The court held a hearing on two motions: 1) The defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction regarding a case filed by Union Gospel Mission of Yakima against Robert Ferguson et al. Both sides presented arguments and the motion was taken under advisement. 2) The plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction regarding the same case, with both sides again presenting arguments before the motion was also taken under advisement. An order from the court is forthcoming.
Original Description:
Union Gospel Mission of Yakima, Wash. v. Ferguson (E.D. Wash., No. 1:23-cv-3027)
The court held a hearing on two motions: 1) The defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction regarding a case filed by Union Gospel Mission of Yakima against Robert Ferguson et al. Both sides presented arguments and the motion was taken under advisement. 2) The plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction regarding the same case, with both sides again presenting arguments before the motion was also taken under advisement. An order from the court is forthcoming.
The court held a hearing on two motions: 1) The defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction regarding a case filed by Union Gospel Mission of Yakima against Robert Ferguson et al. Both sides presented arguments and the motion was taken under advisement. 2) The plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction regarding the same case, with both sides again presenting arguments before the motion was also taken under advisement. An order from the court is forthcoming.
Case 1:23-cv-03027-MKD ECF No. 22 filed 05/31/23 PageID.
476 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Case No. 1:23-CV-03027-MKD UNION GOSPEL MISSION OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON, CIVIL MINUTES Plaintiff, -vs- DATE: MAY 31, 2023 LOCATION: RICHLAND/VIDEO ROBERT FERGUSON, et al., Defendants. MOTION HEARING
Honorable Mary K. Dimke
Cora Vargas 03 Kimberly Allen Courtroom Deputy Law Clerk Court Reporter Ryan Tucker David Ward David Knox DeWolf Daniel Jeon Jacob Reed Plaintiff's Counsel Defendants’ Counsel
[ X ] Open Court [ ] Chambers [X] Video conference
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (ECF No. 11).
Argument by Mr. Ward in support of motion Argument in opposition of motion by Mr. Tucker Rebuttal argument by Mr. Ward Additional argument in opposition by Mr. Tucker Additional rebuttal argument by Mr. Ward Court: Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, ECF No. 11, is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 14).
Argument by Mr. Tucker in support of motion Argument in opposition of motion by Mr. Ward Rebuttal argument by Mr. Tucker Court: Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 14, is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT.