Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Peri- and clinical practice parameters for the critical care practitioner. New
operative and Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medi- guidelines and practice parameters are continually developed, and cur-
cal School, Boston, MA. rent ones are systematically reviewed and revised.
2
Clinical Nutrition Department, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO. These guidelines are being copublished by the American Society for Par-
3
Critical Care, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Penn- enteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) in the Journal of Parenteral and
sylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA. Enteral Nutrition (JPEN), 2017; 41:706–742.
4
Section of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of
Medicine, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX.
5
Division of Nutrition Therapy, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical This document represents the first collaboration between two
Center, Cincinnati, OH. organizations, American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutri-
6
Department of Pharmacy, Betty H. Cameron Women’s and Children’s tion and the Society of Critical Care Medicine, to describe best
Hospital, New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC. practices in nutrition therapy in critically ill children. The target of
7
Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago, these guidelines is intended to be the pediatric (> 1 mo and < 18
Chicago, IL.
yr) critically ill patient expected to require a length of stay greater
8
Biostatistics, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain
Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA. than 2 or 3 days in a PICU admitting medical, surgical, and car-
9
Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Medical College of Wisconsin, diac patients. In total, 2,032 citations were scanned for relevance.
Milwaukee, WI. The PubMed/Medline search resulted in 960 citations for clinical
10
Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, Division of Epidemiology and trials and 925 citations for cohort studies. The EMBASE search
Biostatistics, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL. for clinical trials culled 1,661 citations. In total, the search for
All authors completed both the American Society of Parenteral and Enteral clinical trials yielded 1,107 citations, whereas the cohort search
Nutrition and Society of Critical Care Medicine conflicts of interest form
for copyright assignment and financial disclosure. The authors of these yielded 925. After careful review, 16 randomized controlled trials
guidelines have reported all potential conflicts or financial disclosures. and 37 cohort studies appeared to answer one of the eight pre-
There was no funding or contribution from industry nor were any industry identified question groups for this guideline. We used the Grading
representatives present at any of the committee meetings.
of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation
For information regarding this article, E-mail: nilesh.mehta@childrens.
harvard.edu criteria to adjust the evidence grade based on assessment of
The American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM), which honors the quality of study design and execution. These guidelines are
individuals for their achievements and contributions to multidisciplinary not intended for neonates or adult patients. The guidelines reit-
critical care medicine, is the consultative body of the Society of Critical erate the importance of nutritional assessment, particularly the
Care Medicine (SCCM) that possesses recognized expertise in the prac-
tice of critical care. The College has developed administrative guidelines detection of malnourished patients who are most vulnerable and
Copyright © 2017 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the therefore potentially may benefit from timely intervention. There
American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition is a need for renewed focus on accurate estimation of energy
DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001134 needs and attention to optimizing protein intake. Indirect calo-
rimetry, where feasible, and cautious use of estimating equations nutrition practices in the PICU environment. Most questions
and increased surveillance for unintended caloric underfeeding addressed in this guideline do not have enough homogeneous,
and overfeeding are recommended. Optimal protein intake and its high-quality trials and therefore do not lend themselves to any
correlation with clinical outcomes are areas of great interest. The statistical analyses. A combination of cohort studies and tri-
optimal route and timing of nutrient delivery is an area of intense als, where available, has been summarized and used to develop
debate and investigations. Enteral nutrition remains the preferred practical recommendations by consensus. Where random-
route for nutrient delivery. Several strategies to optimize enteral ized controlled trials (RCTs) were not available, observational
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
nutrition during critical illness have emerged. The role of supple- studies formed the main evidence. Their quality was critically
mental parenteral nutrition has been highlighted, and a delayed reviewed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment,
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC4/OAVpDDa8KKGKV0Ymy+78= on 07/09/2023
approach appears to be beneficial. Immunonutrition cannot be Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology and
currently recommended. Overall, the pediatric critical care popu- guided the consensus-derived recommendations (2).
lation is heterogeneous, and a nuanced approach to individualiz- Definitions. Nutrition support therapy refers specifically to
ing nutrition support with the aim of improving clinical outcomes is the provision of either enteral nutrition (EN) by enteral access
necessary. (Pediatr Crit Care Med 2017; 18:675–715) device and/or parenteral nutrition (PN). Standard therapy
Key Words: adolescent; algorithm; child; critical illness; energy; refers to provision of IV fluids, no EN or PN, and advancement
enteral nutrition; guidelines; immunonutrition; indirect calorimetry; to oral diet as tolerated.
infant; intensive care unit; malnutrition; nutrition team; obesity; Target Patient Population for Guideline. The target of these
parenteral nutrition; pediatric; pediatric nutrition assessment; guidelines is intended to be the pediatric (> 1 mo and < 18 yr)
protein; protein balance; resting energy expenditure critically ill patient expected to require a length of stay (LOS)
greater than 2 or 3 days in a PICU admitting medical, surgical, and
cardiac patients. These guidelines are not intended for neonates
or adult patients. We believe that neonates are different physio-
T
his document represents the first collaboration between logically from older children, and therefore, these guidelines spe-
two organizations, American Society of Parenteral and cifically do not include them. These guidelines are not intended
Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) and the Society of Critical for patients with specific diagnoses such as burn injuries. These
Care Medicine (SCCM), to describe best practices in nutrition guidelines are directed toward generalized patient populations
therapy in critically ill children. but, like any other management strategy in the PICU, nutrition
Guideline Limitations. These SCCM-ASPEN Clinical therapy should be tailored to the individual patient.
Guidelines are based on general consensus among a group of Target Audience. These guidelines are intended for use by
professionals who, in developing such guidelines, have exam- all healthcare providers involved in nutrition therapy of the
ined the available literature on the subject and balanced poten- critically ill child, primarily physicians, nurses, dietitians, and
tial benefits of nutrition practices against risks inherent with pharmacists.
such therapy. A task force of multidisciplinary experts in clinical
nutrition composed of physicians, nurses, pharmacists, dieti-
tians, and statisticians was jointly convened by the two societies. METHODS
These individuals participated in the development of the guide- The GRADE process was used to develop the key questions and
lines and authored this document. These practice guidelines are to plan data acquisition and conflation for these guidelines (2).
not intended as absolute policy statements. Use of these practice The task force of experts defined keywords to be used for the lit-
guidelines does not in any way guarantee any specific benefit in erature search, developed key questions that address major prac-
outcome or survival. The professional judgment of the attending tice themes at the bedside, and determined the time frame for the
health professionals is the primary component of quality medical literature search, target population, and the specific outcomes to
care delivery. Since guidelines cannot account for every variation be addressed. Ultimately, questions related to eight major prac-
in circumstances, practitioners must always exercise professional tice areas were developed, which were reviewed and approved by
judgment when applying these recommendations to individual the ASPEN and SCCM boards. These questions and the recom-
patients. These Clinical Guidelines are intended to supplement, mendations are summarized in Table 1. Due to a dearth of well-
but not replace, professional training and judgment. designed RCTs, many studies addressing these questions and
The current guidelines represent an expanded body of lit- relevant outcomes are either prospective or retrospective obser-
erature since the publication of the first guidelines in 2009 vational reports of clinical outcomes associated with a strategy.
(1). The guidelines offer basic recommendations that are sup- In some cases, these interventions were protocolized. The evi-
ported by review and analysis of the current literature and a dence provided by these observational studies was strengthened,
blend of expert opinion and clinical practicality. Current lit- however, when the effects shown were strong, when the sample
erature has limitations that include variability in study design, size was large, or when there was a dose-response relationship.
small sample size, patient heterogeneity, variability in disease We used the GRADE criteria to adjust the evidence grade based
severity, lack of information on baseline nutritional status, and on assessment of the quality of study design and execution.
insufficient statistical power for analysis. The authors of these The GRADE process distinctly separates the body of evidence
guidelines acknowledge the scarcity of high-level evidence for from the recommendation statements. This separation enables
TABLE 1. Nutrition Support Clinical Guideline Recommendations for the Critically Ill Child
Questions and Recommendations Evidence/GRADE
Q1A. What is the impact of nutritional status on outcomes in critically ill children?
R1A. Based on observational studies, malnutrition, including obesity, is associated with adverse Quality of evidence: very low
clinical outcomes including longer periods of ventilation, higher risk of hospital-acquired
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
infection, longer PICU and hospital stay, and increased mortality. We recommend that patients
in the PICU undergo detailed nutritional assessment within 48 hr of admission.
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC4/OAVpDDa8KKGKV0Ymy+78= on 07/09/2023
Furthermore, as patients are at risk of nutritional deterioration during hospitalization, which can GRADE recommendation:
adversely affect clinical outcomes, we suggest that the nutritional status of patients be re- strong
evaluated at least weekly throughout hospitalization.
Q1B. What are the best practices to screen and identify patients with malnutrition or those at risk
of nutritional deterioration in the PICU?
R1B. Based on observational studies and expert consensus, we recommend that weight and Quality of evidence: very low
height/length be measured on admission to the PICU, and z scores for body mass index-
for-age (weight-for-length < 2 yr), or weight-for-age (if accurate, height is not available), be
used to screen for patients at extremes of these values. In children under 36 mo old, head
circumference must be documented.
Validated screening methods for the PICU population to identify patients at risk of malnutrition GRADE recommendation:
must be developed. Screening methods might allow limited resources to be directed to strong
high-risk patients who are most likely to benefit from early nutritional assessment and
interventions.
Q2A. What is the recommended energy requirement for critically ill children? Quality of evidence: low
R2A. Based on observational cohort studies, we suggest that measured energy expenditure by GRADE recommendation:
indirect calorimetry (IC) be used to determine energy requirements and guide prescription of weak
the daily energy goal.
Q2B. How should energy requirement be determined in the absence of IC? Quality of evidence: very low
R2B. If IC measurement of resting energy expenditure (REE) is not feasible, we suggest that GRADE recommendation:
the Schofield or Food Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization/United Nations weak
University equations may be used “without” the addition of stress factors to estimate energy
expenditure. Multiple cohort studies have demonstrated that most published predictive
equations are inaccurate and lead to unintended overfeeding or underfeeding. The Harris-
Benedict equations and the RDAs, which are suggested by the Dietary Reference Intakes,
should not be used to determine energy requirements in critically ill children.
Q2C. What is the target energy intake in critically ill children? Quality of evidence: low
R2C. Based on observational cohort studies, we suggest achieving delivery of at least two GRADE recommendation:
thirds of the prescribed daily energy requirement by the end of the first week in the PICU. weak
Cumulative energy deficits during the first week of critical illness may be associated with
poor clinical and nutritional outcomes. Based on expert consensus, we suggest attentiveness
to individualized energy requirements, timely initiation and attainment of energy targets, and
energy balance to prevent unintended cumulative caloric deficit or excesses.
Q3A. What is the minimum recommended protein requirement for critically ill children? Quality of evidence: moderate
R3A. Based on evidence from RCTs and supported by observational cohort studies, we GRADE recommendation:
recommend a minimum protein intake of 1.5 g/kg/d. Protein intake higher than this threshold strong
has been shown to prevent cumulative negative protein balance in RCTs. In critically ill infants
and young children, the optimal protein intake required to attain a positive protein balance
may be much higher than this minimum threshold. Negative protein balance may result in loss
of lean muscle mass, which has been associated with poor outcomes in critically ill patients.
Based on a large observational study, higher protein intake may be associated with lower
60-d mortality in mechanically ventilated children.
Q3B. What is the optimal protein delivery strategy in the PICU? Quality of evidence: moderate
R3B. Based on results of randomized trials, we suggest provision of protein early in the course GRADE recommendation:
of critical illness to attain protein delivery goals and promote positive nitrogen balance. weak
Delivery of a higher proportion of the protein goal has been associated with positive clinical
outcomes in observational studies.
(Continued )
Q3C. How should protein delivery goals be determined in critically ill children? Quality of evidence: moderate
R3C. The optimal protein dose associated with improved clinical outcomes is not known. We do GRADE recommendation:
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
not recommend the use of RDA values to guide protein prescription in critically ill children. strong
These values were developed for healthy children and often underestimate the protein needs
during critical illness.
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC4/OAVpDDa8KKGKV0Ymy+78= on 07/09/2023
Q7B. What is the role of PN as a supplement to inadequate EN? Quality of evidence: low
R7B. In children tolerating EN, we suggest stepwise advancement of nutrient delivery via the GRADE recommendation:
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
enteral route and delaying commencement of PN. Based on current evidence, the role of weak
supplemental PN to reach a specific goal for energy delivery is not known. The time when
PN should be initiated to supplement insufficient EN is also unknown. The threshold for and
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC4/OAVpDDa8KKGKV0Ymy+78= on 07/09/2023
incorporation of the weight of the risks versus the benefits that “Adolescent,” or “Young Adult.” Alternatively, we also accepted
occur from adopting the recommendation. Thus, a recommen- citations that had the terms pediatric*, paediatric*, infan*,
dation may be “strong” despite comparatively weak published adolescen*, or child* in at least one of their PubMed/Medline
evidence if the net benefits outweigh the harms from its adop- subject fields. Finally, all citations had to be cross-referenced
tion. Recommendations based mainly on expert opinion were in the “Humans” MeSH folder. The PubMed (non-Medline)
deemed weak. Table 2 describes the standard language and database was then searched using text-based terms (Fig. 1).
rationale for the grade assigned to a recommendation. As an added protection against MeSH miscategorization of
A rigorous search of the Medline/PubMed and EMBASE citations, this text-based search was then used to search the
databases was performed spanning January 1995 through Medline database restricting the search to only yield cita-
March 2016 for citations relevant to nutrition support in the tions carrying those terms in their title or abstract. For the
critically ill pediatric population using the techniques outlined clinical trials search, the Medline portion was restricted to
in a recent publication (3). For the Medline portion of the those citations categorized according to the publication type
search, Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) folders for “Critical “Clinical Trials.” For the cohort search, the Medline portion
Illness,” “Intensive Care,” and “Critical Care” were searched for was restricted to those studies cross-referenced in the “Cohort”
relevant citations. To meet our search criteria, these citations had MeSH folder, whereas the text-based portion was restricted
to also be indexed in MeSH folders for “Nutritional Support,” to only those citations that were not indexed according to the
“Malnutrition,” “Nutrition Assessment,” “Energy Intake,” publication types “Clinical Trial,” “Review,” “Case Reports,” or
“Energy Metabolism,” or “Dietary Proteins.” To further restrict “Commentary.” An analogous search strategy focusing only on
citations to our chosen population, the terms were cross-ref- EMBASE-indexed non-Medline clinical trials was created and
erenced in the MeSH folders for “Pediatrics,” “Infant,” “Child,” implemented for the EMBASE database.
TABLE 3. The Impact of Nutritional Status on Outcomes and the Best Practices to Detect
Malnutrition or Risk of Nutritional Deterioration
Study Design, Population (n),
Reference No. of Sites Study Aim(s) Eligibility Results/Outcome Comments
Bechard Prospective, To determine the n = 1,622 54.2%, normal weight; 17.9%, 45% of the cohort
et al (4) observational influence of Mechanically underweight; 14.5%, was malnourished
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
cohort admission BMI z ventilated, overweight; and 13.4%, obese (obese, overweight,
(combined score on clinical critically ill Outcomes (compared with or underweight) on
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC4/OAVpDDa8KKGKV0Ymy+78= on 07/09/2023
TABLE 3. (Continued). The Impact of Nutritional Status on Outcomes and the Best
Practices to Detect Malnutrition or Risk of Nutritional Deterioration
Study Design, Population (n),
Reference No. of Sites Study Aim(s) Eligibility Results/Outcome Comments
Delgado Retrospective, To evaluate the n = 1,077 No significant differences Over 50% of patients
et al (7) observational, incidence of Malnutrition based between well nourished and admitted to this
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
single center malnutrition in the on weight-for- malnourished for CRP, PICU Brazilian PICU
first 72 hr after age z score: LOS, hospital mortality, or were malnourished
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC4/OAVpDDa8KKGKV0Ymy+78= on 07/09/2023
Question 1B. What Are the Best Practices to Screen Rationale B. In a limited resource setting, timely and
and Identify Patients With Malnutrition or Those at detailed nutritional assessment of every patient in the PICU
Risk of Nutritional Deterioration in the PICU? may not be feasible. A validated method to screen critically ill
Recommendation 1B. Based on observational studies and children for malnutrition risk may help allocate resources to
expert consensus, we recommend that weight and height/ high-risk patients. However, such a screening method is not
length be measured at admission to the PICU, and z scores for currently available. The Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score,
body mass index (BMI)-for-age (weight-for-length, < 2 yr) or the Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pedi-
weight-for-age (if accurate, height is not available) be used to atrics, and the Screening Tool for Risk of Impaired Nutritional
screen for patients at extremes of these values. In children under Status and Growth (STRONGKids) were recently evaluated
36 months old, head circumference must be documented. in 2,567 patients from multiple centers in Europe (20). These
Validated screening methods for the PICU population screens varied significantly in their ability to identify and clas-
to identify patients at risk of malnutrition must be devel- sify malnutrition risk and were unable to detect a significant
oped. Screening methods might allow limited resources to be proportion of children with abnormal anthropometrics. The
directed to high-risk patients who are most likely to benefit authors concluded that none of these screens could be recom-
from early nutritional interventions. mended for use in clinical practice. Admission weight-for-age
Quality of Evidence. Very low. and BMI-for-age (or weight-for-length in children, < 2 yr) z
GRADE Recommendation. Strong. scores of individual patients in relation to population reference
Rationale A. Malnutrition is prevalent in children admitted standards have been used to classify patients as undernour-
to the PICU (6, 7, 14, 15). Although variables used to define ished or obese. Admission BMI z scores predicted mortality in
malnutrition are inconsistent across reports, both underweight a large multicenter cohort of mechanically ventilated children
and overweight status have been associated with worse morbid- (4). Due to their consistent associations with LOS, duration
ity and mortality (4–6, 10). More recently, guidelines to define of mechanical ventilation, and mortality, BMI z scores may
pediatric malnutrition have become available to facilitate early be useful to screen for patients at risk of poor outcomes in
identification of individuals at risk (16). A uniform approach the PICU (17). Despite the inherent challenges of obtaining
to define pediatric malnutrition may allow determination of accurate anthropometric measurements at admission to PICU,
thresholds for interventions aimed at ameliorating nutritional the routine evaluation of weight-for-age and BMI-for-age or
deterioration (17). A large portion of children admitted to weight-for-length z scores must be prioritized. Indeed, in a
PICU is at risk for nutritional deterioration; therefore, peri- majority of tertiary centers, documentation of anthropometric
odic nutritional re-evaluation is essential (15, 18). Nutritional measurements at admission is seen as the standard of care.
assessment must include a dietary history, detection of changes Future Direction. A validated nutrition screen for timely
in anthropometry, functional status, and nutrition-focused and accurate identification of malnourished PICU patients is
physical examination. A nutrition-focused physical examina- needed. This tool will facilitate allocation of resources, early
tion in this cohort allows for determination of individualized interventions, and close monitoring of nutritional status in
nutrient needs, interventions, and monitoring to optimize high-risk patients. A uniform definition of malnutrition must
nutrient intake during illness. The subjective global nutrition be employed, and validated methods for nutritional assess-
assessment is correlated with anthropometric variables in one ment must be developed and implemented in the PICU. Sub-
study but has not been shown to predict outcomes in critically sequently, the impact of malnutrition on clinical outcomes in
ill children (19). the PICU population should be examined.
center achieve nitrogen critically ill MREE was stable for intake and a
and energy children first 10 d relationship
balance and to Median age between energy
MREE decreased 6%
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC4/OAVpDDa8KKGKV0Ymy+78= on 07/09/2023
TABLE 4. (Continued). The Recommended Energy Requirement for Critically Ill Children
Study Design, Population
Reference No. of Sites Study Aim(s) (n), Eligibility Results/Outcome Comments
(Continued )
TABLE 4. (Continued). The Recommended Energy Requirement for Critically Ill Children
Study Design, Population
Reference No. of Sites Study Aim(s) (n), Eligibility Results/Outcome Comments
Mehta et al Prospective To examine the n = 33 High incidence (72%) The study described
(22) cohort, role of IC in Children in the of alterations in the risk of cumulative
single detecting the PICU energy expenditure energy imbalance
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
(0.1–28 yr)
of cumulative medical service and proposed the
energy PICU length of stay concept of targeted
imbalance in was significantly IC with selection
a subgroup higher for patients criteria for patients
of critically ill with hypermetabolism at risk of altered
children with (median, 142 d; metabolism
suspected p = 0.04) vs normal Limitations: small
alterations (median, 33 d) or sample size
in energy hypometabolism Note: majority were
expenditure (median, 50 d) long stay patients
Teixeira- Prospective, To establish n = 11 Positive vs negative The study suggests
Cintra observational the amount Mechanically protein balance was a threshold for
et al (23) cohort, single of protein ventilated associated with energy intake
center and energy infants in the increased energy and a relationship
intake needed PICU following intake (54 vs 17 between energy
to minimize cardiac surgery kcal/kg/d), and protein intake
catabolism Median age p < 0.0001; positive to positively impact
following cardiac (range): 54 d correlation between protein balance
surgery (6–163 d) protein balance and Limitations: small
energy intake (r = sample size and
0.77; p < 0.0001) three subjects were
< 30 d old
Urinary urea nitrogen
excretion may
underestimate total
nitrogen excretion
Mehta et al Prospective To examine if n = 14 Altered metabolism: 13 The study shows a
(41) cohort, a model for Critically ill children of 14 subjects, 15 of disparity between
single targeting IC 50% postoperative 16 measurements estimated energy
center measurements (94%) expenditure,
to a select group Mean age energy intake,
(range): 11.2 Average daily energy
of PICU patients balance: 200 kcal/d and MREE. The
by a dedicated yr (1.6 mo to metabolic state did
32 yr) (range, –518 to
nutrition team +859 kcal/d) not correlate with
could prevent Poor agreement between standard clinical
unintended MREE and estimated characteristics and
excesses or energy expenditure: therefore could
deficits in energy mean bias 72.3 ± 446 not be accurately
balance kcal/d (limits of predicted
agreement: 801.9 to Limitations: small
+946.5 kcal/d) sample size
No correlation between
subjects’ metabolic
status and severity of
illness scores, initial
diagnosis, age, and
body mass index
Energy intake: 132%
(± 68) of MREE
Mean RQ: 0.94
No correlation between
RQ and energy
balance
(Continued )
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine www.pccmjournal.org 685
Copyright © 2017 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.
Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited
Mehta et al
TABLE 4. (Continued). The Recommended Energy Requirement for Critically Ill Children
Study Design, Population
Reference No. of Sites Study Aim(s) (n), Eligibility Results/Outcome Comments
center kinetics and Mean age (sd), bicarbonate kinetics, those developed for
to compare PN group (n = 195% of Schofield growth in healthy
bicarbonate infants and children
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC4/OAVpDDa8KKGKV0Ymy+78= on 07/09/2023
(Continued )
TABLE 4. (Continued). The Recommended Energy Requirement for Critically Ill Children
Study Design, Population
Reference No. of Sites Study Aim(s) (n), Eligibility Results/Outcome Comments
the estimate
and White Bland Altman: poor traumatic brain
equations in agreement between injury
mechanically MREE and all four Limitations: small
ventilated equations sample size; MREE
children with obtained once in
severe traumatic No correlation between
MREE and severity the first 24 hr of
brain injury admission; energy
(Glasgow Coma of illness scores,
weight-for-age z intake not reported;
Scale, ≤ 8) and actual MREE
score
values not reported
Hardy Prospective To compare n = 52 Difference between The study
et al (29) cohort, MREE to BMR 35 ventilated all equations demonstrates
single estimated by 17 spontaneously and individual IC the variability in
center various methods breathing measurements was metabolic state, and
large and highly the inaccuracy of
Median age variable several equations
(range): 4.5 yr to estimate energy
(0–22 yr) 4–10% of estimates
were within 10% of expenditure
MREE Limitations: single
Strong relationship IC measurement
between severity of during the PICU
illness scores and course; and no
MREE: r = 0.72, outcomes reported
p < 0.01
Equations both
overestimated and
underestimated
MREE
ARDS = acute respiratory distress syndrome, BMR = basal metabolic rate, CRRT = continuous renal replacement therapy, DRI = Dietary Reference
Intake, EN = enteral nutrition, FAO/WHO/UNU = Food Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization/United Nations University, IC = indirect
calorimetry, IQR = interquartile range, MREE = measured resting energy expenditure, OR = odds ratio, PAL = physical activity level, PN = parenteral
nutrition, RQ = respiratory quotient, TEE = total energy expenditure.
Question 2A. What Is the Recommended Energy unintended overfeeding or underfeeding. The Harris-Benedict
Requirement for Critically Ill Children? equations and the Recommended Daily Allowances (RDAs),
Recommendation 2A. Based on observational cohort studies, which are suggested by the Dietary Reference Intakes, should
we suggest that measured energy expenditure by indirect calo- not be used to determine energy requirements in critically ill
rimetry (IC) be used to determine energy requirements and children.
guide prescription of the daily energy goal. Quality of Evidence. Very low.
Quality of Evidence. Low. GRADE Recommendation. Weak.
GRADE Recommendation. Weak.
Question 2C. What Is the Target Energy Intake in
Question 2B. How Should Energy Requirement Be Critically Ill Children?
Determined in the Absence of IC? Recommendation 2C. Based on observational cohort stud-
Recommendation 2B. If IC measurement of resting energy ies, we suggest achieving delivery of at least two thirds of the
expenditure (REE) is not feasible, we suggest that the Scho- prescribed daily energy requirement by the end of the first
field or Food Agriculture Organization/World Health Organi- week in the PICU. Cumulative energy deficits during the first
zation (WHO)/United Nations University equations may be week of critical illness may be associated with poor clinical
used “without” the addition of stress factors to estimate energy and nutritional outcomes. Based on expert consensus, we
expenditure. Multiple cohort studies have demonstrated that suggest attentiveness to individualized energy requirements,
most published predictive equations are inaccurate and lead to timely initiation and attainment of energy targets, and energy
1
de Betue et al (50) and RCT, two centers 1
Hypothesized that protein-enriched n = 18
2
de Betue et al (48) formula would stimulate amino acid Infants with RSV bronchiolitis requiring
(arginine) appearance and nitric mechanical ventilation
oxide synthesis
Mean age (sd): experimental, 2.7 mo
2
To study the efficacy of increased (1.4 mo); control, 2.9 mo (1.8 mo)
protein and energy intake to
promote protein synthesis
Botran et al (46) RCT, single center To determine if increased protein n = 51 children (41 analyzed)
delivery improves protein All required mechanical ventilation
metabolism with measurements > 72 hr
of serum and urine markers and
Median age (IQR): 7 mo (3–13 mo)
to evaluate safety and efficacy of
increased protein dose
van Waardenburg RCT (double blind), two To compare nutrient delivery, energy n = 20 (n = 18 for analysis)
et al (51) centers and nitrogen balance, and plasma Infants with RSV bronchiolitis requiring
amino acids with a protein-energy– mechanical ventilation with expected
enriched formula vs a standard length of stay > 96 hr
formula and also to assess
Mean age (sd): experimental, 2.7 mo
tolerance and safety of the protein-
(0.5 mo); control, 3.0 mo (0.6 mo)
energy–enriched formula
EN initiated within 24 hr following PICU Experimental vs control group Unable to demonstrate improvement
admission. Schofield equation used to Valine synthesis rate: 2.73 vs 2.26 μmol/kg/min in protein balance (using stable
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
determine energy needs Net valine balance: 0.54 vs 0.24 μmol/kg/min isotopes and valine as an
Experimental group: high protein, 5 g/kg/d indicator) or a difference between
No differences between groups regarding cardiac
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC4/OAVpDDa8KKGKV0Ymy+78= on 07/09/2023
(Continued )
TABLE 5. (Continued). The Recommended Protein Requirement for Critically Ill Children
Study Design,
Reference No. of Sites Study Aim(s) Population (n), Eligibility
cardiac surgery
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC4/OAVpDDa8KKGKV0Ymy+78= on 07/09/2023
Observational Studies
Jotterand Chaparro Prospective cohort, To assess amount of protein and n = 76
et al (36) single center energy necessary to achieve Children requiring mechanical
nitrogen and energy balance ventilation ≥ 72 hr
and to compare protein and Median age (IQR): 21 mo (4–35 mo)
energy requirements with the
ASPEN recommendations and
DRIs
fluids without AA Inverse ratio between nitrogen balance and urine compared with control group
3-methylhistidine excretion in both groups receiving no AA
Measurements: plasma AA, urine
Limitations: small sample size
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC4/OAVpDDa8KKGKV0Ymy+78= on 07/09/2023
Anabolism was associated with increased protein Patients with traumatic brain injury
intake: median 1.1 (0.7–2.2) g/kg/d vs catabolism with negative protein balance
median 0.1 (0–1.8) g/kg/d (p < 0.0001) also had negative balances
Positive correlation: protein intake and balance, in other intracellular markers;
R = 0.63 (p < 0.0001) together these findings suggest
Positive balance for phosphate and magnesium losses of lean body mass
with protein intake 0.5–1 g/kg/d Minimum intake of 1 g/kg/d
Negative correlation: creatinine clearance and protein and ≥ 50% of goal
protein balance, R = –0.45 (p < 0.0001) energy using Holliday-Segar
formula were associated with a
Negative protein balance associated with positive protein balance, except
pneumonia, sepsis, increased creatinine excretion in septic patients
Limitations: small sample size
(Continued )
TABLE 5. (Continued). The Recommended Protein Requirement for Critically Ill Children
Study Design,
Reference No. of Sites Study Aim(s) Population (n), Eligibility
AA = amino acids, ARDS = acute respiratory distress syndrome, ASPEN = American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, CRRT = continuous renal
replacement therapy, DRI = Dietary Reference Intake, EN = enteral nutrition, IC = indirect calorimetry, IQR = interquartile range, OR = odds ratio,
PN = parenteral nutrition, RCT = randomized controlled trial, RSV = respiratory syncytial virus.
balance to prevent unintended cumulative caloric deficit or ventilation, and increased length of PICU stay). In particular,
excesses. equations such as the Harris-Benedict and the RDAs devel-
Quality of Evidence. Low. oped for healthy adults and growing children, respectively,
GRADE Recommendation. Weak. over-predict energy requirements and should not be used
Rationale. Metabolic alterations are common in critical to determine energy requirements in critically ill children.
illness and patients present with a variety of metabolic states Because IC is not widely available clinically, and predictive
that cannot be predicted, including hypometabolism (mea- equations are consistently inaccurate, innovative efforts
sured resting energy expenditure [MREE], < 90% of pre- must focus on discovering more accessible surrogates of
dicted), normal metabolism (MREE, 90–110% predicted), and MREE. A simplified equation based on measured volumetric
hypermetabolism (MREE, > 110% predicted) (21–25). Cur- Co2 (VCo2) was recently developed in mechanically venti-
rently available equations fail to estimate energy expenditure lated children and was found to be more accurate than equa-
within ± 10% of MREE in a majority of critically ill children; tion-estimated energy expenditure (42, 43). The increased
IC is the only available method to accurately determine energy use of devices that provide bedside VCo2 measurement in
requirements for this population (21, 28–33). Energy expen- the PICU may allow this equation to replace the Schofield or
diture measured by IC in critically ill children is independent WHO equations for determination of energy requirement in
of nutritional status, initial diagnosis, or severity of the acute mechanically ventilated patients.
illness (30–32, 34). MREE may be decreased during deep seda- Observational data suggest a positive association between
tion and neuromuscular blockade, severe hypothyroidism, or adequacy of energy intake and improved outcomes in the
increased with temperature greater than 38°C and prolonged PICU population (8, 36, 44). Intake of greater than two
PICU LOS (16, 30). In cohort studies, MREE did not signifi- thirds of estimated energy goal in a large, multicenter, pro-
cantly vary within the same patient over time (21, 28, 35). After spective cohort and greater than 80% of estimated energy
the baseline, MREE is performed (ideally during the first week goal in a smaller, single-center, retrospective cohort was
of critical illness); repeat measurements may be obtained in significantly associated with reduced mortality in mechani-
patients with significant changes in clinical status (27, 35). cally ventilated, critically ill children (8, 44). Higher energy
Patients at high risk for metabolic alterations are appropri- intake of 54–58 kcal/kg/d is positively correlated with
ate candidates for targeted MREE with IC, especially if this achieving protein balance and anabolism (36, 45). Based
resource is limited (Appendix 1). on hypometabolic states described in a variety of pediat-
If IC is not feasible, the Schofield weight-height or weight ric illnesses and reduced mortality associated with intake of
equations or the WHO equations may be used to esti- greater than two thirds of energy goal, achievement of 100%
mate energy expenditure (37–39). However, stress factors of estimated energy requirement may not be necessary in all
must be used selectively with caution, as their routine use patients (8, 22, 24, 40, 41).
might result in unintended overfeeding. In recent studies, Future Direction. Future studies must examine the optimal
hypometabolism has been demonstrated in patients after energy dose that is associated with improved nutritional and
major cardiac surgery, and following hematopoietic stem clinical outcomes in critically ill children. The impact of route
cell transplantation (25, 40, 41). When using an equation of nutrition delivery must be examined when discussing this
to estimate energy requirements, it is essential to vigilantly dose-outcome relationship.
monitor for potential signs of overfeeding (hyperglycemia,
hypertriglyceridemia, increased Co2 production, increased Question 3A. What Is the Minimum Recommended
arm circumference, and rapid or excessive weight gain) Protein Requirement for Critically Ill Children?
and underfeeding (weight loss, decreased arm circumfer- Recommendation 3A. Based on evidence from RCTs and
ence, malnutrition, prolonged dependency on mechanical supported by observational cohort studies, we recommend a
or calories at initiation of CRRT (p < 0.0001), and did not assess nutrition or
longer duration of CRRT (p < 0.003) clinical outcomes
minimum protein intake of 1.5 g/kg/d. Protein intake higher the interpretation of absolute values. These studies indicate
than this threshold has been shown to prevent cumulative an association between higher protein dose and positive pro-
negative protein balance in RCTs. In critically ill infants and tein balance. In a systematic review of studies in mechanically
young children, the optimal protein intake required to attain ventilated PICU patients, a minimum protein intake of 1.5 g/
a positive protein balance may be much higher than this min- kg/d and a minimum energy intake of 54 kcal/kg/d were asso-
imum threshold. Negative protein balance may result in loss ciated with achievement of positive nitrogen balance (45). In
of lean muscle mass, which has been associated with poor another cohort study of 76 mechanically ventilated children,
outcomes in critically ill children. Based on a large obser- a minimum daily threshold delivery of 1.5 g/kg protein and
vational study, higher protein intake may be associated with 58 kcal/kg energy was required to achieve a positive nitrogen
lower 60-day mortality in mechanically ventilated children. and energy balance (36). In a recent large, prospective, inter-
Quality of Evidence. Moderate. national, multicenter (n = 59), observational study of 1,245
GRADE Recommendation. Strong. mechanically ventilated children from 15 countries, a total of
985 subjects received EN; delivery of greater than 60% of pre-
Question 3B. What Is the Optimal Protein Delivery scribed enteral protein goal was significantly associated with
Strategy in the PICU? decreased 60-day mortality (< 20% vs > 60%; odds ratio, 0.14
Recommendation 3B. Based on results of randomized trials, [0.04–0.52]; p = 0.003) after adjustment for disease severity,
we suggest provision of protein early in the course of critical site, PICU days, and energy intake (9). Hence, at the very min-
illness to attain protein delivery goals and promote positive imum, a protein intake of 1.5 g/kg/d must be ensured to avoid
nitrogen balance. Delivery of a higher proportion of the pro- cumulative protein deficits in critically ill children. The opti-
tein goal has been associated with positive clinical outcomes in mal protein intake threshold for infants and young children
observational studies. is likely to be higher than this value. Specific subgroups, such
Quality of Evidence. Moderate. as infants and young children admitted with bronchiolitis or
GRADE Recommendation. Weak. other causes of respiratory failure requiring mechanical venti-
lation, require 2.5–3 g/kg protein daily to improve protein bal-
Question 3C. How Should Protein Delivery Goals Be ance (46, 48, 51). Protein intake was well tolerated in the above
Determined in Critically Ill Children? studies. However, the safety of protein intake greater than 3 g/
Recommendation 3C. The optimal protein dose associated with kg/d in children more than 1 month old has not been ade-
improved clinical outcomes is not known. We do not recommend quately demonstrated and may be associated with increased
the use of RDA values to guide protein prescription in critically blood urea nitrogen. The effect of the route of protein deliv-
ill children. These values were developed for healthy children and ery, enteral versus parenteral, on clinical outcomes is unclear.
often underestimate the protein needs during critical illness. In particular, the role of early parenteral protein intake has
Quality of Evidence. Moderate. not been shown, and most studies demonstrating the benefits
GRADE Recommendation. Strong. of higher protein intake have utilized the enteral route.
Rationale. Randomized clinical trials of protein supple- Current evidence for increased protein dosing in critically
mentation have included small sample sizes, heterogeneous ill children exceeds RDA recommendations and recommen-
patient populations, use of the enteral, parenteral, or com- dations from WHO. These recommendations are calculated
bined routes, and varied protein doses (0.7–5 g/kg/d) in the estimates from derived equations of protein deposition in
experimental group. Higher protein doses were associated healthy children and do not account for the increased pro-
with positive nitrogen balance, a surrogate for protein bal- tein breakdown that occurs during critical illness (9, 36, 39).
ance. These studies evaluated protein turnover and balance The use of RDA recommendations to guide protein intake
by stable isotope-labeled amino acid methods or with urinary during critical illness may lead to unintended negative pro-
urea nitrogen to obtain nitrogen balance (46–53). Variation tein balance. The determination of protein requirements
in the methods used to assess protein balance further limits for obese patients in the PICU may be challenging. The
adequate Median age: 5.2 yr 24 hr of ARDS) and protein intake and
nutrition is (IQR, 1.0–10.4 PICU mortality was survival in children
associated with with ARDS
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC4/OAVpDDa8KKGKV0Ymy+78= on 07/09/2023
Panchal Retrospective To evaluate n = 339 received Patients in the The authors found no
et al (65) cohort, single the safety of greater than or fed group adverse effects with
center enteral feeding equal to one were younger the use of vasoactive
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
Mehta et al Prospective cohort, To identify n = 117 68% received EN This study highlights
(61) single center risk factors PICU population (20% postpyloric) factors such as
associated with LOS ≥ 24 hr for a total of 381 EN prolonged fasting
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
recommendation of a minimum of 1.5 g/kg/d should also severe feeding-related complications, or mortality were not
be applied to this population, using their ideal body weight. increased in the group who received vasoactive medications
This population is at risk of undetected lean body mass ero- (65).
sion. A reliable method to monitor the body composition for Cohort studies of children admitted to the PICU have
the critically ill pediatric population, particularly obese chil- reported improved survival with optimal nutrient intake
dren, is needed to better address their optimal macronutrient by the enteral route. In two large international prospective
needs. cohort studies of mechanically ventilated children, enteral
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
Future Direction. Future studies are needed to determine delivery of greater than two thirds of the energy goal and
the optimal dose of protein that improves protein balance, greater than 60% of the protein goal was significantly associ-
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC4/OAVpDDa8KKGKV0Ymy+78= on 07/09/2023
nutritional status (e.g., muscle mass and function), and rel- ated with lower 60-day mortality (8, 9). These benefits were
evant clinical outcomes (e.g., duration of mechanical venti- not seen for nutrients delivered via the parenteral route. In a
lation, PICU LOS, and mortality). Future studies must also large, retrospective, multicenter study of 5,105 patients from
examine the effect of specific protein sources and the route of 12 centers, the provision of one-fourth goal calories enter-
delivery on outcomes. ally over the first 48 hours of admission was associated with
reduced PICU mortality (66). In another retrospective cohort
Question 4A. Is EN Feasible in Critically Ill Children? of 107 children with acute respiratory distress syndrome,
Recommendation 4A. Based on observational studies, we rec- enteral delivery of adequate calories (≥ 80% estimated goal)
ommend EN as the preferred mode of nutrient delivery to the and protein (≥ 1.5 g/kg/d) was associated with a reduction in
critically ill child. Observational studies support the feasibility ICU mortality (44). Hence, EN is feasible during acute criti-
of EN, which can be safely delivered to critically ill children cal illness and must be prioritized as the preferred route for
with medical and surgical diagnoses, and to those receiving nutrient delivery.
vasoactive medications. Common barriers to EN in the PICU Future Direction. Future studies evaluating the feasibil-
include delayed initiation, interruptions due to perceived ity of EN in critically ill children should examine its impact
intolerance, and prolonged fasting around procedures. Based on well-defined outcomes. Higher quality randomized study
on observational studies, we suggest that interruptions to EN designs should evaluate the benefits of providing adequate EN
be minimized in an effort to achieve nutrient delivery goals by with predefined energy and protein goals.
the enteral route.
Quality of Evidence. Low. Question 5A. What Is the Optimum Method for
GRADE Recommendation. Strong. Advancing EN in the PICU Population?
Recommendation 5A. Based on observational studies, we sug-
Question 4B. What Is the Benefit of EN in This gest the use of a stepwise algorithmic approach to advance EN
Group? in children admitted to the PICU. The stepwise algorithm must
Recommendation 4B. Although the optimal dose of macro- include bedside support to guide the detection and manage-
nutrients is unclear, some amount of nutrient delivered as EN ment of EN intolerance and the optimal rate of increase in EN
has been beneficial for gastrointestinal mucosal integrity and delivery.
motility. Based on large cohort studies, early initiation of EN Quality of Evidence. Low.
(within 24–48 hr of PICU admission) and achievement of up GRADE Recommendation. Weak.
to two thirds of the nutrient goal in the first week of critical
illness has been associated with improved clinical outcomes. Question 5B. What Is the Role of a Nutrition Support
Quality of Evidence. Low. Team or a Dedicated Dietitian in Optimizing Nutrition
GRADE Recommendation. Weak. Therapy?
Rationale. The enteral route is the preferred modality to Recommendation 5B. Based on observational studies, we sug-
provide nutrition support to adults and children. Animal gest a multidisciplinary nutrition support team, including a
studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of EN on gut- dedicated dietitian, be available on the PICU team, to facilitate
associated lymphoid tissue, mucosal immunity, and improved timely nutritional assessment, and optimal nutrient delivery
survival after Escherichia coli–induced peritonitis and brief and adjustment to the patients
intestinal ischemia (56–60). Early initiation of EN is preferred Quality of Evidence. Low.
in most PICUs. However, a variety of challenges impedes early GRADE Recommendation. Weak.
initiation and maintenance of EN in children during critical Rationale. Despite the preference for the enteral route for
illness (61, 63). Many of these perceived barriers to EN may be nutrition delivery and benefits reported by many authors, the
avoidable (61). In large cohorts of patients on vasoactive med- practice of providing EN to critically ill children is variable.
ications in the PICU, EN was administered without any signif- There is no uniform approach to initiate and advance EN. A
icant adverse events (64, 65). Although the physician decision stepwise protocol/algorithm is expected to address barriers to
to start EN in patients may have been biased by the clinical EN such as prolonged interruptions due to procedures, lack
condition of the patient, gastrointestinal complications (vom- of a clear definition of feeding intolerance, and management
iting, diarrhea, bleeding, and abdominal distension), other of mechanical issues with feeding tubes, among others. The
Yoshimura et al (72) Prospective case series, To investigate the safety and n = 62 Preintervention
single center efficacy of an EN protocol after n = 47 Postintervention
its implementation
Meyer et al (79) Time series, single center To examine the impact of introducing n = 400
a series of enteral feeding Over a 9-yr period and spanning
protocols on nutritional practice in four studies
a PICU over a 9-yr period
EAR = estimated average requirements, EN = enteral nutrition, NGT = nasogastric tube, PN = parenteral nutrition.
698 www.pccmjournal.org July 2017 • Volume 18 • Number 7
Copyright © 2017 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.
Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited
Special Article
Intervention also included calorie counts, from the preintervention to intervention Difficult to parse the older children from
screening by specialists, bedside period. The percentage of patient days neonates
discussion of delivery, guideline when daily protein goals were met Overall, the use of EN algorithm
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC4/OAVpDDa8KKGKV0Ymy+78= on 07/09/2023
(stepwise) for nutrient delivery increased from 51.6% to 72.7% from resulted in increased likelihood of
Goal calories for full-term intubated similar periods reaching protein delivery goals
and nonintubated infants: 80 and
100–130 kcal/kg/d, respectively
The protocol included nutritional Median time to reach energy goal The study reports significantly
assessment and goals, mode of decreased from 4 to 1 d (p < 0.05), with decreased time to reach and
nutrition (EN vs PN), route of EN a higher proportion of patients reaching increased likelihood of reaching
(gastric vs postpyloric), initiation of this goal (99% vs 61%; p = 0.01) nutrient delivery goals after instituting
EN, and maintenance of EN. Also Decrease in avoidable EN interruptions (3 a step-wise EN algorithm
included a stepwise EN algorithm vs 51; p < 0.0001) and decreased use Limitations: no difference in clinical
development and systematic of PN in this subset outcomes
implementation in the PICU
The EN protocol had caloric goal-based The time until initiation of EN (median The study reports higher proportion of
advancements: the goal on day 1 of 22 vs 20 hr) and the total calories nutrient delivery and lower incidence
was set at 40% of target dose and provided did not differ significantly of EN intolerance after implementing
advanced by 20% each day to reach The proportion of energy provided by EN the algorithm in children after cardiac
100% by day 4 and PN in the postgroup was significantly surgery
higher and smaller, respectively, vs the No increase in necrotizing enterocolitis
preimplementation group Limitations: no difference in clinical
The frequency of vomiting was outcomes
significantly lower in the postgroup
vs the pregroup, and the incidence
of necrotizing enterocolitis was not
different between the groups
Baseline evaluation followed by NGT Over the four time periods that represented EN protocols shortened the time to
feeding protocols, specifying feeding the baseline and modifications of an EN initiation, increased the number
rate, type of feed, and gastric residual incremental protocol, the following serial of patients fed enterally, and
volume management were introduced changes were noted: decreased the number of patients
and then further protocols (including Median time to initiate EN: 15, 8, 5.5, fed parenterally
nasojejunal tube feeding algorithm) and 4.5 hr Limitations: no changes in clinical
were introduced Patients receiving EN: 89%, 81%, 99%, outcomes
and 96%
Patients receiving PN: 11%, 19%, 1%,
and 4%
Patients reaching 50% of EAR by day
3: 15%, 26%, 58%, and 59%
Patients reaching 70% of EAR by day 3:
6%, 10%, 35%, and 21%
Initiation of a feeding protocol in the Outcome variables for postintervention vs This study demonstrated that a
PICU preintervention groups: stepwise nutrition protocol reduced
The protocol also included guidance Time to achieve goal feeding (median): time to achieving goal feeding and
on EN tolerance and management/ 14 vs 32 hr; p < 0.001 improved nutrition tolerance
prevention of constipation Reduction in percentage of patients Limitations: no differences in clinical
with emesis and constipation outcomes
Initiation of a feeding protocol in the Energy intake approached predicted basal The study showed the utility of a
first 12 hr of admission to PICU metabolic rate the second day (43 ± 1 protocol to advance EN increased
vs 43.2 ± 1.1 kcal/kg/d) and predicted caloric intake during the first 5 d of
energy expenditure (based on stress admission to the PICU
factors) the fifth day (66.2 ± 2.7 vs Limitations: energy needs were based
67.7 ± 6.4 kcal/kg/d) on equations and stress factors
TABLE 8. Optimal Route (Gastric or Small Bowel) and Timing of Enteral Nutrition
Study Design, No. of
Reference Sites Study Aim(s) Population (n), Eligibility
n = 32 gastric
2) Feeding complications, including n = 30 small bowel
micro aspiration using pepsin in 12 of 42 randomized to postpyloric group
tracheal aspirates were unable to have feeding tube
placed and exited the study
1
Horn et al (77) RCT—convenience 1
To examine the relationship between n = 46
and 2Horn sample, single center two gastric feeding regimens— n = 22 continuous feeding
et al (83) continuous and intermittent, and Median age: 6 mo (0–146 mo)
tolerance as measured by the number
of stools and prevalence of diarrhea n = 24 intermittent feeding (one subject
(≥ 3 stools/24 hr) and vomiting removed due to only 1 d of feeding;
final n = 23)
2
To examine the effect of gastric
feeding regimens, either continuous Median age: 8 mo (1–153 mo)
or intermittent, on GRV, defined as Random assignment to feeding regimen
> 5 mL/kg
Observational Studies
Canarie et al Retrospective cohort, To determine the factors associated n = 444
(89) multicenter with delayed EN Median age (IQR): 4.0 yr (0.5–11.9 yr)
Six PICUs Patients divided into two groups: early
EN (≤ 48 hr) and delayed EN
(> 48 hr) from PICU admission
Gastric vs postpyloric feeding No significant differences between This randomized trial did not show a significant
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
TABLE 8. (Continued). Optimal Route (Gastric or Small Bowel) and Timing of Enteral Nutrition
Study Design, No. of
Reference Sites Study Aim(s) Population (n), Eligibility
Taha et al (86) Retrospective cohort, To evaluate the impact of the time n = 109
single center of initiation of nutritional support Median age (range): 13 yr (8–18 yr)
and achieving full caloric intake on Children severe isolated TBI
PICU LOS and disposition status at
discharge Median Glasgow Coma
Scale on admission to the ICU: 3
TABLE 8. (Continued). Optimal Route (Gastric or Small Bowel) and Timing of Enteral Nutrition
Study Design, No. of
Reference Sites Study Aim(s) Population (n), Eligibility
ARF = acute renal failure, BMR = basal metabolic rate, EN = enteral nutrition, GRV = gastric residual volume, IQR = interquartile range, LOS = length of stay,
OR = odds ratio, PIM2 = Pediatric Index of Mortality 2, RCT = randomized controlled trial, TBI = traumatic brain injury.
use of feeding protocols is considered safe and in individual reported rapid advancement of EN and achievement of nutri-
centers has been effective in optimizing nutrient delivery ent delivery goals by a stepwise algorithmic approach (70, 71,
without increasing the risk of other complications (70–72). 78). The use of EN algorithms/protocols has been associated
In an international multicenter cohort study, nine of the 31 with decreased time to initiation of EN, increased EN deliv-
participating PICUs reported the use of an EN algorithm ery and decreased reliance on PN, and increased likelihood of
(73). These algorithms defined the rate of EN advancement, achieving nutrient delivery goals (70, 72, 79).
recommended nutrition screening and fasting guidelines, Presence of a dedicated multidisciplinary nutrition team
and most centers defined intolerance by some threshold of in the ICU guides the timely initiation and management of
increased gastric residual volume (GRV). Despite being com- nutrition support. It is suggested that the composition of
monly measured in many PICUs, the accuracy of GRV as a the team includes personnel knowledgeable and experienced
marker of delayed gastric emptying has been recently chal- in pediatric critical care, pediatric nutrition, and nutri-
lenged in both adult and pediatric intensive care populations tion support therapy. Dedicated dietitians support sound
(55, 74). Measurement of GRV has not been correlated with nutritional practices such as timely assessment and docu-
risk of aspiration in adult studies, and it is no longer recom- mentation of nutritional status, development of an optimal
mended in the recent adult critical care nutrition guidelines nutritional prescription, serial follow-up, and monitoring
(75, 76). In a recent single-center study of children eligible for safe nutrient delivery are some of the responsibilities
for EN initiation in the PICU, measured GRV did not cor- of a PICU dietitian (80). In a multicenter, observational
relate with delayed gastric emptying or with the ability to rap- cohort study of 31 PICUs, a majority of the centers (93%)
idly advance EN (55). The threshold volume used to define reported presence of a dedicated dietitian for an average of
increased GRV in the PICU is variable (73, 77). In the absence 0.4 full time equivalents per 10 beds (8). In a subsequent
of pediatric trials, we cannot recommend discontinuing GRV larger multicenter study of 59 PICUs, presence of a dedi-
measurement in the PICU, but the role of this practice is not cated dietitian was a significant and independent predictor
clear and might impede EN advancement. Several studies have of adequate enteral protein intake (9). Hence, dietitians are
Caloric intake approached predicted This study showed that use of a gastric EN
BMR on day 2 and estimated needs protocol increased caloric intake during the
(BMR × 1.5) on day 5 first 5 d of admission to the PICU
Correlation between calorie intake and
severity of illness: pediatric Risk of
Mortality score: r = –0.35; p = 0.003;
Therapeutic Intervention Scoring
System: r = –0.37; p = 0.002
essential members of the multidisciplinary care team in the deliver EN to critically ill children. Based on observational
PICU. It is important to develop a seamless transition of studies, we suggest the gastric route be the preferred site for
nutrition care plan as patients move across the continuum EN in patients in the PICU. The postpyloric or small intestinal
of pediatric ward to the ICU and back. route for EN may be used in patients unable to tolerate gastric
Future Direction. Future studies must clarify the evidence feeding or those at high risk for aspiration. Existing data are
to inform stepwise decision making in the EN algorithms. insufficient to make recommendations regarding the use of
These steps include selection of gastric versus postpyloric continuous versus intermittent gastric feeding.
tube feeding, clear and practical definitions of feeding intol- Quality of Evidence. Low.
erance (e.g., reflux, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, and GRADE Recommendation. Weak.
malabsorption), and the role of adjuncts such as prokinetic,
antiemetic, antidiarrheal, acid suppressive, and laxative Question 6B. When Should EN Be Initiated?
medications. In particular, the practice of measuring GRV Recommendation 6B. Based on expert opinion, we suggest
as a marker of EN intolerance in the PICU population must that EN be initiated in all critically ill children, unless it is
be challenged. Future studies examining the role or the opti- contraindicated. Based on observational studies, we sug-
mal threshold of GRV to guide EN delivery are desirable. In gest early initiation of EN, within the first 24–48 hours after
addition, prospective trials are needed to show the benefit of admission to the PICU, in eligible patients. We suggest the
algorithmic EN advancement and dietitian interventions on use of institutional EN guidelines and stepwise algorithms
important nutritional and clinical outcomes. that include criteria for eligibility for EN, timing of initia-
tion, and rate of increase.
Question 6A. What is the Best Site for EN Delivery - Quality of Evidence. Low.
Gastric or Small Bowel? GRADE Recommendation. Weak.
Recommendation 6A. Existing data are insufficient to make Rationale. Gastric feeding is physiologic and is the pre-
universal recommendations regarding the optimal site to ferred EN route for critically ill children, unless the child has
TABLE 9. Indication and Optimal Timing of Parenteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Children
Study Design
Quality; Population n
Number of (Age-Range)
Reference Sites Setting Study Aim(s) Intervention Results/Outcome Comments
perceived or demonstrated risks of aspiration of gastric con- Question 7B. What Is the Role and Optimal
tents into the tracheobronchial tree. The use of small intestinal Timing of PN Initiation as a Supplement to
(postpyloric) feeding in two small RCTs did not demonstrate Inadequate EN?
reduced aspiration when compared with gastric feeding (81, Recommendation 7B. In children tolerating EN, we suggest
82). The postpyloric route was associated with higher pro- stepwise advancement of nutrient delivery via the enteral
portion of goal nutrition delivery in one study (82), but a route and delaying commencement of PN. Based on current
delay in the initiation of nutrition via the postpyloric route evidence, the role of supplemental PN to reach a specific goal
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
in a second study (81). The provision of EN into the small for nutrient delivery is not known. The time when PN should
bowel requires the placement of a feeding tube past the pylo- be initiated to supplement insufficient EN is also unknown.
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC4/OAVpDDa8KKGKV0Ymy+78= on 07/09/2023
rus. This can be accomplished by several methods but requires The threshold for and timing of PN initiation should be
time and expertise and incurs higher costs. In a single-center individualized.
study, mechanical problems with postpyloric tubes led to fre- Based on a single RCT, supplemental PN should be delayed
quent EN interruptions and failure to achieve delivery of goal until 1 week after PICU admission in patients with normal
nutrients (61). In centers with the necessary expertise and baseline nutritional state and low risk of nutritional deteriora-
resources to successfully place postpyloric feeding tubes, this tion. Based on expert consensus, we suggest PN supplementa-
route may be used with caution to improve nutrient delivery. tion in children who are unable to receive any EN during the
Gastric feeding has been administered to critically ill chil- first week in the PICU. In patients who are severely malnour-
dren either as a continuous or intermittent modality. In two ished or at risk of nutritional deterioration, PN may be supple-
RCTs comparing continuous versus intermittent gastric feed- mented in the first week if they are unable to advance past low
ing, authors reported no differences in EN tolerance (77, 83). volumes of EN.
Single-center, observational studies have demonstrated the Quality of Evidence. Low.
feasibility of postpyloric EN in cohorts of critically ill children GRADE Recommendation. Weak.
with a higher prevalence of EN intolerance such as those with Rationale. As previously discussed, EN is the preferred
shock and acute kidney injury (84, 85). route of nutrition support in the critically ill child; however,
Wide variability in the definition of early EN in the criti- PN should be considered when EN is not feasible or is con-
cally ill child has been reported in the published literature. A traindicated. The use of PN as a supplement to EN, timing
majority of the studies have described initiation as early as of supplemental PN initiation, and the targeted macronutri-
6 hours and as late as 48 hours after admission to the PICU ent goal are key questions that will require an evidence-based
(66, 71, 89). In a multicenter study of nutrient delivery in approach. Unfortunately, there is little evidence to guide
the PICU, early EN, defined as delivery of one quarter of these practices. In a recent three-center RCT (PEPaNIC trial)
cumulative goal enteral energy over the first 48 hours, was addressing timing of supplemental PN in critically ill children,
associated with a survival benefit (66). In a multicenter ret- the group with late initiation of PN (on day 8) demonstrated
rospective examination of EN initiation in the PICU, feeding better outcomes (fewer new infections and shorter length of
was delayed more than 48 hours from admission in 20% of PICU stay) compared with the early PN group (receiving PN
the patients (89). Positive-pressure invasive and noninvasive within 24 hr of admission) (90). Also, the late PN group was
ventilation, procedures, and gastrointestinal disturbances likely to have an earlier live discharge from the PICU, shorter
were common risk factors associated with delayed EN. The duration of mechanical ventilation, and lower odds of renal
use of stepwise protocols or guidelines for EN delivery in the replacement therapy.
PICU has been associated with significant reductions in the The finding that can be strongly generalizable from this
time to start EN (71, 78). study is that PN should not be started within 24 hours of PICU
Future Direction. Future, large-scale RCTs should evaluate admission. For reasons outlined below, we recommend cau-
the benefits of gastric versus small bowel feeding, early com- tion in broadly applying the delayed PN strategy (8 d until ini-
pared with delayed EN (< 24 vs ≥ 48 hr), and bolus/intermit- tiation) used in the control group of this study. Children in this
tent versus continuous gastric feeding. These studies must have study received significant enteral calories: mean of 30 kcal/kg/d
clear definitions of EN delivery targets and intolerance and (300 kcal/d) by day 4. It is possible that most of these children
must include important clinical outcomes including hospital- could have been sustained enterally using a robust EN protocol
acquired complications, PICU and hospital LOS, and duration (70, 71). Children in this study were discharged at rates that are
of mechanical ventilation. standard in most PICUs: 50% left the PICU by day 4 and 74%
by day 8. As only 24% of the late PN cohort was exposed to
Question 7A. Is There a Role for Early PN Initiation in PN, the intervention arm of the trial was more representative
Critically Ill Children? of a “no PN” strategy. Again, this supports the conclusion that
Recommendation 7A. Based on a single RCT, we do not initiation of PN within the first 24 hours of admission is not
recommend the initiation of PN within 24 hours of PICU advisable as a general strategy in the PICU.
admission. Our expert consensus is that PN should not be withheld until
Quality of Evidence. Moderate. day 8 as a universal strategy in critically ill children. Because most
GRADE Recommendation. Strong. children were receiving significant amounts of EN, the results
1
Larsen et al (95) and RCT Examine effects of two different n = 32
2
Larsen et al (97) lipid emulsions on 1plasma Infants with congenital heart disease
phospholipids and 2immune scheduled for open-heart surgery with
biomarkers cardiopulmonary bypass
Mean age (sd): 40 wk (0.6 wk) gestational
age, 3.5 ± 0.5 kg, and 10.6 d at the time
of surgery
Experimental group (n = 49): standard At day 5, patients in the PN + glutamine Glutamine supplementation in PN
PN + glutamine group had significantly higher levels of administered to critically ill children
Control group (n = 49): standard PN HSP-70 when compared with controls failed to show any differences in
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
1
Briassoulis et al (93); RCT To compare outcomes in critically 1
n = 50 critically ill children
2
Briassoulis et al ill children receiving an immune- 2
n = 38 (30 analyzed) critically ill children
(94); and 3Briassoulis enhancing formula or standard with septic shock
et al (99) formula 3
n = 40 critically ill children with severe
1
NB, nutritional indices, antioxidant traumatic brain injury
catalysts
2,3
Cytokines, hospital-acquired
infections, nutritional indices
ALI = acute lung injury, ARDS = acute respiratory distress syndrome, BMR = basal metabolic rate, EN = enteral nutrition, EPA = eicosapentaenoic acid,
GLA = γ-linolenic acid, HSP-70 = heat shock protein 70, IL = interleukin, LOS = length of stay, MV = mechanical ventilation, NB = nitrogen balance,
PN = parenteral nutrition, RCT = randomized controlled trial, TNF = tumor necrosis factor.
of the PEPaNIC trial should not be extrapolated to children the two time points. A majority of children in this study had
receiving no EN. The proportion of severely malnourished chil- energy expenditure estimated using equations that have been
dren in the study is unclear and likely to be low. The nutritional discredited in critically ill children (refer to Recommendations
assessment/screening tool used in the study (STRONGkids) and Rationale for Question 2B). Hence, it is possible that a sig-
has not been validated in critically ill children, and its accuracy nificant portion of children in the early PN arm of this study
in hospitalized children has been questioned (20). Also, BMI z were over-fed. In addition, glycemic control protocols were
scores of patients in the study suggest that most children were different in each of the three centers. Multiple problems exist
well nourished at PICU admission. Therefore, the results can- with one of the primary outcomes in this study, new infections
not be extrapolated to severely malnourished children or those acquired during the ICU stay. The investigators used nonstan-
at risk of malnutrition who may not tolerate a week of cumu- dard definitions of acquired infections such as ventilator-asso-
lative nutrient deficit accrued by the late PN strategy. Finally, ciated pneumonia and catheter-related blood stream infection
other vulnerable groups such as children admitted to the PICU (BSI). The presence of indwelling devices such as central
with contraindications to EN, intestinal failure, or requiring venous catheters in the two groups was not reported. It is not
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation often rely on PN to meet clear how the investigators distinguished between an infection
nutrient needs. In these subgroups, the optimal timing of PN to present at baseline from a new infection.
supplement or replace EN as the mode of nutrient delivery will The role of PN initiated from 2 to 7 days in the PICU can-
need to be determined by future trials. not be determined by this study, and the findings of this study
The PEPaNIC investigators chose an EN energy delivery need to be confirmed by future RCTs. Until then, EN should
threshold of less than 80% goal, to trigger supplemental PN at be initiated and actively advanced in eligible children in the
Experimental group: enteral: 20 mg/d Experimental vs control groups: Enrollment terminated for futility after
zinc; selenium: 1–3 yr, 40 μg/d; 3–5 28-d mortality: 10.3% (15/145) vs second interim analysis indicated
yr, 100 μg/d; 5–12 yr, 200 μg/d; 5.8% (8/139); p = 0.16 the conditional power to determine
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
adolescent, 400 μg/d; 0.3 g/kg/d PICU LOS: median, 9 vs 11 d; p = 0.16 a beneficial effect of zinc, selenium,
glutamine; IV: 0.2 mg/kg/d (≤ 10 mg/ glutamine, metoclopramide,
dose) metoclopramide every 12 hr, No significant difference in infectious compared with whey protein,
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC4/OAVpDDa8KKGKV0Ymy+78= on 07/09/2023
PICU. The optimal timing of supplemental PN in children Rationale. Several dietary components, including gluta-
failing to meet their nutrient delivery goals enterally must be mine, arginine, nucleotides, omega-3 fatty acids, fiber, antiox-
individualized based on the nutritional and clinical status of idants, selenium, copper, and zinc, have been used in various
the patient, and anticipated nutrient deficits during the course combinations to modulate dysregulated immune responses
of illness. induced by critical illness, injury, and surgery. The aim is to
Future Direction. Future studies should focus on determin- achieve a therapeutic benefit, such as to attenuate inflamma-
ing the optimal timing for PN supplementation in cases where tion or provide nutrients depleted by stress. Terms used to
EN is insufficient to meet the nutritional requirements dur- describe this therapy include immunonutrition, immunonu-
ing the first week of critical illness. These trials must account trients, immunonutrient-enhanced diet, immune-enhancing
for the varying baseline nutritional status of patients and their nutrition, immune-modulating nutrition, pharmaconutri-
individualized energy and protein goals. tion, pharmaconutrients, and pharmaceutical nutrients.
RCTs comparing immunonutrition to standard nutrition in
Question 8. What Is the Role of Immunonutrition in critically ill children have used a variety of nutrients, deliv-
Critically Ill Children? ered using the enteral or parenteral route, in heterogeneous
Recommendation 8. Based on available evidence, we do populations, and using different methods to estimate energy
not recommend the use of immunonutrition in critically ill needs. In some studies, a combination of interventions has
children. been studied; therefore, the impact of any single immuno-
Quality of Evidence. Moderate. nutrient is difficult to interpret. In one pilot RCT and one
GRADE Recommendation. Strong. retrospective cohort, investigators examined the use of an
enteral formula containing omega-3 fatty acids, gamma-lino- critically ill adult nutrition support therapy guidelines rec-
lenic acid, and antioxidants in critically ill children with acute ommend that immunonutrition not be used in critically ill
respiratory distress syndrome (91, 92). Although the spe- septic or medical patients but may be considered in those
cialty formulae were feasible and tolerated in these studies, who are perioperative, or have traumatic injuries (75). Due
neither study was powered to show difference in outcomes. to the potential harm of glutamine and arginine supplemen-
Other small, single-center studies randomizing critically tation in adults and the paucity of pediatric data, immuno-
ill children with respiratory failure, septic shock, and trau- nutrition cannot be currently recommended in critically ill
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
or a standard pediatric formula were also underpowered and of immunonutrition in select populations, such as immuno-
unable to demonstrate outcome differences (93, 94). In two compromised and malnourished critically ill children, with
studies, infants requiring PN were randomized to receive standardized clinical interventions and therapies to avoid
IV lipid emulsion as omega-3 fatty acids, either alone or in confounding results. These studies need to define immunonu-
combination with medium- and long-chain (omega-6) fats, trition and specific populations where it might be tested. In
or a 100% soybean oil-based lipid (omega-6) (95, 96). These addition, studies are needed to identify the optimal route of
studies were designed to evaluate the effects of the two lipid immunonutrient delivery.
formulations on inflammatory biomarkers; relevant clinical
outcomes for critically ill children were not evaluated. Lipids SUMMARY
containing omega-3 versus 100% omega-6 fatty acids were In this article, we have provided guidelines for some of the
associated with lower plasma pro-inflammatory cytokines important steps in the provision of optimal nutrition to the
and potential for reduced ICU LOS (97). Clinical outcomes critically ill child. We selected key questions for this version
of critically ill children requiring PN randomized to receive of the guidelines, but we are aware that some of these and
parenteral glutamine did not differ from those administered several other questions remain unanswered and will require
standard PN (98). In a comparative effectiveness trial, criti- systematic investigation. A majority of the recommenda-
cally ill children requiring mechanical ventilation and EN tions in these guidelines are driven by consensus or low-
were randomized to receive enteral supplementation of a level evidence. We hope that our systematic search strategy,
combination of glutamine, zinc, selenium, and metoclo- followed by meticulous data abstraction, has allowed us to
pramide, or whey protein (100). The study was terminated for capture all the relevant studies. The process of converting
futility at a planned interim analysis after enrollment of 293 a broad variety of evidence levels to meaningful and prac-
patients. No differences in PICU LOS, duration of mechani- tically applicable recommendations is challenging. These
cal ventilation, infections, or mortality were demonstrated. recommendations provide a starting point from where the
However, in a small subgroup of immunocompromised chil- nutritional strategy for individual patients can be custom-
dren, a significant reduction in nosocomial infections was ized. The guidelines reiterate the importance of nutritional
seen with the study intervention compared with whey protein assessment, particularly the detection of malnourished
(1.57 vs 6.09; p = 0.011). No two trials of immunonutrients patients who are most vulnerable and therefore potentially
in children are similar, and none demonstrated superiority may benefit from timely nutritional intervention. There is
of immunonutrition versus standard nutrition in critically ill a need for renewed focus on accurate estimation of energy
children in terms of clinical outcomes. needs and attention to cumulative energy imbalance. IC
Prior studies in critically ill adults have demonstrated must be used to guide energy prescription, where feasible,
reduced hospital LOS and mortality with glutamine- and cautious use of estimating equations and increased sur-
supplemented PN (101). Based on these observations, in veillance for unintended caloric underfeeding and overfeed-
a recent large multicenter two-by-two factorial trial of ing are recommended in its absence. Optimal protein dose
mechanically ventilated, critically ill adults with multiple and its correlation with clinical outcomes is an area of great
organ failure, patients were randomized to glutamine, anti- interest. The optimal route and timing of nutrient delivery
oxidants, both, or placebo (102). A significant increase in is an area of intense debate and investigations. EN remains
hospital and 6-month mortality and a trend toward increased the preferred route for nutrient delivery. Several strategies
28-day mortality were seen in the group receiving glutamine. to optimize EN during critical illness have emerged. The
A subsequent multicenter trial of critically ill mechanically role of supplemental PN has been highlighted, and a delayed
ventilated adults showed no infectious benefits and possi- approach appears to be beneficial. Immunonutrition cannot
bility of harm with a significantly higher 6-month mortal- be currently recommended. Overall, the pediatric critical
ity in medical patients randomized to a formula containing care population is heterogeneous, and a nuanced approach
glutamine, omega-3 fatty acids, and antioxidants versus a to individualize nutrition support with the aim of improv-
standard high-protein formula (103). Arginine supplemen- ing clinical outcomes is necessary. We have summarized key
tation has been considered to improve immune function areas for future investigations, which will guide us in devel-
and wound healing in critically ill patients but has demon- oping the next level of evidence-based nutrition therapy in
strated increased mortality in septic patients (104). The 2016 the future. Until then, multidisciplinary collaborative efforts
must continue to prioritize and highlight the unique and 19. Vermilyea S, Slicker J, El-Chammas K, et al: Subjective global nutri-
tional assessment in critically ill children. JPEN J Parenter Enteral
dynamic nutritional needs of the critically ill child in the Nutr 2013; 37:659–666
complex PICU environment. 20. Chourdakis M, Hecht C, Gerasimidis K, et al: Malnutrition risk in hos-
pitalized children: Use of 3 screening tools in a large European popu-
lation. Am J Clin Nutr 2016; 103:1301–1310
REFERENCES 21. Dokken M, Rustøen T, Stubhaug A: Indirect calorimetry reveals that
1. Mehta NM, Compher C; A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors: A.S.P.E.N.
better monitoring of nutrition therapy in pediatric intensive care is
Clinical Guidelines: Nutrition support of the critically ill child. JPEN J
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
41. Mehta NM, Costello JM, Bechard LJ, et al: Resting energy expen- 63. Rogers EJ, Gilbertson HR, Heine RG, et al: Barriers to adequate
diture after Fontan surgery in children with single-ventricle heart nutrition in critically ill children. Nutrition 2003; 19:865–868
defects. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2012; 36:685–692 64. King W, Petrillo T, Pettignano R: Enteral nutrition and cardiovascu-
42. Kerklaan D, Augustus ME, Hulst JM, et al: Validation of ventilator- lar medications in the pediatric intensive care unit. JPEN J Parenter
derived VCO2 measurements to determine energy expenditure in Enteral Nutr 2004; 28:334–338
ventilated critically ill children. Clin Nutr 2017; 36:452–457 65. Panchal AK, Manzi J, Connolly S, et al: Safety of enteral feedings
43. Mehta NM, Smallwood CD, Joosten KF, et al: Accuracy of a simplified in critically ill children receiving vasoactive agents. JPEN J Parenter
equation for energy expenditure based on bedside volumetric carbon Enteral Nutr 2016; 40:236–241
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
dioxide elimination measurement–a two-center study. Clin Nutr 2015; 66. Mikhailov TA, Kuhn EM, Manzi J, et al: Early enteral nutrition is asso-
34:151–155 ciated with lower mortality in critically ill children. JPEN J Parenter
44. Wong JJ, Han WM, Sultana R, et al: Nutrition delivery affects out- Enteral Nutr 2014; 38:459–466
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC4/OAVpDDa8KKGKV0Ymy+78= on 07/09/2023
comes in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. JPEN J 67. Kyle UG, Akcan-Arikan A, Orellana RA, et al: Nutrition support
Parenter Enteral Nutr 2016. [Epub ahead of print] among critically ill children with AKI. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013;
45. Bechard LJ, Parrott JS, Mehta NM: Systematic review of the influence 8:568–574
of energy and protein intake on protein balance in critically ill children. 68. Kyle UG, Jaimon N, Coss-Bu JA: Nutrition support in critically ill chil-
J Pediatr 2012; 161:333–339.e1 dren: Underdelivery of energy and protein compared with current rec-
46. Botrán M, López-Herce J, Mencía S, et al: Enteral nutrition in the criti- ommendations. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012; 112:1987–1992
cally ill child: Comparison of standard and protein-enriched diets. J 69. Kaufman J, Vichayavilas P, Rannie M, et al: Improved nutrition deliv-
Pediatr 2011; 159:27–32.e1 ery and nutrition status in critically ill children with heart disease.
47. Chaloupecký V, Hucín B, Tláskal T, et al: Nitrogen balance, 3-meth- Pediatrics 2015; 135:e717–e725
ylhistidine excretion, and plasma amino acid profile in infants after 70. Hamilton S, McAleer DM, Ariagno K, et al: A stepwise enteral nutrition
cardiac operations for congenital heart defects: The effect of early algorithm for critically ill children helps achieve nutrient delivery goals.
nutritional support. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 114:1053–1060 Pediatr Crit Care Med 2014; 15:583–589
48. de Betue CT, van Waardenburg DA, Deutz NE, et al: Increased pro- 71. Petrillo-Albarano T, Pettignano R, Asfaw M, et al: Use of a feeding pro-
tein-energy intake promotes anabolism in critically ill infants with viral tocol to improve nutritional support through early, aggressive, enteral
bronchiolitis: A double-blind randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis nutrition in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med
Child 2011; 96:817–822 2006; 7:340–344
49. Geukers VG, Dijsselhof ME, Jansen NJ, et al: The effect of short-term 72. Yoshimura S, Miyazu M, Yoshizawa S, et al: Efficacy of an enteral feed-
high versus normal protein intake on whole-body protein synthesis ing protocol for providing nutritional support after paediatric cardiac
and balance in children following cardiac surgery: A randomized dou- surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2015; 43:587–593
ble-blind controlled clinical trial. Nutr J 2015; 14:72 73. Martinez EE, Bechard LJ, Mehta NM: Nutrition algorithms and bedside
50. de Betue CT, Joosten KF, Deutz NE, et al: Arginine appearance and nitric nutrient delivery practices in pediatric intensive care units: An interna-
oxide synthesis in critically ill infants can be increased with a protein- tional multicenter cohort study. Nutr Clin Pract 2014; 29:360–367
energy-enriched enteral formula. Am J Clin Nutr 2013; 98:907–916 74. Elke G, Felbinger TW, Heyland DK: Gastric residual volume in critically ill
51. van Waardenburg DA, de Betue CT, Goudoever JB, et al: Critically ill patients: A dead marker or still alive? Nutr Clin Pract 2015; 30:59–71
infants benefit from early administration of protein and energy-enriched 75. McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG, et al; Society of Critical Care
formula: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr 2009; 28:249–255 Medicine; American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition:
52. Verbruggen SC, Schierbeek H, Coss-Bu J, et al: Albumin synthesis Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support ther-
rates in post-surgical infants and septic adolescents; influence of apy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine
amino acids, energy, and insulin. Clin Nutr 2011; 30:469–477 (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
53. Verbruggen SC1, Coss-Bu J, Wu M, et al: Current recommended par- (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2016; 40:159–211
enteral protein intakes do not support protein synthesis in critically ill 76. Ozen N, Tosun N, Yamanel L, et al: Evaluation of the effect on patient
septic, insulin-resistant adolescents with tight glucose control. Crit parameters of not monitoring gastric residual volume in intensive care
Care Med 2011; 39:2518–2525 patients on a mechanical ventilator receiving enteral feeding: A ran-
54. Carlotti AP, Bohn D, Matsuno AK, et al: Indicators of lean body mass domized clinical trial. J Crit Care 2016; 33:137–144
catabolism: Emphasis on the creatinine excretion rate. QJM 2008; 77. Horn D, Chaboyer W, Schluter PJ: Gastric residual volumes in criti-
101:197–205 cally ill paediatric patients: A comparison of feeding regimens. Aust
55. Martinez EE, Pereira LM, Gura K, et al: Gastric Emptying in Critically Crit Care 2004; 17:98–100, 102–103
Ill Children. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2017 Jan 1. [Epub ahead of print] 78. Briassoulis GC, Zavras NJ, Hatzis MD TD: Effectiveness and safety
56. Ikeda S, Kudsk KA, Fukatsu K, et al: Enteral feeding preserves muco- of a protocol for promotion of early intragastric feeding in critically ill
sal immunity despite in vivo MAdCAM-1 blockade of lymphocyte hom- children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2001; 2:113–121
ing. Ann Surg 2003; 237:677–685 79. Meyer R, Harrison S, Sargent S, et al: The impact of enteral feeding
57. Kudsk KA, Stone JM, Carpenter G, et al: Enteral and parenteral feed- protocols on nutritional support in critically ill children. J Hum Nutr
ing influences mortality after hemoglobin-E. coli peritonitis in normal Diet 2009; 22:428–436
rats. J Trauma 1983; 23:605–609 80. Wakeham M, Christensen M, Manzi J, et al: Registered dietitians mak-
58. Li J, Kudsk KA, Gocinski B, et al: Effects of parenteral and enteral nutri- ing a difference: Early medical record documentation of estimated
tion on gut-associated lymphoid tissue. J Trauma 1995; 39:44–51 energy requirement in critically ill children is associated with higher
59. Sano Y, Gomez FE, Kang W, et al: Intestinal polymeric immunoglobu- daily energy intake and with use of the enteral route. J Acad Nutr Diet
lin receptor is affected by type and route of nutrition. JPEN J Parenter 2013; 113:1311–1316
Enteral Nutr 2007; 31:351–356 81. Kamat P, Favaloro-Sabatier J, Rogers K, et al: Use of methylene blue
60. Fukatsu K, Zarzaur BL, Johnson CD, et al: Enteral nutrition prevents spectrophotometry to detect subclinical aspiration in enterally fed intu-
remote organ injury and death after a gut ischemic insult. Ann Surg bated pediatric patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008; 9:299–303
2001; 233:660–668 82. Meert KL, Daphtary KM, Metheny NA: Gastric vs small-bowel feeding
61. Mehta NM, McAleer D, Hamilton S, et al: Challenges to optimal in critically ill children receiving mechanical ventilation: A randomized
enteral nutrition in a multidisciplinary pediatric intensive care unit. controlled trial. Chest 2004; 126:872–878
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2010; 34:38–45 83. Horn D, Chaboyer W: Gastric feeding in critically ill children: A ran-
62. de Oliveira Iglesias SB, Leite HP, Santana e Meneses JF, et al: domized controlled trial. Am J Crit Care 2003; 12:461–468
Enteral nutrition in critically ill children: Are prescription and deliv- 84. López-Herce J, Mencía S, Sánchez C, et al: Postpyloric enteral nutri-
ery according to their energy requirements? Nutr Clin Pract 2007; tion in the critically ill child with shock: A prospective observational
22:233–2339 study. Nutr J 2008; 7:6
85. López-Herce J, Sánchez C, Carrillo A, et al: Transpyloric enteral nutri- concentrations after open heart surgery in infants. JPEN J Parenter
tion in the critically ill child with renal failure. Intensive Care Med Enteral Nutr 2015; 39:171–179
2006; 32:1599–1605 96. Nehra D, Fallon EM, Potemkin AK, et al: A comparison of 2 intrave-
86. Taha AA, Badr L, Westlake C, et al: Effect of early nutritional support nous lipid emulsions: Interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
on intensive care unit length of stay and neurological status at dis- JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2014; 38:693–701
charge in children with severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci Nurs 97. Larsen BM, Goonewardene LA, Joffe AR, et al: Pre-treatment with
2011; 43:291–297 an intravenous lipid emulsion containing fish oil (eicosapentaenoic
87. Tume L, Latten L, Darbyshire A: An evaluation of enteral feeding prac- and docosahexaenoic acid) decreases inflammatory markers after
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hC
tices in critically ill children. Nurs Crit Care 2010; 15:291–299 open-heart surgery in infants: A randomized, controlled trial. Clin
88. Sánchez C, López-Herce J, Carrillo A, et al: Early transpyloric enteral Nutr 2012; 31:322–329
nutrition in critically ill children. Nutrition 2007; 23:16–22 98. Jordan I, Balaguer M, Esteban ME, et al: Glutamine effects on heat
ywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3i3D0OdRyi7TvSFl4Cf3VC4/OAVpDDa8KKGKV0Ymy+78= on 07/09/2023
8 9. Canarie MF, Barry S, Carroll CL, et al; Northeast Pediatric Critical shock protein 70 and interleukines 6 and 10: Randomized trial of
Care Research Consortium: Risk factors for delayed enteral glutamine supplementation versus standard parenteral nutrition in
nutrition in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2015; critically ill children. Clin Nutr 2016; 35:34–40
16:e283–e289 99. Briassoulis G, Filippou O, Kanariou M, et al: Temporal nutritional
90. Fivez T, Kerklaan D, Mesotten D, et al: Early versus late parenteral and inflammatory changes in children with severe head injury fed a
nutrition in critically ill children. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:1111–1122 regular or an immune-enhancing diet: A randomized, controlled trial.
91. Jacobs BR, Nadkarni V, Goldstein B, et al; Nutritional Pediatr Crit Care Med 2006; 7:56–62
Immunomodulation in Children with Lung Injury (NICLI) Study Group: 100. Carcillo JA, Dean JM, Holubkov R, et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver
Nutritional immunomodulation in critically ill children with acute lung National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
injury: Feasibility and impact on circulating biomarkers. Pediatr Crit Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network (CPCCRN):
Care Med 2013; 14:e45–e56 The randomized comparative pediatric critical illness stress-induced
92. Mayes T, Gottschlich MM, Kagan RJ: An evaluation of the safety immune suppression (CRISIS) prevention trial. Pediatr Crit Care
and efficacy of an anti-inflammatory, pulmonary enteral formula in the Med 2012; 13:165–173
treatment of pediatric burn patients with respiratory failure. J Burn 101. Wischmeyer PE, Dhaliwal R, McCall M, et al: Parenteral glutamine
Care Res 2008; 29:82–88 supplementation in critical illness: A systematic review. Crit Care
93. Briassoulis G, Filippou O, Hatzi E, et al: Early enteral adminis- 2014; 18:R76
tration of immunonutrition in critically ill children: Results of a 102. Heyland D, Muscedere J, Wischmeyer PE, et al; Canadian Critical
blinded randomized controlled clinical trial. Nutrition 2005; Care Trials Group: A randomized trial of glutamine and antioxidants
21:799–807 in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2013; 368:1489–1497
94. Briassoulis G, Filippou O, Kanariou M, et al: Comparative effects of 103. van Zanten AR, Sztark F, Kaisers UX, et al: High-protein enteral
early randomized immune or non-immune-enhancing enteral nutrition nutrition enriched with immune-modulating nutrients vs standard
on cytokine production in children with septic shock. Intensive Care high-protein enteral nutrition and nosocomial infections in the ICU:
Med 2005; 31:851–858 A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 312:514–524
95. Larsen BM, Field CJ, Leong AY, et al: Pretreatment with an intra- 104. Bertolini G, Iapichino G, Radrizzani D, et al: Early enteral immunonutrition
venous lipid emulsion increases plasma eicosapentanoic acid in patients with severe sepsis: Results of an interim analysis of a random-
and downregulates leukotriene b4, procalcitonin, and lymphocyte ized multicentre clinical trial. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:834–840
APPENDIX 1. Targeted Indirect Calorimetry (31) ●● Children with thermal injuries or amputations
Children who are at high risk for metabolic alterations are sug- ●● Children requiring mechanical ventilatory support for
gested candidates for targeted measurement of resting energy more than 3 days
expenditure using indirect calorimetry (IC) in the PICU: ●● Children suspected to be severely hypermetabolic (status
epilepticus, hyperthermia, systemic inflammatory response
●● Underweight, overweight, or obese
syndrome, dysautonomic storms, etc.) or hypometabolic
●● Children with more than 10% weight change during ICU stay
(hypothermia, hypothyroidism, pentobarbital or mid-
●● Failure to consistently meet prescribed energy goals
azolam coma, etc.)
●● Failure to wean or need to escalate respiratory support
●● Neurologic trauma (traumatic, hypoxic, and/or ischemic) Any patient with ICU stay more than 4 weeks may benefit from
●● Oncologic diagnoses (including children with stem cell or IC to assess adequacy of energy intake.
bone marrow transplant)