You are on page 1of 1
(@ 14 d5 Nfs 15 Nh4 h6é 16 f4 (Kreiman—Christiansen, U.S. Chp. 2002), now 6 . . . exf4 17 gxf4 Qe7 18 Bg2 Bg4 gives chances for both sides. (hb) (A) 13 Bf Nfs 14 h3 Ng6 g3 15 h6é =, Canada—Marin, Turin Ol. 2006. (B) 13 dxe5 dxe5 14 Qe2 Nf =. (@ 143 Nfé 15 Nh4 and now instead 15 . . . cxd47! of Shirov—Lesiege, North Bay: 1994, 15 ... g5 would leave chances for both sides. () 9 d4_h6 10 Bh4 Re8 =, Urzica—Karpov, Stockholm 1967. (k) 12... . Qe7 13 Re1 Na5 14 d4 Rbd8 15 Qc1 Nxb3 16 axb3 +, Nunn—Smejkal, Bundesliga 1992. () 14 Qd3 Qe7 15 Nd2 g5 16 Bg3 Nh5 =, Rodriguez—Rizouk, Malaga 2005. (m) 9 Bxf6 gxf6 10 d4 c6 11 Be2 Ng6 12 Re1 f5 =, Bogut—Atalik, Bosnia 2004. (n) 11 NfS Bxf5 12 exf5, now instead of 12... Qd7 + (Tarrasch-Vidmar, San Se- bastian 1911) 12 .. .Kh8 is roughly equal. (0) 14 Rxf4 Rxf4 15 Qxf4 Nf6 16 Bxf6 Rf8 17 Qe3 Rxf6 18 Qxa7 +, — Agdestein, Hastings 1991. (p) 9... Ng6 10 Nxg6 fxg6 11 Bc4t Kh8 12 f4 Qe8 13 Qd2 Be6 14 Bb3 +, Vallejo Pons-Korchnoi, rapid match 2004. (q) 12 Bxe6 fxe6 13 Qg4 +, Marshall—Capablanca, New York 1909, is very much like the previous column. (x) Nunn—-Tatai, Manila 1992, featured 13... b6?! 14 Bxe6 fxe6 15 Qg4 RIG 16 f4 +. Instead 13 .. , exd4 14 Qxd¢ is only a tad better for White. (s) 7... Bg4 8 Bxc6 bxc6 9 Ng3 Nh5 10 h3 (10 c3 Bc5 11 Nfs Qfé 12 h3 Bxf5 13 Bg5 Qe6 14 exf5 Qxfs 15 g4 Qe6 16 gxh5 Qxh3 -, Berg—Bronstein, Tastrup 1990) 10 ...Nxg3 11 fxg3 BcSt 12 Kh2, James-De La Vega, Buenos Aires 1985; now 12 ... . Bxf3 is best but still slightly in White's favor. () 9... .Ng6 10 d4 a6 11 Ba4 bS 12 Bc2 Bb7 13 a4 h6 was here agreed drawn in Gulko-Sosonko, Thessaloniki 1988. (u) 10... Bb6 11 d4 exd4 12 cxd4 d5 13 65 Ne4 14 Be2 Nxg3 (Podlesnik—Djurié, ‘Yugoslavia 1988) 15 hxg3 +. (v) 14 Re1 with a minimal advantage to White, Campora—Atalik, Calvia Ol. 2004. 124

You might also like