Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Done - Q27 Mansard
Done - Q27 Mansard
Consequences
Mansard will be liable for any bribery acts performed by its employees
Its global in scope
Tarnish Mansard’s reputation and may lose potential clients
Fines and penalties may be imposed on Mansard
In the worst-case scenario, the operating license of Mansard may be revoked threatening
their going concern assumption
Incur legal costs to defend the case in Court
Negative impact on cashflow and profits
Recommendations
Employee references
Consequences
May hire incompetent employees who will not fit into the job scope
May hire poor integrity employees
o Mistakes and fraudulent activities may be undertaken by these employees
Incur additional costs to rectify these mistakes / retrain these employees
Adverse / negative impact on cashflow and profit
Recommendations
Communicate to the HR department that all employees must include a minimum of two
references within their application form and this condition should be stipulated within the
employment contract
One of the references must be from the previous employer
Without the references, their employment will not be confirmed and may be terminated
after a period of time
Implement monitoring procedures
Consequences
This would result in material misstatements in the financial statements and with both
revenue and profits overstated
Mansard would pay additional taxes and bonuses would have been paid for non-existent
revenue.
Ill-informed decisions would also be made by the management of Mansard as the
information reported would be unreliable. This would have a negative impact on both its
cashflow and profits.
Recommendations
Gable
As the NCA has been disposed, it should be removed from the NCA register and failing to do
so would result in an overstatement of NCA.
In addition, the recoverability of the overpayment is now doubtful and in accordance with
IAS 37, a provision should be recognized. Refusal to adjust by the management would result
in an overstatement of assets and similarly this represents a disagreement.
A qualified opinion should therefore be issued. An explanation together with its impact
should be included after the opinion paragraph under the heading “Basis of Qualified
Opinion”.
Hip
$170k (185-30) represents 11.3% of PBT and 3.2% of TA is material to the FS.
As there are no alternative procedures to substantiate the amount due from Dome together
with the existence of the debts, we should therefore issue a modified report on the basis of
insufficient evidence.
An explanation together with its impact should be included after the opinion paragraph
under the heading “Basis of Qualified Opinion”. In addition, we are unable to confirm that:
o proper accounting records were kept; and
o we have received all information and explanations.