Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TISTCW-FSI 20-INF.3 - Paris MoU Annual Report 2010 (Paris MoU)
TISTCW-FSI 20-INF.3 - Paris MoU Annual Report 2010 (Paris MoU)
SUMMARY
Executive summary: This document relates to the Paris MoU Annual Report 2010
INTRODUCTION
1 The Paris MoU is pleased to submit the Annual Report 2010 to the Sub-Committee.
Annex 1 contains Paris MoU Port State inspection data in the format proposed during the
Fifth IMO Workshop for PSC MoU/Agreement Secretaries and Database Managers. Tables
showing the number of inspections and detentions carried out, the performance of flag
Administrations and a list of ships banned from the Paris MoU region in the period
from 1 January 2010 to 24 October 2011 and the reasons for the ban are set out in annex 2.
2 In summary:
.2 the overall detention rate decreased to 3.28 per cent of inspections, the
lowest rate ever;
.3 42 flag Administrations are on the "White List", including three new entries.
There are 18 flag Administrations on the "Black List", of which five are in
the category of very high risk for targeting purposes; and
I:\FSI\20\INF-3.doc
FSI 20/INF.3
Page 2
INSPECTION FINDINGS
3 The number of detentions (790) and the rate of detention decreased significantly.
3.28 per cent of ships were detained (columns 2 and 6 of table 1 in annex 2). At the same
time the number of inspections carried out (24,058) and the number of individual ships
inspected (14,753) have decreased slightly (columns 3 and 5).
4 The detention record of flag Administrations over three years determines whether
their ships are targeted for inspection in the Paris MoU region. Since flag Administration
performance is measured against a set standard, entry to the "White List" of quality flags is
potentially open to all.
5 The number of flag Administrations on the "White List" (42) has increased and on
the "Black List" (18) has decreased.
6 The "Grey List" may be seen as an area of incentive – to flag Administrations on the
"Grey List" to improve and join the "White List", and to flag Administrations in the lower
category of the "Black List" to move from the "Black List" where their ships are targeted for
inspection and may be banned following detention.
7 The highest risk category in the "Black List" contains the following entries – the
Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Libya, Togo, Sierra Leone and Montenegro.
8 A list of ships banned from the Paris MoU region in the period from 1 January 2010
to 24 October 2011 is attached to this report for information (table 6). A complete and
up-to-date version may be found on the website at www.parismou.org
***
I:\FSI\20\INF-3.doc
FSI 20/INF.3
Annex 1, page 1
ANNEX 1
Inspection data1
Percentage
Number of
of Number
Member Number of inspections Number of Detention
inspection of
Authority inspections with deficiencies3 percentage
with detentions
deficiencies
deficiencies
Belgium 1,361 690 3,067 50.70 37 2.72
Bulgaria1 514 394 2,380 76.65 25 4.86
Canada1 976 443 1,771 45.39 19 1.95
Croatia 417 252 1,055 60.43 16 3.84
1
Cyprus 293 173 989 59.04 27 9.22
Denmark 630 287 863 45.56 8 1.27
Estonia 384 111 279 28.91 1 0.26
Finland 376 104 230 27.66 1 0.27
France 1,515 913 3,880 60.26 57 3.76
Germany 1,466 733 3,371 50.00 36 2.46
Greece 1,021 559 4,019 54.75 47 4.60
Iceland 106 37 70 34.91 3 2.83
Ireland 436 185 784 42.43 11 2.52
Italy 1,993 1,191 6,257 59.76 119 5.97
Latvia 479 121 398 25.26 1 0.21
Lithuania 507 310 1,174 61.14 5 0.99
1
Malta 241 175 804 72.61 10 4.15
Netherlands 1,698 859 3,964 50.59 34 2.00
Norway 793 262 852 33.04 18 2.27
Poland 858 474 2,395 55.24 22 2.56
Portugal 468 291 1,426 62.18 13 2.78
1
Romania 1,233 708 3,587 57.42 48 3.89
I:\FSI\20\INF-3.doc
FSI 20/INF.3
Annex 1, page 2
Percentage
Number of
of Number
Member Number of inspections Number of Detention
inspection of
Authority inspections with deficiencies3 percentage
with detentions
deficiencies
deficiencies
Russian
1,358 935 5,204 68.58 54 3.98
Federation1,2
Slovenia 267 163 1,175 61.05 28 10.49
Spain 2,093 1,428 8,340 68.23 95 4.54
Sweden 743 251 607 33.78 5 0.67
United
1,832 1,233 6,104 67.30 50 2.78
Kingdom
Total 24,058 13,282 65,045 55.21 790 3.28
1
Member Authorities having dual or triple membership
2
Only movements to the Russian ports of the Baltic, Azov, Caspian and Barents Seas
are included
3
The number of deficiencies per Member Authority is not recorded in the annual report
2010 and had to be extracted from the database after the closing date for the annual
report 2010. After this date data has been added to the database. Therefore there is a
difference between the total number of deficiencies in the annual report and the total
number of deficiencies in this annex.
I:\FSI\20\INF-3.doc
FSI 20/INF.3
Annex 1, page 3
After this date data has been added to the database. Therefore there is a difference
between the total number of deficiencies in the annual report and the total number of
deficiencies in this Annex.
5
Other ship types as used in the region.
Inspection data6 per category of deficiency
Other
6
Some data may have been reported to other Regional Agreements
***
I:\FSI\20\INF-3.doc
FSI 20/INF.3
Annex 2, page 1
ANNEX 2
*An individual ship is a ship that has been inspected on a visit to a Paris MoU port during a
year. A vessel inspected more than once in a year is counted as 1 individual ship.
Bermuda,
1 UK 270 0 26 12 -1.91
2 Germany 1,388 14 113 81 -1.81
3 Sweden 984 9 83 55 -1.80
United
4 Kingdom 2,007 25 160 121 -1.76
5 Netherlands 3,860 54 297 244 -1.75
6 France 355 2 33 16 -1.73
7 Denmark 1,385 17 113 81 -1.73
8 Finland 624 6 55 33 -1.71
9 China 250 1 25 10 -1.68
I:\FSI\20\INF-3.doc
FSI 20/INF.3
Annex 2, page 2
I:\FSI\20\INF-3.doc
FSI 20/INF.3
Annex 2, page 3
Table 3 Flag Administrations that have moved from the "Black List" to the "Grey List"
in 2010
United
43 States 128 4 14 4 0.03
44 Thailand 128 4 14 4 0.03
Iran, Islamic
45 Republic of 146 5 16 5 0.03
46 Latvia 144 5 16 5 0.04
47 Vanuatu 177 7 18 6 0.06
48 Faroes 157 6 17 5 0.07
49 Switzerland 94 3 11 2 0.11
50 Malaysia 74 2 9 1 0.11
51 Curaçao, NL 599 35 53 31 0.18
52 Belize 660 40 57 35 0.23
53 Bulgaria 230 13 23 9 0.27
54 Saudi Arabia 62 3 8 1 0.32
55 Morocco 153 11 16 5 0.53
56 Tuvalu 36 3 6 0 0.58
57 Mongolia 43 4 6 0 0.65
58 Jamaica 48 5 7 0 0.74
59 Tunisia 57 6 8 0 0.77
60 Honduras 65 7 8 1 0.82
61 Slovakia 234 21 23 9 0.83
62 Algeria 98 10 12 2 0.84
63 Dominica 167 16 18 6 0.86
64 Viet Nam 37 5 6 0 0.89
65 Cook Islands 150 15 16 5 0.90
66 Egypt 112 12 13 3 0.92
I:\FSI\20\INF-3.doc
FSI 20/INF.3
Annex 2, page 4
On 1 January 2011 the New Inspection Regime came into force. As a result the ban reason
"no valid ISM Certification" no longer exists as of 2011.
In accordance with section 3.10.5 of the 31st amendment to the Paris MoU
(valid till 31 December 2010), ships are banned after multiple detentions: these ships will be
refused access to any port in the region of the Memorandum.
As a result of the New Inspection Regime the banning criteria for multiple detentions have
been changed. As of 2011 all ships (instead of certain ship types only) under grey and black
listed flags (instead of black listed flags only) can be refused access after multiple detentions.
This is in accordance with section 4.1 of the 32nd and 33rd amendment to the Paris MoU.
I:\FSI\20\INF-3.doc
FSI 20/INF.3
Annex 2, page 5
In accordance with section 3.12 of the 31st amendment to the Paris MoU
(valid till 31 December 2010) and section 4.2 of the 32nd and 33rd amendment of the Paris
MoU, ships which jump detention or fail to call at an indicated repair yard are banned: these
ships will be refused access to any port in the region of the Memorandum.
The following ships were banned in the period from 1 January 2010 to 24 October 2011:
I:\FSI\20\INF-3.doc
FSI 20/INF.3
Annex 2, page 6
* Please note that the particulars of the ships on this list are only updated on request of the
banning authority. The main identifier of a banned ship is the IMO number.
** The full list of banned ships is available on the Paris MoU-website at www.parismou.org.
___________
I:\FSI\20\INF-3.doc