Professional Documents
Culture Documents
George Lipsitz
Gramsci . . . has become a fountain from which everyone takes whatever water
George Lipsitz is assistant professor of American studies at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.
1 Antonio Gramsei, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith
146
Struggle for Hegemony 147
of social struggle than a coroner conducting an inquest into the blasted hopes of
the past. John Patrick Diggins uses Gramsci's concept of hegemony to explain the
seemingly unchallenged primacy of liberal individualism in American political cul-
ture, while T. J. Jackson Lears cites Gramsci's work on "contradictory consciousness"
as an explanation for how American workers in the nineteenth century exercised a
"half-conscious complicity in their own victimization." In their challenging and elo-
quent analyses, Diggins and Lears focus on the undeniable triumphs of liberal in-
dividualism and consumer capitalism over oppositional movements stressing
equality, collectivity, and mutuality. But they present hegemony less as something
to be struggled for than as something imposed on society from the top down. Most
2 John Patrick Diggins, "Comrades and Citizens: New Mythologies in American Historiography," American
Historical Review, 90 (June 1985), 614-38; T. J. Jackson Lears, "The Concept of Cultural Hegemony: Problems
and Possibilities," ibid., 567-93.
3 Stuart Hall, Oral Presentation, Minneapolis, Minn., April 3, 1987. Notes in Lipsitz's possession.
148 The Journal of American History
struggle; the institutional failure of the Knights did not preclude subsequent labor
militancy and radical politics. In fact, the lessons of struggle taught by the Knights
created the social and individual preconditions for future political contestation by
millions of Americans. Fink learns from the people he has chosen to study, and he
finds important evidence underscoring the activist implications of Gramsci's writ-
ings - about the instability of bourgeois hegemony, the struggle for legitimation es-
sential to all oppositional movements, and the enduring culture of opposition in
America that survives any individual episode of struggle.
Yet, in my view, Fink does not go far enough; he does not follow his argument
to its logical conclusion. His scenario about how the Knights might have emerged
forming themselves and others through mutuality and collective action. To dismiss
either the civil rights movement or the Paris Commune as examples of the power
of liberal individualism or the workings of contradictory consciousness is to miss
their role in the war of position as instances where human self-activity manifested
and legitimated the most radical kinds of oppositional thought and action. One
need not imagine how those two insurgencies might have succeeded in taking state
power to understand how they helped shape a prefigurative counterhegemony with
enduring historical and ideological import. 4
As the examples of the American civil rights movement and the Paris Commune
demonstrate, victory and defeat are not mutually exclusive categories. The civil
4 Harvard Sitkoff, The Struggle for Black Equality, 1954-1980 (New York, 1981), 165, 186; George Breitman,
ed., Malcolm X Speaks (New York, 1965); Karl Marx, The Paris Commune (New York, 1934), 85.
, Sara Evans, Personal Politics: The Roots of Women's Liberation in the Civil Rights Movement and the New
Left (New York, 1979); Paul Buhle, Marxism in the United States: Remapping the History ofthe American Left
(London, 1987).
150 The Journal of American History
tance that had been going on for centuries. Likewise, in Jack Conroy's wonderful
novel from 1933, The Disinherited, the narrator remembers that his father's union
lost every strike along the way, but that even as it lost, conditions gradually got better
for the workers. Their willingness to strike never seemed to bring any victories in
the short run, but it served as a threat to management and consequently as an incen-
tive for concessions that might avoid strikes in the long run. In The Disinherited
that memory ofclass struggle informs the self-definition and willingness to take risks
that brings Conroy's hero into one of the most important mass mobilizations in his-
tory-the union organizing drives of the 1930s. Even in failure, social contestation
changes the material and ideological balance of power in society. Conversely, even