Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Frequency Analysis of The Heartbeat Sounds
Frequency Analysis of The Heartbeat Sounds
net/publication/228412447
CITATIONS READS
14 12,441
2 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
ICHSMT’18: International Congress on Health Sciences and Medical Technologies, 21-23 October 2018, Algiers Algeria View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Fethi bereksi reguig on 22 May 2014.
Abstract: This paper is concerned with a synthesis study of the fast Fourier transform
(FFT) in analysing the heartbeat sounds or the phonocardiogram signal (PCG). This
analysis concerns four sounds (S1, S2, S3 and S4) and PCG signal with click or mur-
mur. It is shown that the spectral analysis can provides enough features of PCG signals
that will help clinics to obtain qualitative and quantitative measurements of PCG sig-
nal's characteristics and consequently aid to diagnosis.
Keywords Heartbeat, Phonocardiogram, Four sound, click, murmur, spectral analysis, FFT.
85
Biomedical Soft Computing and Human Sciences, Vol.13, No.1, pp.87-92 (2008)
-9 -9
x 10 x 10
1.2 1
Sound S1 P2 Sound S2
T1
1
0.8
0.8
M1
0.6
fft magnitude
fft magnitude
A2
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0 0
100 200 300 400 500 100 200 300 400 500
frequency(Hz) frequency(Hz)
9 0.9
Sound S3 Sound S4
8 0.8
7 0.7
6 0.6
fft magnitude
fft magnitude
5 0.5
4 0.4
3 0.3
2 0.2
1 0.1
0 0
100 200 300 400 500 100 200 300 400 500
frequency(Hz) frequency(Hz)
Fig.1. Fourier transform analysis of the sounds S1,S2,S3 and S4 with Hamming window (FFT 1024)
86
SM Debbal & F Bereks-Reguig: Frequency analysis of the heartbeat sounds
87
Biomedical Soft Computing and Human Sciences, Vol.13, No.1, pp.87-92 (2008)
-5 -8
x 10 x 10
8 5
E S 4 .5
6
4
4
3 .5
2
3
fft magnitude
amplitude
0 2 .5
2
-2
1 .5
-4
1
-6
0 .5
-8 0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 0 200 400 600
t im e (s a m p le s ) F re q u e n c y (H z )
a)
-5 -8
x 10 x 10
8 5
O S 4 .5
6
4
4
3 .5
2
3
fft magnitude
amplitude
0 2 .5
2
-2
1 .5
-4
1
-6
0 .5
-8 0
0 2000 4000 6000 0 200 400 600
t im e (s a m p le s ) F re q u e n c y (H z )
b)
-5 -8
x 10 x 10
8 4
E C
6 3 .5
4 3
2 2 .5
fft magnitude
amplitude
0 2
-2 1 .5
-4 1
-6 0 .5
-8 0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 0 200 400 600
t im e (s a m p le s ) F re q u e n c y (H z )
c)
88
SM Debbal & F Bereks-Reguig: Frequency analysis of the heartbeat sounds
-3
x 10
1.5 2
normal cardiacs sounds
normalized amplitude 1 frequency spectrum
1.5 for the normal
fft magnitude
0.5 cardiacs sounds
a)
0 1
-0.5
0.5
-1
-1.5 0
0 2000 4000 6000 100 200 300 400 500
number of samples) fréquency(Hz)
1.5 15
frequency spectrum
normalized amplitude
1 aortic-stenosis
for the aortic-stenosis b)
fft magnitude
0.5 10
0
-0.5 5
-1
-1.5 0
0 2000 4000 6000 100 200 300 400 500
number of samples) frequency(Hz)
1.5 15
c)
aortic-insuficiency frequency spectrum
normalized amplitude
1
for the aortic-insuficiency
fft magnitude
0.5 10
0
-0.5 5
-1
-1.5 0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 100 200 300 400 500
nuber of samples) frequency(Hz) d)
1.5 1.5
mitral-stenosis frequency spectrum
normalized amplitude
1
for the mitral-stenosis
fft magnitude
0.5 1
0
-0.5 0.5
-1
-1.5 0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 100 200 300 400 500
number of samples) frequency(Hz)
89
Biomedical Soft Computing and Human Sciences, Vol.13, No.1, pp.87-92 (2008)
The second sound seems have high extent frequency ber–October 2006, pp 298-305.
than the three other sounds. This study is concerned also
the PCG signal with click or murmur. The PCG signal [10] S.M DEBBAL – F. BEREKSI-REGUIG: “Automatic measure of
with click have a less broad frequency extent than the the split in the second cardiac sound by using the wavelet trans-
PCG signal with murmur. We can finally say that the form Technique”. Computer in Biology and Medicine (CMB);
Volume 37, 269-276. 2007
results are complementary to facilitate a good approach
and to better understand the heartbeat sounds.
90