’ (=water) goes from
liquid to gas; in ‘Your SHOElaces are undone’, the shoelaces were done before, but now they
aren’t.
4- Final adverbials of time and place (FCSATs and FCSAPs) : when they have a context-
setting function, they are non nuclear.
Notice that, in the last example, the verb is in the past tense. The AAT is almost redundant. Who I
saw is more important than when I saw him.
Adverbials of time and place can be context- setting (CS) or time-focusing (TF).
FCSATs and FCSAPs (Final Context Setting Adverbials of Time and Place, respectively) are non-
nuclear and not accented.
They haven’t ARRIVED yet. They don’t MANUFACTURE this any more.
Usually, when there is a number in the adverb of time, the adverb is TF. However, it may not be
so, as can be seen in the following examples:
Example 1
- I’m SORRY, sir. / We’re FULL on March 1st, / but I have an opening on March 3RD.
NF OF TFA
Example 2
AGNES! / I haven’t seen you in AGES. / Where ‘ve you been LIVING for the past six months?
Vocative TFA CSA
Although there is a number in the adverbial, it is OF. ‘Six months’ refers to ‘in ages’.
5- Vocatives in final position are non-nuclear . Both speaker and hearer know who is being
addressed.
7-Adjectival Wh- objects: involve wh- questions where an adjectival wh- word functions as a
premodifier to the noun, and the Noun phrase is the direct object to the verb. The nucleus
falls on the object noun following the adjective. The verb is usually predictable in the context.
Deep structure: You took [DO: NP which course] Head: course PM: which hence ‘adjectival’
The Nucleus does not fall on the DO when this is a wh- pronoun or when the verb has further
complementation.
He got his HAIR cut. (One usually has one’s hair cut or done; ‘cut’ is predictable in the context.)
He didn’t get the CAR washed. (A car is usually washed, among other predictable things.)
I have a POINT to make. (‘make’ collocates with ‘point’, so it is a predictable verb here).
Cf.: He got his hair CURLED/DYED. These verbs are semantically richer than ‘cut’, so we can
highlight them.
According to Cruttenden, the last sentence is capable of taking the Nucleus on the noun, but if
emphasize is not predictable in the given context, it can take the Nucleus.
But when the noun has further complementation, the Nucleus falls on the end of the Rel Cl:
The starting point for the determination of which lexical item/s (if any) need/s to be accented is the
so-called “rule of Broad Focus (henceforth, BF), also known as “Last lexical item rule” (LLIR).
This rule states that in a string of new1 information (i.e., unpredictable items, sense-selective
items), the nucleus or tonic falls on the last lexical item in the IP.
But what if some items in the IP have been mentioned before, either explicitly or implicitly?
The existence of such items in an IP causes the IP to be in Narrow Focus (henceforth, NF).
I shall follow Cruttenden (2007) in his use of the term ‘old information’ (henceforth, OI) to refer
to such items.
Whether an LI will be accented or not will depend on a binary choice: either the item is new1, and
therefore, accented, or it’s old, and therefore unaccented.
Cruttenden distinguishes four types of OI: verbatim, paraphrastic, physical evidence, and implied
by context.
For each category, I shall use the following acronyms: VOI, POI, PE, IOI.
62
As I said before, in order to decide whether an item should be accented or not, we should decide if
that item is unpredictable or not. If we were to put a blank space in our discourse, and we omitted
an item, could the listener retrieve the missing item? Can the listener guess or recover somehow the
word we have omitted? This is the key question to ask yourself when deciding where the accents
‘go’.
A useful, methodical way of deciding which items should be accented, and which ones shouldn’t, is
to use the following algorithm every time you’re confronted with the decision on which LI should
carry the nucleus/tonic and whether there should be any other accents (particularly, an onset) in the
IP.
Start from the BF Rule. Look at the IP you have to analyse. If all the items are new1, the first
lexical item will have an onset accent, the LLI will bear the nuclear accent, and any other Lis in
between will also be new1, and therefore prominent.
Look at your IP and decide, reading from right to left, if any of the items can be considered OI.
First, consider, the LLI. Then, consider the penultimate item. Then, the antepenultimate. And so on
and so forth. More precisely, if any item/s fit any of the four categories of IO, then you can be sure
those items should not be accented. The nucleus will fall on the next LI, going from the last one
(right) to the one before (left).
If you follow this procedure every time you have to analyse tonicity in an IP, you’ll eventually
automatise it and you’ll do it very quickly. It’s important to develop this orderly way of ascertaining
where the nucleus falls as a systematic procedure, rather than jump from item to item, at random.
Once you’ve established where the tonic should fall, you should check if there’s a candidate for the
onset accent. In BF, this’ll be the first LLI, but bear in mind that in NF, the first and other items
may be OI.
Below is a flowchart showing my algorithm for the determination of nucleus and onset placement,
and the type of focus. The symbol means ‘exists’. The three dots mean ‘then’.
The full flowchart below includes the case of Exceptions to the LLI Rule (ELLIRs)
Some words tend to reject the nucleus, or in other words, tend to be deaccented. These expressions usually
occur in sentence-final position, and are separated from the main clause by a comma. However, in the
traditional (grammatical-attitudinal approach), they’re considered to be included in the same IP as the main
clause, so they shouldn’t be chunked. In final position (unmarked), they don’t tend to receive their own IP,
and therefore, do not receive a nucleus.
Very important: This is just a list. It does not include an exam-type justification of why these expressions
reject the nucleus in final position. This is discussed in class.
Note: the underlining shows Focus. All the following IPs are in BF.
1- Cohesion markers
3- Textual markers:
4- Approximative markers:
2. A: I’m off to the garage now. I must have a new exhaust-pipe fitted.
B: OK. Don’t forget to get the battery charged and the tyres pumped up.
A.2 ) What sentence patterns can you find which do not follow the rule of Broad Focus?
Why don’t the nuclei fall on the last lexical item?
B) Mark the nuclei and onsets in the following exchanges and account for your choices. Then categorise
the exceptions to the rule of Broad Focus:
1. (Parent and grandparent are talking about the recent activities of the older children. They have just
discussed what Alice did earlier).
Grandparent: What did Will do this morning?
Parent: He got his hair cut, and his beard trimmed, too.
G: And what did Ernest do?
P: He was lazy. He didn’t get the car washed or the oil changed, either.
12. A student bursts into the classroom and yells out: “Everyone get out of here! There’s a bomb in the
school!”
1. A conflict arose over the autonomy of the southern states. Then the Civil War broke out.
2. At ten o clock, the guests arrived. Then Andrew stormed in.
3. A dispute ensued. Finally, after a long negotiation, a solution emerged.
B No, it must have been Sue who went. What did they leave for?
A John had some business to attend to.
B This morning he mentioned his check had arrived. Maybe they’ve gone to cash it.
A Is there a bank in the neighbourhood?
B There’s one opposite.
Track B21
Definition of the term ‘CONTRAST’: an opposition between two items belonging to the same set or
system; or an opposition between one item against all the other members of the same category and
all the others available from the same category.
FUNCTION WORDS are usually made prominent when a CONTRAST is expressed or implied:
A: I ' l l leave it on the table, shall I? B: No, put it UNder the table.
A : That looks pretty easy. B: Well , YOU do it then !
Track B22
It is rarely prominent except at the end of a number of fixed phrases with this and that:
You know I was buying a new car? Well , THIS is IT. (= this is the one)
THIS is IT, then. ( = it's time to do something I don't want to - leave, part, etc.)
I just signed my name , and THAT was IT. ( = nothing more had to be done)
A : Just swim across. B: THAT'S just IT. ( = that's the problem) I can't swim.
Track B23
Any is often prominent (and pronounced /' eni) when it means 'it's not important which'
Somebody, anybody, etc. are often prominent when they are the subject of a sentence:
A: Apparently, there were no witnesses. B: But SOMEbody must have seen it.
Notice that here, ‘somebody’ refers to a particular person. It doesn not function as a noun of general
reference.
Track B24
The is accented ( strong form) when we say that something is the best, most
important, etc. of its kind:
You should go to the Maldives. It's THE place to see coral .
Track B25
The auxiliary verbs be, have and d o and the modal verbs are often prominent –
Do, did and does are often made prominent for emphasis with the present and past simple:
We DID warn you. (=it’s not the case that we didn’t warn you) ditto
Track B26 I
In a piece of new information or a question made up only of function words, the last function
word is often made prominent:
Track B27
Think about the words in bold in these dialogues and underline them if they are likely to be prominent. Then
listen and check your answers.
Track B28
I can't stand the stuff: Non- prominence on final nouns of general reference
and approximatives
When we refer to something already mentioned, we can use the stuff (for uncountable nouns),
the place(s) and the thing(s) (for countable nouns) . Very often, some criticism is intended:
1) A: I've got some apple juice. Do you want some ? B: No, I can't stand the stuff.
2) Jack seems to spend all his time in his bedroom. Never leaves the place.
We can use these words with sort of to show that we have just given examples of a larger group of
things. Often we use (all) this, that, these, those, before sort of:
4) Before we could use the laboratory, we had to learn a bout safety and all that sort of stuff.
5) The book 's about corruption in sport - taking bribes, placing illegal bets and all this sort of thing.
6) When we were in Rome we were taken to museums, art galleries and those sorts of places.
We can use and stuff, and things and and places in a similar way to refer in a general way to
things and places without giving any further detail:
The phrase and that is used to mean that other things were involved, without specifying more
74
precisely what:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nuclei on function words: mark ONSET and NUCLEUS (FROM DICKERSON)
1a (A is opening a present)
B: What is it?
1b (A is reading an article)
B: What is it about?
2c (Outside the theatre, talking about the actors) How were they?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Track C40
When a reflexive pronoun follows a verb or preposition and refers to the subject, it is usually non-
prominent) :
Track 41
When we use emphatic pronouns myself, yourself, etc ,they are usually prominent. For example –
However, pronouns like this can be made non-prominent if we want to highlight a contrast somewhere else
in the sentence. Compare:
but: A: You look thirsty. Would you like a glass of this juice ?
B: Actually, I could drink the whole BOTtle myself.
Track C45
B: I can't eat it all myself. Marco would like it. Why not give some to him ?
A: But I made it for you. You don't like it, do you ?
B: Well, it's not the cake itself. It's the icing . . .
A: And I was feeling so pleased with myself.
84
boiling point civil war claim form defining moment dental floss
distance learning greenhouse hot potato house-hunting ice rink
lipstick loudspeaker orange juice pay phone rubber band
search party shop assistant dish towel town hall
What is . . .
Compound noun or adjective+ noun?: Decide and place onset and tonic.
1 chemical formula
5 coffee shop
2 bank account
6 best man
3 American football
7 mobile phone
4 artificial intelligence
8 flight attendant
9 sofa bed
10 magnetic field
11 tea strainer
12 space station
Apple pie chicken soup orange cake side door back entrance
More on tonicity
Some issues of special interest in this subject. The following topics are for student research.
e.g. that’s it. Put my neck on the line. No love lost between us. All hell broke loose.
Deaccentuation of adverbs of proper functioning: I don’t FEEL well. I can’t SEE properly.
The cases of “so” and “one”: I think so and I think so. Which one and Which one?
1. Recap the different functions served by intonation (all 3 systems; see Wells and Tench).
2. Learn the following important concepts you’ll need for the understanding of the discoursal meaning
of tones:
All languages are considered to be shaped and organised in relation to three functions, or metafunctions.
1. Ideational
2. interpersonal
3. textual
Ideational: language concerned with building and maintaining a theory of experience. It includes the
experiential function and the logical function.
Experiential: the grammatical choices that enable speakers to make meanings about the world around us
and inside us.
Logical function as those systems “which set up logical–semantic relationships between one clausal unit
and another”[8] The systems which come under the logical function are TAXIS and LOGICO-SEMANTIC
RELATIONS. When two clauses are combined, a speaker chooses whether to give both clauses equal status,
or to make one dependent on the other. In addition, a speaker choose some meaning relation in the
process of joining or binding clauses together. Halliday argues that the meanings we make in such
processes are most closely related to the experiential function. For this reason, he puts the experiential
and logical functions together into the ideational function.[9]
The interpersonal function refers to the grammatical choices that enable speakers to enact their complex and
diverse interpersonal relations. This tenet of systemic functional linguistics is based on the claim that a
speaker not only talks about something, but is always talking to and with others.
The grammatical systems that relate to the interpersonal function include Mood, Modality, and Polarity.[
Textual function. The term encompasses all of the grammatical systems responsible for managing the flow
of discourse. These systems “create coherent text – text that coheres within itself and with the context of
situation”. They are both structural (involving choices relating to the ordering of elements in the clause), and
non-structural (involving choices that create cohesive ties between units that have no structural bond). The
relevant grammatical systems include Theme, Given and New, as well as the systems of cohesion, such as
Reference, Substitution, and Ellipsis.
A summary of the attitudinal approach (O’Connor & Arnold, 1972) and its
shortcomings.
Source: Tench (1996)
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
A and B have agreed to meet. But they haven’t decided what to do. Whatever A suggests, B has already
done or is going to do it soon. Assign tones to both participant’s moves.
C68
1 a: Do you want some tea?
B: A glass of water is what I’d really like.
2 a: I see your neighbours keep goats.
B: The awful smell is what I object to.
3 a: What's for breakfast?
B: Coffee and toast is what I usually have
4 a: What are you having for your birthday?
B: What I’m hoping for is a new computer.
5 a: My train to work was late yet again.
B: What you should do is write and complain.
6 a: All the plants in my garden are dying.
B: What we want is some rain.
7 a: What did you get from the butcher's?
B: These sausages were all they’d left
8 a: What's the view like from your bedroom window?
B: All I can see is a block of flats.
C69
1 A: How is Dan getting on in Sydney?
B: (his brother - went to Australia)
2 A: You looked uncomfortable during the meeting.
B: (my back - aching)
3 A: I suppose the Liberals will raise taxes now they are in government.
B: (the Democrats - won the election)
D3
We commonly use a fall-rising tone when we want to indicate our reservation about something.
For example, we may not completely agree with something, or we know that what we are saying is only partly
correct (restriction), or we may not be sure that what we are saying will be accepted:
A: is it an interesting town?
B: the old parts are. ( other parts aren't)
=
Joe and Olivia are going on holiday in the morning , but Joe is excited and can't sleep. Do you think
Joe's questions are likely to have a rising tone or a falling tone?
C74
C79
7 A: What do you think of my new skirt? B: You can't go out dressed like that. Have you no shame?
8 A: Roz's exam results were good, weren't they? B: Didn't she do well?
9 A: The match is on TV tonight. B: Who cares?
10 A: David looks awful. B: Do you mind? That's my brother you're talking about.
PRACTICE: Go back on all the exercises above and account for the interactional meanings of tones and the
contexts they project. (see projection in Brazil’s CVIE).
SUMMARY so far
Some relationships between the speaker’s choice of tone and assumption of the state of convergence.
Speaker choice: referring tone. The assumption of common ground when the speaker believes the
information contained in the IP is shared by him/herself and the listener.
Speaker choice: proclaiming tone. The assumption of no common ground; the speaker believes the
information is new to the listener. The speaker proclaims the information in the IP, performs an act of
telling, because s/he thinks the listener doesn’t know the information.
117
Speaker choice: proclaiming tone. The assumption of no common ground: when the speaker treats
material which is not new to the listener (or the speaker thinks this is the case) as if it were new.
Divergence.
Speaker choice: referring tone: The assumption of common ground: when material which is judged by
the speaker as new, i.e. not present in the area of convergence, but the speaker still treats this material
as if it were shared. Convergence.
Marking the status of information in an IP: in all cases, the choice is between a proclaiming tone (either p
or p+) for new2 information (i.e. information that does not belong to the area of convergence), or for a telling
act, and a referring tone (either r or r+) for shared information, or an act of reference to common ground.
118
TASK 1. Let us refresh the grammatical approach first. For the dialogue below, predict the intonation of the
utterances in bold type according to the grammatical approach (Lee)
TASK 2. Brazil claims that there is no such thing as 'intonation of questions'; there are exchanges. Read the
ones below. What is speaker A doing in each opening move? What is B doing?
Exchange 1:
Opening move Answering move
A: 'I prefer \that one B: Oh. Minimum contribution; -------------------------------
obligatory move ( may be non-
verbal)
Speaker A is TELLING Speaker B is acknowledging receipt
of A's info
Exchange 2:
A: You prefer \that one? B: Yes/ No. Obligatory A: \ Oh. optional
Speaker A is asking (hOW DO YOU Speaker B is answering Speaker A is acknowleding
KNOW?) receipt of B's info
Other ways of asking:
Do you prefer that one?
Which one do you prefer?
119
Exchange 3:
A: They’re very expensive. B: Yes. -----------------------------
Speaker A IS NEITHER TELLING B expresses agreement (matching)
NOR ASKING; seeks B's agreement
What Brazil wants to show is that it is not the form that determines the communicative value of an utterance,
e.g. You prefer that one has the form of a declarative sentence, but in the context of two friends who are
talking about preferences, e.g. deciding which wallpaper to buy for their flat, the utterance has the value of a
question.
a)
b) TASK 3. Look at the following situation: Husband is sitting on sofa, reading newspaper. Wife enters
room, puts coat on and buttons it up. Husband sees this and says:
a) What tone do you think he uses? Why does he make this choice?
b) Now listen to the audio to check your prediction. Were you right?
c) TASK 4. Listen to the following exchange. What tone does speaker B use? Account for his choice from a
discoursal perspective.
d)
e)
(189) A: // i’ve JUST been talking to JOHN //
B: // you’ve BEEN in the OFfice //
A: // YES //
f)
Notice that both (187) and (189) are declarative sentences in form (a grammatical label) but they're being
used with a questioning function. The speakers make assumptions about what can be taken as already
negotiated between speaker and hearer, and request the hearer's confirmation. In other words, the speakers
want to check if their assumptions are correct. In Brazil's terms, (187) and (189) are CHECKING questions.
TASK 5. A passenger bound for Sheffield is at the station, looking for his train. What tone is he most likely to
use in the utterance below, and why?
Now listen to the audio to check your prediction. Were you right?
(202)
Patient: I have an appointment for two o’clock.
Receptionist: // are YOU mister RObinson //
b) Now listen to the audio to check your prediction. Were you right?
Notice that (204) and (202) are interrogative sentences in form, but their intonation is the same as that of
(187) and (189). In discoursal terms, all of these are ____________________________ .
TASK 7. Imagine possible contexts of interaction for the following exchanges and account for the tones
according to the discoursal approach.
TASK 8a : Our traveller is still trying to find the Sheffield train. She has asked at several platforms, yet
unsuccessfully. Tired from walking around, she goes to the next platform and asks, rather impatiently:
As you can see, Wh- questions do not always take a fall, and Yes/No questions do not always take a rise!
Both (208) and (206) are wh- questions in form, but they're being used for different purposes, so they take
different tones. As we have seen above, (206), having an r tone, is a question to CHECK, even though it is a
Wh- in form. A question with p tone, be it Wh- -like (208)- or Yes/No -like (204)- is a question to FIND
OUT: IT EXPECTS NEW INFORMATION. The speaker asks the hearer to tell him/ her that which s/he does not
know and cannot/ does not want to make assumptions about. Notice that in questions, irrespective of their
form, THE P TONE INDICATES THAT THE NEW INFORMATION COMES FROM THE HEARER, NOT FROM THE
SPEAKER.
TASK 7b: Interrogative statements with proclaiming tone can be reformulated as questions to find out, i.e.
wh- questions. Reformulate (204).
Cf. Lee's example(p. 33) A: Could you pass the /salt? (B does not respond) A: Could you pass the \salt?
Cf the example cited by Tench (p. 97) A: Is this your /bag? B: Pardon? A: Is this your \bag?
Brazil claims that the so-called 'intonation of questions' is not determined by the form (grammar) of the
question. Rather, it has to do with what the speaker knows or does not know; with what he assumes to be
already negotiated between him/her and the hearer.
Brazil divides all questions, irrespective of their grammar, into two main groups:
121
a) Those which have referring tone (dominant or non-dominant) are CHECKING questions; the speaker
wants to ________________________;
b) those which take falls are FINDING OUT questions; the speaker is saying 'Please tell me'; s/he expects
______________________;
TASK 9 (AT LAST!): Now use the discoursal approach to account for the intonation of the utterances we
analysed in the dialogue about Catherine's holiday trip.
PRACTICE
Dialogue 1
Dialogue 2
2. Rewrite the following questions to find out without changing their communicative value:
TASK 5. Listen and compare the following exchanges, in which the second speaker (B/ doctor) echoes the
lexis and grammar of A's/ the patient's utterance. What is the significance of the tone choices in each case?
(191)
A. // i SAW him in OXford street //
B // you SAW him in OXford street //
A: // p YES //
122
(192)
A // p SAW him in OXford street //
B// you SAW him in OXford street //
A: // p YES //
(193) a
Doctor: // p where do you GET this pain//
Patient: // p in my HEAD//
Doctor: // you GET it in your HEAD//
Patient: // P YES //
(193) b
Doctor: // p where do you GET this pain//
Patient: // p in my HEAD//
Doctor: // you GET it in your HEAD//
Patient: // P YES //
TASK 8. What do you think is the difference in communicative value between (196) and (195) below?
This is a summary of Brazil’s chapter. The student is advised to read this summary before tackling the reading
of the actual chapter in the book (The CVIE). The audio files have been taken from the book, and their
listening while reading are strongly recommended. The numbers next to the recorded samples are the same
ones found in the book.
Brazil claims that there is no such thing as intonation of questions. He also argues that the traditional view
that questions take a rise and statements take a fall is an oversimplification.
He explains that the p/R distinction, involving questions of common ground and the conversational pursuit of
speaker/ hearer convergence, requires some adjustment if it is to be applied in interrogative contexts.
Exchange 1
A: I prefer that one
B: [Oh]
123
Exchange 2
A: You prefer that one?
B: Yes
A: [Oh]
Exchange 3
A: They’re very expensive.
B: Yes.
In 1 the information goes from A to B; 1 is then a telling exchange. It is made up of a telling move and a
follow-up move, which may be verbalised or not.
In 2, A is requesting information from B; it is an asking exchange, since the speaker will not be telling the
hearer about the hearer’s own preference. The structure is made up of an asking move, an answering move and
an optional follow-up.
The purpose of exchange 3 is to establish mutuality, to ascertain that hearer and speaker see things eye-to-eye:
it is a matching exchange.
2 is then a tentative suggestion articulated by the speaker and put forward for the hearer to concur if mid
termination is chosen, or adjudicate, if high termination is chosen. The speaker is asking the hearer.
Therefore we may say that the discourse values of 1 and 2 are determined on the basis of who knows what.
Brazil compares the examples 1 and 2 above with the one below:
The appropriacy or inappropriacy of the question mark will depend on whether it is the speaker or the hearer
who knows about John’s preferences.
While (180) is aimed at removing uncertainty on the part of the hearer (the speaker proclaims info), (181) is
aimed at the removal of the speaker’s uncertainty, not the hearer’s.
The world-changing element is not the assertion but the hearer’s yes or no that the assertion seeks to elicit.
The step towards convergence that the speaker initiates is being brought about by the response it pre-empts.
In (182) // p JOHN prefers THAT one// , depending on the context of interaction, the speaker either
- offers to change the hearer’s world view or
- articulates an assumption that the hearer will change his/ her world view.
What happens if the examples above are said with referring tone? (we’ll use the symbol R to examine what r
and r+ tones have in common)
(183) projects a context of interaction in which the content of the tone unit is common ground.
In (184) // R you preFER THAT one// , the speaker is offering a tentative assessment of common ground and
asks the hearer to concur with or adjudicate with respect to its validity: ‘Am I right in taking it as already
established between us that you prefer that one?’ A step towards greater convergence will be achieved only
with the hearer’s production of the response Yes or No. In other words, the speaker supposes a provisional
area of common ground which awaits a proclaimed endorsement.
Husband is sitting on sofa, reading newspaper. Wife enters room, puts coat on and buttons it up. Husband sees
this and says:
The utterance (187) // r you’re GOing OUT //, if addressed to someone buttoning up his coat, can be
interpreted as a presentation of the apparent intentions of the hearer as if they were negotiated common ground
and a simultaneous request for information. It can be reformulated as “Please confirm that I’m drawing the
right conclusion from your actions”. (187) is a making-sure question.
// p you’re GOing OUT // This utterance projects a context in which the speaker does not know what
interpretation to put on the hearer’s conduct. It is a question to find out, and it can be reformulated as “Is that
it? Or if not, what are you going to do?”
Bearing in mind what we have said so far, read the following exchange. Can you predict the tones?
Here, speaker B’s assumption of what may be taken for common ground is based not upon visual evidence but
upon A’s preceding assertion.
B: // p you’ve BEEN in the OFfice // proposes one of the possible places where the hearer may have met John,
with the implication that, for all the speaker knows, it might have been elsewhere. It can be reformulated as “Is
that what you’re telling me?” or “Where did you meet John?”
Both in (187) and in (189) the declarative mood item with referring tone serves to check an inference. In (191),
however, this explanation cannot be applied:
When a speaker echoes the lexis and grammar of an utterance, the appropriate paraphrase is not “Am I right in
concluding that...?” but “Am I right in thinking you said/ meant ...?”.
The local effect of an echo like this can be described in terms of surprise: “Have I heard correctly...?” indicates
that what has been heard is somehow contrary to expectations. The speaker is heard as if saying “That’s an
odd place for him to be!” Provided that the mid key is used, the proclaimed version of (191) lacks this element
of expectation.
(192) could occur during a police enquiry, where the questioner wants to make sure that the witness
remembers accurately. The interrogator is heard as if saying “Think again- was it Oxford Street, or was it
somewhere else? “
If the doctor chose referring tone, he’d be heard as questioning his own hearing or understanding of what the
patient has said. He would sound as if he’d never known anyone have this particular kind of pain there before!
With proclaiming tone, the doctor would be heard as asking for greater precision, as recycling the question, by
behaving as though the patient has not yet selected a response and leading to “Yes. Behind my eyes.”
2. YES/ NO QUESTIONS
Brazil claims that within the context of interaction, what matters is who knows what about whose intentions.
Therefore respect of this, there is no difference between a) and b) below:
The significance of the grammatical form of b) is that it marks the utterance as interrogative even in the
absence of any relevant features of speaker/ hearer understanding, i.e. the interrogative value of b) is given by
the grammar, whereas any putative interrogative value for a) will have to be determined by the context of
interaction.
Therefore if a) and b) are similar, what was said before about declarative mood or moodless utterances may be
applied to utterances where the grammar makes explicit the interrogative function, as in the examples below:
(195) // p DO you prefer THAT one // is a question to find out, equivalent to “I don’t know whether you prefer
that one or not. Please tell me. Which one do you prefer?”
(196) // r+ DO you prefer THAT one // is a question to check an assumption of speaker/ hearer common
ground. It is equivalent to “Am I right in assuming that you prefer that one?”
Proclaimed polar questions are very common in certain kinds of guessing games, such as “Twenty Questions”
(“Animal, Vegetable or Mineral” in the US). At the beginning of a round, participants have no clue as to the
answer so they start by guessing, characteristically with p tone:
As the possibilities are narrowed down, players start to put their questions not as guesses, but as deductions or
hunches, characteristically with r tone. The speaker tentatively projects a context in which the response has
126
been negotiated, and asks the quizmaster for confirmation (or denial) of the assumption. The speaker modifies
his/her world view in advance and submits the modification for the hearer’s approval.
With p tone, speaker B will probably be heard as unhelpfully suggesting a name off the top of his head. With r
tone, Arthur is proposed as being the forgotten name: “I think his name might be Arthur- am I right?”
The traveller makes an assumption that it is and asks the hearer to have it checked. If the question had p tone,
it would sound as if the traveller had no idea what time his train was due to leave.
Yes/ no questions are often asked in circumstances where the asker has some reason for projecting an
assumption that he knows the answer. This may account for the traditional assertion that “yes/ no questions
take a rise”
3. INFORMATION QUESTIONS
If speaker B does not know the book title, s/he will use p tone. He asks the question to find out. It can be
reformulated as “Tell me the title, so that I shall recognise it if I come across it.”
With referring tone in his utterance, Speaker B is heard as asking not for information but rather whether the
book A is looking for is the one he recently saw in the bathroom or elsewhere. (206) // r WHAT’S it
CALLED // is similar to (207) // r IS it robinson CRUsoe //, and although these questions anticipate different
answers (Robinson Crusoe and Yes), they both check B’s provisional assumption that the lost book is the one
he saw in the bathroom before he goes on to make a suggestions as to where it might be found.
The traveller would be checking whether this was the train she wanted to catch. The question is equivalent to
(204)
But if the traveller has asked several times and on different platforms and has been told that it is not the train
she wants, she might ask:
(213) // p and WHERE does THIS train go to // which signals exasperation, as if she was saying “From the
way the system seems to be working, it could be going anywhere!”
Requests for information of the how, where or when kind occur frequently in situations where the information
is so far unnegotiated. This may be the reason why traditionally, wh- questions have been associated with
falling tones. But this tendency is a fact about situations and not a deterministic relationship between question
type and tone selection.
4. Social elicitation
We do not always ask questions to find out information or to have our assumptions confirmed or denied. Many
real-life elicitations seek to establish social relationships. They are sometimes called phatic questions; they are
meant to be friendly so they usually have a referring tone, the tone insinuating togetherness:
Compare
As these are social formulae, their answers are conventional (Yes). The speaker behaves as if the answer had
already been negotiated.
Here the speaker is asking for help, so he uses r tone (non dominant) to suggest togetherness. If the action
required is in the benefit of the speaker, the speaker will try not to be dominant.
When there is benefit for the hearer, the speaker can afford to be dominant. In offering help, he can use r+
tone.
p+:
Rise-
Fall
r: Fall-
Rise
r+:
Rise
0:
Level
129
1. Match the labels with the type of question. There’s one label that doesn’t match any of the categories.
TYPE OF
EXAMPLES
QUESTION
1a) Shall we go /home? 1b) Shall we go \home? 2a) Would you pass the /salt? 2b) Would
1
you pass the \salt? 3a) Will you come and \see us? 6) You’re /coming?
7) This is \your book, \isn’t it?
2 8) This is \your book, /isn’t it?
9) This is \your book, /is it?
10a) What’s your /name? 10b) What’s your \name? 11a) What’s going \on? 11b) What’s
3
going /on?
13) Would you like /tea│ or \coffee? 14) Shall we go or \not?
4
15) So you’ve been to the seaside. Did you /swim │or /sunbathe│or go /boating?
5 16) Did you \swim │or \sunbathe│or go \boating?
17a) A: Where’s Tom? B: In the coal-cellar. A: (incredulous) /Where? /Where did you say he
was?
17b) A: Why did they leave early? (B answers but A is inattentive.) A: /Why did you say they
6 left early?
17c) A: Are you /going there? (B answers at length but doesn’t make the point clear.) A: I
don’t understand at all. /Are you going there? Or \aren’t you?
2. Choose the most suitable meaning for each of the boxes 1-4. There are two extra meanings.
PRACTICE: For each of the questions below, complete the gaps in the rules.
This is a _________ question. ___________ questions have _____________ tones in the first chunks(s), and a
________ tone in the last chunk.
2. So you've been to London. Did you see St. /Paul's │or Westminster /Abbey│or the / Tower?
In the question above, the speaker is mentioning different _____________, not options, so there is no falling
tone on Tower.
In the example above, speaker B ____________ A's question to gain time to think. This kind of question often
ends with a __________ .
This is not a real question, but a _________________ question. Questions like this one do not expect an
answer, since the answer is obvious. They resemble exclamations. They start with _____________ pitch on
the first stressed syllable and have a _______________ tone on the last one.
Answers to rising tail questions
Expressing \Yes, it \is
‘Yes, it \is. /Yes, it \is.
agreement
Expressing \No, it \isn’t.
‘No, it \isn’t. /No, it \isn’t.
disagreement
\No, it /isn’t
Contradicting \No, it \/ isn’t.
Reading guide on Key and Termination
Brazil (1997) The Communicative Value of Intonation in English.
Key
3. What is the difference between a linguistic and an existential paradigm (revise Prominence in Brazil)?
4. How many members does the existential paradigm have when we use High Key
5. Why should an attitudinal labelling of High Key be avoided?
6. How many elements in the paradigm does Mid Key include?
7. How should we interpret High Key within an open set? (Two possibilities)
8. Which term does Dr. Brazil use, instead of key, when key operates on an extended tone unit?
9. Which key expresses agreement?
10. Which key expresses disagreement?
11. How can you soften disagreement that is made through High Key?
12. How can you compare adjudication and concurrence in the classroom exchange?
13. Find synonyms for adjudication and concurrence.
To sum up
High Key projects
Mid Key projects
Low Key projects
Termination
1. How does termination operate in the tone unit?
2. What does termination project?
3. What is concord?
4. What is concord breaking?
Chapter 6
1. Read the following exchanges and utterances. Decide which of the underlined tone units are likely to be
realised on high key, mid key or low key.
a) (Outside the cinema) We couldn’t get in. There were no tickets left.
e) (Two friends talking) A: Sonia’s thinking of buying a Porsche. B: Yes. She’s keen on fast cars.
g) She went to buy a bicycle// and she came back with a sports car.
132
h) (The weatherman on TV): In the mountains, where the temperatures are lower, there could be snow.
i) (Context: The neighbours normally neglect their garden A: Our neighbours// are gardening.
A: I expect you enjoy living in London? B: You don’t mean you actually chose to live in
London?
3. THE CLASSROOM EXCHANGE: What key do you expect to hear in the underlined tone units?
make the right noises/make all the right noises (idiom): If you say that someone makes the right noises or makes all the
right noises, you think that they are showing concern or enthusiasm about something because they feel they ought
to rather than because they really want to.
1. Introductions
133
2. Showing interest.
7. Offers
12. Modesty
_______________________________________________________________________________
Note that the following questions will not necessarily be asked ‘as they are’ in an exam. They are meant to
guide your reading, reflection and comprehension of how intonation works.
Relate these questions to concrete examples so that you practise applying the theory to practice.
Prominence
1. What is prominence? What are prosodic features? Which features render a syllable prominent?
2. How many degrees of prominence are there in English? Provide graphic representations.
140
3. Build a chart indicating the articulatory and auditory effects of those features on the syllable of a
word.
7. Finch and Ortiz Lira state: “It is incorrect to say that syllables are made prominent by stress alone”.
Provide articulatory and auditory reasons for this claim. Illustrate with an example.
13. How many unstressed syllables can there be after a primary accent?
14. Classify affixes according to the effect they have on word accent. Provide examples.
15. Which syllables are accented in the following words? Which syllables are prominent in the following
words? examination – telegram – interesting – unhappy - university –
16. Does a native speaker know the difference between accent and prominence? Yes/No. Why?
19. Does the accentual pattern of English words vary? Give reasons.
20. What do you observe about the occurrence of accent in English words (look at the examples under 6
Accentuation of simple words)
21. What is the tendency as to word accent in simple words – nouns, adjectives, verbs?
22. What problems do Spanish speakers face when they have to pronounce polysyllabic words?
24. What activities would you suggest to drill accentuation in polysyllabic words?
25. Formulate three rules about word accent that you think your students should know.
26. What is a compound word? What patterns of accentuation can they have (in general terms)?
29. What is stress shift and why does it take place? Provide examples.
30. Describe the two stress tendencies in the English language, and how they stand in relation to each
other. Provide examples of both tendencies.
31. Why is word accent both "fixed" and "free"?
32. Describe and exemplify the factors that make a syllable prominent, according to Gimson/ Ortiz Lira.
33. How many degrees of prominence are there in English? Provide graphic representations.
34. What is the rule of alternation? How does it relate to secondary stresses?
35. Classify affixes according to the effect they have on word accent. Provide examples.
36. What is a compound word? What patterns of accentuation can they have (in general terms)?
37. Mention 4 types of single-accented compounds, explain their accentual pattern and give examples of
each.
38. Mention 4 types of double-accented compounds, explain their accentual pattern and give examples of
each.
39. What is stress shift and why does it take place? Provide examples.
Discourse analysis
40. Relate McCarthy Ch. 1 to Brown and Yule Ch. 2. What are the contributions made by Hymes and
Grice? Build a table showing those contributions.
41. McC. CH. 1, p.6 Signal the differences between British and American Discourse Analysis.
42. McC. CH 1, p.7 Provide an example of correspondence between form and function and another one
of non-correspondence.
43. McC. CH. 1, p.8 What is the discourse analyst interested in?
44. Exemplify how we can do things with language. (Austin: speech acts)
45. McC. CH. 1, p.13-14 What is a framing move and what is a transaction?
47. McC. CH. 1, p. 14 How does the term transaction relate to Brown and Yule chapter 1.
48. McC. CH. 1, p. 23-4 What general conclusions can you draw about the characteristics of spoken
discourse?
49. How do Brown and Yule complete the picture of spoken discourse?
50. Describe and exemplify the concepts of reference, presupposition, implicature and inference.
51. What is the cooperative principle? Find examples that show how this principle works.
52. What are the features of the context of situation according to Dell Hymes?
53. What are the grammatical categories which Cruttenden describes as deserving of separate intonation
groups? Provide examples.
54. What is ‘nucleus placement’? Explain and exemplify the concepts of lexical focussing and
grammatical focussing.
142
55. What is the difference between broad focus and narrow focus?
56. What are the exceptions to the rule of broad focus mentioned by Cruttenden?
57. What is ‘old information’? What types of old information does Cruttenden mention?
61. McC. CH. 1, p. 18 What are the relevant elements of the conversational context?
62. McC. CH. 1, p. 19 How does classroom talk differ from conversations outside the classroom?
63. McC. CH. 1, p. 20 Point out boundaries in everyday talk (pitch and classroom talk)
64. McC. CH. 1, p. 23-24 What general conclusions can you draw about the characteristics of spoken
discourse?
65. How do Brown and Yule complete the picture of spoken discourse?
Word stress
72. McC. CH. 4, p . 101 What effect does high/low pitch have in conversation?
77. McC. CH. 4, p . 109 What is the effect of narrow/wide pitch range. Point to some uses of the tones.
82. McC. CH. 5, p . 120 Provide minimal context data to exemplify adjacency pairs where second pair-
part is thanks.
83. McC. CH. 5, p . 123 Provide examples of follow-up moves in natural conversation.
84. McC. CH. 5, p . 123 Design a set of cue cards for students to develop function-chain activities.
85. McC. CH. 5, p . 126 What are interview style patterns useful for?
88. McC. CH. 5, p . 128 How does natural conversation compare with classroom talk? See above.
89. McC. CH. 5, p . 129 What features of turn-taking do you find similar in both English and Spanish?
90. Define prominence according to Brazil and then explain this notion in your own words (CV Chapter
2). Exemplify.
91. According to Brazil, prominence is an act of selection. Explain this idea in your own words and
compare it with the notion of prominence by Gimson. How do the two approaches differ?
92. What is a paradigm? Characterise the general paradigm and the existential paradigm; exemplify (op.
cit.)
94. Analyse the components of the tone unit below according to O'Connor & Arnold's attitudinal approach
and relate them to Brazil's discoursal approach.
95. // she's been SEEing that FRIEND of hers //
96. Why doesn't Brazil describe the elements outside the tonic segment in detail?
97. What's the difference between 'tone' and 'tone group'. How many tone groups are there in O'Connor &
Arnold's system?
98. How many tones are there in Brazil's system? Are there any tone groups? If so, how many?
101. Define the three systems which operate in intonation. How do the three systems organise
information?
144
103. Define theme and rheme. What are their syntactic correlates?
104. Explain the concept of neutral tonality. What does Tench refer to when he speaks of ‘functional
equivalence’?
106. What are the two kinds of structural deviation which affect tonality? Provide examples.
107. Define checking tags and copy tags. What tones are associated with them?
108. For the following syntactic constituents, describe and exemplify processes of syntactic
disambiguation:
relative clauses
apposition
verb complementation
negative verb domains
report clauses
clause complements
111. What is marked tonicity? Identify the different exceptions to the rule of broad focus mentioned by
Tench, and provide examples
112. What are the functions of the fall? Describe them from the point of view of the attitudinal approach
and the grammatical approach.
113. Describe the phonetic realisation of the p tone and its functions.
114. The low drop, the high drop and the long jump: compare and contrast.
115. Explain the differences in meaning between the high drop and the low drop.
116. Relate the low drop and the high drop to Brazil's approach.
117. Compare Tench's use of the word "dominance" to Brazil's. How are they different?
118. Characterise the uses of the low rise according to the attitudinal and the grammatical approaches.
119. Characterise the uses of the high rise according to the attitudinal and the grammatical approaches.
120. Characterise the r+ tone and its uses in telling moves and asking moves.
121. Can Tench's notion of "deference" be equalled with Brazil's concept of "dominance"? Why/ Why not?
126. How can the fall rise interact with statements containing "any"? Provide examples.
Intonation of questions
131. Draw a chart showing the possible intonations of the different kinds of questions according to
the grammatical approach.
132. Discuss intonation of tail questions according to the grammatical approach.
133. What is the typical tone used in Yes/ no questions, according to the attitudinal approach?
134. According to the discoursal approach, what factor(s) determine(s) the intonation of questions?
135. Why does Brazil say that there is no such thing as "intonation of questions"? What does
discourse consist of, then?
136. Discuss and provide examples of questions to check and of questions to find out.
137. What is the effect of asking as yes/no question with a falling tone, according to the grammatical
and the attitudinal approaches?
138. What is the value of the r+ tone in Wh- questions? Provide examples.
139. When can a 'Yes/No' question take a p tone?
140. Can a speaker ask a question with referring tone if s/he cannot make any assumptions about
what the answer will be (i.e. if the speaker has no way of inferring the answer)? Justify.
141. You want to ask for a favour, saying Can you do me a favour? What tone should you use?
Why?
142. What tone would you use if you offered help or a service, e.g. in Can I help you? Account for
your choice.
143. What is the communicative value of high termination in a question to find out?
144. What is the communicative value of high termination in a question to check?
Orientation