RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RPMS)

For Teachers I – III - ANNOTATIONS

KRA 1: CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND PEDAGOGY

OBJECTIVE 1: Applied knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas (PPST
1.1.2)
MOVs: Attach your Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or inter-observer agreement form
from an observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 7 in COT – Outstanding
For KRA 1 - Objective 1, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. I
applied high level knowledge of content and pedagogy within and across curriculum teaching areas to
create a conducive learning environment that enables an in-depth and sophisticated understanding of the
teaching and learning process to meet individual/group learning needs. It is evident that I have met the
objective, as shown by a rating of 7 under Indicator 1 – Applied knowledge of content within and
across curriculum teaching areas. This is equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS
Rating Scale.

Rating of 6 in COT – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 1 - Objective 1, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. When
delivering the lesson, I demonstrated accurate, in-depth and broad knowledge of concepts in presenting
the lesson, and in responding to learners’ questions in a manner that is responsive to learners’
developmental needs. It is evident that I have met the objective, as shown by a rating of 6 under
Indicator 1 – Applied knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas. This is
equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 5 in COT – Satisfactory

For KRA 1 - Objective 1, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. When
delivering the lesson, I demonstrated accurate, in-depth and broad knowledge of concepts in presenting
the lesson, and in responding to learners’ questions in a manner that attempts to be responsive to pupils
developmental learning needs. It is evident that I have met the objective, as shown by a rating of 5
under Indicator 1 – Applied knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas.
This is equivalent to 5 points (Outsatnding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 4 in COT – Unsatisfactory

For KRA 1 - Objective 1, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. When
delivering the lesson, I demonstrated accurate knowledge of key concepts both in presentation of the
lesson and in responding to learners’ questions and reacting to questions or comments. It is evident that
I have met the objective, as shown by a rating of 4 under Indicator 1 – Applied knowledge of content
within and across curriculum teaching areas. This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the
RPMS Rating Scale.
OBJECTIVE 2: Used a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement in literacy and
numeracy skills (PPST 1.4.2)
MOVs: Attach your Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or inter-observer agreement form
from an observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 7 in COT - Outstanding
 For KRA 1 - Objective 2, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. When
delivering the lesson, I integrated well connected teaching strategies that promote individual/group
learners’ critical literacy and/or critical numeracy skills. Since I was able to meet the objective, a rating
of 7 under Indicator 2 – Uses a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement in
literacy and numeracy skills, which is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale
where given.

Rating of 6 in COT – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 1 - Objective 2, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. When
delivering the lesson, I consistently applied relevant strategies that enhance learners’ literacy and/or
numeracy skills in all aspects of the lesson. A rating of 6 under Indicator 2 – Uses a range of teaching
strategies that enhance learner achievement in literacy and numeracy skills, which is equivalent to
4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale where given.

Rating of 5 in COT – Satisfactory

For KRA 1 - Objective 2, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. When
delivering the lesson, I frequently applied relevant strategies that enhance learners’ literacy and/or
numeracy skills in my lesson. A rating of 5 under Indicator 2 – Uses a range of teaching strategies
that enhance learner achievement in literacy and numeracy skills, which is equivalent to 3 points
(Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale where given.

Rating of 4 in COT – Unsatisfactory

For KRA 1 - Objective 2, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. In some
parts of my lesson, I provided activities which address learners’ literacy and/or numeracy needs but I
failed to do so in some critical parts of the lesson where either or both skills are necessary. A rating of
4 under Indicator 2 – Uses a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement in
literacy and numeracy skills, which is equivalent to 2 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating
Scale where given.

OBJECTIVE 3: Applied a range of teaching strategies to develop critical and creative thinking, as well
as other higher-order thinking skills (PPST 1.5.2)
MOVs: Attach your Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or inter-observer agreement form
from an observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 7 - Outstanding
For KRA 1 - Objective 3, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. I
provided a broad range of questions and activities, including those of higher-order that challenges
learners to analyze their thinking to promote deeper understanding. I clearly fulfilled the goal, as
evidenced by a rating of 7 under Indicator 3 – Applied a range of teaching strategies to develop
critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking skills. This is equivalent to 5
points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 6 – Very Satisfactory
For KRA 1 - Objective 3, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. Using
a well-directed questions and activities, I challenged learners to justify their thinking and successfully
engaged most of them during the teaching and learning process. It is evidenced by a rating of 6 under
Indicator 3 – Applied a range of teaching strategies to develop critical and creative thinking, as
well as other higher-order thinking skills which is equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the
RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 5 – Satisfactory
For KRA 1 - Objective 3, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. I
employed range of teaching strategies to ensure that most learners are given opportunities to give their
opinions/ideas about the lesson and to react to the opinions of their classmates. A rating of 5 under
Indicator 3 – Applied a range of teaching strategies to develop critical and creative thinking, as
well as other higher-order thinking skills which is equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS
Rating Scale were given.

Rating of 4 – Unsatisfactory
For KRA 1 - Objective 3, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. In
delivering the lesson, I personally asks questions and provided activities that mostly require learners to
interpret, explain or just describe ideas they have learned. A rating of 4 under Indicator 3 – Applied a
range of teaching strategies to develop critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher-order
thinking skills which is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale were given.

KRA 2: LEARNING ENVIRONMENT & DIVERSITY OF LEARNERS

OBJECTIVE 4: Managed classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in
meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical environments
(PPST 2.3.2)
MOVs: Attach your Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or inter-observer agreement form
from an observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 7 - Outstanding
For KRA 2 - Objective 4, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation.
During classroom observation, I organized and maintained classroom structure and engaged learners
individually/in groups, in meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-on learning activities within a
range of physical learning environments. A pro-active classroom structure management practices to
support flexible movement of the learners management practices to support flexible movement of the
learners during group activities were evident. As demonstrated by a score of 7 on Indicator 4, I certainly
met the objective – Managed classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in
meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical
environments. This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 6 – Very Satisfactory
For KRA 2 - Objective 4, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation.
During classroom observation, all learners were able to work productively within the allotted time,
physical space and resources. I managed to let pupils be engaged in meaningful exploration, discovery
and hands-on learning activities. As demonstrated by a score of 6 on Indicator 4, I certainly met the
objective – Managed classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in
meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical
environments. This is equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 5 - Satisfactory
For KRA 2 - Objective 4, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation.
During classroom observation, it is evident that most learners work productively within allotted time,
physical space and resources. A score of 5 on Indicator 4, I certainly met the objective – Managed
classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful exploration,
discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical environments. This is equivalent to 3
points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 4 - Unsatisfactory
For KRA 2 - Objective 4, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation.
Classroom layout is simple and somewhat suitable for different learning activities. A score of 4 on
Indicator 4, – Managed classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in
meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical environments
were given. This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

OBJECTIVE 5: Managed learner behavior constructively by applying positive and non-violent

discipline to ensure learning-focused environments (PPST 2.6.2)
MOVs: Attach your Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or inter-observer agreement form
from an observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 7 - Outstanding
For KRA 2 - Objective 5, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. I
constructively managed learner behavior by applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure a
learning-focused environment. The fact that I received a rating of 7 on Indicator 5 indicates that I
achieved the goal. – Managed learner behavior constructively by applying positive and non-violent
discipline to ensure learning-focused environments. This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in
the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 6 – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 2 - Objective 5, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet from an
Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. I responded
appropriately to the misbehavior of my learners at all times without any loss of instructional time. A
rating of 6 on Indicator 5 indicates that I achieved the goal. – Managed learner behavior
constructively by applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure learning-focused
environments. This is equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 5 - Satisfactory
For KRA 2 - Objective 5, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet from an
Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. I frequently
manages learners behavior against established rules of conduct and most of learners follow such. A
rating of 5 on Indicator 5 – Managed learner behavior constructively by applying positive and non-
violent discipline to ensure learning-focused environments were given. This is equivalent to 3 points
(Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 4 - Unsatisfactory
For KRA 2 - Objective 5, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet from an
Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
classroom observation I occasionally managed misbehavior of my pupils against established rules of
conduct and majority of them follow such rules. A rating of 4 on Indicator 5 – Managed learner
behavior constructively by applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure learning-focused
environments were given. This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

OBJECTIVE 6: Used differentiated developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address

learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences (PPST 3.1.2)
MOVs: Attach your Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or inter-observer agreement form
from an observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 7 - Outstanding
For KRA 2 - Objective 6, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
classroom observation, differentiated and developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address
the diverse learning needs were evident. As indicated, I received a rating of 7 on Indicator – Used
differentiated developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address learners’ gender,
needs, strengths, interests and experiences This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS
Rating Scale.

Rating of 6 – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 2 - Objective 6, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
the delivery of lesson, differentiated strategies that motivate and engage group of learners at their
cognitive levels, allowing them to achieve the learning outcomes were provided. A rating of 6 on
Indicator 6 – Used differentiated developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address
learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences were given. This is equivalent to 4
points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 5 - Satisfactory
For KRA 2 - Objective 6, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
classroom observation, differentiated and developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address
the diverse learning needs were evident. A rating of 5 on Indicator 6 – Used differentiated
developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address learners’ gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences were given. This is equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating
Scale.

Rating of 4 - Unsatisfactory
For KRA 2 - Objective 6, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
classroom observation, differentiated and developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address
the learning needs for most were evident. A rating of 4 on Indicator 6 – Used differentiated
developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address learners’ gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences were given. This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS
Rating Scale.

KRA 3: Curriculum and Planning

OBJECTIVE 7: Planned, managed, implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and learning
processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts (PPST 4.1.2)
MOVs: Attach your Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or inter-observer agreement form
from an observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 7 - Outstanding
For KRA 3 - Objective 8, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. As a
teacher, I managed well structured lessons with emphasis on explicit connections between previous learning and
new concepts and skills. The fact that I received a rating of 7 on Indicator 7 indicates that I achieved the
goal. – Planned, managed, implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and learning
processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts. This is equivalent to 5
points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 6 – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 3 - Objective 7, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
the delivery of lesson, the sequenced of activities purposely scaffolds learners toward achieving the
lesson’s objectives. A rating of 6 on Indicator 7 indicates that I achieved the goal. – Planned,
managed, implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and learning processes to meet
curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts. This is equivalent to 4 points (Very
Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 5 – Satisfactory
For KRA 3 - Objective 7, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
the delivery of lesson, I managed to implement lessons with appropriate elements of developmentally
sequenced teaching and learning processes. A rating of 5 on Indicator 7 indicates that I achieved the
goal. – Planned, managed, implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and learning
processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts. This is equivalent to 3
points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 4 – Unsatisfactory
For KRA 3 - Objective 7, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
the delivery of lesson, I was not able to demonstrate understanding of the pre-requisite relationships
when planning and there where some problems with the lesson strategies that negatively impacted
learning. A rating of 4 on Indicator 7 – Planned, managed, implemented developmentally
sequenced teaching and learning processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching
contexts were given. This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
OBJECTIVE 8: Participated in collegial discussions that use teacher and learner feedback to enrich
teaching practice (PPST 4.4.2)
MOVs:
1. Proof/s of attendance in LAC sessions/FGDs/meetings/other collegial discussions
2. Minutes of LAC sessions/FGDs/meetings/other collegial discussions on use of teacher and learner
feedback to enrich teaching practice
3. Reflection Notes of teachers on their demonstration of teaching practices following participation
from LAC sessions/FGDs/meetings/other collegial discussions that use teacher and learner feedback to
enrich teaching practice with proof of attendance
4. Any equivalent form/document that highlights the objective
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 7 - Outstanding
For KRA 3 - Objective 8, I have attached reflection notes on the demonstration of teaching
practices following my participation from collegial discussions that discusses teacher and learner
feedback across 4 quarters. The fact that I gained a rating 7 on Indicator 8 implies that I accomplished
the objective – Participated in collegial discussions that use teacher and learner feedback to enrich
teaching practice. This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 6 – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 3 - Objective 8, I have attached reflection notes on the demonstration of teaching
practices following my participation from collegial discussions that discusses teacher and learner
feedback across 3 quarters. A rating of 6 on Indicator 8 – Participated in collegial discussions that
use teacher and learner feedback to enrich teaching practice were given. This is equivalent to 4
points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 5 – Satisfactory
For KRA 2 - Objective 8, I have attached minutes of collegial discussions attended following my
participation that discusses teacher and learner feedback across 2 quarters. A rating of 5 on Indicator 8
– Participated in collegial discussions that use teacher and learner feedback to enrich teaching
practice were given. This is equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 4 – Unsatisfactory
For KRA 2 - Objective 8, I attended collegial discussions that discuss teacher/learner feedback to
enrich instruction with proof of attendance following my participation in 1 quarter only. A rating of 2
on Indicator 8 – Participated in collegial discussions that use teacher and learner feedback to
enrich teaching practice were given. This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS
Rating Scale.

OBJECTIVE 9: Selected, developed, organized, and used appropriate teaching and learning resources
including ICT, to address learning goals (PPST 4.5.2)
MOVs:
SET A as Option - Attach your Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or inter-observer
agreement form from an observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom
observation
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 7 - Outstanding
For KRA 3 - Objective 9, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. I was
able integrate extensive and multi-disciplinary learning resources, including ICT, which are appropriate
and aligned with the learning goals. As a result, I obtained a rating of 7 on Indicator 9 which signifies
that I attained the objective – Selected, developed, organized, and used appropriate teaching and
learning resources including ICT, to address learning goals. This is equivalent to 5 points
(Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 6 – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 3 - Objective 9, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
classroom observation, learning resources, including ICT, which are consistently aligned with the
learning goals were utilized. As a result, I obtained a rating of 6 on Indicator 9 which signifies that I
attained the objective – Selected, developed, organized, and used appropriate teaching and learning
resources including ICT, to address learning goals. This is equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory)
in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 5 – Satisfactory
For KRA 3 - Objective 9, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
classroom observation, learning resources, including ICT, which are generally aligned with the learning
goals were utilized. As a result, I obtained a rating of 6 on Indicator 9 which signifies that I attained the
objective – Selected, developed, organized, and used appropriate teaching and learning resources
including ICT, to address learning goals. This is equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS
Rating Scale.

Rating of 4 – Unsatisfactory
For KRA 3 - Objective 9, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
classroom observation, instructional materials and resources are incompletely aligned with the
instructional purposes. A rating of 4 on Indicator 9 – Selected, developed, organized, and used
appropriate teaching and learning resources including ICT, to address learning goals were given.
This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

KRA 4: ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING

OBJECTIVE 10: Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative
assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements (PPST 5.1.2)
MOVs: Attach your Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or inter-observer agreement form
from an observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 7 - Outstanding
 For KRA 4 - Objective 10, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
classroom observation, assessment strategies which engage learners to monitor and reflect on their own
progress were evident. As indicated, I received a rating of 7 on Indicator – Designed, selected,
organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 6 – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 4 - Objective 10, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
classroom observation, learners were encouraged to assess and monitor the quality of their work against
the assessment criteria and performance standards. As indicated, I received a rating of 6 on Indicator 10
– Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment
strategies consistent with curriculum requirements. This is equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory)
in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 5 – Satisfactory
For KRA 4 - Objective 10, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
classroom observation, I provided a variety of assessment strategies that address most of the learning
goals. A rating of 5 on Indicator 10 – Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative
and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements were given. This is
equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 4 – Unsatisfactory
For KRA 4 - Objective 10, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet
from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person classroom observation. During
classroom observation, assessment strategies were utilized but only some are aligned with the learning
goals. A rating of 4 on Indicator 10 – Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative
and summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements were given. This is
equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

OBJECTIVE 11: Monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement using learner attainment
data (PPST 5.2.2)
MOVs:
Any one (1) of the following:
1. Individual Learning Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
2. Peer Assessment Data
3. Sample of learners’ output with reflection/self-assessment
4. Progress charts/anecdotal records
5. Class Record/Grading Sheets
6. Lesson Plan showing index of mastery
7. Frequency of errors with identifies least/most mastered skills
8. Any equivalent ALS form/document that highlights the objective

ANNOTATION:
Rating of 7 - Outstanding
For KRA 4 - Objective 11, I have attached the Individual Learning Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
wherein pupils’ progress based on the given intervention strategies were monitored and evaluated. I also
included a sample of learners’ output with reflection, class record and grading sheets, reading and
numeracy profile as well as Item Analysis of test results across 4 quarters. As a result, I achieved a
rating of 7 on Indicator 11, demonstrating that I reached the objective. – Monitored and evaluated
learner progress and achievement using learner attainment data. This is equivalent to 5 points
(Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 6 – Very Satisfactory

Monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement based on attainment from an
individual data.
Timeliness - across 3 quarter
Rating of 5 - Satisfactory
Monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement based on class attainment data
Timeliness - across 2 quarter
Rating of 4 - Unsatisfactory
Monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement based on the existing grade
level/department/learning area report.
Timeliness - in only 1 quarter

OBJECTIVE 12: Communicated promptly and clearly the learners’ needs, progress and achievement
to key stakeholders, including parents/guardians (PPST 5.4.2)
MOVs: Any one (1) of the following:
1. Sample of corrected test paper of a learner in a learning area with parent’s or guardian’s signature
and date of receipt.
2. Minutes of meetings with key stakeholders
3. Report card with parent’s or guardian’s signature in all quarters supported by minutes of meeting
4. Communication with key stakeholders
5. Anecdotal record
6. Any equivalent ALS form/document that highlights the objective

ANNOTATION:
For KRA 4 - Objective 12, I have attached a copy a sample copy of corrected test paper with
parent’s or guardian’s signature and date of receipt as well as minutes of meeting during PTCA
Conference and a communication cardex that sustained engagement to monitor learners needs, progress
and achievement across all quarters. In Indicator 12, I got a rating of 7, indicating that I achieved the
objective – Communicated promptly and clearly the learners’ needs, progress and achievement to
key stakeholders, including parents/guardians. This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the
RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 6 – Very Satisfactory
Communicated promptly and clearly using various tools and strategies learners needs, progress
and achievement to key stakeholders including parents/guardians.
Timeliness - across 3 quarter
Rating of 5 - Satisfactory
Communicated promptly and clearly using only one (1) strategy learners needs, progress and
achievement to key stakeholders including parents/guardians.
Timeliness - across 2 quarter
Rating of 4 - Unsatisfactory
Communicated learners needs, progress and achievement to key stakeholders including
parents/guardians but not regularly
Timeliness - in only 1 quarter

KRA 5: PERSONAL GROWTH AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

OBJECTIVE 13: Applied a personal philosophy of teaching that is learner-centered (PPST 7.1.2)
MOVs:
A reflection/journal entry that highlights the application of a learner-centered teaching
philosophy in the lesson plan or community work
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 7 - Outstanding
For KRA 5 - Objective 13, I have attached a reflection/journal entry that highlights the
application of a learner-centered teaching. It details the consistent involvement of learners in the
teaching-learning process across all 4 quarters. As a result, in Indicator 13, I obtained a rating of 7
indicating that I met the objective – Applied a personal philosophy of teaching that is learner-
centered. This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

Rating of 6 – Very Satisfactory

It reflects involvement of learners in the teaching-learning process resulting form the application
of a personal philosophy of teaching that is learner centered
Timeliness - across 3 quarter
Rating of 5 - Satisfactory
It shows the application of a personal philosophy of teaching that is learner-centered
Timeliness - across 2 quarter
Rating of 4 - Unsatisfactory
It indicates a personal philosophy of teaching that is not learner-centered.
 Timeliness – in only 1 quarter

OBJECTIVE 14: Set professional development goals based on the Philippine Professional Standards
for Teachers (PPST 7.5.2)
MOVs:
1. Certification from the ICT Coordinator/School Head/Focal person in-charge of e-SAT
2. IPCRF-DP
2. Mid-Year Review Form (MRF)
3. Updated IPCRF-DP from Phase II
ANNOTATION:
For KRA 5 - Objective 14, I was able to prove that I set professional development goals based on
the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers by attaching a copy of my updated IPCRF-
Development Plan during the Phase II of the RPMS cycle and submitted all other acceptable MOVs
within the prescribed RPMS Phase. As a result, in Indicator 14, I obtained a rating of 7 signifies that I
obtained the objective – Set professional development goals based on the Philippine Professional
Standards for Teachers. This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

NOTES FOR OBJECTIVE 14

Very Satisfactory – Discussed progress on professional development goals with the rater during the
mid-year review as evidenced by MOV No. 3

Satisfactory – Set professional development goals based on e-SAT results as evidenced by MOV No.
32

Unsatisfactory – Accomplished the e-SAT at the beginning of the school year as evidenced by MOV
No. 41

PLUS FACTOR
OBJECTIVE 15: Performed various related works/activities that contribute to the teaching and
learning process
MOVs: Certificates
ANNOTATION:
For Objective 15, I have attached certificates with pictures of my active participation as I
performed various related works/activities that contribute to the teaching and learning process beyond
the School/Community Learning Center (CLC) across 4 quarters. As a result, in Indicator 15, I obtained
a rating of 7 implies that I achieved the objective – Performed various related works/activities that
contribute to the teaching and learning process. This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the
RPMS Rating Scale.

NOTES FOR OBJECTIVE 15

Very Satisfactory – Performed at least 1 related work / activity that contributed to the teaching-learning
process within the school / Community Learning Center (CLC) as evidenced by submitted MOV
across 3 quarters

Satisfactory – Performed at least 1 related work / activity that contributed to the teaching-learning
process within the learning area / department as evidenced by submitted MOV across 2 quarters

Unsatisfactory – Performed at least 1 related work / activity that contributed to the teaching-learning
process within the class as evidenced by submitted MOV in 1 quarter only.