Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Di Maggio, P.J. & Powell, W. (1991) - Chapter 1. Introduction (p.1-38) 2

    Uploaded by

    David Carrasquilla
    18 views22 pages

    Original Title

    Di Maggio, P.J. & Powell, W. (1991). Chapter 1. Introduction (p.1-38)2

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    18 views22 pages

    Di Maggio, P.J. & Powell, W. (1991) - Chapter 1. Introduction (p.1-38) 2

    Uploaded by

    David Carrasquilla

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 22
    The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis siie ty Walter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio ‘The Unversity of Chicago Press (Chicago and London ‘Beano Chags Pen eno omy Uae of Ce Suir aba 91 spwozieeroe sine) emspsusn6a5o4 54 any tp Cag Fb Da ‘eet natn ein "ster Powel ul Daag tdsaibionial tents. ani Lect vier Ie Digg © Teper te tan oe a (Suen tbe Ane Nasu emi namin ‘Soe femmes other fred iy Her, ass a Contents Actoowledgmeas 1 Taroom Paul] DiMaggio and Water W. Powell, Part One: The Initial Formolations 2° ested Ogio Fema Stace ‘as Myth and Ceremony Joba W. Meyer and Brin Rowan 3 ThelronCage Revisited: Institutional somorpism and Collective Rational In Organization Fels aul. DiMageo and Water W. Powell 4 TheRoleolestutionalization i Cultural Persitence Lyme. Zocker 5 The Onanization of Social Sectors: Propositions i and Early Evidence "We Richard Soot and John W. Meyer Part wo: Refining Istitational Theory 6 Iastnons, nsitional Eos, and lstadoalism or Ronn L.Bepperson 7) Unpacking esitutionl Arguments ‘We Richard Soot 8" Bxyondng the Scope of station Anis ‘Walt W. Powell, 9 ‘The Pubic Onderand the Construction ‘of Formal Onanizations Ronald L Fepperson and Soa W: Meyer 10 Bringing Socnty Back In: Symbols, Practices, _g.__ iilestaonl Contos Roper Friedland and Rober R, Alford are Thee: Empirical Investigations A. Constructing Organizational Fields 11 Conteting ae Organizational Fick as «Professional, Prec U.S. AR Museums, 1920-1540 asl. DiNtagaio a 6 ® 108 13 16 we T introduction ‘Wacran W, owen ntitationl theory presen prado. Institutional stlyis is 28 old a ite Durkheim's exhortation ost "social fac as hing,” yet suicealy novel tobe preceded by new is mach ofthe conlamperary Heat. Ineittionalsn, _perportedly represents dstnctive approach tthe study of socal, enon, nd poll phenomens ets often easier ain agrecment boat wba ithe hot than abou wha it Thera several reasons for ths ambiguiy clare ‘hove writen about intttons hme ofenbeenethercausl shou defiing ‘hems oitonlom has disparate meanings ndiferent ciples; end, ve ‘withinerganizato thers, “isin var nth relaiveemphssis on ‘micro and macro features, i their weightings of cognitive and mative as pects of Insitutions, and inthe ioportnce they tbat to interests and ‘elationa netvors inthe creation au difsio of esttons. Although thre ae as many “ew insiionaliss” as thre are social sei ‘nce disciplines, his Bok i abot jst one of hem, th ne that ha made te ‘mark on orzaization theory, espacial Hat branch mos lose soca ‘with sociology In presenting the papers assembled hee, we hope f accom ‘lish dee dings. Fst by publishing ogee fr the st mea part 1) four ‘ofca- SRend exogenous change gui ordothey vole gaily ain ways tat trent typally angled? ome stiuron in pola! cence and economics ecoanis Siu eno hghy- alee, Tiss aranements_consa Se win oy eenng sr ces unvile, pestding al eon ant resting certain pater of ou llosdtion so el (1986, 1989) han opud that sch pica instaone a Cn scenes stu ands seiory sytem mtb obra ipl sae make credible commitments. And economists Ricard Neon ‘cs Ay Winer (1982) copasz the le of rer norms, and cle rascal change wd exp stow the view hat mac competion arnt lecn of efcintorzaniatoal srs and process, But se Oe Siough portant, someting of an exception; mest pu sae eect an economists who sy istatons vw them at provision. sree mary esing plats on he way oan efit gum son “Sraatnalsoslgits Sn sapive storing 1s pensive, ln eee Savon aod sce tate insiulnalizd te onisaty a pangs than thse that eno. nded, given te dsintion be tween and laste noted above tis amost a mater of ‘fein Socitgiats onc sna-cnce colt itech in cede an hyseal nk coss re pry responsible or tora Less eno he only, oe ost portant, fat, Tas =10- Inwtton onal argument ae epee Psa inl fen samen sae fain se EEE =e ged eal “Siematvesthycan iain) nsttutions do ot jt connin opons: SS eet nh po terete er) 7 ‘words, some f hemos important snk cot re copii. : 1 Wiegand eect iy nb pnd = ihe hn ee Sma Fennel hnge Se va oor ocr angen tht have bute ostttona reps sudden appear: ‘Emu Ge Powe ch). nce econ an pola seus ober ) funtion espns fh ways in wh toons reper ecient s0- “Tne pecblene of sovenaice Scopas et aT Spates pens geraoe ete lamae Bepuimby oe pt ea ‘The New Inetitationalism and the Sociological Tradition ‘The new insitonalism in organizational analysis has a distinctly logy in rebel Sth diverge = in optentc eye ore err ‘sociological approaches to organizations and institutions. "Do eclcate these Siete tn ih oo ei ‘esis andthe ol tesanaln ranean ty Ti Sain a iis of iter en mtionan ‘nadercresn Anglo Ames continent el hey, pate arly to developments in the theory of action. sme ‘Ti New erro aun, ieee 1. inreoapect one could assign ith atte mew istanalsn a xual sus, volline be 197 eye whch aa yer {Btedwo somal pope, “Teeter Cao tan ta” instead Oren Ral Stetson Crocay™ (itis Ronnie 2) whch eo ny of te coral conpnens ot hovel eg. be vac, sme of we sar were ein Moyers ongoing researh on th we yt (Meyers Hanan 199) {Soap inf ila per on hoa “chars cate ins 197 ed Soleo spt Meyers peosepaton thm ines lel > = Introduction omens is cvdeat in his early work on context! eet in organizational ‘rcrch (1968), The 1977 papers, andthe ful colabraion berseen Meyer “dW. Richard Scot tha followed (19830), laried and developed ist: ‘onal piel in te context of formal crgnizatons. By 1985, wher Lymge Zocker convened sal sonference onthe subject at UCLA (Zucker 1987), “The wuner of scholars nied bythe effects ocala, ua, ceremony. sd “Fig lve sures on organizations is ts benaned ad ERGs ace oO te “old isttanai” of Pip Selita his ssa, yt verges (otha ftom substantially Sc 199, 195, and for on apes at ecl overview, cs Sof Penow 198, Both i od ua ac apres shar shepard Tesolin forget, a each ews aston a pond! poses tx ates ganizations ks intrest etna se Bh xiphsie the slatonsipbe- insen oga Fervor ome toreved aps ‘lca tats consistent With 0 our on Et roach dress te ole of clare im saping ove Give The decked rational andrei eas OF mOSTafmatve ap proaches to ogatzatins, tes similarities vine moch continuity between ‘old institutional snd the new. Ye he later departs rom the fone nificant ways urimarized in bl | 1-In describing these dilerences, we Emphasize core features of ous, individual exceptions ca be found "The old isituionalitm was sghforearly potical in its aalyis of yop conic and organizational stategy. The leadership ofthe Tenses Va ey Autry, for example, co-opted external constituencies itctonally, tending of is creas” more populist sgiulural designs to poet the ral ‘loctiiceton program (Selznick 1940). By contrast, the new institutional say dst sof tee thn rete oat ‘Se pussies dep Sue athmatetwe stucco and Meyer ch). Aon ‘we note below, institutional and political approaches to organizational change ‘sunt cone fel Gogo he xs inal vrk won ‘Spee futon tated 0 prevent elo om epi or ng Spon ft inerets(DMagao 1988 Te follows that although the okt and new appeaches agree tht insti snl contin ania) aoa, ey ety dees ‘Soca Coser wiki cc enpszng he ves of ee Win ‘Seaiztions a eel poldeal adeofs and allaners, andthe pew es SE lctgen tsveen noi and linc) ea ‘mon unlenedigy fn slo expt ated” cher 1985. "Ton difecncr reef inte etme of orgaztonal sce in ne Innsdtion Societe ‘et nce eee pene Sol ore Sond onate Siro al npn atte tna commun Fi soe oe Sirafeckaicies, Coops Comins Liticscetinim Grete oor mcey Gaiaioutsrmmis.” eng rene Tepe aan Tact apes eye ae SEE tect Urner Uae eyo pion Winner sins Chon, in Seatpost toy om Digae om fale Orne the two trains. The old instittonalism highlighted th “shadowtand of formal interaction Selaniek 1945-60) aed “liq, parclariticelements in ecraimentor promi — bth oilsuate bow the formals de ‘atti the difeson of cai departs nd opeating procedtes ineroganizaina inuences, ‘conformity, andthe pesaasiveness of cultural accounts, aherthan tothe use tons they are intended o perform (Meyer and Rowan, DiMaggio and Powel, this vol). ‘Another fundamen diereace between he two nstonaisms isin het conception f the envtonmet. Authors of ler work (Selarck 1949 ‘Goaldne 1954; Dalton 1959; Clark 160) describe organizations tat are em ‘bedded inca ommanities, to which they are edb the ail yale of ‘etsonnel and by ltrorganizatonl esis (“o-opation”) hammered outa {cette iteration. The new isttationlism focuses intend on nonlocal environments, eer organizational sectors or feds oughly coteinas with the bovaderes of industries, proesions, or rational societies (Soot and ‘Meyer, ch. 5). Enviconments, inthis vie are more suite in heir nBuences, tater tha being co-opted by organizations they pence the epanization, reatng the Tenses through which ctor iw the word andthe very categories ‘of struct, ston, se thought (6 pat 2. Inreducion Because isitonalization was a proces ia which constraining lations wth loa constituenies evolved ove ie, ee intitonaliss regarded co [aviation as Boh the ws hat ere istatonalized an the key oe of he proces, By conta, necinetttioalis view iastinionazaton as oaing Srtheseeml or ile, dosnt ino ‘Organizational forms, suc components and rules, pot specific organiza ‘one, are instonalized, Thus whores the old insiusonalsm viewed ‘rzaizatons as crganic woe, tte ae insittionlisn eats the soos Coupled aay of standardized elements “Other ingot diferences folio om this: fsitatonalizaion, inthe lee view, establisbed a wique orgznizatonal “chincter.. . cystalized ‘Geough the peseration of custom and precedent” ‘Seioemotna enard andes fates fom pate ote esas Sur crcl, or! stasis. Wit cocoa! rewar ae, ‘evil merealee pent value ofentions nd “obo” sand Evalatinfor he pecormance of ls, ich tht rope efomance bythe ‘Sita wel os by thr, seen ay voding in sown Sah Paso Tost 20148). Equipe wih sch aes and ned spostions, 3 well command of symbolsystam ht renders conaricaton posi chiles {pow imo sllboodteay anal confor othe expecatos of aes toply the sociartesin which bey bavbecn cast Theinegraton le, ‘stars witha cle spose ax fn nprsve ony inttoalied whe ey ae fly cmqrous wih he pevling utr tes le gna round experts confor wi ir a e-lentions shared by member of she al Tito intgration, hts, fe intearaton of eof common valu ates wth he internalized pe. sion struct ofthe costituet personals” she “core phenome a the base of social exer (Parsons 19512), — “This telgrmmmatc condensation hay des jie tthe richness and in semaity of Parson’ account. Some of what we bave left othe numerous it at which Panonsinzaduces opportunites fr conic or iyi is "stem, or his iscassons of additonal machasisns dat complement noe. ‘mative coescasus in ensuring social order--need not dtu bere. What ‘nhl ha he andi of unas Bekins c st ssl fom re ds ot Fron (PSL Ginseng ton ns tate etaces “luce su ta mines elcome Panam ann etonat _Gisze Te dt tag wollte Eis toca spose ely ope eps of ene sl ee Keeping with his tparte scheme of orientations toward acti, Parsons) inal descr ctr or ncling acute alm (cmpesing ead | Bela eabecasfaece express dimers anton eave ci sea (ossing of valores). Es ote se ofl tee si feet oy cont, cul nad an ive of senor ond aaa: Tt chee kad st tales ove Y Tas rin ccna naa Oe aye ‘hc cogtton af ons nts andar inp! inbcar cnr 99 tdvclping the fame boweer, Pans aes ae efi nove tt ct fay soe of hs Eheim OF he ea ea ce ata ato erento sing ee thar dened fever of ultra nol Geof ee ily seen, a Beg Seager a eae CD -paiting sees Seed, win calves const mode, Fans {his scetn fom cope fo eaeive specs y arene ter ‘elton oes” and pacny be ene naan ‘ne ep a cnr of sys Panos lS 195; Pans oO 1951-37. Final, cognition std cates re for mst purposes cof oa ‘bid “ce cope svar ato oon ha“ ‘ipsenlt expan comeing palestine eno (rere {die LI, oat Toor Paos msn a ff and rll ol, ken ng este herent Spey fra Bese aon tan spt te entacon fh pe ‘Shean, towhh “cle” rental acer eet The es ‘harParson te ister compe Acne ad ‘the se ba mits ut neato prof raion OY ‘Sscnig humans who anes cone nl mallaeeed Saeed Paps established smutiimensionslpraigm atembrace the afectve sodevalasve dimension stort orcmtons, tan unprecedented o- fhistated foo ofl bony tha kad inion an sect levels of Atala He moved beyend mao indrmenal ronal, enscended the {Ea dichoomy betwen pesons a ners, and enogeied and o- Eile nao, Ts a no meat fea; Duta the penonenaogl {Err inomiting ne procese of cognition and adopting he stealer ferigsbewprlucodultaranss sist esoing andthe Tnicolpaticasos and choice Irwoude ett phenomeacogy and etno- tretbodsogy epee cogatve some apes of ate (Ceo 1974; Herage 1984, ch. 2° “Ty summarz, Pavone elton wa incomplete for es ess, Fst he tossed on te Cte ss foe exten of he opie oc cae teprosef ula and action oettion. Sevon, be pil tested acon ‘occuriagas iit wee be pnduto shrivel non pet Ti ie osumed mach more tingor rents orBth int and imersbec- {he conltenc than eee work in peycology hs shown be the ake. “Teer follow ese fom analy oft ntact athe es ois ‘tomy ten fm the oils pounding im peony psjcoloy. He can tay be med forth fre mee Hef pycog’s engi reve tin revsed ene images of conto. Hs vw af leas, ad sxe x morally integrated ents and his definition of instutions a aye feof vegutry noms, of tls govering sos i aro mere ‘entero ir conformity wat ule common values ofthe _sommunity" Parsons 0.4) eet te ewe was wig. These ‘Sfp and tt ny of scons followed Fr them made ese 0 instal ke Stanek and lp thm tina previo} neglected treat of oguizaoal fe, Before lng weve, to ses cine {ogy ante coptvereottion would make PusonInguag of rte fe ose son an ado asec or ease ey of oi ‘On of thse, cognitive peyton: hs anntigenos branch, he Carle sch, Within orgnizaton tery. ey cotton ofthe Care sha fs boca to foc oth rine, taken for grated aspects of organics We Ne cn fad aes of cogs a Weer’ ery of brent fghasis on he rol of “eae rus a reluing une ad- eating power elon, an ston a treacany hs ies rom Ssrinstadon by ovals which, "being less bound o schemata Terme” and “functions mor sow)” (192) 19789361015. Bu og ive lens prse wes naval organiza thy by Here Since nd Jamon March (Sion 1915 March an Sinan 1988; Cyet and March ipa ‘March inon, Richard Cye, ni collegues developed an amy of a ating multiple acts wih ices pee” vers. The now nitions morgan tery ove a considerable det tothe Caml schoo. We eared fom Simon’ 194588-5) early wok hat ‘bi mast nt be sen a pulps cement in bela, batter ‘mets by wich stenon sited to sled pct of sation, oe ‘clusion af ompeing npc ugh tus cen ante decton, ‘pons (154579109 rch nus of theo pein sceing te ‘Civies nd pesos ofertas partipnts ao rain enn ing Mar and Sao (936 as stent ei _-Pamicslary desison making inolve ule following nore can Ie exeulaion following more than the calculation “Sf conequnces, March and it claps rect work nt “aug tok" hs devel af ined oe cmplaue a soe = score mes yang, pons ‘Giana ply soled gldesestn ce ago quando mating of probes and saluons (Coen and Match Dre Nas ea Math an essing any "The work of he Canes epee robs aleatveto he canons ‘t ehoie fond in ssa ein Rery and meoecononie they tiirefonst develop site ofcboicedventy tenon action, Mach ‘Simons pinay foes wason elon aang antral orga tional pests. This resceupaton ed then avy Roman expen ‘wh erguiatonl enn, Nope. nthe Golan [EnsmoMETNODOLOGY ANB Purnontnotoey Because they were ot sociologists, Marchand Simon tad x0 need to confront the Parsonsin paraigm; moreover tt work ha ited impact, at frst, on gncral (as distinct om organizations) sociology. Within he dic. line itself, the challenge of analyzing engnitve aspects of behavior and the ‘akee-frgranted element in cognition went usmet unt the 196, whee “Hapld Garakel, Parsons sudeat inoencod ab well by the penomenolony ‘of Aled Schur, took on the task. Carfinkel developed an approach tosis investigation, etinometiodoogy that he came to regard sam aerative ape re Inrocion socinlogy; in return, stclology marginalize etomstholoay a8 an ext ‘yet of inquiry il adapted oie as ofthe Siemas.2 Yet despite the fale [EGactakels sbitons poet on teow ems, hsesponse 0 Parsons’ nom Iti they of ction has ad a momentous impact. “Garinke’s work reopened the neglected problem of “onlerin symbolic sy ters and sought to discover the natu of practical knowlege and the role of ‘Sognition in face-to-fae interctin, Soci order, he argued, toatl fom de pe cen dl is feds praca ivi nthe oar of eeyayineraion. neiction Tia cone an oBTemabic proces in which persons must work had 10 cn ‘Seut 2 mutual impression of itrsbjetvi Inthe effrs to make sense {ogether convesional patiipants employ citbackground knowledge, cos nitve ypitcatons that Garis refers to ar “socal-sanctiond facto te in-society-that-any-bonafde member of the-sociey knows” (1967.70, ‘Conversions are said byte inherent india of anguae, the ability io elt ny uterance To some external knowledge hat mast “Garfinkel departs fom phenomenology in notig tat contextual knowledge anno sustin neractinal oder by isl, because the symbole oder i mever perfectly shared. Ax Randsl Collins (1981995) pus it, erances “are fe oenty ambiguous or eroneous, not always nual understood ot flly xpd” Thos convertion not suiomatcallysisuined buts « “pac- ‘eal ganizations ascompbishment.” People enter ito conversation with an Site of unt end a lignes to overtook a great dea, doing “accom Imodative wouk” fo “normalize” interactions tht appear 1 be 0138 207. ules an ports postoes pe penumbra reas; an "et cetera cause” implicit fn every rule leeves room fr negation and innovation. Actors “ad boc” ‘when they encounter unexpected ezeumstances, and employ legitating “ae- Counts” define bebavior sensible. Garfinkel devetoped this vocabulary in the context of lian series of "breaching experiments” in which be ands vents voted subse consittve expectations and noted the often dramatic ‘consequences (Garfinkel 1967, in wat sense does ethnomethodology constitute theoretical ciallengs 10 ‘arson del? To tar with, Garfakel shifted te image of egnition from sional, discursive, qussscenife pros t on tha operates Ingely. realli evel of cosclooress, soule and conventional “practi son” yrs” ha re recognized only when they are breached, To this iad peropctve on ineracion that casts doubt on he imptanee of nor taive or cogntive consensus, The wnderjing attade of trust and the ‘lings of prtcigsns to use normalizing techniques enable partepans sin cous evn inte abc of el inerebjeti, muh ss geement(Cicoue! 19143), Fly, enoaty ised a pst bs ‘Sheva, or Panons, ation lays hasan ruleset anda desired nd, tock of elt mal ‘Gurfnel reais norms, but cy ae ot te subtanive ones hat Parsons tad in ming. Rather they ae copntve guidance syst cms, ls of tact ily Hey ad etiey 10 See eles om rmlized i accounts. As such, Garinkel’s roles moe closely resemble the “script” or "peeduction sytem” of cognitive peycology (Scbank and Abelson 1977; Kise. 1987) han Parson nor st vals, “The 960 also saw the emergence of anche line of phenomenological ‘hiaking, Peter Berger snd Thomas Lackmans The Solel Contrcton of ‘ely. This work hada mre diet iflence on insittionally minded itizational scholars, no dubs because it granted insttuions a larger role in _gueton for soilopical hor i How si posible teat jective meaning Ser wie” ce Gs Beer a Lsknen ee Size the cenaliy of "common sese knowledge” to iteration and the teacketing of dubs. “The vali of my knowles of every ay I” they cond, nen fu gan pe oy eT al i tes P ‘Berger and Luckmann ke Panns, light he micoconstetion of cia cue hat conceed Gari. Practical earns othirconce, Inde, theraceoun finns as constted by "a repro piesion of ab tulad actions by types of cts” (196758 ssilarto Pano dacsson of Jnstsonaled voles, but with racial ilewace, Their alse operates Ineyateeelfcopsan, wir Paso opts th ee and stot spect nd the int praton of role egrets th the pts aly system. By contra, Berger and Lockman grant extraordinary power fnstastions as cognitive cnsrctions, sugening that hey “cont human conduct prior to o apr om any mechanisms or vancons spec Set upto supp them (p55). Even the iteration of typists, though guided by cated tachment and inked normative legion. is sssentally cognitive in une, Ethnonetbodology and phenomenology ngether provide the ew insite tina wih & micosoilogy of consdenble power. ARBough this foundation has no ben cused extensivey Cut ete chapters by Jepper son, Seat, and Zhe, whores his Rel) tis plein Meyer snd Rowan'steatmeatf “account,” intheicemphans onthe rae fhe loge of confidence" a sustaining an sion of nervy within schools, nd -a Indction thee definition of “insitonalized res” a “clsseatins ball imo saciety se reiprocsteltypifcations or interpretations.” ‘This fusion of eitometodlogy and phenomenology is nts satisfactory theory of action for fl to ofr convincing answers to several questions Fist, hy ate store wing to work so hard wo sustain thee images fray fd tn craton that coni them Its pt enough to aguas Berger and TTockmann doth th exterior, objected quai of shared ypifeations pro- ‘ides no aleative for Gavikel demonstrates tat common sense sloneis ot “Mequste to proce sucesfl interaction, Second, how do the mictopraceses| ‘ith which these theories ae concerned produce socal ode? Tt ean do to rede social strcture wo an investor of typifications ora st of constitve Iles. Soll provided and costed sips rarely prescribe acon ina ay that ambiguously exalises comect behavior. Third, what place do inen- tionality aed ners have a he instuina order? ‘A ful dsctsoo ofthese nse would equi a volume ofits own. These problems have nt been solved: oe, pehaps, are the kel to prove sole ‘iin the eames of neintntonal her. Os he otber han, we can i= em important developments in gent) sci theory tat bear decided Sees wit th ow inttuoai and ae bepnning 6 make their mask on i es tothere approaches that we now ta, Buawers ov 4 Tony ff Panctient. ACTON “The new istituionaism i based at the mcrolevelon what we have called theory of procical ection. By chs we mean a set of reting pips that ‘eflet the cognitive tr in contemporary soil theory in two ways. Pst ew trork in socal theory emphasizes the copie dimension of ation to far reser exe than di Ptson and, in doing so, hasbeen infuened by the “cognitive evolution” in peychoogySecend, this Wark departs fom Parons preccipation with thereon, eaealtve aspect of cognition tofous on pre eeiousprovcsct and schema a they ene ao routine taken fr greed evi pct activity); and to pray the afecive and evaluative den ‘ons of acon timely bound up with, bit some extent subordinate to, the cognitive in aher words, the cogritv tm ifors an emergent “theory ‘of practic action” tha bh defines cogeition diferely than di Parsons and, tthe same time, accords tach greater importince ‘The imight of etnomethodofogy are iterated into s more maidines sional framework in the wok of Anthony Gidéeos (1979, 1986, 1986). The tak of Gari evident in Giddens notion of “struction,” the n> final and necessary reproduction of socal structure by “knowledgeable gens” in everyday fe ad the rosigrcal indexing oftheir actions to shred ‘ppieatins in hs eriphass onthe “zeleive monitoring of conduct in the ‘Spt daycootiniy of sci! fe" (198844); atin is isintion between sation practical and discursive consciousess, or between tit and conscious ees frit, Giddens emphasizes he role of roatine in stnnng sora rust and ‘etches the dimers of payehology of motivation in hisnotenof te “basic ‘security system asa fundaneotlcomponet ofthe self. Drawing selectively ‘on developmental ego peycholog, Giddens contends thatthe contol of ise laity i "Whe most geneazed motivations origin of human conde” {p.541 The means such contol is adherence to route, an the compulsion {tw avoid anxiety motivates str to sunan the vocal encounters that comtiute ‘he stu ofboth daily ie and social suctr. Thus Giddens provides a cog ‘tive theory of commiment to srg behaviors tat doesn rest on the ‘om and Section ofthe Parsonsanwadion. ‘Giddens’ accoumt however, does ite o explain why some interactions go ‘eter than eters or why outnes create parca stub ates. Although Giddens repeatedly sess the poit that ators ar ow egeable, i masked ‘conta othe view of aman as "cular dope,” bie work ths far provides Tie isight ito he sources ofthis Knowledge. A soluion othe pablen of ‘cro stability requires an integration ofthe caecic, aetve element of ac- ‘on ha lthoug est under the sac in Garike's extent of moray over uly developed. “Two theorists, Erving Goffman and Randall Colin, have drawa on Duk tim to explo this dimension of practical consciousness (Collis 1988), Gotan (1967) dea decisive contribution in adapting Duk sthory of society tothe dyad, interpreting interaction a mii, cereronialaetvity Criented to aftemieg the sacodnas of selves. Pusoas, 100, blieved that oople valued proper oe performance in andof ise. But Gofman innovate by relaxing the essurpions of intersects and valve consensus, compar ing the “nual order" he analyzed to the “schoolboy ade?” of Parsoosian theory, wherein people mast work ant fr the credits they pin and cheating ‘elicits sanctions. The sital game, be argues, i “easier” on societies and prope alike because "ihe person insulates ise by... does, ball truths ilsions, and rationalization” (Goffman 196713). What rail in the ritual game i th sence of firmation tat exchange pares rive fom ‘succesful encounters, the fecings of slfbod tat are reinforced. Commit ‘ent to the “interaction tual” and he sl, and at w specifi values, the explicit object of imeration, orth incidentals of appropiate role pee formance Collins hs incorporate Gotan’ processive insights ino more en compassing theory. What mest people cal socal structure, he ate, Is ‘onsite ot of “interction itl chains” in wich popl, operating tthe level of practical consciousness ves curl esoucs and motor ene ties in ritual cocountry that enact either hiscty (when cultural. end ‘motional sources areregul) or solidarity (when thet ae evenly matched), ‘Rather than viewing society ss bound together by functionally aecessey moe a Iroc al consensus, Callin ses i¢ at ited and sven, to varying degrees. by ‘notional soar, emeraig ot out ofthe elise ition of ators but “on etings of comerbershi o antagonism geneated by repestive intra tion, Groups defied by class, gender, educational atainmet, or occupation ‘ty ia their moral density. in their conto of altura sures, an inthe umber and lspersion ofthe iteractans. Tess features intr ape group member’ styles of dicouse, odeaatins toward deviance and pulses, ‘nd cosmopoitsnism, Stub Cn hess of cobs pats of alliance and, _ Seger tena ele sos) enestom epateing ‘ofthese intercon la me and space and or the end Get evo scare nyo vying ney, wee moral ey is strongest (Coline 1981, 1988). ‘We have considered sberl contemporary theodss whose work, which bears an fy tthe new institonalism, nakes several Key advance: tre ‘Stables the centrality of cognition: it exphasines the practical sensi ‘nate, nowcaleltive nate of praciral rato andi pans the assuptions fine and intrabjectve cnasency that Wee prominent in Parsons’ ‘hugh, Bu thse gins have come a cost. Fist in oveteacing to Parsons ‘raggeraed emphasis on noma, some solalogia cognitvisshave been slow totheorize the ormatve elemento pact eton, instead presenting images faction licking in subsantive content Second, they have overlooked. an port insight of Parsons, developed pray in his ergument abou the ‘exis role ofthe copie wientatonineconomic decision making, that dit erent insted donsine evoke cngotive, caecte, and evaluative ‘reations varied degres. Thi they bave aed come up with an an Ty constr as powerful the ole sytem o explain the relative Sitbetween pesons andthe postions they occupy the soca division of lbor. Even in these areas, however, vances ane detested from wii th emetgng poe igatcmapetcor bole sks rong active riponses,wheras ote —Seemio opera athe cogntve level alope—have taken to forms Fis, ‘Some sholrs ave traced istorell terse and dision of what ohn Meyer ‘lhe "Wister tutu eooun,” a Dackeimiaa complex ofinvialism, atonal, and evohitonsm, snd nked th legimacy and evocativenes of these ferent, ot employed ia discourse, to canges in both soca sic fi cule (ete chapters by Jepperson and Meyer, and Freda and A or soso Meyer 1938 and 1988b, Thomas 1989), Atmore general ev ‘of abtracton, Mary Douglas (1986) as developed sophisticated and ing ing apumentatibuting the legitimacy of isteuions to their capacity © sustain "atulizing alopss.” she argues, begin ws conven: Sn wh hs hey el in coe of eae al > election, tenegettion, ad freidag. To become institutionalize abe a levoduton on requies “parle copetive convention stain” an ings that obscures its purely huan origins, Egipped wih sch an analogic “Pas; insons sper Ss “prt he orderof the envese and so are ey © standas the ground of aguneat"Butnotall conventions cansasain natural atalogies, only tosethat “match ator of outer or precedence” £0 ‘hat "the socal pater elafrces te logical puters a pve it prominene= (Douglas 1986:32). Tus Douglas provides basis for anticipating What Kinds fof estutons may aie and ink the insttational oder to ptm of social Disrre. “The notion thatthe eative weights of cognition, aft, and evaluation change across various sets of acon has been ess developed, although bere, too, me se reseat progres. Set and Meyer (ch. 3) dstigush between at !yuealy independent aston and ech dimensons of organizational environments te more echnicaly developed a envionment, the peste the ‘ole fordiscursiv aod analy cogniton; he more instiutonalied the greater ‘heroleso practical eason spd, perp, evaluation. Bel (1973 suggest economy, calue, and polity ae orgnized sound eontraictory “ats pi ‘ples in postindustial societies. iedland and Alor (ch. 10) identify Severlinsttutional domains, each with is ova "ogi" of ston emphasizing Aieenthases cf evaluation nd, 9 somcextet, the predominance ifeent scslon-ornatons: cognitive Inthe make ad bureaucracy, lective in the amily evaluative in religion. "Th ink between miro and macroleel of analysis has ot recived mc) plicit atation fom practitioners of the new instfutionalism, mest of whom | ‘move bck and forth among ethoomesbodology, phenomenology pono tional resource dependence arguments. Zucker (ch. 4) ite most etmometh- ‘odologial, suggesting that many typieations re "bultup” fom ground level bynes interactions, although some. “organization” have gsn- eral siglicance.Jepperion (ch. 6) 100 draws on ethomethodoogs, echoing (Giens and Collin fo viewing isttons a “able designe fr chonialy ‘peated activity sequences" Jepperen and Meyer (ch. 9) ae the most ph ‘omenological. emphasizing shared tpifcatons tht vary aos societies but se lrgly shared within ation sates, Scott nd Meyer (ch. 8) and DiMaggio fet Powel (3) erploy moc tac inagery a rw on the Caregic ‘cats nan of sting! the former emphasize incetives ceed by ver ‘ial autor structs that vary aeoss rgnizatonl sectors theater tess ‘orzo ecwous that both frus attention and ai ia he difusion of shared. “social theory, exphasizng the dose (ake-or rane) elements of aio, 1 in lasifeation, practical consciousness ("knowledge without coscepts” Inolucton {1984:40), dhe sted embod eodacton of ssl rcs (Bou Ges end Paseron 1977) Th aii a analecomstoct, em “replated improvisation” epee ules that epee he cogiive, adele and crave) ination Us of pn espero “sso carl pistons of cal exer, exeenondponomenally 2 “eopl kur" Becate of common isres,meres f ech “ls on” shire «sino habits, eang regulars in thug, pons, ‘poss, peso apa, ai seis of so ark to {Econo fron ccpy th sol act te onal repo, Taos, nis ie, ae imepunbl fom he datibaon of apstons “tran can "oly bvome este and ste" I, "ke a amen or fous, someone to ssn intrest at el sicily at bane int totake on" our 981-309). ‘Tota const sth corettone of Bou’ theory of ate ts role fo expo how aad wy siateplly one aes crn 1 rodice and agule to soll sce hts st tie eres. With ‘Eien te ies etied above, Boars argument makes fou real

    You might also like