You are on page 1of 4

6KLHOGLQJ7HFKQLTXHVIRU5DGLDWLRQ2QFRORJ\)DFLOLWLHVE\3DWWRQ+0F*LQOH\

3HWHU-%LJJV

&LWDWLRQ0HGLFDO3K\VLFV  GRL


9LHZRQOLQHKWWSG[GRLRUJ
9LHZ7DEOHRI&RQWHQWVKWWSVFLWDWLRQDLSRUJFRQWHQWDDSPMRXUQDOPHGSK\V"YHU SGIFRY
3XEOLVKHGE\WKH$PHULFDQ$VVRFLDWLRQRI3K\VLFLVWVLQ0HGLFLQH

$UWLFOHV\RXPD\EHLQWHUHVWHGLQ
6KLHOGLQJLPSOLFDWLRQVIRUVHFRQGDU\QHXWURQVDQGSKRWRQVSURGXFHGZLWKLQWKHSDWLHQWGXULQJ,037
0HG3K\V  

5DGLDWLRQWUDQVPLVVLRQGDWDIRUUDGLRQXFOLGHVDQGPDWHULDOVUHOHYDQWWREUDFK\WKHUDS\IDFLOLW\VKLHOGLQJ
0HG3K\V  

2QWKHYDOLGLW\RIWKHVXSHUSRVLWLRQSULQFLSOHLQGRVHFDOFXODWLRQVIRULQWUDFDYLWDU\LPSODQWVZLWKVKLHOGHGYDJLQDO
FROSRVWDWV
0HG3K\V  

6KLHOGLQJFRQVLGHUDWLRQVIRUWRPRWKHUDS\
0HG3K\V  

6KLHOGLQJIRUWKHUPDOQHXWURQV
0HG3K\V  
BOOKS AND PUBLICATIONS

Book Reviews can readily turn to a particular topic for 1997, Reprinted 1998 共with minor correc-
reference, as is the usual wont when de- tions兲. 64 pp. Price: £10.00, plus postage
signing a room. The book is considerably and handling 共softcover兲.
helped by the aid of example calculations This report contains outlines concern-
at the end of each section; this will cer- ing the quality assurance testing 共not ac-
Shielding Techniques for Radiation On- tainly clarify any misunderstandings about ceptance testing兲 of x-ray imaging sys-
cology Facilities. Patton H. McGinley. the calculational methodology. This is a tems. After an introduction, the main
Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI, comprehensive, well-written, easy-to-read chapters are: Radiographic Equipment;
1998. 147 pp. Price: $62.95. book that I believe is as necessary to a Films, Intensifying Screens, Processors
The first place a medical physicist shielding designer as the NCRP reports, and the Darkroom; Mammographic Equip-
looks for help to calculate the necessary since it translates those reports into practi- ment; Dental Equipment; Image Intensifi-
shielding for a new radiation therapy facil- cal terms and includes much updated infor- ers 共Fluoroscopy and Fluorography兲; Digi-
ity is in the NCRP reports. Report #s 49 mation. tal Fluoroscopy Systems, Computed
共1976兲 and 51 共1977兲 deal with x-rays and There are a few minor points that do Tomography; and Patient Dose Measure-
gamma rays up to 10 and 100 MeV, re- not mar this volume but could well be cor- ments.
spectively, while report # 79 共1984兲 deals rected or incorporated in the next edition. Each of these chapters first contains a
exclusively with neutrons. For a facility The introduction on the ‘‘history of room table listing the physical parameters that
with a 6 MV linear accelerator, all the nec- shielding’’ is curious for its omission of are important to measure. For each physi-
essary shielding information is to be any discussion of 60Co units; this is prob- cal parameter the following recommenda-
readily found in Report # 49. For a dual ably because the section was taken from tions are given: the level of expertise 共A or
energy linear accelerator with a maximum one written by the author for Health Phys- B兲 for those performing the test, the fre-
energy of 15 or 18 MV, additional infor- ics to celebrate the Roentgen centenary. In quency of testing, the priority or impor-
mation can be found in report # 51; the the same section, the betatron’s mode of tance of the test 共1 or 2兲, the ‘‘remedial
problem of neutrons at x-ray energies ⭓10 operation is not clearly explained. Room level’’—a level of performance at which
MV can be handled using report # 79. It designers, who are used to dealing with remedial action needs to be initiated, and
cannot have escaped the average physi- workloads in terms of cGy per week and the ‘‘suspension level’’—a level of perfor-
cists’ notice that the information in these maximum permissible doses of mSv per mance at which the equipment should be
reports is comprehensive only for low en- week, would find it a great inconvenience removed from clinical use immediately un-
ergy x-rays and, even then, there are some to discover all the tables with dose equiva- til the performance is corrected. Following
deficiencies. For example, the reports lents outside the room in terms of this table are very short ‘‘Explanatory
equate head leakage TVLs with primary ‘‘nSv s⫺1’’ and for dose rates at isocenter Paragraphs’’ for each physical parameter
beam TVLs, there are no scatter factors for in terms of ‘‘6.67 cGy s⫺1.’’ These are containing: a ‘‘Suggested Method,’’ ‘‘Ref-
high energy x-rays and practical methods units that the typical designer would never erences,’’ and ‘‘Comments.’’ The ‘‘Sug-
for calculating door shielding thicknesses use and they would most likely do as I did, gested Method’’ does not actually describe
of lead with or without borated polyethyl- namely pencil in each table the equivalent the method of performing the test—it sim-
ene 共BPE兲 are not provided. Since those values using conventional units. The only ply lists the normal test equipment in very
NCRP reports first came out, the field of omission for shielding consideration is an general terms. The authors state that ‘‘No
radiation therapy has undergone a rapid x-ray or electron-only facility that uses attempt has been made to give detailed test
transformation from low to high energy lead with or without BPE instead of con- methods here.’’ In fact, methods of testing
therapy machines, so these problems have crete. Solutions to calculational problems are not really discussed at all. These meth-
now become more pressing. However, left for the reader should have been pro- ods are discussed in the citations listed un-
there has been substantial research in this vided. der ‘‘References.’’
area over the past few years, the results of This is the first self-help book on this This report is of limited utility if one
which need to be included in the old re- topic on the market and is therefore a wel- does not have access to the referenced
ports. It is for this reason that Report # 49 come addition. It should certainly be con- documents, particularly these frequently
is currently under revision by an AAPM sidered a must-buy for all shielding de- referenced ones: Assurance of Quality in
task group and an NCRP committee to in- signers. Finally, the publishers should be the Diagnostic X-ray Department, 1988,
clude all new information for x-rays and congratulated on producing a book with an BIR; Measurement of the Performance
neutrons. attractive cover; addition of the artwork is Characteristics of Diagnostic X-ray Sys-
This book on shielding techniques by a welcome change from the standard plain tems used in Medicine—Report 32 共2nd
Patton McGinley not only fills the gaps left jacket. edition兲—Parts I–VI 共6 documents兲,
by the outdated NCRP reports, but, more Reviewed by Peter J. Biggs 1996–1998, IPEMB; The Commissioning
importantly, provides practical methods and Routine Testing of Mammographic X-
for solving all of the typical problems en- Peter J. Biggs, Ph.D., is Associate Profes- ray Systems—Report No. 59, 1989, IPEM.
countered by the shielding designer. It sor and Acting Head, Division of Radia- The present report is clearly designed to be
covers areas from low to high energy x-ray tion Biophysics, at the Massachusetts Gen- used in conjunction with a number of other
beams, from rooms with mazes to those eral Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. British publications.
without and from simple concrete barriers The material covered in the initial
to complex arrangements involving lead or tables of each chapter appear to be fairly
steel in addition to concrete. It also in- Recommended Standards for the Rou- well thought out and can be helpful for
cludes information on skyshine, design of tine Performance Testing of Diagnostic someone desiring guidance on the type of
HDR and brachytherapy rooms, ozone pro- X-Ray Imaging Systems. IPEM Report tests useful in a quality assurance program
duction, air activation, and advice on writ- No. 77. The Institute of Physics and Engi- along with test frequencies and tolerance
ing reports for regulatory authorities. The neering in Medicine, 4 Campleshon Road, limits. One should be reminded that ‘‘re-
chapters are well organized, so that one York, YO2 1PE, England. First Edition medial levels’’ or ‘‘suspension levels’’ in

1556 Med. Phys. 25 „8…, August 1998 © 1998 Am. Assoc. Phys. Med. 1556
this report do not necessarily correspond to years. Now this book is back in print, in a diation include prenatal death, growth re-
U.S. government regulatory limits, includ- second edition, updated, and with an im- tardation, small head size, severe mental
ing MQSA. As might be expected with proved and expanded format. retardation, intellectual deficit, seizures,
such a compendium, I would take issue The explanations in this edition are other malformations, malignancies, and
with some of the recommendations; also quite clear and to the point. Even in the heritable mutations. The level of risks in-
there are a number of important omissions. introduction the authors clear up possible dicated by numerous scientific studies 共this
The brief titles of physical parameters with misunderstandings by defining the terms chapter alone gives 152 references, 78 of
little, if any, further explanations may con- ‘‘gestation age,’’ ‘‘conception age,’’ and them within the last 10 years兲, along with
fuse the reader at times. Following are ‘‘menstrual age,’’ and also the terms ‘‘em- the sensitive periods, are presented in a
some examples from Chapter 3, ‘‘Radio- bryo,’’ ‘‘fetus,’’ and ‘‘conceptus.’’ 共My comprehensive but concise manner. Going
graphic Equipment.’’ For tube potential note: what we usually refer to as a ‘‘fetal beyond the simple description of risks the
the remedial level of ‘‘⫾10% of intended’’ dose calculation’’ should more properly be authors try to give some perspective to
seems somewhat too lenient; ⫾5% would called a ‘‘conceptus dose calculation’’—as these risks. A good example is Table 4-1:
probably be more appropriate. For AEC it is in this book.兲 the ‘‘Percent Likelihood of NOT Develop-
systems the physical parameter ‘‘Resultant The book is divided into three parts ing Childhood Cancer after Prenatal Diag-
film density’’ seems ill defined even when plus appendices. Part I is titled ‘‘Diagnos- nostic Irradiation.’’ Table 4-2 gives an ex-
the reference is consulted. The AEC sys- tic Radiations and Risks to Unborn Chil- cellent summary of the effects of
tem should be checked for consistent per- dren’’ and is composed of four chapters. diagnostic levels of radiation on the con-
formance as both the tube potential and pa- Chapter 1 explains some basic concepts ceptus and is one of the single most useful
tient thickness are varied. For conventional about radiation, x-ray examinations, and pages of information in the book.
radiographic equipment, the report omits radionuclide examinations. Some funda- Part II of this book is titled, ‘‘The
tests of automatic collimation, focal spot mental radiobiology is discussed empha- Clinical Management of the Pregnant Pa-
size, beam quality 共HVL兲, grid alignment, sizing effects on the conceptus, including tient Needing Diagnostic Study.’’ Here we
image artifacts, and the AEC backup timer. the classic graphs from Russell and Brent. are faced with decisions concerning the di-
For conventional tomography, image reso- The nature of nonionizing radiations from agnostic imaging of a patient known to be
lution tests are omitted. ultrasound and MRI are also explained. pregnant. This section starts off with a de-
A number of good documents on the The mechanisms for possibly harmful ef- tailed flow diagram for decision making in
performance testing of x-ray imaging fects from ultrasound and from the static these situations. In Chapters 5, 6, and 7 the
equipment have come out of Britain over magnetic fields, field gradients, and radio- authors proceed through the decision mak-
the years. If you have found these docu- frequency fields of MRI are discussed. ing process: ‘‘Stage I, Preliminary Consid-
ments useful, you may also find this latest Chapter 2 summarizes the basic units of erations,’’ ‘‘Stage II, Assessing the
IPEM Report No. 77 to be a worthwhile radiation and radioactivity. Also, the mea- Risks—What are the Data?,’’ and ‘‘Stage
additional reference. sures and units of importance in ultrasound III, To Proceed or Not to Proceed.’’ Again
and MRI are explained. the authors try to put the benefits and risks
Reviewed by Frank N. Ranallo Chapter 3 describes the various types of into proper perspective. They state: ‘‘To
diagnostic x-ray procedures and the vari- put risks into perspective, the physician
Frank N. Ranallo, Ph.D., is an Assistant ous factors which affect conceptus dose. should be aware of the normal risks of
Professor (CHS) of Medical Physics at the Several tables provide approximate dose pregnancy and the multiple teratogenic
University of Wisconsin-Madison. His re- ranges or limits for various types of x-ray factors in modern living.’’ Thus in Table
search interests include the optimization of examination. A number of important con- 7-1 they list agents or conditions 共other
the design and use of medical imaging cepts are clearly stated. For example when than radiation兲 with associated risks during
equipment and the development of instru- discussing the calculation of conceptus pregnancy, which I found quite interesting.
mentation and methods to test the perfor- dose from CT the authors state: In stage I they discuss topics such as emer-
mance of medical imaging systems. gency versus elective procedures and
screening for pregnancy; in stage II, esti-
mating conceptus doses, determining ges-
Exposure of the Pregnant Patient to Di- It is essential not to use the CTDI for
tational age, and risks of delaying a study;
agnostic Radiations—A Guide to Medi- the abdomen as a reliable model for
in stage III, decisions to delay a study,
cal Management. 2nd Edition. Louis K. dose estimation to the conceptus.
minimizing the dose in the study, and
Wagner, Ph.D., Richard G. Lester, M.D., CTDI is likely to underestimate the ac-
counseling the patient.
and Luis R. Saldana, M.D. Medical Phys- tual dose for many reasons. 关Bold and
ics Publishing, Madison, WI 53705, 1997. italics are the authors’兴 Part III is titled, ‘‘The Clinical Evalua-
259 pp. Price: $69.95 共hardcover兲. tion of Pregnant Patients Previously Ex-
One of the most troubling moments in posed to Diagnostic Radiations.’’ Again
my career was seeing the emotional tur- Five reasons are then given for this state- this section starts off with a detailed flow
moil of a young lady who had been told by ment. This chapter also discusses the many diagram for decision making. In Chapters
her physician that she should seriously factors which affect the conceptus dose 8, 9, and 10 the authors proceed through
consider terminating her pregnancy solely from nuclear medicine examinations. To the decision making process in a manner
because she had received a chest x-ray. aid in the calculation of dose from radio- similar to part II.
Unfortunately, many of those who counsel pharmaceuticals the authors include a Chapter 11 describes 23 case studies,
women concerning the risks of a radiologi- comprehensive table, extending over six illustrating the concepts discussed in the
cal procedure unknowingly performed dur- pages, of the estimated conceptus dose per rest of the book. For example the first two
ing pregnancy, or of the risks of a radio- administered activity for various radio- cases are ‘‘Broadside motor vehicle acci-
logical procedure contemplated during a pharmaceuticals at different conception dent, pelvic injury’’ and ‘‘Herniated disk
known pregnancy, do not have accurate in- ages. in 34-year-old woman.’’ I found this chap-
formation for these purposes. I found the Chapter 4 discusses the prenatal risks ter a welcome addition to the new edition.
first edition of this book, published in from ionizing radiation in detail and also Some readers may find the appendices
1985, to be an excellent source of such in- describes the possible risks from ultra- the most useful part of the book. Appendix
formation and had guarded my copy care- sound, magnetic fields, and radiofrequency A, ‘‘Conceptus Dose Calculations for X-
fully while it was out of print for several waves. The possible effects of ionizing ra- Ray Examinations,’’ provides exten-

1557 Med. Phys. 25 „8…, August 1998 © 1998 Am. Assoc. Phys. Med. 1557
siveguidance in the calculation of concep- patient. This book should be part of the Frank N. Ranallo, Ph.D. is an Assistant
tus dose with numerous tables, graphs, and essential library of any diagnostic medical Professor (CHS) of Medical Physics at
equations. Several examples are numeri- physicist. I also highly recommend it to theUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison and
cally worked out, comparing the results of radiologists and genetic counselors. Any- the Radiation Consultant to the Wisconsin
as many as four different methods of ob- one involved in the counseling of pregnant Teratogen Project—Clinical Genetics De-
taining the conceptus dose. Doses from CT patients exposed to diagnostic radiation or partment.
scans are covered in depth. Also the some- in the decision making for diagnostic pro-
times confusing topic of doses when the cedures on pregnant patients should defi-
conceptus is outside the primary beam is nitely have access to a copy of this book.
discussed. In a similar fashion, Appendix Its clear, logical explanations, figures,
B covers the calculation of conceptus dose tables, flow charts, and numerous worked-
Books Received
for radionuclide studies. out examples make it an excellent instruc-
Exposure of the Pregnant Patient to tional book for those that need to learn The editor acknowledges receipt of the fol-
Diagnostic Radiations is clear, compre- about this subject. Yet still it remains a lowing publications which may be re-
hensive, and extraordinarily useful. The uniquely useful reference for those already viewed in later issues if they are judged to
discussions in this book are thoughtful and familiar with the field, and I would be sur- be of sufficient interest to the majority of
balanced, drawing from a large store of prised if the ‘‘old pros’’ did not gain sub- readers, subject to space limitations. Read-
referenced publications. In short, it is a stantial valuable new information and in- ers interested in reviewing books should
‘‘classic.’’ It is rare to find a technical sights from this book. advise the Book Review Editor of their
book so well done and so on target in fill- availability, qualifications, and interests.
ing an unmet need: I know of no other Practical Nuclear Medicine. P. F.
publication that comes close to compre- Sharp, H. G. Gemmell, and F. W. Smith.
hensively describing the concerns of diag- Oxford University Press, New York. 345
nostic radiation exposures to the pregnant Reviewed by Frank N. Ranallo pp. Price: $59.50.

1558 Med. Phys. 25 „8…, August 1998 © 1998 Am. Assoc. Phys. Med. 1558

You might also like