I can't help myself , I like to write keeps brain stimulated.

But trying to figure

out why if you install a engine above the wing ,[in order to compete with airbus
new big engine instalment on their plane] a plane was in full thrust the nose
tended to point upward' which could lead to a stall, instead of re engineering the
planes[ cause they did not have time to compete against airbus and will lose
money]they installed software that automatically pushed the nose down if the
pilot flew the plane at too high    of an angle.' How can a computer patch up the
sound engineering principles of a plane? obviously the plane would do this
because of the inherent dynamic and balance of the plane was compromised and
the plane acted like this to compensate for its augmented balance ratio they
created from the higher up placed engine...so a computer program to push
engine down will create stress on a plane.    so the propensity for a false reading
is high given the software is now trying to replace the engineering defects of the
plane and literally compromised the flyability of the plane. so whenever the
pilot pushed the plane up, MCAS program pushes it down... The most stupid
illogical function implemented..ever. it is apparent it is making a quick
technicality fix with the sole purpose of adding the engine without exploring the
dynamic role of the software to aid and act flexibly and organically with pilot
controls..so    the designers felt they could add software    to patch up the defect
without revisiting how the triangulation and dynamics of the airplane flight in
its engagement and flight course    can activate the software stall function in
different scenarios where plane function and steering needs a certain amount of
flexibility and dynamism in the flight path in order to get to the destination.. no
doubt software has a limitation because it cannot replace an engineering defect ,
so its problems are precipitated further.

The fact that the software was programmed to automatically lower the plane is
indicative of engineering flaw of a plane where engine was moved up and
forward and had an inclination, [not just when pilot moved the plane up but
even when the plane was moving even keeled to point up…. This makes sense
that they injected 5 to 10second rounds of automated stalling mechanism as a
desperate attempt to cover the design and engineering flaws of the plane. If it
were an issue of an angle of how much the pilot nosed up the plane, then a
simple directive in the manual would have rectified that, but the plane pushed
up when its throttled ,not when the pilot moved the nose up and the designers
hoped to trick and disguise this glitch with the software presuming that the
automated 5 second automatic directives of the program to push the plane down
would not be observable since they estimated that the plane would tend to   
point up every 5 to 10 second interval and therefore would balance It out..… but
the pulse to balance was at least significantly off. but the flaw was observable
and it looked to the pilots whom did not know of the program that their was
something wrong with the plane rather than a software    malfunctioning that
was spurting our commands and therefore could be manageable.

They did not mention MCAS in the manuals because it would compromise the
sales front of the product , thus if communicated that the device was
compensating for a flaw of which would be immediately apparent, then people
would have raised questions and the company would not have sold as many
planes.
The new engine placement increased risk of stalling and especially at low
speed” rogue Boeing 737 max planes 60 minutes program , this indicates that
the problem was integral and not activated when the pilot pitched the plane up
as I first assumed with the first video. They were too close to certification to
change the design.

Software depended on a 1 sensor system to legally avoid costly training

procedures if they had 2 sensors. So this implies that that their intention was an
attempt to balance the plane, a far reach and demand on a software    to be the
foundation of the planes flight safety integrity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aO7_indbfME