Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction:
1. Let me begin by thanking the leadership of the Church of
Pentecost for showing leadership in creating such an important
forum which is necessary to building national consensus for the
development of our dear country, Ghana. I feel very grateful and
privileged to be part of this very important and historic program,
and the opportunity to share a few thoughts and ideas to guide the
discussions on creating the building blocks for financing
development in Ghana. My topic today is on “Building Public
Support Towards Mobilizing Resources Domestically for
Development”. This topic is timely, and appropriate. For those who
would recall my public lecture at the University of Ghana in
September 2021, on the topic “Re-Thinking Development
Financing: Macroeconomic Management When the Love is
Gone”, I touched on this issue and made a case that once the love
from our development partners appear to have shifted to a different
direction—this comes when countries graduate into middle
income status—the financing of development in such economies
shifts from dependence on donor support to raising domestic
resources.
12. But support from the central bank is not a sustainable way to
finance government expenditures. Government deficit
monetization by the central bank can undermine its autonomy and
credibility and potentially de-anchor inflation expectations of
forward-looking economic agents, making it extremely difficult to
fight inflationary pressures in Ghana. Faced with these realities, the
government had no choice but to request an IMF programme. An
IMF programme provides some breathing space for government to
implement its remedial policies in an orderly manner. The
corrective measures that are often implemented by the government
as part of the programme requirements and IMF’s own credibility
in ensuring that they are implemented, may help to restore investor
confidence in the economy and reignite portfolio flows. In
addition, it can also unlock additional donor funds that were
withheld because of the crisis. However, the painful domestic debt
restructuring process that preceded the approval of the IMF
programme, highlights the importance of shifting the paradigm
from external financing to domestic resource mobilization.
21. Also, the recent introduction of the Ghana card means that we
now have data on more employees and entities that fall within the
tax bracket. It is therefore up to the Ghana Revenue Authority to
reach out and bring all these potential taxpayers into the tax net. As
more people and entities are enrolled to pay tax, the per capita tax
burden could be reduced through elimination of nuisance taxes,
while raising the tax-GDP-ratio from a larger base.
30. The Bible is very clear on this: as public office holders and
leaders in governance and authority, we should see ourselves as
Ministers of God. What would God expect from us as we serve the
citizens? We have a mandate which—clearly from the passage—is
a mandate blessed by God to serve the people and provide for their
needs. We cannot afford to miss this mandate. We have no option
than to deliver since as Ministers of God, we will account for our
mandates. It is only when we have delivered on this mandate that
Romans 13:7 can fully be expected. It is only when we deliver that
we would have the moral right and courage to expect the citizens to
endeavour to pay their taxes and revenues because doing so
honours God.
References:
Robert I. Rotberg (2004) Strengthening “African Leadership: There Is Another Way”
Foreign Affairs, Vol. 83, No. 4 (Jul. - Aug., 2004), pp. 14-18
NDPC (2018) Ghana Infrastructure Finance for Sustainable
Development Goals
Appendix
Table 1: Revenue statistics for selected African countries
Average of
Country Ghana's
Tax Revenue (as % of GDP) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 average(2011-2020) Peers
Ghana 11.8 12 11.3 11.9 12.9 13.1 13.4 13.7 13.2 13.4 12.67
Burkina Faso 13.4 14.9 15.9 14.3 14.6 15.3 16.2 16.6 17.3 16.6 15.51
Togo 12 12.5 14.5 15.5 16 16.4 15.8 14.6 15 15.4 14.77
Cote d'Ivoire 11.1 12.8 12.7 12.2 12.6 13.1 13.3 13 13.2 13.4 12.74
Kenya 16.5 16.1 16.1 17.3 16.8 17 17.4 16.8 16.4 15.3 16.57 22.824
South Africa 24 24.4 24.8 25.4 26.5 26.1 26.1 26.6 26.2 25.2 25.53
Tunisia 27.7 27.7 28.3 29.3 28.5 27.9 29.2 29.9 32.2 32.5 29.32
Egypt 15 14.1 15.5 14.3 14.7 14.5 15.3 15 14.4 13.3 14.61
Morocco 28.4 29.5 28.1 27.8 26.8 27.5 28 28.2 28.3 28.3 28.09
Africa(31) 15.1 15 15.3 15.5 15.6 15.6 15.7 15.9 16.2 16 15.59
Source:
BOG/OECD (2022)