Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• First, a short introduction where you state 1) claim (or thesis, ie., how you’d answer the
research question I posed), and 2) explain the argument that will proceed in paper. • Second,
analysis of argument in 3-5 pages • Last, a thorough conclusion, in which you summarize your
argument, moves made in paper, and talk about the implications of your paper. Implications
could be literary, historical, or theological. 4-5 pages
First, answer: why are these two topics (migration as evil/causing suffering) constantly
married in all the genres/texts of the HB/OT (i.e., why the different writers join these two
themes)? Here you may use Carr and the OT to help answer this.
- Growing pains
- Migration is not evil; the journey is hard
- Exodus
For example, you may argue that a particular story or stories are the key interpretative
texts of a book, or central to the understanding of a certain prophet, or a lament, etc, that point to
the most pressing question the biblical writers are wrestling with. Here is where you come up
with an interpretation, so no need to use Carr, my lectures, etc.
2
My paper will be on two ideas. The first one is that migration in the form of an evil, and
the causation of suffering is commonly linked throughout the texts of the Old Testament due to
the misunderstanding of growing pains. I talk about growing pains in terms of the difficulties one
faces during major periods of change. The idea that migration in of itself is evil is not one I agree
with, but rather, see it more as a natural correlation during times of change. The second idea I
will talk about is that the question of, “Why do bad things happen to people?” The term ‘bad’ is
subjective, and the events that the Hebrew people had to go through can be seen through
different perspectives, as it does not necessarily have to be considered ‘bad’, but rather,
The connection between migration and suffering might appear to be purposely done at
first, considering the number of times it comes up in the Old Testament. However, I believe that
suffering is commonly connected with changes. Growing pains are real in any situation, with
migration being no exception. God tends to nudge these groups of people in what He considers
to be the right direction, and He cannot do that unless He gives them an incentive. The biggest
example of this is shown in Exodus when God promised Moses and the Hebrew people a land all
Everything happens for a reason, and while the things that happen to us may sometimes
appear to be painful can actually be beneficial in the long run. There are things beyond our
control, and it is important to be able to recognize that and to hold out hope. In Exodus, God
showed the Hebrews the longer route to Israel in order to avoid a war occuring in the shorter
route. Considering how scarce information was at this time, it is possible that these group of
Hebrews never found out about this war that happened, so they could have never known why the
longer, forty year route was necessary. No journey is easy, and it is how we respond to the things
However, every migration that God pushed for was not necessarily due to positive
changes in their lives. While God is known to have a plan, some of his plans involved the
punishment for sins, which is what some of these migrations involved. Although, it is important
to note that the anamorphic view of God that the Hebrews display in the Old Testament make it
hard to determine which punishments might have come from God and which were simply natural
disasters they had to endure for nature’s sake. In Exodus, he makes sure that the Hebrew people
who end up living in the Promised Land are the children of the people who left Egypt. He
purposely makes it so that the original generation of travelers do not make it, as it was his
punishment for all the complaining and doubts they had during the journey.
The biblical authors grappled with a variety of questions during the writing process, as
they were dealing with a major existential crisis. I believe that the biggest question on their mind
was, “Why do bad things happen to people?” as they could not fathom why they were going
through such terrible times. The Old Testament being written during the Exile of the Hebrew
people creates a context to the pessimistic view the Hebrew people held of God and their overall
circumstances. This view is clearly represented in the Lamentations, as they question God’s
4
reasoning and complain about their exile. They feel defeated and unheard, as in the fifth
Lamentation called, “A Plea for Mercy,” they pool together a community voice to talk about how
badly they are being treated in Babylon, and how they urge for the good old days.
Originally, I was going to phrase this overarching question as, “Why do bad things
happen to good people?” However, the word good is very subjective. Growing up in a
non-christian household, I have never truly grappled with the idea of sins and sinning. In reading
the Old Testament, the Hebrew people seemed to me to be fairly good people. Though in
consideration of the fact that my concept of sinning is underdeveloped, I have no idea what was
considered to be a ‘good’ person to God and to the Hebrews in the Old Testament. Without
attaching this adjective, the point still stands as to why these bad things were happening to
people in general. What amount of sins could possibly incur that amount of punishment? In the
story of Genesis, God punished Adam and Eve in a way that included the rest of all humanity.
Personally, I would not consider Adam and Eve bad people for eating that forbidden fruit,
however, God had his own reasonings and ways of distributing punishments for sins that does
The idea of the suffering involved in migration simply being growing pains connects to
this question of, “Why do bad things happen to people?” It is all about the perspective you
choose to view it from. As I mentioned in the previous paragraph, good is subjective, but so is
bad. The Old Testament has very strong, “Why me?” vibes, which is completely understandable.
However, in changing your perspective, there is more to these migrations than simply suffering.
It is a time of change and growing, and viewing these difficulties as necessary changes in order
to grow into a better person would have changed the Old Testament completely, in the sense of
looking at God and the things they went through in a different, more positive light. While I may
5
not be a Christian, I am a firm believer that everything happens for a reason, and while it is easy
to complain and cry out against the circumstances we find ourselves in, it is important to always
keep in mind that there may be a reason this is happening to you and that outcome will be better
In conclusion, migration is not evil suffering but rather a necessary growing pain in
between the reality you are leaving and the reality you are moving towards. As the evidence in
every migratant’s story shows, things are not as easy as black and white since there are a variety
of factors involved in this topic. The question of “Why do bad things happen to people?” circles
back to the first question of the correlation between migration and suffering. Growing pains are a
necessary ‘bad’ in order to better appreciate the good, as well as in terms of growing as a better
understand the context and the outcome of things in the Bible, as the Hebrew people viewed all
the things that occurred to them in a negative way. Changes always come with difficulties, but it
is the perspective you focus on that can change these difficulties to new, exciting challenges.