Professional Documents
Culture Documents
- VERSUS -
PETITION
PETITIONER, assisted by the Public Attorney’s Office, through the
undersigned counsel, unto this Honorable Court, most respectfully submits
this Petition, and hereby alleges the following:
5) Petitioner was issued and has held the owner’s duplicate copy of the
said Title. He kept it in his personal files in their house at Barangay
San Miguel, Ramon, Isabela;
6) For how many years, the said owner’s duplicate copy of Original
Certificate Title No. P-2539 was safely kept. However, on August 3,
2022, when Petitioner looked for the said Title among his personal
files, he discovered that the same was gone and missing;
7) And despite diligent search and effort to locate the Owner’s Duplicate
Copy of Original Certificate of Title No. P-2539, he could not find it
such that he genuinely believes that the said copy is now lost and
beyond recovery;
9) An original duplicate copy of the said title is intact and on file with
Respondent Registry of Deeds as per Certification / Certified True
Copy of the said Title dated August 12, 2022, which the said Office
had issued, a copy of which is hereto attached and made an integral
1
Certified True Copy of the same Title is hereto attached and marked as Annex “A, A-1, A-2, A-3
and A-4” and made an integral part hereof.
2
In case of discrepancies between such contents and values that has been manually copied and
encoded on this page, and that appearing on the attached Certified True Copy-- the latter shall be
deemed controlling and a conclusive representation of the same.
3
A copy of the said Tax Declaration No. is hereto attached, marked as Annex “B” and form an
integral part of this Petition;
4
A copy of the said Tax Declaration No. is hereto attached, marked as Annex “C” and form an
integral part of this Petition
5
Attached is an “Affidavit of Loss”
PETITION : PAGE 2 OF 5
part hereof6. As a matter of fact, Petitioner’s Affidavit of Loss was
already annotated on the said duplicate Original Copy of the Title on
file with the said Respondent7, to wit:
11) Petitioner’s surname had been known by his family, friends and his
community as “APANGCHAN” and not “APANCHAN” as
misspelled in the OCT, subject to this case, and that he has been
using “APANGCHAN” as his surname in all his private and public
transactions/documents;
CAUSES of ACTION
12) Petitioner anchors his cause of action in Section 108 of P.D. No.
1529, otherwise known as the Property Registration Decree, to wit:
6
See Annex “A, A-1, A-2, A-3 and A-4”
7
Said Affidavit of Loss was annotated on page 5 or Annex “A-4” of the duplicate original copy of
the Title on file with Respondent Registry of Deeds, with “Entry No. ” -which be encircled and
submarked as Annex “A-4-a” and made an integral part hereof.
PETITION : PAGE 3 OF 5
notice to all parties in interest, and may order the entry or
cancellation of a new certificate, the entry or cancellation of a
memorandum upon a certificate, or grant any other relief upon such
terms and conditions, requiring security or bond if necessary, as it
may consider proper; Provided, however, That this section shall not
be construed to give the court authority to reopen the judgment or
decree of registration, and that nothing shall be done or ordered by
the court which shall impair the title or other interest of a purchaser
holding a certificate for value and in good faith, or his heirs and
assigns, without his or their written consent. Where the owner's
duplicate certificate is not presented, a similar petition may be filed
as provided in the preceding section.
All petitions or motions filed under this Section as well as under any
other provision of this Decree after original registration shall be filed
and entitled in the original case in which the decree or registration
was entered.
13) The misspelled surname was due to inadvertence and did not arise
from any malevolence, ill-will or to defraud any other persons or
agency. Said mistake is only clerical, and certainly not a
controversial issue;
15) Petitioner also anchors his cause of action in Section 109 of P.D. No.
1529, otherwise known as the Property Registration Decree, to wit:
“Section 109. Notice and replacement of lost duplicate certificate.
In case of loss or theft of an owner’s duplicate certificate of title,
due notice under oath shall be sent by the owner or by someone
in his behalf to the Register of Deeds of the province or city
where the land lies as soon as the loss or theft is discovered. If a
duplicate certificate is lost or destroyed, or cannot be produced by a
person applying for the entry of a new certificate to him or for the
registration of any instrument, a sworn statement of the fact of such
loss or destruction may be filed by the registered owner or other
person in interest and registered.
PETITION : PAGE 4 OF 5
16) In compliance to paragraph 1 of Section 109, P.D. No 1529,
Petitioners has already given due notice to the Registry of Deeds,
Lamut, Ifugao that the Owner’s Duplicate Copy of Title is loss. The
Affidavit of Loss executed by the Petitioner has been annotated as an
encumbrance on the Title.8
WITNESS to be PRESENTED
18) To support the allegations in the Petition, the Petitioner, BEN H.
APANGCHAN9, will testify to prove that he is the Petitioner in this
case and the registered owner of the subject Title lost, as well as to
prove all the allegations in the Petition, particularly the circumstances
surrounding the title’s loss.
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed of the Honorable
Court, after due notice and hearing, that a judgment be rendered in favour of
the Petitioner, declaring the owner’s duplicate copy of OCT No. P-2539 as
already LOST, and thereby Ordering the Registry of Deeds of Lamut, Ifugao
to:
Other reliefs, just and equitable, under the premises are likewise
prayed for.
8
See Annex “4-A-a”
9
His testimony is contained in his Judicial Affidavit which is hereto attached, marked, and
made part hereof as Annexes “F and series”.
PETITION : PAGE 5 OF 5