Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Draft Rem 1 Syllabus
Draft Rem 1 Syllabus
I
Covers Civil and Criminal Procedures
By: Henedino M. Brondial
CIVIL PROCEDURE
(As amended by A.M. No. 19-10-20-SC, effective May l, 2020)
I. JURISDICTION
A. Classes of Jurisdiction
- Jurisdiction according to its nature: original, appellate
- Jurisdiction according to its object; corresponding principles
i. over the subject matter
ii. over the persons of the parties
iii. over the "res"
iv. over the issues
v. over the territory
References:
1. Section 5, Article V Ill, 1986 Constitution
2. Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980
3. B.P. Big. 129
4. RA 7691
5. RA 8369 (Family Courts Act)
6. SC-AO No. 113-95- Intellectual Property Courts
7. PD 1486; 1606 (Sandiganbayan)
8. RA 7975; 8249; 10660 (Sandiganbayan)
9. RA 9282 (Court of Tax Appeals)
10. RA 9054 (Sharia'h Courts)
II. RULES 1 to 5
A. Actions: Commencement (Sections 3 and 5, R-l)
Cases:
1. Alday vs. FGU Insurance— 350 SCRA
2. Mercado vs. CA, 569 SCRA
3. Proton Pilipinas vs. Banque Nationale de Paris, 460 SCRA
4. Ruby Shelter Builders vs. Formaran, 578 SCRA 283
5. St. Louis University vs. Cobarrubias, 626 SCRA 649 *
6. Gipa vs. Southern Luzon Institute, 726 SCRA, June 18, 2014 *
7. Sy-Vargas vs. Estate of Ogsos, 805 SCRA (2016)
8. Camaso vs. TSM Shipping Inc., 807 SCRA (2016)
X. RULE 13: Filing and Service ofPleadings, Judgments and Other Papers (Sections 1-19)
A. Distinguish Filing from Service
B. Manner of Filing; Modes of Service
- service by electronic means and facsimile
- what is presumptive service
- what is conventional service
- is there still priority in the mode of service?
C. Completeness of Filing/Service
D. Proof of Filing/Service
E. Notice of Lis Pendens
Cases:
s
ous
D. Omnibus Motion
Xll.
RULE E. Prohibited Motions
S 15: F. Dismissal with prejudice
Motion
s
(Sectio
1. Republic vs. Dimarucut, 857 SCRA (2017)
ns 1-
13) 2. Acampado vss. Cosmilla, 771 SCRA
A. D3. Laude vs. Gines-Jabalde, 775 SCRA
e
f4. De Guzman vs. Ochoa, 684 SCRA
i
n
i
t
i
o
n
B. R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
C. K
i
n
d
s
:
l
i
t
i
g
i
o
u
s
;
n
o
n
-
l
i
t
i
g
i
Note: Rule 16 has been deleted and/or transposed
XXIII. RULE 36: Judgments, Final Orders and Entry Thereof (Sections 1-6)
- When is judgment deemed entered? Effect?
1. Several judgments (S-4)
2. Separate judgments (S-5)
3. Judgments against entities without personality (S-6)
Case: FASAP vs PAL, 858 SCRA (for class discussion)
REMEDIES
AGAINST
EXECUTORY
JUDGMENTS
XXVI. RULE
S 38
and 47
A. Rel
ief
fro
m
Jud
gm
ent
s
(R-
38)
P
e
t
i
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
R
e
A625
Note: The offenses are cognizable only by the RTC regardless of the penalty impossible:
i. Violations of the Omnibus Election Code
ii. Violations of the Intellectual Property Law
iii. Violations of the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012
iv. Violations or the Anti- Money Laundering Law
v. Violations of the Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002
vi. Cases of Written Defamations
A. Definition/Description
- when a matter of right
- distinguish from Preliminary Examination
Read: Fenequito vs. Vergara, Jr., 677 SCRA 113
Burgundy Realty Corporation vs. Reyes, 687 SCRA 524
E. Quantum of Evidence
- probable cause vs. prima facie
PCGG vs. Navarro-Gutierrez, 773
SCRA De Lima vs. Reyes, 779 SCRA
A. Definition/Description
B. Conditions/Requirements
- effective upon approval and shall remain in force at all stages of
the proceedings until promulgation of judgment by the RTC
- when appearance is required
C. When:
- bail is a matter of right; a matter of discretion;
- bail as a constitutional right
D. Kinds:
a. corporate surety
b. property bond
c. cash bond
d. recognizance: is an obligation of record entered into before some court or
magistrate duly authorized to take it, with the condition to do some particular act
particularly the appearance of the accused for trial
B. Kinds of Plea:
(a) conditional
(b) unconditional
(c) negative/indirect (refusal to plead)
(d) inverted (pleads guilty with exculpatory evidence)
(e) improvident plea (not knowing fully well)
E. Suspension of arraignment
a) when suffering from unsound mental condition
b) prejudicial question
c) petition for review
d) absence of judicial personnel
Read: 1. People vs. Estomaca — 256 SCRA 421
2. People vs. Pangilinan — 518 SCRA 359
3. Daan vs. Sandiganbayan — 560 SCRA 233
4. People vs. Janjalani -639 SCRA 157
F. Bill of Particulars, Read: Enrile vs. People, August 11, 2015
Read:
1. People vs. Lacson — 400 SCRA 267
2. Panaguiton vs. DOJ- 571 SCRA 549
3. People vs. Dumlao - 580 SCRA 409
4. Soriano vs. People - 591 SCRA 244
5. Cerezo vs. People - 650 SCRA 222
6. Co vs. New Prosperity Plastic Products, 727 SCRA 503, 6/30/14
7. People vs. De Leon, 754 SCRA 147
B. Order of Trial
- civil vs. criminal cases; Order in presentation of Evidence
C. Modes of Discovery in criminal cases
Read: People vs. Marta Cristina Servo and Julius Lacanilao, October 9, 2012 For class
discussion. Compare People vs. Webb, Vda. De Manguerra vs. Risos and Go vs. People.
F. Demurrer to Evidence
Read: Cabador vs. People, 602 SCRA
People vs. Tan, 625 SCRA
Rep. vs. De Borya, 814 SCRA 10 (2017)
Cases:
1. Llamas vs. CA -601 SCRA 288
2. People vs. Monteclaros — 589 SCRA 320
3. Hipos Sr. vs. Bay — 581 SCRA 674
4. People vs. Lorenzo — 619 SCRA 389
5. People vs. Baron - 621 SCRA 646
6. Abeliana vs. People - 655 SCRA 683
7. People vs. Asis - 629 SCRA 250
8. Basilonia vs. Villaruz, 765 SCRA 489
9. Morillo vs. People, 777 SCRA 207
RULE 121 - NEW TRIAL OR RECONSIDERATION
1. In civil cases vs. criminal cases
2. Grounds; effect
Cases:
1. Estino vs. People - 584 SCRA 304
2. Briones vs. People 588 SCRA 345
3. Saludaga vs. Sandiganbayan — 619 SCRA 364
4. Lumanog vs. People - 642 SCRA 248
5. Payumo vs.Sandiganbayan — 654 SCRA 277
Cases:
1. Marimla vs. People, 604 SCRA (2009)
2. People vs. Punzalan, 774 SCRA 653
3. People vs. Nuevas, 516 SCRA (2007)
4. Veridiano vs. People, 826 SCRA (2017)
5. People vs. Cosgafa, 830 SCRA (2017)
6. Miguel vs. People, 833 SCRA (2017)
7. Dimal vs. People, 862 SCRA (2018, plain view doctrine)
8. Reyes vs. People, 865 SCRA (2018)