Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wahyu Ariefuddin Siregar, Text Analysis Procedure2, NPM 2116010010
Wahyu Ariefuddin Siregar, Text Analysis Procedure2, NPM 2116010010
11 FINDINGS Individuals are legally responsible not only if objectively harmful FINDINGS The perpetrators of trademark biolations have benefited themselves which
affects are carried out forbidden, but also because the actions have resulted in losses for registered mark owners.
been intended even without wrong intentions.
12 CONCLUSIONS Criminal law consequences of Perpetrators and Victims of CONCLUSIONS The Manifest in ht impostion of criminal sanctions as stipulated in the
embezzlement crimes by a Notary Officer is that the perpetrators must provisions of Article 100 and Article 101 of the Trademark and
be held accountable for Their Actions Legally where as victims who Geographical Indication law
suffer losses due to criminal acts are processed to be given criminal
sanctions through the criminal justice process at the Denpasar Distric
Court.
13 THE SIMILARITIES 1. The similarties between these two journals is the same as the THE SIMILARITIES 1. The similarties between these two journals is the same as the
crime scene. crime scene.
2. The similarties between these two journal is the legal 2. The similarties between these two journal is the legal consequence
consequence is imprisonment is imprisonment
14 THE DIFFERENCES 1. In the first journal the occurrence of criminal act of THE DIFFERENCES 1. In the second journal there is a violation commited by someone
embezzlemet commited by individual which harmed the victim against Brand rights.
2. The type of punichment carried out in the first journal case is 2. The type of punishment carried out in the second journal case is
the main criminal sentence without any fines. the principal criminal penalty plus a fine or compensation for the
loss caused by the Brand Rights.