Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2019, Numerical Study On Flow Boiling in A Tree-Shaped Microchannel
2019, Numerical Study On Flow Boiling in A Tree-Shaped Microchannel
Abstract
A two-dimensional model is developed to numerically study the water flow boiling through a
tree-shaped microchannel by VOF method. In this work, the bubble dynamics and flow patterns
along the channel are examined. Additionally, the pressure drop, heat transfer performance and
the effects of mass flow rate and heat flux on the heat transfer coefficient are analyzed and dis-
cussed. The numerical results indicate that, there are three main bubble dynamic behaviors at
the wall, namely coalesce-lift-off, coalesce-slide and coalesce-reattachment. At the bifurcation
in high branching level, the slug bubbles may coalesce or breakup. The flow patterns of bubbly,
bubbly-slug flows occur at low branching level and slug flow occurs at high branching level.
The passage of bubbles causes the increasing of fluid temperature and local pressure. Addi-
tionally, the pressure drop decreases with the branching level. The flow pattern and channel
confinement effect play a vital role in heat transfer performance. The nucleate boiling dominant
§
Corresponding author.
1950111-1
November 27, 2019 11:27 0218-348X 1950111
W. Yu et al.
heat transfer is observed at low branching level, the heat transfer performance is enhanced with
increasing branching level from k = 0 to 2. While, at high branching level, the heat transfer
performance becomes weaker due to the suppression of nucleate boiling. Moreover, the heat
transfer coefficient increases with the mass flow rate and heat flux.
tronic technology develop towards the miniaturiza- stream and upstream regions. Wang et al.16 found
tion,1 imposing a critical challenge to the heat dissi- flow regimes of stable and unstable modes, which
pation. As an efficient heat transfer mode of vapor– are divided by the vapor quality of 0.013. The flow
liquid phase change, the flow boiling in microchan- regimes of single-phase liquid, bubbly and elongated
nel heat sinks could meet the requirements of bubbly/slug occur in the stable mode, while the
removing great heat in these miniaturized devices. unstable modes contain the flow regimes of bub-
Particularly, owing to the optimized heat and mass bly, elongated bubbly/slug, semi-annular and annu-
transfer capability, the tree-shaped microchannel lar/mist. Additionally, the flow regimes can influ-
Fractals 2019.27. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
provides a promising solution in enhancing the heat ence the wall temperature and pressure drop.
transfer performance in both single-phase and two Due to the limitations in capturing vapor-
phase flows,2,3 which is applied for a number of liquid interface during the flow boiling process
microscale applications, including electronic cool- in microchannel as well as the distribution of
ing,3,4 mass exchangers,5 chemical reactors,6 and temperature and pressure along the channel by
fuel cells.7,8 To this context, it is of great signifi- experimental studies, a number of direct numeri-
cance to give a fundamental understanding in flow cal simulations with various methods, like volume-
pattern and heat transfer during the flow boiling of-fluid,17–27 Level set28,29 and Lattice–Boltzmann
process in tree-shaped microchannel networks. (LBM)30,31 have been implemented to investigate
It has been known that bubble dynamics has a the bubble dynamics. Kuang et al.26 used VOF
major impact on flow pattern evolution and heat method to simulate the boiling flow behavior in
transfer.9 Numerous experiments have been con- the heat pipe. The flow patterns of bubbly and
ducted to investigate bubble dynamics of flow boil- slug flows were observed. The bubble growth and
ing in microchannel heat sinks. For examples, Yeoh coalescence induce the slug flow. Zhuan et al.18–21
et al.10 found that the shear lift force overcomes the conducted simulations to investigate the flow boil-
predominant forces of surface tension and growth ing in microchannel by VOF method. The results
when bubble lifting off. Situ et al.11 also stated that also show that the growth and coalescence of bub-
the growth and shear lift forces govern the bub- bles can significantly affect flow pattern evolution
ble at the instant of the lift-off. Ahmadi et al.12 (bubbly/slug to slug, slug to slug/semi-annular).
observed that most bubbles lifted in a short time Additionally, for nucleate boiling, the bubbles are
after nucleation under the atmospheric pressure, first fastened by surface tension, and then the rapid
which is caused by the unsteady growth force, the growth and departure from the wall of bubble
bubble shape and the condensation at the side wall. occurs when the wall superheat is higher than the
In contrast, bubbles usually slide along the sur- transition point. Dong et al.30 investigated the influ-
face under the elevated pressures. Lee et al.13 found encing factors of bubble on the fluid flow and heat
that the size of bubble departure from the wall is transfer in the microchannel by LBM method. It
controlled by the surface tension and drag of fluid is found that the bubble growth at the wall gen-
flow. Fu et al.9 stated that the growth and coa- erates flow resistance. The bubble nucleation and
lescence of bubbles were two major factors influ- motion alternately enhance or weaken the influence
encing flow pattern evolution. Kandlikar et al.14 of bubble dynamics on the flow boiling. In addi-
stated that the elongated bubbles can deteriorate tion, by using a fractal model, Yu and co-workers
the heat transfer. Chen et al.15 also studied the presented a series of analytical studies for nucleate
significance of flow pattern in the heat transfer. pool boiling,32 subcooled flow boiling heat trans-
They observed the flow patterns of bubbly, slug fer,33 high heat flux nucleate boiling region34 and
1950111-2
November 27, 2019 11:27 0218-348X
1950111
critical heat flux (CHF)34 based on the fractal dis- in the determination of flow boiling in tree-shaped
tribution of nucleation sites on boiling surfaces. The minichannel networks. In particular, compared to
proposed model contains less empirical constants the traditional serpentine channel, flow boiling in
than the conventional models. The model predic- constructal tree-shaped minichannel networks pos-
tions are shown to be in excellent agreement with sesses less pressure drop, lower pumping power
experimental data, which verifies the validity of the requirement, better temperature uniformity and
fractal model. higher coefficient of performance. Similarly, Salakij
As an attractive way for electronic cooling, the et al.41 developed a one-dimensional model to sim-
disadvantages of flow boiling in single, straight ulate convective boiling flow through a fractal-like
microchannel heat sinks are large pressure drops branching microchannel network. The results show
by UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO on 01/01/20. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
and flow instabilities. Owing to the inspiration that as the vapor extraction rate increases, there
of biological transport systems, which show the is a significant reduction in pressure drop through
optimal solutions for information handling and the channel, bulk fluid temperature and exit vapor
fluid transport problems,1 a constructal tree-shaped quality.
microchannel networks was developed as high- In view of the above studies, the detailed work
performance heat sinks. Bejan3 first proposed a con- on the flow boiling in a tree-shaped microchannel
structal tree-shaped network based on the construc- is still inadequate, particularly the bubble dynam-
tal theory for electronic cooling. Later, Bejan and ical behaviors are still waiting to be elucidated.
Fractals 2019.27. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
Errera35 introduced a deterministic tree network Therefore, in our study, a 2D fractal tree-shaped
for fluid flow with minimal volume-to-point flow microchannel network is constructed and VOF
resistance. Bejan36 found that the total heat cur- method was used to numerically investigate the sub-
rent convected by the double tree is proportional cooled flow boiling in this structure. The bubble
to the total volume raised to power 3/4. However, dynamic behaviors and the flow patterns are investi-
these constructal tree-shaped channel networks are gated. Additionally, the pressure drop, heat transfer
non-fractal. Inspired by the fractal pattern of mam- performance of each branching level and the effects
malian circulatory and respiratory systems, Pence37 of mass flow rate and heat flux on the heat transfer
and Chen et al.38–40 introduced fractal-shaped coefficient are explored.
microchannel networks for the convective cooling of
microelectronic devices with circular and rectangu-
2. MATHEMATICAL MODEL
lar geometric shapes. After assuming a laminar and
fully developed flow and neglecting effect of bifur- A two-dimensional model is developed in this paper.
cation on pressure drop, they analytically observed As illustrated in Fig. 1, the tree-shaped microchan-
that under the condition of the same convective nel can be established as follows.
heat transfer area, the fractal-shaped microchan-
nel network has much higher heat transfer rate
and smaller pressure drop than parallel microchan- 6 7 10 11
nels. Senn and Poulikakos7 numerically investigated 2 3 6 7 4
3
the laminar convective heat transfer and pressure 5 8 9 12
drop characteristics in fractal tree-like microchannel
Lk+1
2
2 3
network for thermal management in polymer elec-
Lk
trolyte fuel cell and compared to the corresponding 1 2
characteristics in traditional serpentine flow pat- 1
W k+1
Wk
1950111-3
November 27, 2019 11:27 0218-348X
1950111
W. Yu et al.
The source term S in Eqs. (6) and (7) considering total cell numbers in the computational domain is
the mass transfer during the processes of evaporat- 437980.
ing and condensing is determined by Lee’s model44
cl αl ρl (Tl − Tsat )/Tsat , Tl ≥ Tsat , 2.4. Case Validation
S= (16)
cv αv ρv (Tl − Tsat )/Tsat , Tl < Tsat , To verify the present numerical model, we conduct
where cl and cv are the relaxation time coefficients numerical simulation corresponding to two typical
(s−1 ). In this study, they are set to be 1. experimental cases in Ref. 17, and compared the
numerical results with experimental data. Accord-
ing to the experiment, a coiled tube made of quartz
by UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO on 01/01/20. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
2.2. Boundary Conditions glass with six straight tubes and five bend sec-
A uniform heat flux of q = 20 W/cm2 is applied on tions is used in the case validation. The diameter of
the outer wall. The constant flow rate of water is circular cross-section is 6 mm. In addition, R141B
imposed at the inlet, and the outlet pressure is set is adopted as the working fluid. The flow boiling
as 1 atm = 1.013 × 105 Pa. The inner wall is set as process through this coiled tube under two opera-
the no-slip boundary condition. The subcooling at tion conditions: (a) flow rate of 10 L/h, heat flux of
the inlet is set to be 3 K. Prior to the transient sim- 6888 W/m2 and subcooled of 8.5 K; (b) flow rate of
ulation, a preliminary steady state of single-phase 15 L/h, heat flux of 6888 W/m2 and subcooled of
Fractals 2019.27. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
simulation was conducted to provide the initial 15.5 K, are chosen as two typical cases for the val-
conditions. idation. As shown in Fig. 2, there is a good agree-
When the interface of two phases contacts the ment between the numerical results and experimen-
inner wall, the wall adhesion effect should be con- tal data, which verifies that the current model is
sidered. The surface normal of these cells at the reliable for predicting the dynamic behaviors of flow
wall is determined by the contact angle between the boiling in a tree-shaped microchannel.
interface and the wall, θw , by
n̂ = t̂w sin θw + n̂w cos θw , (17) 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
where t̂w is the unit tangential to the inner wall, 3.1. Bubble Dynamic Behaviors
while n̂w is the unit normal to the inner wall. In
all cases, we assume that the contact angle of the In this paper, three stages of bubble dynamics can
vapor phase on the inner wall surrounded by the be identified. First, the tiny bubble is generated and
liquid phase is θw = 150◦ . attached to its nucleate site. Subsequently, the bub-
ble keeps growing with further evaporation. Once
the bubble size reaches a certain extent, the drag
2.3. Numerical Methods force of fluid overcomes the surface tension and the
Because the Reynolds numbers in all cases are bubble starts to slide on the wall. Also, it may merge
below 200, the laminar model is adopted to sim- with the neighboring bubble to form a large bubble.
ulate the two-phase fluid flow. The control vol- Second, with the bubble size increasing, shear lift
ume finite-difference technique is used to solve the force is large enough to make bubble depart from
governing equations with the boundary conditions. the wall. Third, the bubble is accelerated under the
The pressure-velocity coupling is determined by large inertial force.
pressure-implicit with splitting of operators algo- For the bubble dynamic behavior of coalesce-lift-
rithm. The momentum and energy equations are off, as shown in Fig. 3a, the bubble slides along
discretized by the second-order upwind scheme. the flow direction, and coalesces with another one.
Additionally, the pressure staggering option scheme There is a liquid film sandwiched between the two
is chosen for the pressure interpolation. A variable neighboring bubbles before the contacting, and it
time step scheme and proper under-relaxation fac- ruptures by the capillary instability when the liq-
tors are implemented to obtain good convergence in uid film is sufficiently thin. The liquid microlayer
simulation. In addition, the relative residuals of the between the stems vaporizes until the stems depart
variables for velocity, pressure and energy in each from the wall. Once the shear lift force is large
control volume are ensured to be less than 0.1% enough, the merged bubble departs from the wall
for each time step. Considering the results of grid- and reshapes to spherical shape by the surface ten-
independent test and the computing capability, the sion. Thus, the velocity inside the bubble is larger
1950111-5
November 27, 2019 11:27 0218-348X
1950111
W. Yu et al.
(a)
by UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO on 01/01/20. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
(b)
Fig. 2 Comparison of flow boiling between numerical simulation (right) and experiment (left) in a horizontal coiled tube:
(a) comparison of vapor profile under the flow rate of 10 L/h, heat flux of 6888W/m2 and subcooled of 8.5 K, (b) comparison
Fractals 2019.27. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
of vapor profile under the flow rate of 15 L/h, heat flux of 6888 W/m2 and subcooled of 10.5 K (red-vapor, blue-liquid).
than the velocity of main stream and a local vortex of the flow boiling. The subcooled water is heated
flow forms around the interface (see t = 11.8 ms). at the wall, inducing the boiling commencement,
For the bubble dynamic behavior of coalesce- and then the bubbly flow occurs. The vapor pro-
slide, as shown in Fig. 3b, the velocity deviations duction characterized by both the size and number
can lead to the coalescence between two sliding bub- of bubbles is increased by the further evaporation,
bles. After the bubble coalescence, the shear lift which induces the strong interaction and frequent
force is not sufficiently large to balance the surface coalescence between the bubbles. When the bubbles
tension, the merged bubble remains attached to the depart from the wall and then flow with the main
wall and keeps sliding. Due to the surface tension, stream, they interact and coalesce into larger bub-
a local vortex flow forms at t = 15.25 ms. For the bles, the bubbly-slug flow occurs. At high branch-
bubble dynamic behavior of coalesce-reattachment, ing level, the decrease in channel diameter signifi-
as shown in Fig. 3c, the merged bubble lifts-off from cantly changes the distribution of the vapor-liquid
the wall. However, its motion distance is very small, two phases. When the bubble length is larger the
after a short time, the bubble is blow back onto the channel diameter, the flow pattern transforms from
wall by the local flow field. bubbly-slug flow to slug flow.
Figure 3d shows the processes of bubble coa-
lescence and breakup at the bifurcation in high
branching level. The bubble breakup process can be 3.2. Vairation of Pressure, Void
described as follows: under the upstream pressure, Fraction and Fluid
a parabolic-like neck is formed at the bifurcation Temperature
and gets thinner with time. After a certain exten- As shown in Fig. 5, a sharp increase in the void
sion, the bubble is broken into two different ones. faction indicates the passage of vapor bubble and
The sharp rears of daughter bubbles are distorted a drop indicates the arrival of liquid phase. At
heavily due to the inertia. After a while, the tail of high branching level (k = 3 and 4), the slug
daughter bubbles shrinks due to the surface tension. flow and the smaller channel diameter lead to
In the breakup process, the velocity inside the bub- the long-time emergence of high void fraction
ble is apparently larger than the velocity surround- (ϕ = 1).
ing the bubble, which is induced by the inertia force The temporal evolution of pressure, fluid temper-
and surface tension acting on the bubbles. ature and void fraction for the selected section at
Generally, three typical flow patterns are 4th branching level is shown in Fig. 6. The vari-
achieved along the flow direction: bubbly, bubbly- ations of pressure, void fraction and fluid temper-
slug and slug flows. Figure 4 shows the snapshot ature are completely synchronized, indicating the
1950111-6
November 27, 2019 11:27 0218-348X
1950111
water vapor
vapor
water
t = 11.4ms t = 14.39ms
t = 11.7ms t = 14.59ms
by UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO on 01/01/20. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
t = 11.8ms t = 14.7ms
t = 12ms t = 15.08ms
Fractals 2019.27. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
t = 12.3ms t = 15.25ms
t = 12.8ms t = 16.01ms
t = 6.14ms t = 15ms
t = 6.26ms t = 17ms
t = 6.31ms t = 19ms
t = 6.6ms t = 21.6ms
t = 6.85ms t = 22ms
t = 7.53ms t = 24ms
1950111-7
November 27, 2019 11:27 0218-348X
1950111
W. Yu et al.
(a) 50
40
30
p (Pa)
20
10
0
(b) 520
480
T (K)
440
400
360
(c) 1.0
by UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO on 01/01/20. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06
t (s)
60
1950111-8
November 27, 2019 11:27 0218-348X
1950111
400
Twout Tw0 Tw1 (a) 400
395 Tw2 Tw3 Tw4 395
390
Tw (K)
390 385
Tw (K)
380
385
375
(b) 60000
380
h (W/m2·K)
40000
375
20000
0.008 0.010 0.012 0.014
t (s) 0
by UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO on 01/01/20. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
(c) 100
80
Fig. 8 The averaged wall temperature of each branching
Nu
60
level and at the outlet. 40
20
0
3.4. Wall Temperature 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8
L (mm)
The averaged wall temperature of each branching
level (Tw0 , Tw1 , Tw2 , Tw3 , Tw4 ) and averaged tem- Fig. 9 The variation of local wall temperature, heat trans-
perature at the outlet (Tout ) after the flow boil- fer coefficient and Nusselt number along the channel at 3rd
Fractals 2019.27. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
branching level.
ing reached steady state is shown in Fig. 8. The
heat flux applied at the outer wall induces a super-
heated thermal boundary layer at the inner wall throughout the microchannel, Tw,loc is the local wall
that thickens along the flow direction, which con- temperature.
tributes to the increase of active sites. Owing to the The local Nusselt number indicates the influence
fast growth of bubbles and their coalescence into of bubble dynamic behaviors on the heat transfer
large bubbles, the liquid absorbs more energy dur- performance in microchannel. Figure 9 plots the
ing the evaporation process with the larger super- local wall temperature, heat transfer coefficient and
heat degree of liquid, resulting in the wall temper- Nusselt number at 3th branching level. As shown,
ature drops from Tw1 to Tw3 . While, as the slug the heat transfer performance varies dramatically
flow occurs at 4th branching level, the slug bubble along the flow direction at same branching level, due
may contact the wall, inducing the increase in wall to the inherently chaotic nature of boiling mecha-
temperature. nism. The peak of local Nusselt number indicates
the high vapor quality and low wall temperature.
3.5. Heat Transfer Performance As the vapor has much lower thermal conductivity
compared to liquid, the bubble accumulation at the
The local heat transfer performance of flow boil- wall blocks the contact between the liquid and solid,
ing between the inner wall and the working fluid is thus inducing the sharp increasing of wall tempera-
expressed by the Nusselt number (N uloc ), which is ture, and deteriorating the heat transfer, while the
calculated for all positions at the heated wall along bubble departure from the wall induces the increas-
the flow direction. ing of heat transfer. Figure 10 shows averaged heat
The local heat transfer coefficient (hloc ), channel transfer coefficient and Nusselt numbers as the func-
hydraulic diameter (Dh ) and local thermal conduc- tion of branching level. Heat transfer performance
tivity of mixture phases (λloc ) were used for calcu- of each branching level is quite different due to the
lating N uloc , variations of flow patterns and channel confinement
effect. As shown in Figs. 4 and 10a, first, there is an
λloc = (1 − ϕ)λl + ϕλv , (18)
increase in heat transfer coefficient from 0th to 2th
q branching level, and then sharply decreases in the
hloc = , (19)
Tw,loc − Tsat area of developed boiling from 2th to 4th branching
hloc Dh level with higher shares of the vapor phase. This
N uloc = , (20) phenomenon is ascribed to that the heat transfer
λloc
dominated by nucleate boiling occurs at 0th to 2th
where Tsat (Tsat = 373.15 K) is the saturation branching level, where the channel is occupied by
temperature of water and is considered constant bubbly and bubbly-slug flows. While the nucleate
1950111-9
November 27, 2019 11:27 0218-348X
1950111
W. Yu et al.
42000 (k = 0) (k = 1) (k = 2) (k = 3) (k = 4)
2
39000
1 31.4 31.5 35.6 31.4 20.9
2 34.0 38.8 30.0 23.4
36000
3 33.2 29.7 19.1
4 38.8 30.4 25.1
33000
5 30.4 19.3
0 1 2 3 4
6 29.7 21.9
by UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO on 01/01/20. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
k
7 33.4 21.8
(a)
8 31.6 22.3
9 21.7
10 21.6
40
11 21.7
12 22.8
35
13 20.3
14 21.6
30 23.3
Nu
15
Fractals 2019.27. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
16 21.5
25
20 52000
0 1 2 3 4 48000
k
h (W/m2⋅K)
(b) 44000
Fig. 10 (a) The averaged heat transfer coefficient and (b) 40000
averaged Nusselt number of each branching level. G = 50kg/m2⋅s
36000 G = 250kg/m2⋅s
G = 500kg/m2⋅s
32000
0 1 2 3 4
boiling is gradually suppressed at 2th to 4th branch- k
ing level, where the channel is occupied by slug (a)
flows. Based on the Nusselt numbers of each branch-
ing level in Table 2, Fig. 10b shows the averaged 50000
q = 20w/cm2
Nusselt number of each branching level. The tran- q = 10w/cm2
sition from bubbly to bubbly-slug flow with higher 45000 q = 5w/cm2
h (W/m2⋅K)
1950111-10
November 27, 2019 11:27 0218-348X
1950111
the heat transfer coefficient. The main conclusions microchannel networks in the cooling of electronics,
are summarized as follows: Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 52(5–6) (2009) 1421–
1430.
(1) Three main bubble dynamic behaviors includ- 2. C. Zhang, Y. Chen, R. Wu and M. Shi, Flow boiling
ing coalesce-lift-off, coalesce-slide and coalesce- in constructal tree-shaped minichannel network, Int.
reattachment are obtained. Bubble coalescence J. Heat Mass Transfer 54(1–3) (2011) 202–209.
is pervasive in flow boiling, and the appear- 3. A. Bejan, Constructal-theory network of conducting
ances of lift-off, slide or reattachment depend paths for cooling a heat generating volume, Int. J.
on the local flow field. At the bifurcation in Heat Mass Transfer 40(4) (1997) 799–811.
Fractals 2019.27. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
high branching level, the bubbles may coalesce 4. C. Zhang, L. Wu and Y. Chen, Study on solidifica-
or breakup. tion of phase change material in fractal porous metal
foam, Fractals 23(1) (2015) 1540003.
(2) Three typical flow patterns including the bub-
5. A. Rivera-Alvarez and A. Bejan, Constructal geom-
bly, bubbly-slug and slug flows are sequentially
etry and operation of adsorption processes, Int. J.
observed along the flow direction. The bub- Therm. Sci. 42(10) (2003) 983–994.
bly and bubbly-slug flows occur at low branch- 6. L. Wang, W. Wu and X. Li, Numerical and experi-
ing level. While the slug flow occurs at high mental investigation of mixing characteristics in the
branching level due to the combined effects constructal tree-shaped microchannel, Int. J. Heat
of bubble dynamics and channel confinement, Mass Transfer 67 (2013) 1014–1023.
the decrease in channel diameter significantly 7. S. M. Senn and D. Poulikakos, Laminar mixing, heat
changes the distribution of vapor and liquid transfer and pressure drop in tree-like microchannel
phases. nets and their application for thermal management
(3) The passage of vapor bubble induces the in polymer electrolyte fuel cells, J. Power Sources
increasing of local pressure and fluid temper- 130(1–2) (2004) 178–191.
8. J. V. C. Vargas, J. C. Ordonez and A. Bejan, Con-
ature. The pressure drop decreases with the
structal flow structure for a PEM fuel cell, Int. J.
increase in branching level. Due to the high
Heat Mass Transfer 47(19–20) (2004) 4177–4193.
thermal resistance of vapor phase, the bubbles 9. X. Fu, P. Zhang, C. J. Huang and R. Z. Wang, Visual
attaching to the wall would cause the hot spot study of flow pattern evolution of flow boiling in
of the wall, inducing the sharp increase in wall a microtube, Heat Transfer Eng. 32(11–12) (2011)
temperature. 1009–1018.
(4) The flow pattern and channel confinement 10. G. H. Yeoh and J. Y. Tu, A unified model consider-
have vital influence on the heat transfer of ing force balances for departing vapour bubbles and
the microchannel. The typical nucleate boil- population balance in subcooled boiling flow, Nucl.
ing dominant heat transfer was observed at low Eng. Des. 235(10–12) (2005) 1251–1265.
branching level, where the channel is occupied 11. R. Situ, T. Hibiki, M. Ishii and M. Mori, Bubble lift-
by bubbly and bubbly-slug flows; thus, the heat off size in forced convective subcooled boiling flow,
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 48(25–26) (2005) 5536–
transfer performance is enhanced with increas-
5548.
ing branching level from k = 0 to 2. Because
12. R. Ahmadi, T. Ueno and T. Okawa, Bubble dynam-
the nucleate boiling is gradually suppressed at ics at boiling incipience in subcooled upward flow
3th to 4th branching level, where the chan- boiling, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 55(1–3) (2012)
nel is occupied by slug flows, the heat trans- 488–497.
fer performance weakens. Moreover, the heat 13. P. C. Lee, F. G. Tseng and C. Pan, Bubble dynamics
transfer coefficient in tree-shaped microchannel in microchannels. Part I: Single microchannel, Int.
increases with the mass flow rate and heat flux. J. Heat Mass Transfer 47(25) (2004) 5575–5589.
1950111-11
November 27, 2019 11:27 0218-348X
1950111
W. Yu et al.
14. S. G. Kandlikar, Similarities and differences between microchannels, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 52(21–
flow boiling in microchannels and pool boiling, Heat 22) (2009) 5204–5212.
Transfer Eng. 31(3) (2010) 159–167. 29. S. Y. Zhou, X. Q. Xu and B. G. Sammakia, Mod-
15. T. L. Chen and S. V. Garimella, Local heat trans- eling of boiling flow in microchannels for nucleation
fer distribution and effect of instabilities during flow characteristics and performance optimization, Int.
boiling in a silicon microchannel heat sink, Int. J. J. Heat Mass Transfer 64 (2013) 706–718.
Heat Mass Transfer 54(15–16) (2011) 3179–3190. 30. Z. Q. Dong, J. L. Xu, F. M. Jiang and P. Liu,
16. G. D. Wang and P. Cheng, An experimental study Numerical study of vapor bubble effect on flow and
of flow boiling instability in a single microchannel, heat transfer in microchannel, Int. J. Therm. Sci.
Int. Commun. Heat Mass 35(10) (2008) 1229–1234. 54 (2012) 22–32.
by UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO on 01/01/20. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
17. Z. Yang, X. F. Peng and P. Ye, Numerical and exper- 31. S. C. Wu, C. Yu, F. W. Yu and Y. P. Chen,
imental investigation of two phase flow during boil- Lattice Boltzmann simulation of co-existing boil-
ing in a coiled tube, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer ing and condensation phase changes in a confined
51(5–6) (2008) 1003–1016. micro-space, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 126 (2018)
18. R. Zhuan and W. Wang, Simulation on nucleate 773–782.
boiling in micro-channel, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 32. B. M. Yu and P. Cheng, A fractal model for nucleate
53(1–3) (2010) 502–512. pool boiling heat transfer, J. Heat Trans.-T. ASME
19. Z. Rui and W. Wen, Simulation of subcooled flow 124(6) (2002) 1117–1124.
boiling in a micro-channel, Int. J. Refrig. 34(3) 33. B. Xiao and B. Yu, A fractal analysis of subcooled
Fractals 2019.27. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
1950111-12
November 27, 2019 11:27 0218-348X
1950111
42. C. D. Murray, The physiological principle of min- 44. W. H. Lee, Pressure iteration scheme for two-
imum work. I. The vascular system and the cost phase flow modeling, in Multiphase Transport:
of blood volume, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 12(3) Fundamentals, Reactor Safety, Applications, Vol. 1
(1926) 207–214. (Hemisphere Publishing, Washington DC, 1980),
43. J. U. Brackbill, D. B. Kothe and C. Zemach, A pp. 407–432.
continuum method for modeling surface tension, J.
Comput. Phys. 100 (1992) 335–354.
by UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO on 01/01/20. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
Fractals 2019.27. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
1950111-13