Supplemental L i t e r a t u r e R e v i e w : S e c t i o n TIT

Comment on Mg-Pr
(Magnesium-Praseodymium)
H. O k a m o t o

[93Sac] determined the Mg-Pr phase diagram (Fig. 1) by Cited References

means of x-ray powder diffraction, optical and scanning elec-
89Nay: A.A. Nayeb-Hashemi and J.B. Clark, Bull. Alloy Phase_Dia-
iron microscopy, EPMA, and DTA. [Massalski2] showed a grams., 10(1 ), 23 -27 (1989).
schematic phase diagram redrawn from [89Nay]. [93Sac] con- 93Sac: A. Saccone,A.M. Cardinale,S. Delfmo,andR. FelTO,Intermetal-
firmed the crystal structures of all Mg-Pr intermetallic phases lics, 1,151-158(1993).
reported by [89Nay].

Weight P e r c e n t P r a s e o d y m i u m
20 40 60 80 ]00
1000 ........ iI ' ' II . . . . . . . . . i . . . . . . . . . i .........

931~

8OO ~ 7 9 ~0 765 ~ 795 ~

// ,' 74ooc-'-.~ 4o.5f . ~ - - - - ~ o . o ~ ~ /1"
O
o / ,l ~1 725~ ' \ [ 735 C \\ (~Pr) /// I
650 ~ - / / " 670~ | I '\ / I i
\ / ,' ,, , / , I
~3 600 \ 5 0 / 575~ ,' I I \ / ! [
;:G
~ \ ,I ', / ' [
" - , , ~ / ! (aPr) I
560 ~ i ~ 565 ~ ' , i i 510 ~ 'I/" ,..." "
9 I ~~ I I 80.5 ~.
III ~ II
III 1 I I
I.~
400
},' ! Iii

i
I
I
II
II
't
l
I II I

t |1

"
I
I
%
|1
II

ii~t~
I
I

0
t- ::!
~00 ~t . . . . I J ! .... ,
30 40
I1~
It

60 80
I
tI

100
Mg A t o m i c PereenL P r a s e o d y m i u m Pr
Fig. 1 Mg-Pr phase diagram.

Comment on Ru-Te
(Ruthenium-Tellurium)
H. O k a m o t o

[94Ber] determined the Ru-Te phase diagram (Fig. 1) by in- [Massalski2] reproduced the Ru-Te phase diagram drawn by
vestigating the concentration range 0 to 70 at.% Te using met- [Moffatt], which was in tum based on the report by [85Zha]
allography, XRD, XMA (x-ray microanalysis), and DTA. that RuTe2 decomposes into Te (gas) and (Ru) above 780 ~
Dimorphic RuTe,2 has a small hyperstoichiometric composi- The crystallographic transformation of RuTe2 is shown to be
tion range (67.3 to 67.8 at.% Te). temperature-composition dependent in Fig. 1.

Journal of Phase Equilibria Vol. 16 No. 6 1995 535