Professional Documents
Culture Documents
e) Judicial Decisions:
In contemporary times, Judicial Decision has come to be an important source of Law.
It is the responsibility of the courts to interpret and apply laws to specific cases. The
courts settle the disputes of the people in cases that come before them. The decisions
of the courts – the judicial decisions, are binding on the parties to the case. These also
get accepted as laws for future cases. But not all judicial decisions are laws.
Only the judicial decisions given by the apex court or the courts which stand
recognized as the Courts of Record, (like the Supreme Court and High Courts of any
country) are recognized and used as laws proper. Lower Courts can settle their cases
on the basis of such judicial decisions.
f) . Equity:
Equity means fairness and sense of justice. It is also a source of Law. For deciding
cases, the judges interpret and apply laws to the specific cases. But laws cannot fully
fit in each case and these can be silent in some respects. In all such cases, the judges
depend on equity and act in accordance with their sense of fair play and justice.
Equity is used to provide relief to the aggrieved parties and such decisions perform
the function of laying down rules for the future. As such equity acts as a source of
law.
Enacted law (parliamentary law, primary legislation, hard law)
Enacted law is law made by parliament to give effect to some public policy and is
known as statute law, legislation or Acts of Parliament. In addition, parliament,
through its statutes, can and does authorize other bodies to make laws known as
orders, regulations, rules or by-laws. All of these are known as delegated legislation.
g) Scholarly works
Scholarly works refer to writings by leading authorities in the field of law. They are
regarded as sources under the heading of common law because of their special nature.
Reference must also be made to modern textbooks and scholarly articles or
publications. Though these have no inherent authority of their own, they may be
regarded as very persuasive sources of law where neither legislation nor case law is in
point, or where they are explaining a legal point which is not clearly covered in
legislation or case law. The persuasive nature of an opinion of an author depends,
inter alia, on the standing of the author in the field of law in question, the reputation
of the author among judges, the scholarly level of the piece of work involved and the
degree to which the nature of the presentation is convincing.
h) Constitution
This is the supreme or highest law of the land, otherwise referred to as the Grund
norm of the land and no other law may be in conflict with it. It is the primary source
of law because it is the supreme law of Zambia and if any other law is inconsistent
with it, that other law, to the extent of such inconsistency, is null and void.2 The
Constitution of Zambia is the primary source of law in Zambia It governs the
organization of the political state and its relations with its citizens. It creates the
executive, legislature and judiciary functions of the state. As was discussed earlier,
the executive, legislature and judiciary are state organs. Under the concept of
separation of powers, the enactment of laws is reserved for the legislature. The
interpretation of the law is the work of judiciary. The role of the executive is policy
implementation and to sometimes act as the brainchild and/or hatchery of certain Bills
(or proposed laws). Nevertheless, there is a lot of overlapping of these functions,
which in essence compromises the independent running of three institutions, each
from the other. A classic example is given of this overlapping is where
a Cabinet minister (Executive) is a member of parliament (Legislature) and at the
same time a Minister of Justice (Judiciary). That the Constitution is the supreme law
of Zambia entails that the existence and validity of other laws in the country depends
on the extent to which such other laws are consistent with the provisions of the
constitution.
Statute law has the following advantages:
statute law takes precedence over case law
a statute can communicate simple and carefully drafted instructions
parliament can plan for the future, while unenacted case law decisions look to the
past through precedents .
statutes can be created, amended, etc, whereas case law is, in theory, bound by
the Doctrine of precedent .