Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 3
Who Are You?
Consciousness, Identity, and the Self
CHAPTER SUMMARY
Traditional philosophical views on the immortality of the soul arose from Socrates and Plato, and were
later appropriated by Augustine in influential ways, which Aquinas built on in an attempt to synthesize
philosophy and religion. Descartes held important views on the nature of mind as a nonphysical thing,
which he argued must be immaterial, because unlike physical things, its existence cannot be doubted.
Locke, on the other hand, thought of personal identity as something whose existence can be inferred
from the existence of a continuing subject of experience. Hume and Kant held opposing views on how
the self arises from conscious experience. Many modern views on the nature of the mind traceable to
Ryle, who thought opposing the mind and the physical was due to a “category error.” Contemporary
physicalists think the mind can either be eliminated in favor of brain states, or that the mind is realized
in the physical without mental states being identical to physical states. Phenomenologists like Husserl
and Merleau-Ponty are convinced that direct experience should be considered without psychological
origins or causal explanations. These are all Western concepts of self, which contrast with concepts of
self found in other cultures, such as the Buddhist concept of anatta or “no-self.”
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
© 2016, 2013, 2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
3.3 Describe St. Augustine’s synthesis of Plato and Christianity.
3.5 Elucidate Locke’s theory that all knowledge originates in direct sense experience.
3.7 Discuss Kant’s theory that all knowledge originates in direct sense experience.
3.9 Explain Ryle’s theory that the self is defined in terms of the behavior presented to the world.
DISCUSSION PROMPTS
1. Why have influential thinkers, past and present, considered the soul as immortal? What do you
think of their reasons for thinking so?
2. Why did Descartes seek to doubt everything that could be doubted? Do you think that is a
valuable enterprise?
3. How were Locke’s and Hume’s approaches to the self as consciousness similar? Why did they
come to different conclusions?
4. Where do phenomenologists stand on the duality of mind and body? Do you think of the mind
and body as being one or as two distinct entities?
5. What are the differences between Hume’s concept of the self and the Buddhist concept of no-
self? Do you agree with the philosophers who say the self is an illusion or with those who see
the self as real?
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
13
Test Bank
The following assessment has been created for in-class use. This assessment is available
through Pearson’s MyTest website—allowing for easy access for creating your own tests.
© 2016, 2013, 2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Please contact your local Pearson sales representative to learn about the options available.
Visit
http://www.pearsonhighered.com/replocator.
Multiple Choice Questions
Difficulty: 1 = Easy; 2 = Medium; 3 = Challenging
Choose the best possible answer for each of the following.
According to Socrates, in order to live a life of purpose and value, we must begin to
examine _.
A. our self
B. various cultures
C. scientific discoveries
D. natural wonders
Answer: A
Learning Objective: LO 3.1 Explain why it is important to understand the nature of the self.
© 2016, 2013, 2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
B. the physical, mental, and emotional
C. soul, body, and mind
D. reason, appetite, and spirit
Answer: D
Learning Objective: LO 3.2 Discuss Socrates’s and Plato’s theories of the immortal soul.
© 2016, 2013, 2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
B. to determine mathematical models of thinking
C. to build knowledge on a foundation he could be absolutely certain of
D. to prove the existence of God
Answer: C
Learning Objective: LO 3.4 Discuss Descartes’ modern perspective on the self.
sense experience.
© 2016, 2013, 2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Difficulty Level: Easy
8. Locke thought that identity of a self through time could be established on the basis
of _______.
A. matter
B. memory
C. the will
D. experience
Answer: B
Learning Objective: LO 3.5 Elucidate Locke’s theory that all knowledge originates in direct
sense experience.
© 2016, 2013, 2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
TB_03_10_We Construct the Self: Kant, Understand, LO 3.7
10. Kant thought that Hume was wrong to say that _______.
A. all knowledge arises out of experience
B. the self delineates the possible forms of knowledge
C. the self is an immaterial thing
D. the self is just conscious experience
Answer: D
Learning Objective: LO 3.7 Discuss Kant’s theory that all knowledge originates in direct sense
experience.
Which of the following correctly characterizes Freud’s beliefs about the self?
A. There are two selves, one conscious and one unconscious.
B. Our true self is unconscious and we have to make special efforts to know it.
C. Our true self is conscious and has to be carefully separated from the
unconscious.
D. There is no self because the parts of the mind are knowable only separately.
Answer: A
Learning Objective: LO 3.8 Describe Freud’s idea of the multilayered self.
materialism.
phenomenology.
Essay Questions
What was Socrates’ views on the soul, and why did he hold that view?
• Socrates was convinced that, in addition to our physical bodies, each person possesses an
immortal soul that survives beyond the death of the body.
• The soul is unchanging and immortal, surviving the death of the body.
• Our souls and bodies are radically different.
• Souls strive for wisdom.
Learning Objective: LO 3.2 Discuss Socrates’s and Plato’s theories of the immortal soul.
© 2016, 2013, 2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
TB_03_17_The Soul is Immortal: Socrates and Plato, Analyze, LO 3.2
Learning Objective: LO 3.2 Discuss Socrates’s and Plato’s theories of the immortal soul.
Learning Objective: LO 3.3 Describe St. Augustine’s synthesis of Plato and Christianity.
What was Descartes’ theory of knowledge, and how did that guide his philosophical
investigations?
• The first principle of Decartes' theory of knowledge is cogito, ergo sum (I think,
therefore, I am).
© 2016, 2013, 2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
• No rational person will doubt his or her own existence as a conscious, thinking entity
while we are aware of thinking about our self.
• It would be impossible to be self-conscious if we didn’t have a personal identity of
which to be conscious, so self-identity and being self-conscious are mutually
dependent on one another.
What was Descartes’ conclusion about the nature of the self, and how did he arrive
at that conclusion?
• Descartes declared that the essential self (the thinking entity) is radically different
from the physical body.
• Like Plato, Descartes believed in a dualistic view of reality divided into a spiritual,
non-material realm and physical, material realm.
• By advocating a dualistic metaphysic, Descartes was able to maintain both his
scientific integrity and his religious convictions.
• Descartes believed that the thinking self and the physical self were connected via the
pineal gland.
How did John Locke’s views differ from those of Descartes? How did that determine
Locke’s views of the self?
• Locke's revolutionary theory was that the mind is a tabula rasa (blank slate) which is
written on by experience.
• Like Descarte, Locke believed in developing knowledge based on clear thinking,
rigorous analysis, and real-world observation and experimentation.
• For Descartes, reasoning provides the origin of knowledge. For Locke, all knowledge
originates in our direct sense experience.
© 2016, 2013, 2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Learning Objective: LO 3.5 Elucidate Locke’s theory that all knowledge originates in direct
sense experience.
What was Hume’s argument for the position that there is no such thing as the self?
• According to Hume, human experience consists of impressions (basic sensations) and
ideas (thoughts and images that are copies of impressions).
• Because the self is not found among these continually changing sensations, we can
only conclude that there is no good reason for believing that the self exists.
• What is the self we experience according to Hume? A “bundle or collection of
different perceptions, which succeed each other with an inconceivable rapidity, and
are in a perpetual flux and movement.”
What was distinctive about Kant’s view of the nature of self as related to experience?
• Kant attempted to synthesize rationalism and empiricism by showing the important
role of both experience and reason.
• Disturbed by Hume’s conclusions, Kant observed what Hume had overlooked: our
primary experience of the world is not a disconnected stream of sensations. In
general, we live in a fairly stable and orderly world in which sensations are woven
together into a fabric that is familiar to us.
• For Kant, the order and organization of our world comes from our own minds, that
sort, organize, relate, and synthesize fragmented input.
Learning Objective: LO 3.7 Discuss Kant’s theory that all knowledge originates in direct
sense experience.
© 2016, 2013, 2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Difficulty Level: Moderate
What was Ryle’s view of the mental as it relates to the physical? How did Ryle’s view
differ from those before him?
• Ryle's philosophy aligns with behaviorism in psychology, where the self is defined in
terms of the individual's behavior.
• Ryle characterized "Descartes' myth" of the dualism of mind and body as "the ghost
in the machine," where the immaterial self is rattling around inside the physical
body.
• For Ryle, the self is best understood as a pattern of behavior, the tendency or
disposition for a person to behave in a certain way in certain circumstances.
• Inherent problems: Ryle’s denial of inner selves causes a difficulty analogous to
Hume’s denial of a similar entity—namely, that Ryle writes, speaks, and acts as if the
existence of the inner self is not in doubt
Learning Objective: LO 3.9 Explain Ryle’s theory that the self is defined in terms of the
behavior presented to the world.
What are the two forms of physicalism? How do they differ from each other?
• Physicalism: all mental states are explainable in terms of physical brain states; there
is no separate, immaterial "self."
• Functionalism: Mental states (beliefs, desires, being in pain, etc.) are constituted
solely by their functional role—that is, they cause other mental states, sensory
inputs, and behavioral outputs. Jerry Fodor takes behaviorism farther, pointing out
that mental events, activities, or processes form connections between sensory
stimulus and behavioral response.
• Eliminative Materialism: Our ordinary, commonsense understanding of the mind is
deeply wrong and that some or all of the mental states posited by common sense do
not actually exist. Paul Churchland says that the usual terms that describe mental
states are "folk psychology"; we need a new vocabulary and conceptual framework
grounded in neuroscience.
© 2016, 2013, 2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Learning Objective: 3.10 LO Define the perspectives of functionalism and eliminative
materialism.
© 2016, 2013, 2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.