Project Title % 00 SENORO DEVEL! APPROVED JOINT OPERATING BODY PERTAMINA ~ MEDCO E&P TOMORI SULAWESI : MATERIAL OFFLOADING FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENORO Document Title : BASIS OF DESIGN Document No. : SNO-C-DB-60-101 ‘Nomber of Atachnens| : ‘Number of Pages| 34 Paes [ORIGIN. [CHECKED] ‘APPROVED BY REV DATE PURPOSE ‘NAME | NAME | NAME | NAME. DATE a ‘3077012 ISSUE FOR REVIEW ‘au | ¥PO extor12 ISSUE FOR APPROVAL aif [ro] [asa [nw JOINT OPERATING BODY PERTAMINA - MEDCO E&P TOMORI SULAWESI MATERIAL OFFLOADING FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENORO-Doe. No. : > | BASIS OF DESIGN anOlO nncotel ae. reocoot MATERIAL OFFLOADING a is A 34 FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENORO- Rev, Date ; 01/10/2012 CONTENTS........ LIST OF FIGURE LIST OF TABLES. 1.0 Ll 12 13 14 15 1.6 20 at 22 23 3.0 3.1 32 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. Purpose... Base Case Marine Facilities. DESIGN CRITERIA... Design Ship... Material .. 2.2.1 Reinforced Concrete... 2.2.2 Reinforcement Bar..... 2.2.3 Steel Profile... 2.2.4 — Concrete Spun Pil Concrete Cover. LOAD DESIGN... Vertical Load... 3.1.1 Dead Load and Superimposed Dead Load .. 3.1.2 Live Load.. Environment Load. 3.2.1 Current Load 3.2.2. Wind Load on Structure...Doe. No. ae BASIS OF DESIGN NG Cina aeaei we O Rev. Page: PemTAMna rococo MATERIAL OFFLOADING B Bota FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENORO Rev. Date : 01/10/2012 33 34 35 40 41 42 50 5.1 52 33 60 61 62 63 70 3.23 Impact and Mooring Load.. 33.1 Berthing Speed. 3.3.2 Berthing Impact Load 33.3 Mooring Load Seismic Load. Loading Condition and Combination, 3.5.1 Load Conditions 3.5.2. Load Combination... 3.5.3. Super-Structure Design 3.5.4 Sub-Structure Design. DESIGN LIFE AND CORROSION PROTECTION GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN .. Geotechnical and Pile Design Safety Factor Design and Analysis Software... CODE AND STANDARD.. Marine Facilities Planning and Design Structural Design. Geotechnical... DESIGN AND ANALYSIS SOFTWARE ..Figure 3.1 Figure 3.2 Figure 3.3 Figure 3.4 Figure 3.5 Figure 3.6 Figure 3.7 Figure 3.8 Figure 3.9 Figure 3.10Response Spectrum 500 year return period Doc. No. SNO-C-DB-60-101 BASIS OF DESIGN Rew: Page: MATERIAL OFFLOADING B ireca FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENORO Rev. Date : 01/10/2012 LIST OF FIGURE Crawler Crane Cometto Trailer (for reference).. Truck T-45 (500 kN)... Drag coefficient Cp for superstructure with solid elevation. Design berthing velocity (BS 6349: Part 4) Lateral wind force coefficient at forward aft perpendiculars. Longitudinal wind force coefficient. Longitudinal current force coefficient and lateral current force coefficient at the forward and aft perpendiculars. 24 Maximum peak ground acceleration at bedrock SB for Indonesia with 500 year return period (SNI 03-1726-2002)Panama react MATERIAL OFFLOADING B Table 2.1 Table 2.2 Table 2.3 Table 2.4 Table 2.5 Table 2.6 Table 3.1 Table 3.2 Table 3.3 Table 3.4 Table 3.5 Table 3.6 Table 3.7 Table 4.1 Table 5.1 Doe. No. oF BASIS OF DESIGN SNO-C-DB-60-101 Rev. Page : Sof 34 FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENORO Rey. Date : 01/10/2012 LIST OF TABLES Permissible Crack Width in Reinforced Concrete According to ACI Committee(>. Steel Reinforcement Characteristi Nominal Cover and Design Crack Width. Drag coefficient CD for piers. Inertia Coefficient. Inertia Coefficient. Mooring Load (OCDI). Reduction factor R in accordance with SNI 03-1726-2002. Importance factor in accordance with SNI 1726-2002().. Load Combinatior Typical rates of corrosion for structural stels in temperate cimatesyy Soil factor for soil bearing capacityDoo N a BASIS OF DESIGN aac esiti zw a a rae Pemann rocooica MATERIAL OFFLOADING io CEPA FACILITY (MOH JETTY SENORO |-—B_—1_— Set 10 Wl 12 13 INTRODUCTION Purpose This report covers the basis design of Material Off Loading Facility (MOF) Jetty Senoro Project which to be built by PT. Adhi Karya (persero) Tbk. The MOF included causeway, trestle, and jetty head. ‘The pupose of this document is to present design criteria that will be used in conjuction with engineering and construction drawing. Base Case Marine Facilities ‘Those report that have conjuction with this basis design are: © Design of causeway; © Design of trestle construction; © Design of jetty head construction; Simulation of port hidro-oceanographic simulation is inclusive of this design works. Structure of The Report This report is Volume II Part 1 of the following report which has been arranged for this project in order to presents technical approach and results. The structure of the report is as follow: Volume I: Site Survey and Soil Investigation Report Document No. Part I: Soil Investigation Method of Statement (MOS) | _SNO-B-SO-60- 111 Part 2: Soil Investigation Report SNO-C—RP-60- 107 Volume I: Design Calculation Report Report Document No. Part 1: Basis of Design ‘SNO- C- DB - 60- 101 Part 2: Design Report Jetty Head Substructure SNO-C=RP - 60- 101 Part 3: Design Report Jeity Head Superstucture SNO-C—RP- 60- 102 Part 4: Design Report Trestle Substructure SNO- C=RP- 60- 103 Part 5: Design Report Trestle Superstructure SNO-C=RP- 60- 104 Part 6: Design Report Causeway Substructure SNO—C—RP- 60- 105 Part 7: Design Report Causeway Superstructure SNO- C= RP - 60- 10614 15 1.6 > G SNO-C-DB-60-101 y he Rev. Page Parramina recone MATERIAL OFFLOADING B of 34 Doc. No. : BASIS OF DESIGN FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENORO Rey. Date : 01/10/2012 Volume IN: Drawin; Document No. SNO-G-IN-60-101 Deliverable List Volume IV: Technical Specification This report is Volume II: Part 1 Reference Some reference document has been used in developing this design as well as this report. They are as follow: © Basic Design Report Rev.02, PT. LAPI ITB, 28 June 2012; © Soil Investigation and Survey Blanket Contract Senoro & Sulawesi Area, PT SURVEYOR INDONESIA, February 2008; © Final Report, PT. LAPI ITB, 2011; U All units are in SI unit. Language Language in this report will in English.2.0 2A 22 Doc. No. : ‘SNO-C-DB-60-101 Rev. Page: MATERIAL OFFLOADING B 8 of 34 FACILITY (MOF) JE (MOH JETTY SENORO [22 Date : 01/10/2012 BASIS OF DESIGN DESIGN CRITERIA This basic design work is performed principally according to the following criteria. Design Ship The facility shall be able to accommodate type 2,500 DWT ship (Max.) with the following particulars: Table2.1 Ship Characteristic Max. 2,500 DWT | Tug Boat LOA (Length of Overall) | 63 m (210 ft) 20.16 m B (Breadth Molded) 16.8 m(56 ft) sam D (Depth) 3.6 m (12 ft) - d Draft) 3.1m (10) 2.6m This specification has been based on general cargo type ship. Back side of jetty head is used for tugboat. Material ‘The following represent the standard of performance for entire offshore facilities. 2.2.1 Reinforced Concrete The following was used as the basis in this design. Table 2.2 Concrete Grade Floor/Slab (precast and cast in place) | K.300 | c= 249 kg/m? Beam (precast and cast in place) K.300 | fc= 249 kgicm? Pile Cap (precast and cast in place) | K.300 | c= 249 kg/cm? Concrete Fill For Pile (cast in place) | K.300 | Pe=249 kgiem? ‘The deflection of structural member, i.e., plate and beam should be in accordance with the SNI 03-2847-2002 (Table 9 Lendutan Izin Maksimum) as follows. Table 2.3 Deflection Control of Reinforced Conerete Member. ‘Tenis Komponen struktur Lendutan yang diperhitungkan | Batas lendutan ‘Atap datar yang tidak menahan atau | Lendutan seketika akibat beban hidup (L) e tidak disatukan dengan komponen aa ‘nonstruktural yang mungkin akan rusak oleh lendutan yang besarBASIS OF DESIGN Doe. No. | SNO-C-DB-60-101 MATERIAL OFFLOADING B FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENORO Rev. Page 9 of 34 Rey. Date : 01/10/2012 Jeais komponen struktur Lenduian yang diperhitungkan | Batas lendutan [Lanai yang tidak menahan ata tidak | Lendutan seketikaakibat beban hidup (L) t disatukan dengan komponen a nonstruktural yang mungkin akan sak oleh lendutan yang besar ‘Konsiruksi aap atau lantal yang | Bagian dari Tendutan tral yang tejadi P menahan sta disaukan dengan | setlah pemasangan Komponen | 4g5 Komponen nonstruktural yang nonstuktural (jumlah deri lendutan smungkin akan rusk oleh lendutan | jangka panjang,akibat semua beban tetap yang beser yang bekerja, dan lendutan se ‘Kontruksiaop alu anal yang) iba penambaban beban hidup)* al menahan atau disatukan dengan — Komponen nonstruktural yang, aad mungkin idk akan rusak oleh lendutan yang besar ‘Batasan ii tidak dimaksodkan untuk mencegah Kemunghinan penggenangan ar. Kenungkinen penggenangan air hares [am | aco | aoo | aw | s00 | 800 | 3m ea Per ‘a [ 2m | 200] [253 -[ 253 [255 | 253 | 283 | 253 [253 | 253 | 28 | 2s Figure 3.2 Cometto Trailer (for reference)Doe. No: a BASIS OF DESIGN ane De one £2 Oo Rev. Page PERTAMINA MincotsEnc: MATERIAL OFFLOADING B 15 of 34 FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENORO Rev. Date : 01/10/2012 Figure 3.3, ‘Truck T-45 (500 kN) 3.2. Environment Load 3.2.1 Current Load From data that provided by Clients, current speed for the use of structural design is 0.59 m/s. ‘The current induced drag loads on piles is calculated by the following formula based on Clause 38.2 of BS6349 : Part 1 : 2000. 1 a Fy =2xCpxpxV?x4, i Pp Where: Fo: steady drag force (kN) 2 : density of fluid (1.025 t/m’ for the sea water) Ay : area normal to flow (m”) (marine growth thickness is assumed as 150 mm) v : incident current velocity (mm/sec) Co: drag coefficient (Cp = 1.0 for the tube pile) Current load will considered marine growth of 150 mm thick. 3.2.2 Wind Load on Structure Wind force acting on the surface of upperstructure is calculated according to BS 5400: Part 2 Clause 5.3 Wind load: 1978. Wind force acting on the surface of deck with the projected area, A, is calculated as follow:Doe. No. | -~ : BASIS OF DESIGN SNO-C-DB-60-101 Ms QO Rev. Page: PeRTAMINA vectra MATERIAL OFFLOADING B 16 of 34 FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENORO Rev. Date : 01/10/2012 =qxAxCp 4g =0613xK 2 Fy = wind load (N) q : dynamic pressure head (N/m?) A : solid area (m?) Cp : drag coefficient (from either Figure 5 an Table 9 from BS 5400:Part 2) Vc: design wind speed Design wind speed in accordance with paragraph Sa. Winds can occur from any direction. Wind load for design of the construction is taken 120km/hr of speed. Drag Coefficient: e : t ttt | 1 Figure 3.4 Drag coefficient Cp for superstructure with solid elevation ee a e363 a a6 B90 2Doe. No: ~~ BASIS OF DESIGN SNO-C-DB-60:101 we iM ag Prana rusts MATERIAL OFFLOADING B 47 of 4 FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENORO Rev. Date : 01/10/2012 Table 3.1 _ Drag coefficient CD for piers. Cotas 4 ts 18 182022 1418 18 18 20 22 1304 18 18 18 20 42 sa oo 1 2 a3 os 08 08 09 10 12 os os om 08 os ty mow OBO] wa oe Cprrsveorocraon | a7 08 ov op 10 an 13 “GINGLEWiTH SMOOTH SURFACE WHERE os wh arpa an Chl hal aactngenampeng aoa teeta on Sirens onthogwsnsteacud ora ower Pagan tems sear 3.2.3 Wave Load Design wave accordingly to “Basic Design of Material Off Loading Facility of Senoro Project, PT. LAPI ITB”. Wave height at storm condition show an average of 2.2 m may occur in the area of interest. Wave load on a pile is calculated by the following Morison’s equation when the wave length is larger than five times as long as the pile diameter in accordance with Clause 39.4, Wave forces, BS6349 : Part 1 : 2000. This equation is based on the assumption that cross-section of the piles is sufficiently small compare to the wave length and the local gradient of the water particle acceleration and velocity along the pile is to be neglected. The Morison’s equation is expressed as follows:BASISOF DESIGN | SNo.c-pp-so-i01 Rev.) Page: MATERIAL OFFLOADING B Siacree FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENORO Rev. Date : 01/10/2012 F : horizontal force per unit length of pile (kN/m) F, + inertia force per unit length of pile (kN/m) Fy: drag force per unit length of pile (kN/m) 2 : density of fluid (1.025 t/m? of seawater) D : diameter of pile (m) + allowance for marine growth 150 mm u : horizontal particle velocity at the axis of pile (m/sec) dwdt — : horizontal particle acceleration at the axis of pile (m/sec) C, inertia or mass coefficient (C, = 2.0 for tube pile) Cy —_: drag coefficient (C4= 1.0 for tube pile) Z : wave length (m) Table 3.2 Inertia Coefficient. Inertia coeBcicat 20D) 219d) Lor Diet — ost Dita — 03s Dit-=— 10 (Source: Clouse 5.4.1 Part I, Techical Standards for Port and Harbour Facts in Japan), Note:- This table is applicable for D<0.1LDoe, Nov? SNO-C-DB-60-101 Rew: Page? MATERIAL OFFLOADING ms Ti of 4 FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENORO Rey. Date: 0171072012 BASIS OF DESIGN Table33 Inertia Coefficient. Projected ree | Dmg concent = — = =i ne 20>) == =OH » [= pe Last (Source: Clause 72 Part I, Technical Standards for Port and Harbour Facilites Japan). Total wave force is obtained by the said Morison’s equation (F=F;+F,) and the drag force Fy depends on wave particle velocity and the inertia force Fj; depends on wave particle acceleration. 3.3. Impact and Mooring Load Impact or so called berthing impact load and mooring load are produced by ship during berthing and mooring. 3.3.1 Berthing Speed Berthing speed is a very important factor in determining the berthing energy. In this project berthing speed is taken based on BS 6349 Part 4 as follow:Doe. No.: = BASIS OF DESIGN SNO-C-DB-60-101 we & fess: PeRTAMINA rect MATERIAL OFFLOADING i. ea eaal FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENORO Rev. Date : 01/10/2012 Cool y 000 ie | —— i Se pow SD 3 ° 0.20 : “) 2 5) 50 100 500 Water displacement in 1000 tonne Figure 1— Design berthing velocity as function of navigation conditions and size of vessel (Brolsma et al. 1977) Figure3.S Design berthing velocity (BS 6349: Part 4) Condition of berthing: a) Good berthing, sheltered b) Difficult berthing, sheltered ©) Easy berthing, exposed 4) Good berthing, exposed ¢) Navigation conditions difficult, exposed From the graph and berthing conditions it is important to limited berthing condition of ship. The ship should not berth at high waves condition. Berthing velocity in this project were assumed 0.25 m/s! with tug boat assisted, 3.3.2 Berthing Impact Load The berthing energy is calculated as follow: Max Ship 2,500 DWT: En =0.SMD*Cn*C,*Co*Co#V9> Ean = SF*En (=1.5xSF) Design of Material off Loading Faility of Senoro Project, PT. LAPI ITBDoe. No.: > BASIS OF DESIGN SNO-C-DB-60-101 we oO Re Page PERTAMINA Hocotnncl MATERIAL OFFLOADING B 21 of 34 FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENO} (mor ENORO | Rey, Date : 01/10/2012 En is defined as normal berthing impact and Ean as abnormal berthing impact. BS 6349 recommend a safety factor ranging from 1.5 to 2.0. This project will incorporate a safety factor of LS. Where: E = effective berthing energy (ton-m); MD —_=displacement of the ship (ton), assume to be 1.3 x DWT; Vn = Velocity of the ship taken normal to the berth (m/sec); =0.25 m/s Cn =hydrodynamic mass coefficient; =142D/B C, = softness coefficient; C. = configuration coefficient (1.0 for open type pier and 0.9 for closed type pier); C. = eccentricity coefficient; = (K’+R?cos")(K7+R?) D = draught of vessel (m); B = beam of vessel; R = distance of point of contact from the centre of mass in m; K —_=radius of gyration of the ship; velocity factor; 0 = berthing angle; = 10° The ship berthing process recognized as parallel berthing in such the berthing angle are very small. Vessel load due to wave, current, wind are outside of this design scope of work. However some measurement is taken to consider the above. © The fender berthing energy to increased by a certain factor of safety 25%; Thus by this the reaction of fender will also exceed as per the performance curve provided by supplier; ‘© The mooring forces due to the wind force and current force will be overwhelmed by statement obtained from references; Exceedance of forces due to the asymmetric berthing layout is outside of this design.Doe. No. : = ¥ BASIS OF DESIGN SNO-C-DB-60-101 ge Oo ass Pemaminn rots MATERIAL OFFLOADING B 22 of 34 FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENORO Fe grant Fender absorption will be under the basis of one fender contact that is each fender will be absorbing a maximum of Ean. The proposed fender is V-fender. 3.3.3 Mooring Load Mooring foree. The safe mooring forces shall be estabilished in accordance with the Minimum Breaking Limits fo the total number of mooring lines to be put out to a mooring or breasting dolphin or jetty (EMBL). The number of mooring lines will depend on the type of vessel and the maximum number of mooring lines that can be attached to each one mooring dolphin or breasting dolphin or jetty will depend on the optimum mooring line pattern that can be achieved. For this project the mooring point load taken 35 ton for single mooring point load. However, wind and current action on moored ship has been conducted under the following procedure. Longitudinal Wind Force: re ea( Bg) as Lateral Wind Force: Rat C( sig Va A ‘Wind Yaw Moment: Cyy = non-dimensional Longitudinal Force Coefficient; Cyy =non-dimensional Transverse Force Coefficient; Myyy =Non-dimensional Yaw Moment Coefficient; Pw lensity of air; V = velocity of wind at 10 m elevation knots Aq = longitudinal (Head-on) area in m* Ay, = Longitudinal (broadside) area in m* Lye = length between perpendiculars in m Fyy = longitudinal wind force in tonnes Fyw = lateral wind force in tonnesDoc. No. = 2 | BASIS OF DESIGN SNO-C-DB-60-101 sx” Rev Page: PERTAMINA MeocoteN MATERIAL OFFLOADING B 23 of 34 FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENORO Rey. Date : 01/10/2012 Mw = yaw moment in tonnes meters Coefficient used in the calculation is as follow: LATERAL WIND FORCE COEFFICIENT AT THE FORWARD AND AFT PERPENDICULARS: Svan Syew C. yaw yen 80100 0 WIND ANGLE OF ATTACK, 6, Figure 3.6 Lateral wind force coefficient at forward aft perpendiculars. "nud tNct OF ATTACE;OQ Figure 3.7 Longitudinal wind foree coefficient. Longitudinal Current Force:Doe. No.: BASIS OF DESIGN genome Rev : MATERIAL OFFLOADING St |lenaa aaa FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENORO coe Rev. Date : 01/10/2012 Lateral Current Force at Forward Perpendicular: Eyre Cyr Bea )eVoxTeLe LONG/TUDINAL CURRENT FORCE COEFPICIENT AND LATEAAS. CURRENT Om COEFFICIENT AT THE FORMARD AND AFT PERPENDIGULARS WATER DEDTW To ORAFT RATIO = us WATER DEPTH TO DRAFT RATIO = 204 See Gime vee ‘0304000 ao io 120140 Tea Tho 1 a0 T6000 (CURRENT ANGLE OF ATTACK, CURRENT ANGLE OF ATTAGK, Figure 3.8 Longitudinal current force coefficient and lateral current force coefficient at the forward and aft perpendiculars. The dimensions and the load on the mooring facilities can also be determined by using a references which is presented in the table below. Table3.4 Mooring Load (OCD1) Gross tonnage (GT) | Tractive force acting | Tractive force acting of vessel (fons) _| on mooring post (KN) | on a bollard (KN) 200 BASIS OF DESIGN eNom ie el ©) Rev. Page: Pemranma ocr MATERIAL OFFLOADING B 28 of 34 FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENORO Rev. Date : 01/10/2012 For seismic loading condition applied in 2 major directions as follow: © 100% EQx + 30% EQy © 30% EQx + 100% EQy 3.5 Loading Condition and Combination 3.5.1 Load Conditions Basic loading condition taken into consideration in this design will be divided into three main categories as follows: © Berth Working; Vessel moored; © Abnormal Berthing: © Seismic: no wind or wave load; Load combination shall be design to ensure application of the worst load combination for sizing of, and determination of maximum stress levels in the individual members of the structure. Where applied wind, wave, or current loads cause lower stress levels than without their exposure, their effects shall be eliminated from the relevant load combination. Following three cases are to be analyzed (service load combination, load factor combination, and seismic combination). ‘The upper structure should be design to resist all combination of loads which may realistically be assumed to act on the structure simultaneously. Loads may act directly on the super structure or indirect via the piles. For both limit state and working stress design methods, the individual loads to be used in each combination are described as nomial loads, as defined in 3.15.3 of POLB (Port of Long Beach) v2.0. 3.5.2 Load Combination The load combinations is based on POLB (Port of Long Beach V2.0), with conditions of service loads and factored loads. Load factors and load combinations represented in the following table.Doe. No, BASIS OF DESIGN SNO-C-DB-60-101 = a Oo rare ee PeRTAMNA vectra MATERIAL OFFLOADING B 29 of 34 FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENOR« cor ‘ORO | Rev, Date : 01/10/2012 ‘Table 3.7 Load Combination? Table 3: «Load Factors for LFD and LD LOAD FACTOR DESIGN (LFDY’ LOAD COMBINATION FACTORS. oe D Ly E w BE | R+S+T | EQ | BU M 1 | te |t= oo | =| oe a uff owl asf -| el—-[ se or o | — | 16] as] — oa v a | vce] ort | Sean] Cire) ee] ea ees wfimfiuwflul-|—-|—-f»elos MI el 10 - - = 10 - ve SERVICE LOAD DESIGN (SLD) LOAD COMBINATION FACTORS Case tia > [es] e | w | se [rset] eo] au | x | sues i rof tof cof — | -[ - [—] 0] — | 10m u ro 1o| cof cof —[ 1 [fal — 1 10 rof io] — | [—| of — Vv 10] oi} ro} o3 | 10} — - 10} — v rof sof cof cof — [| - [-| 10] 10 ; “The Load Factor Design require the strength reduction factors, § as specified in ACT-318 2008. ® For te load factor of crane load case see Table 3-1 Reduce load factor 00.9 for dead load (D) to check members for minimum axial load aud ‘maximum moment. 4 For wiform live load only. © K = 050 (PGA), to account for the affects of the vertical component of ground acceleration. The K-factor shall be applied to the vertical dead load (D) only. not tothe inertia mass ofthe whact ? Port of Long Beach (POLB)Doe. No. = BASIS OF DESIGN SNO-C-DB-60-101 we Oo Rew Page: PERTAMINA Hocotnnct MATERIAL OFFLOADING B 30 of 34 FACILITY (MOF) JETTY (MOR) JETTY SENORO Tey. Date | 01/10/2012 Load Srmbols D = Dead Load Live Load Impact Load Buovancy Load Berthing Load Enh Pressure Load Earthquake Load ‘Wind load Creep sib shortening Lood Shrinkage Load Temperature Load Mooring Lead 3.5.3 Super-Structure Di For super structure design, load combination to be considered is based on Service Load Design (SLD) and Load Factor Design (LFD). ‘The Load Factor Design is use to design reinforcement of concrete member. The Service Load Design is use to check stress, crack on concrete member. 3.5.4 Sub-Structure Design For substructure design, load combination to be considered is based on Service Load Design (SLD). The Service Load Design is use to design the foundation member as well as the soil bearing capacity.—__— ‘Doe. No. = a : BASIS OF DESIGN SNO-C-DB-60-101 Q Rev. Page : Pemtamina mocooncs MATERIAL OFFLOADING B 31 of 34 FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENORO [ao 4.0 DESIGN LIFE AND CORROSION PROTECTION 4.1 Design Life The design life of structures shall be 20 years with the intention that minimal maintenance will be required to major structural items within the design life. 4.2. Corrosion Rate Corrosion rate used will be as follow BS 6349-1: 2000 Clause 59, Table 4.1 Typical rates of corrosion for structural steels in temperate climates. Corrosion rate (mm/sidelyear) Exposure Zone Mean™ Upper limit” “Atmospheric zone: 0.04 0.10 = above splash zone and where direct wave or spray impingement is infrequent Splash zone: 0.08 0.17 = _above mean high-water and mean low-water spring level Tidal zone: 008 ol ~_ between mean high-water and mean low-water spring level Tntertidal zone: 0.08 0.17 ~__between low-water spring and 0.5 meter below LAT Continuous seawater immersion zone: 0104 013 ~__from 0.5 meter below LAT to seabed level Below seabed level or in contact with soil . oo na 7 The rae is for each face exposed fo the environment ofthe zone ® The upper limit Figures are the 95% probability values.Dow. Now? =) BASIS OF DESIGN SNO-C-DB-60-101 w= 2 i Pas: PERTAMINA pacocotNtncs MATERIAL OFFLOADING B 32 of 34 FACILITY (Mt NOR (MOR JETTY SENORO 2 Date: 01/10/2012 5.0 1 52 53 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN Geotechnical and Pile Design Geotechnical pile design will be in general compliance with API RP 2A-WSD and applicable British Standard. It is anticipated that piles will be founded on hard soil strata and that pile settlement effects will be not significant, Factors of safety equivalent to the following working stress factor of safety will achieved. Safety Factor Safety factor for soil bearing capacity in this project taken as follow: ‘Table 5.1 Soil factor for sol bearing capacity Seismic T Description Normal | Point | Friction | Remark Bearing | Bearing Vertical Bearing Capacity 23 15 2.0 Pulling out force 25 25 Design and Analysis Software Design and analysis shall be carried out the software as follow: * For pile design and check: ALLPILE (CIVILTECH); * For causeway design and check: PLAXIS 3-D; * Pile Driving Analysis (FADWAVE or MICROWAVE); All the above software will be validated in such both manual calculation and computer calculated produced good agreement.Doc. No, : = | BASIS OF DESIGN SNO-C-DB-60-101 ae Revi | Page: Pemramia cote MATERIAL OFFLOADING 5 care FACILITY (MOF) JETTY SENOR eae a Rev. Date : 01/10/2012 6.0 CODE AND STANDARD 6.1 Marine Facilities Planning and Design 1 British Standard Code of Practice for Marine Structures - Part 1-6, BS6349: British ‘Standard Institution; Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF): Prediction of Wind and Current Loads on VLCC’s (current forces only); 3. Technical Standards for Port and Harbor Facilities In Japan, 2009; 5. Standard Design Criteria For Port In Indonesia, 1984, Maritime Sector Development Programme, Directorate General Of Sea Communications; Port of Long Beach (POLB), Wharf Design Criteria Version 2.0. 6.2 Structural Design 1 Indonesian Sismic Code, “Standar Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung” (SNI 03-1726-2002); Tata Cara Pethitungan Struktur Beton untuk Bangunan Gedung (SNI 03-2847-2002); 3. British Standard Code of Practice For Maritime Structures; The American Association of State Highway and Transportation officials (AASHTO) Standard Specification for Highway Bridges; American Concrete Institute (ACI): ACI318-95, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete; Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI): PCI Design Handbook; 7. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC): Manual of Steel Constructions; 8. American Welding Society (AWS): AWS D1.1 Structural Welding Code. 6.3 Geotechnical 1. 2. API RP 2A-WSD; AASHTO.Doe. No. = BASIS OF DESIGN SNO-C-DB-60-101 we Oo ea PERTAMINA MiccotnEncl MATERIAL OFFLOADING B 34 0f 34 FACILI '¥ (MOP JETTY SENORO To Date: 01/10/2012 7.0 DESIGN AND ANALYSIS SOFTWARE Design and analysis shall be carried out the software as follow: © For structural analysis and design: SAP2000 v.11; © For CAD using Autocad 2010; * PCACol. All the above software will be validated in such both manual calculation and computer calculated produced good agreement,