Professional Documents
Culture Documents
STW 43-WP.6 - Report of Drafting Group 1 (Drafting Group)
STW 43-WP.6 - Report of Drafting Group 1 (Drafting Group)
DISCLAIMER
As at its date of issue, this document, in whole or in part, is subject to consideration by the IMO organ
to which it has been submitted. Accordingly, its contents are subject to approval and amendment
of a substantive and drafting nature, which may be agreed after that date.
General
2 The group was attended by representatives from the following Member States:
AUSTRALIA MALAYSIA
CHINA MARSHALL ISLANDS
DENMARK NORWAY
GEORGIA PHILIPPINES
GERMANY POLAND
INDIA REPUBLIC OF KOREA
INDONESIA SWEDEN
IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF) SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
ITALY UNITED KINGDOM
JAPAN UNITED STATES
LATVIA
I:\STW\43\WP\6.doc
STW 43/WP.6
Page 2
Terms of reference
3 The group, taking into account decisions, comments and proposals made in
Plenary, was instructed to:
Revised model course on the operational use of Electronic Chart Display and
Information Systems (ECDIS)
4 As instructed, the group considered the draft model course on the operational use of
Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems (ECDIS) set out in the annex to document
STW 43/3/1, taking into account decisions and comments made in plenary, together with the
following documents that provided comments and proposed amendments: STW 43/3/9
(GlobalMET), STW 43/3/10 (ICS et al), STW 43/3/11 (Finland and Germany), STW 43/3/19
(Poland), STW 43/3/20 (United Kingdom) and STW 43/3/21 (United Kingdom).
5 The group was of the opinion that the model course should not be too prescriptive in
particular with regard to the hardware requirements. In view of this, the group focused on
identifying learning objectives and avoiding details of a 'prescriptive' nature. The group
agreed to make changes to give greater flexibility and practicability to the model course.
An example of an equipment set up for ECDIS training is placed as an appendix to the model
course.
6 Regarding staff requirements, majority of the group was of the view that ECDIS
course is primarily a technical course designed to teach proper operation of an ECDIS.
The group agreed that the only qualification and experience needed to deliver this ECDIS
course which contain element from both the management and operational section of the
STCW Code is an Officer of a Watch Certificate of competency. United States, supported by
Denmark, IAMU and others, commented that this course alone is not intended to fulfil the
competency and therefore we believe the instructor qualifications set out in the model
courses are appropriate, However, the United Kingdom, supported by others, expressed the
views that management level courses should be delivered by trainers with relevant
management level qualifications and experience. In case of an ECDIS course, the level of
qualification and experience should either be an STCW Master's qualification or other
qualification or experience at the discretion of the administration approving the course.
7 The group was of the opinion that trainees should be fully aware of the nature, risk
and methods taken to resolve ECDIS anomalies. In particular, it should be understood that
as a software driven system, ECDIS will remain susceptible to future anomalies and that
advice and guidance regarding this matter will from time to time be made available to ships.
Therefore, the group agreed to incorporate an "anomalies" item in the detailed teaching
syllabus.
I:\STW\43\WP\6.doc
STW 43/WP.6
Page 3
10 As instructed, the group considered the draft model course on Ship Security Officer
set out in the annex to document STW 43/3/3, taking into account decisions and comments
made in plenary together with document STW 43/3/23 (Norway) that provided comments and
proposed amendments.
11 Regarding the entry standards, the group noted that no specific entry standards
were required to attend the course. In that respect, the group agreed that in order to obtain
a Certificate of Proficiency as Ship Security Officer, the trainee shall obtain approved
seagoing service as mentioned in STCW Regulation VI/5 as amended, in addition to meeting
the standard of competence as ship security officer.
12 In light of the above discussions in paragraphs 10 and 11, the group prepared
amendments to the text of the model course on Ship Security Officer, as set out in
annex 2.
New model course on Security training for seafarers with designated security duties
13 As instructed, the group considered the draft model course on Security awareness
training for seafarers with designated security duties, set out in the annex 1 to document
STW 43/3/2, taking into account decisions and comments made in plenary together with
document STW 43/3/14 (China) that provided comments and proposed amendments.
14 Regarding the use of citadels, the group discussed the inclusion of citadel training in
the draft model course. It was agreed that citadels were not universally used on ships and
that training for their use where fitted should be a matter for an individual ship's Safety
Management System and the group considered that it was appropriate to add "use of citadel
where provided on board" as a subtopic under hijacking or seizure of ships or of persons on
board and make reference to MSC.1/Circ.1334 on Guidance to Shipowners and Ship
Operators, Shipmasters and Crews on Preventing and Suppressing Acts of Piracy and
Armed Robbery against Ships.
15 In light of the above discussions in paragraphs 13 and 14, the group prepared
amendments to the text of the new model course on Security awareness training for
seafarers with designated security duties, as set out in annex 3.
16 As instructed, the group considered the draft model course on Security awareness
training for all seafarers set out in the annex 2 of document STW 43/3/2, taking into account
decisions and comments made in plenary.
17 After some discussion, the group prepared amendments to the text of the new
model course on Security awareness training for all seafarers, as set out in annex 4.
I:\STW\43\WP\6.doc
STW 43/WP.6
Page 4
***
I:\STW\43\WP\6.doc
STW 43/WP.6
Annex 1, page 1
ANNEX 1
***
I:\STW\43\WP\6.doc
STW 43/WP.6
Annex 2, page 1
ANNEX 2
Page 6 Objective
Replace subparagraph .3 as follows:
"coordinating the security aspects of passengers, and/or the handling of
cargo and ship's stores with other shipboard personnel and with the
relevant Port Facility Security Officers"
I:\STW\43\WP\6.doc
STW 43/WP.6
Annex 2, page 2
Page 21 Table
In item number 4 – Ship Security Assessment, replace the hours by 1.25
Page 23 Table
In item number 6 – Ship Security Plan, replace the hours by 2.0
Page 27 Table
In item number 10 – Security Administration, replace the hours by 1.0
***
I:\STW\43\WP\6.doc
STW 43/WP.6
Annex 3, page 1
ANNEX 3
Page 1 Title
Delete the word "awareness"
***
I:\STW\43\WP\6.doc
STW 43/WP.6
Annex 4, page 1
ANNEX 4
Delete reference R6
2.3 Definition:
In the third line, delete the word "(BMP 3)"
I:\STW\43\WP\6.doc
STW 43/WP.6
Annex 4, page 2
__________
I:\STW\43\WP\6.doc