Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ESPGHANESPENESPR Guidelines On Pediatric Parenteral Nutrition - 66 Fluid and Electrolytes
ESPGHANESPENESPR Guidelines On Pediatric Parenteral Nutrition - 66 Fluid and Electrolytes
55
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect 56
57
Clinical Nutrition 58
59
60
journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/clnu 61
62
63
64
65
1 ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: 66
2 67
3 Q4 Fluid and electrolytes 68
4 69
5 Q3 F. Jochum a, *, S.J. Moltu b, T. Senterre c, A. Nomayo a, S. Iacobelli d, the ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ 70
6
ESPR/CSPEN working group on pediatric parenteral nutrition1 71
7 72
a
8 Ev. Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Department of Pediatrics, Berlin, Germany
b 73
Department of Neonatal Intensive Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
9 c 74
Service Universitaire de N!eonatologie, Centre Hospitalier R!
egional (CHR) de la Citadelle, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Li"
ege, Liege University,
10 Li"
ege, Belgium 75
11 d !
Reanimation N! eonatale et P!ediatrique, N!
eonatologie CHU La R! !
eunion, Site Sud-Saint Pierre and Centre d'Etudes P! erinatales de l'Oc!
ean Indien, CHU La 76
12 R!eunion, Site Sud, Saint Pierre, France
77
13 78
14 79
15 a r t i c l e i n f o 80
16 81
17 Article history: 1. Methods
82
18 Received 29 May 2018
83
19 Accepted 29 May 2018 The aim of the current revision is to update the previous chapter
84
20 [1] on basis of the scientific evidence published since 2004. The
85
21 work of the authors who wrote the previous version of this chapter
86
22 is gratefully acknowledged and forms the basis of this updated
87
23 guideline.
88
24 The literature search was conducted using the Medline and
89
25 Cochrane syst. Database covering the period from 2004 until
90
26 December 2014. The systematic literature review was performed by
91
27 92
28 93
29 * Corresponding author. Department of Pediatrics, Ev. Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Stadtrandstr. 555, D-13589 Berlin, Germany. Fax: þ49 (0) 30/3702 2380.
E-mail address: frank.jochum@pgdiakonie.de (F. Jochum).
94
30 1 95
ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN working group on Pediatric Parenteral Nutrition: BRAEGGER Christian, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland; BRONSKY Jiri,
31 University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic; CAI Wei, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; CAMPOY Cristina, Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, 96
32 University of Granada, Granada, Spain; CARNIELLI Virgilio, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy; DARMAUN Dominique, Universite ! de Nantes, Nantes, France; 97
DECSI Tama !s, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pe !cs, Pe!cs, Hungary; DOMELLOF € Magnus, Department of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Umeå University, Sweden;
33 98
EMBLETON Nicholas, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, The United Kingdom; FEWTRELL Mary, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK;
34 99
FIDLER MIS Nata$sa, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; FRANZ Axel, University Children's Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany; GOULET Olivier, University
35 Sordonne-Paris-Cite !; Paris-Descartes Medical School, Paris, France; HARTMAN Corina, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tikva, Israel and Carmel Medical 100
36 Center, Haifa Israel; HILL Susan, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom; HOJSAK Iva, 101
37 Children's Hospital Zagreb, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, University of J. J. Strossmayer School of Medicine Osijek, Croatia; IACOBELLI Silvia, CHU La Re !union, Saint
102
38 Pierre, France; JOCHUM Frank, Ev. Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Berlin, Germany; JOOSTEN, Koen, Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery, Intensive Care, Erasmus MC-
Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; KOLACEK $ Sanja, Children's Hospital, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; KOLETZKO Berthold, k
103
39 104
LMU e Ludwig-Maximilians-Universita €t Munich, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Munich, Germany; KSIAZYK Janusz, Department of Pediatrics, Nutrition and Metabolic
40 Diseases, The Children's Memorial Health Institute. Warsaw; LAPILLONNE Alexandre, Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France; LOHNER Szimonetta, Department of Pediatrics, 105
41 University of Pe!cs, Pe
!cs, Hungary; MESOTTEN Dieter, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; MIHALYI ! Krisztina, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pe
!cs, Pe
!cs, Hungary; MIHATSCH 106
42 Walter A., Ulm University, Ulm, and Helios Hospital, Pforzheim, Germany; MIMOUNI Francis, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, The Wilf Children's Hospital,
107
the Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, and the Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; MØLGAARD Christian, Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of
43 108
Copenhagen, and Paediatric Nutrition Unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; MOLTU Sissel J, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; NOMAYO Antonia, Ev. Waldk-
44 rankenhaus Spandau, Berlin, Germany; PICAUD Jean Charles, Laboratoire CarMEN, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, Hopital croix rousse, Lyon, France; PRELL Christine, LMU 109
45 e Ludwig-Maximilians-Universita €t Munich, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Munich, Germany; PUNTIS John, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds, UK; RISKIN Arieh, Bnai 110
46 Zion Medical Center, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel; SAENZ DE PIPAON Miguel, Department of Neonatology, La Paz University Hospital, Red de Salud 111
47 Materno Infantil y Desarrollo e SAMID, Universidad Auto ! noma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; SENTERRE Thibault, CHU de Lie "ge, CHR de la Citadelle, Universite! de Lie
"ge, Belgium;
SHAMIR Raanan, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tikva, Israel; Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; SIMCHOWITZ Venetia, Great Ormond Street NHS Trust,
112
48 113
London, The United Kingdom; SZITANYI Peter, General University Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic; TABBERS Merit M., Emma
49 Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; VAN DEN AKKER Chris H.B., Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 114
50 VAN GOUDOEVER Johannes B., Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; VAN KEMPEN Anne, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; VER- 115
51 BRUGGEN Sascha, Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery, Intensive Care, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; WU Jiang, Xin Hua
116
Hospital, Shanghai, China; YAN Weihui, Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
52 117
53 118
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.948
54 0261-5614/© 2018 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 119
Please cite this article in press as: Jochum F, et al., ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: Fluid and electrolytes,
Clinical Nutrition (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.948
YCLNU3499_proof ■ 26 June 2018 ■ 2/10
Please cite this article in press as: Jochum F, et al., ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: Fluid and electrolytes,
Clinical Nutrition (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.948
YCLNU3499_proof ■ 26 June 2018 ■ 3/10
1 Immaturity of the distal nephron with an anatomically short- parenteral nutrition (PN), e.g. normal saline, amino acid and cal- 66
2 ened loop of Henle leads to reduced ability to concentrate urine cium solutions. 67
3 [16]. Maximum urinary concentrations are up to 550 mosm/l in 68
4 preterm infants, and 700 mosm/l in term infants, compared to 5. The neonatal period 69
5 1200 mosm/l in adults [17]. Neonates may be placed at risk for 70
6 volume depletion when a high renal solute load cannot be Immediate adaptation processes after birth affect the meta- 71
7 compensated for by the ability to produce concentrated urine. bolism of water and electrolytes as a result of discontinuation of 72
8 Although hormonal factors i.e. the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone placental exchange with a relative immaturity of physiological 73
9 system, and the arginine-vasopressin-axis are mature early in processes. Birth also implies the onset of thermoregulation and 74
10 gestation, the effects are limited by renal immaturity [18]. Thus, in sometimes considerable insensible water losses. Subsequent 75
11 VLBW infants urine output may frequently increase above 5 ml/kg/ adaptation includes the onset of autonomic renal regulation of 76
12 h. In preterm infants a lower plasma oncotic pressure and higher fluids and electrolytes, and intake of fluids and other nutrients. 77
13 permeability of the capillary wall [19] also enhance the shift of The time course of adaptation may be divided into three major 78
14 water from the intravascular to the interstitial compartment. This phases [10]: 79
15 puts preterm infants at an increased risk of oedema, especially 80
16 under pathologic conditions such as sepsis [20]. - Phase I: transition. The immediate postnatal phase is charac- 81
17 terised by an initial relative oliguria [27] lasting hours to days, 82
18 4. Electrolytes and considerable insensible water losses via the immature skin. It 83
19 is followed by a diuretic phase lasting some days, and progressive 84
20 Sodium (Na) is the principal cation of the ECF and Na concen- diminished insensible water losses along with increasing corni- 85
21 trations influence intravascular and interstitial volumes. Na excre- fication of the epidermis. During this transitional phase, body 86
22 tion occurs primarily through urine, but also through sweat and fluid compartments are rearranged by isotonic or hypertonic (i.e. 87
23 faeces. Chloride (Cl) is the major anion of the ECF. The exchangeable hypernatriemic and hyperchloremic) contraction of the ECF 88
24 Cl remains relatively constant per unit of body weight at different compartment. Continuing natriuresis (as present during foetal 89
25 ages. Even if chloride balance usually parallels that of sodium, and so life) also occurs during this phase of transition [28]. Phase I 90
26 it is strictly correlated to the extracellular volume balance, chloride usually ends when maximum weight loss has occurred. 91
27 losses and excretion can also occur independently from sodium, - Phase II: the intermediate phase corresponds to the period 92
28 mainly in equilibrium with bicarbonate status [21]. The daily turn- between minimal weight (maximal weight loss) and return to 93
29 over of Cl is high. Renal conservation occurs with tubular reab- birth weight. In premature neonates e especially in ELBW and 94
30 sorption of 60e70% of the filtrated Cl. In addition, Cl is involved in VLBW infants e urine output might still be high with high Na 95
31 maintaining osmotic pressure, hydration, and ionic neutrality. Na excretion during this phase. The duration of the intermediate 96
32 and Cl are also the major ions influencing the ‘strong ion difference’ phase varies in length, but birth weight is usually regained by 97
33 (SID), one of the 4 systems acting on blood pH. According to the 7e10 days of life in normal breastfed term infants. 98
34 Stewart's approach, the concept of SID is used to help explain - Phase III: stable growth is characterized by continuous weight 99
35 “metabolic” acid base abnormalities associated with changes in gain with a positive net balance for water and electrolytes. 100
36 chloride concentration [22]. A decrease in the SID will result in an 101
37 acidifying effect on plasma. The SID is calculated as the charge dif- 102
38 ference between the sum of measured strong cations (Naþ, Kþ, Ca2þ, 5.1. Phase I/transition
103
39 and Mg2þ) and measured strong anions (Cl#, lactate) [23]. As both 104
40 Naþ and Cl# are the major strong ions in plasma, the SID calculated 105
41 as the simply difference between sodium and chloride represents 106
R 6.1 In term neonates, postnatal weight loss generally occurs during
42 one independent variable determining the hydrogen ion and the 107
the first 2e5 days of life and should not usually exceed 10% of
43 bicarbonate ion concentrations; so, an increase in the plasma Cl# birth weight (LoE 2þþ, RG 0, conditional recommendation,
108
44 relative to Naþ decreases the plasma SID and lowers the pH [24]. strong consensus) 109
45 Potassium (K) is the major intracellular cation and the K pool R 6.2 In ELBW and VLBW infants, 7e10% weight loss seems to be 110
46 correlates well with the lean body mass. The intracellular K concen- adequate taking into account their higher body water content 111
and the adverse complications associated with fluid overload
47 tration is dependent on Na/K-ATPase activity which can be impaired if 112
(LoE 2þþ, RG B, strong recommendation, strong consensus)
48 there are insufficient supplies of oxygen and energy [25]. Ten percent R 6.3 A gradual increase of fluid intake is recommended in preterm 113
49 of the K body pools are not exchangeable (bone, connective tissue, and term neonates after birth (LoE 3, RG B, strong 114
50 cartilage). Extracellular K concentration is not always related to recommendation, strong consensus) 115
R 6.4 Electrolytes (Na, Cl and K) should be supplied starting during
51 intracellular concentration. In addition, intra- to extracellular K shifts 116
phase I/contraction of ECF compartment/initial loss of body
52 can occur, e.g. in acidotic states through exchange with H ions. weight (LoE 3, RG 0, strong recommendation, consensus)
117
53 Incidental gastrointestinal and skin electrolyte losses are very R 6.5 Cl intake should be slightly lower than the sum of Na and K 118
54 low. In neonates Na gastrointestinal losses represent 0.1e0.2 mmol/ intakes (Na þ K-Cl ¼ 1e2 mmol/kg/d) to avoid excessive Cl 119
55 kg/d in premature infants and around 0.01e0.02 mmol/kg/d in term intakes and risk of iatrogenic metabolic acidosis (LoE 3, RG 0, 120
strong recommendation, strong consensus)
56 infants [26]. Electrolyte losses may be increased under pathological 121
R 6.6 In ELBW and VLBW infants, Na and K may be recommended from
57 conditions like bowel obstruction, ileostomy, pleural effusions, the first day of life when giving the recommended high amino 122
58 peritoneal drainage, and external cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Un- acids and energy supply, providing that urine output is 123
59 der these circumstances the electrolyte losses due to lost fluids can ascertained, and taking into account the potential for the 124
60 development of nonoliguric hyperkalaemia (LoE 2þ, RG 0, 125
only be estimated and continuous monitoring of serum electrolytes
conditional recommendation, strong consensus)
61 is recommended (see section monitoring below). R 6.7 It should be recognized that the needs of individual patients may
126
62 On the other hand it may be of importance that considerable deviate markedly from the ranges of generally recommended 127
63 amounts of Na and K may be supplied along with drugs (e.g. ben- intakes depending on clinical circumstances such as fluid 128
64 zylpenicillin) and minerals that are prepared as Na or K salts (e.g. retention, dehydration or excessive water losses, or others (GPP, 129
strong recommendation, strong consensus)
65 phosphates). Similarly, sources of Cl are numerous while on 130
Please cite this article in press as: Jochum F, et al., ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: Fluid and electrolytes,
Clinical Nutrition (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.948
YCLNU3499_proof ■ 26 June 2018 ■ 4/10
1 The goals for fluid and electrolyte administration during this nutritional support for very preterm infants point to a postnatal 66
2 phase are to [11]: weight loss of 7e10% of birth weight in ELBW and VLBW infants 67
3 receiving higher nutritional supplies starting from birth [43e48]. 68
4 - allow contraction of ECF with negative water and Na balance but Loss of body weight higher than generally expected may indicate 69
5 without compromising intravascular fluid volume and cardio- inadequate fluid, Na, protein and/or energy intakes besides other 70
6 vascular function and while maintaining normal serum elec- pathology, and should lead to further investigations. Thus, during 71
7 trolyte concentrations; the body water contraction of phase I, close clinical monitoring 72
8 - secure a sufficient urinary output without oliguria (<0.5e1.0 ml/ should be performed to avoid inadequate intakes, oliguria 73
9 kg per hour) for longer than 12 h; (diuresis <1 ml/kg/h for longer than 12 h), electrolytes distur- 74
10 - ensure regulation of body temperature by providing enough bances and acidosis. 75
11 fluid for transepidermal evaporation. Electrolyte homoeostasis during the first week of life also de- 76
12 pends on maturity, birth weight, energy and amino acid intakes 77
13 During the postnatal transition phase, body fluid compartments [45,49]. In term breastfed neonates, human milk Na content usually 78
14 are rearranged by isotonic or hypertonic contraction. Normally the decreases from around 40 mmol/L on day 1, to 10e15 mmol/L after 79
15 phase occurs without oliguria (<0.5e1 ml/kg/h within 12 h), elec- day 3. The evolution of Cl content is quite similar to Na content but 80
16 trolyte disturbances, and/or acidosis. Expected postnatal weight with 10e20% higher concentrations. Conversely, K content in- 81
17 loss depends on hydration status at birth, e.g. intrauterine growth- creases from 12 to 16 mmol/L during the first two days of life to 82
18 restricted neonates typically lose less weight than eutrophic neo- 16e20 mmol/L after day 3 [37,38]. 83
19 nates. Environmental factors and nutritional intakes also signifi- In preterm neonates, restricted Na intake has positive effects on 84
20 cantly influence postnatal weight loss. Double wall incubators oxygen requirements and the risk of later bronchopulmonary 85
21 reduce insensible water loss in VLBW neonates by about 30% when dysplasia [50]. However, there is also evidence that Na restriction 86
22 a humidity of 90% is used at thermo-neutral temperature. After gives rise to a higher risk of hyponatremia [21,51]. Furthermore, 87
23 postnatal maturation of the epidermal barrier and cornification large variations in serum Na concentration may impair later neu- 88
24 during the first 5 days of life, ambient humidity can be reduced step rocognitive outcome in preterm infants [52]. In addition, restricted 89
25 by step [29]. The use of waterproof coverings (such as plastic films, supply of Na and K may also affect phosphorus supply if Na- or K- 90
26 plastic blankets, and bubble blankets) in addition to treatment in a phosphate salts are used. 91
27 double wall incubator leads to further reduction of insensible water A restriction of Na intake during the period of ECF contraction 92
28 loss by 30e60% [30]. Endotracheal intubation and mechanical should be performed cautiously allowing for a negative net bal- 93
29 ventilation using warmed and humidified air significantly reduce ance for Na of about 2e3 mmol/kg per day during the first 2e3 94
30 insensible respiratory water loss [31] and fluid requirements are postnatal days while closely controlling serum concentrations 95
31 reduced by 20 ml/kg/d. The use of emollient ointments decreases until a weight loss of approximately 5e10% has occurred. Along 96
32 insensible water loss of up to 50% in open care conditions [32,33] with the contraction of ECF, Na serum concentrations generally 97
33 but may also increase infection rates [34,35]. Radiant warmers increase during the first 2e5 days, but should remain within the 98
34 and single wall incubators significantly increase water loss and high normal range (<150 mmol/l). Na concentrations <140 mmol/ 99
35 impair thermoregulation in VLBW infants [36]. Phototherapy also L in combination with significant weight loss around 10% 100
36 increases insensible water loss. may indicate Na depletion and should always instigate clinical 101
37 Despite some controversies, normal term breastfed neonates assessment. 102
38 usually serve as a reference for all neonates when considering Recent studies have demonstrated an increased incidence of 103
39 postnatal nutrition, adaptation, and growth. Fluid intakes may hypokalaemia, hypophosphatemia and hypercalcaemia while 104
40 significantly vary in normal term breastfed neonates [10]. On optimising protein and energy intakes according to current rec- 105
41 average, milk production and infant intakes increase rapidly from ommendations in VLBW infants [21,43,45,53e58]. It corresponds 106
42 less than 100 ml per day on the first day of life to 500e600 ml per to a refeeding-like syndrome. In infants with adequate protein and 107
43 day after 4e5 days, then increase more slowly to reach energy intake, especially in growth restricted and ELBW prema- 108
44 600e800 ml per day after 1 month and 700e900 ml per day after ture infants who have low mineral stores and high requirements, 109
45 6 months [37,38]. On average, the postnatal weight nadir usually K supplementation may be initiated from the first day of life to 110
46 occurs after 2e3 days and represents a weight loss of 6e7% in reduce the risk of hypokalaemia and to enable the provision of 111
47 breastfed infants [39]. In formula fed term infants, the timing of adequate phosphorus supply. However, especially during the oli- 112
48 loss is similar but weight loss is lower, between 3 and 4% of birth guric phase and in infants with high risk for nonoliguric hyper- 113
49 weight. This implies that mean time to regain birth weight is also kalaemia (i.e. ELBW infants) close monitoring is necessary to 114
50 quicker in formula fed (6e7 days) than in breastfed neonates (8e9 ensure normal K serum concentrations. A deferment of K supply 115
51 days) [39]. Even though postnatal weight loss exceeding 10% is might be required in some of these infants to avoid hyper- 116
52 frequently not wished in term neonates, it is not always linked to kalaemia. However Na and K supply should start latest before 117
53 an underlying pathology [40]. Because of higher insensible water serum concentration of these electrolytes drop below recom- 118
54 losses and immature kidneys, premature neonates, especially mended values [21]. 119
55 ELBW infants, require more fluids than term infants during the A high Cl intake may induce hyperchloraemic metabolic acidosis 120
56 first week of life [41]. A review of four randomized clinical studies in VLBW infants and should be avoided. Indeed, these are a caus- 121
57 with different levels of fluid intake during the first week of life ative factor for intraventricular haemorrhage and other morbidities 122
58 concluded that fluid restriction reduces the risk of patent ductus in preterm babies [59]. 123
59 arteriosus, necrotising enterocolitis, and death. Fluid restriction The use of “Cl-free” Na and K solutions should be considered in 124
60 also tends to reduce the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia but to preterm infants on PN in order to reduce the risk of metabolic 125
61 increase the risk of dehydration [42]. However, tight goals for fluid acidosis [21,60e63]. Table 1 shows the recommended parenteral 126
62 restriction may interfere with the feasibility of providing sufficient fluid and electrolyte intake of neonates during the first days of life 127
63 a nutrient supply. Recent investigations regarding enhanced early (Phase I of adaptation). 128
64 129
65 130
Please cite this article in press as: Jochum F, et al., ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: Fluid and electrolytes,
Clinical Nutrition (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.948
YCLNU3499_proof ■ 26 June 2018 ■ 5/10
1 5.2. Phase II: the intermediate phase 5.3. Phase III: stable growth 66
2 67
3 68
4 R 6.8 After initial postnatal weight loss, birth weight should usually be R 6.9 Fluid and electrolyte homoeostasis should be maintained 69
5 regained by 7e10 days of life (GPP, conditional recommendation, while the infant is gaining appropriate weight during the 70
strong consensus) phase of stable growth (LoE3,
6 71
RG B, strong recommendation, strong consensus)
7 72
8 73
9 The goals for fluid and electrolyte management during this in- 74
termediate phase are to [11]: The goals for fluid and electrolyte management during stable
10 growth (phase III) are to 75
11 76
12 - replete the body for electrolyte losses and replace actual water 77
and electrolytes; - replace losses of water and electrolytes (maintain water and
13 electrolyte homoeostasis). 78
14 - maintain proper fluid and electrolyte homoeostasis while the 79
infant is regaining birth weight; - provide enough extra water and electrolytes to reach an
15 adequate rate of growth with adequate fluid and electrolyte 80
16 homoeostasis 81
17 The recommended fluid intakes in phase II are based on studies 82
18 suggesting that a daily fluid intake equal to or higher than 170 ml/ 83
kg body weight per day is accompanied by high urinary Na excre- Fluid requirements during stable growth are related to the ex-
19 pected weight gain. Water loss from stool is negligible in early life 84
20 tion with negative Na balance, even if Na intake is as high as 85
10 mmol/kg body weight per day [64]. Fluid therapy in ELBW in- prior to establishing enteral feeding in premature infants. When
21 full enteral feeding is achieved, faecal losses of 5e10 ml/kg per day 86
22 fants in excess of 200 ml/kg/d does not maintain Na balance, 87
regardless of the amount of NaCl provided. There is evidence that are usually assumed to balance metabolic water production [72].
23 Accretion of body mass during growth periods requires an 88
24 fluid intake lower than 140 ml/kg body weight per day, together 89
with Na intake of about 1 mmol/kg body weight per day, is adequate supply of electrolytes. It has been shown that restricted
25 administration of Na impairs longitudinal growth and weight gain 90
26 adequate to maintain Na balance in ELBW neonates [65e70]. 91
However, in preterm infants of less than 35 weeks of gestation [26]. Plasma Na concentrations were normal in VLBW infants with
27 Na intake of 1.5e2.6 mmol/kg/d and fluid intakes of 140e170 ml/ 92
28 Na supplementation of 4e5 mmol/kg/day during the first 2 weeks 93
of life led to better neurocognitive performance at the age of 10e13 kg/d [73,74]. With more “aggressive” feeding regimes and
29 increased growth rates, additional Na supply in relation to growth 94
30 years compared to a control group of infants with Na intake of only 95
1e1.5 mmol/kg/d under the study conditions [71]. It seems sensible rate might be necessary.
31 Breast-fed term infants need as little as 0.35e0.7 mmol/kg body 96
32 to increase Na and fluid supply in order to replace electrolyte and 97
fluid losses during the intermediate phase (see Table 2). weight per day of Na during the first 4 months of life to achieve
33 adequate growth [75]. In preterm infants, a higher growth rate 98
34 Common recommendations suggest an average time to regain 99
birth weight by about 7e10 days after birth. This is supported by explains a higher Na requirement.
35 The amount of K usually recommended is similar to the amount 100
36 evidence from epidemiological studies. Observations from 101
population-based cohorts of healthy neonates point to a median provided in human milk, about 2e3 mmol/kg per day [76].
37 Preterm infants also retain about 1.0e1.5 mmol/kg body weight 102
38 time to recover birth weight in healthy neonates around 8.3 and 6.5 103
days (in breast-fed and formula-fed infants, respectively), but also per day of K, which is about the same as foetal accretion [77].
39 Table 3 shows the recommended parenteral fluid and electro- 104
40 suggest a considerable proportion of infants have not regained their 105
birth weight before 12e14 days [39,40]. In those neonates pathol- lytes for neonates during the first month of life (phase III/stable
41 growth). 106
42 ogy needs to be carefully excluded and the feeding regime checked. 107
43 108
44 Table 1
109
45 Recommended parenteral fluid and electrolyte intake during the first days of life in neonates (Phase I of adaptation).e 110
46 111
Days after birth
47 112
48 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 113
49 Fluid intakea (ml/kg/d) 114
50 Term neonate 40e60 50e70 60e80 60e100 100e140 115
Preterm neonate >1500 g 60e80 80e100 100e120 120e140 140e160
51 116
Preterm neonate 1000e1500 g 70e90 90e110 110e130 130e150 160e180
52 Preterm neonate <1000 g 80e100 100e120 120e140 140e160 160e180
117
53 Nab,d (mmol/kg/d) 118
54 Term neonate 0e2 0e2 0e2 1e3 1e3 119
55 Preterm neonate >1500 g 0e2 (3) 0e2 (3) 0e3 2e5 2e5 120
Preterm neonate <1500 g 0e2 (3) 0e2 (3) 0e5 (7) 2e5 (7) 2e5 (7)
56 c,d 121
K (mmol/kg/d) 0e3 0e3 0e3 2e3 2e3
57 Cl (mmol/kg/d) 0e3 0e3 0e3 2e5 2e5 122
58 a
123
Postnatal fluid requirements are highly dependent on treatment conditions and environmental factors. Certain clinical conditions may afford modifications of daily fluid
59 intakes, e.g. phototherapy (add volume ca. 10e20%), infants with asphyxia/respiratory distress syndrome/mechanical ventilation with humidified respiratory gases (reduce 124
60 volume by ca. 10e20%). 125
61 b
Careful adjustment of water and electrolyte administration is needed in ELBW infants at onset of diuresis and in polyuric patients. In cases of high urinary Na losses the 126
62 need for Na supply may exceed 5 mmol/kg/d, especially in neonates <1500 g at the end of phase I. 127
c
K administration should regard initial phase of oliguria and the risk of non-oliguric hyperkaliemia in VLBW infants. A deferment of parenteral K supply might be required
63 128
to avoid hyperkaliemia.
64 d
Parenteral Na and K supply should start latest before serum concentrations drop below recommended values. 129
65 e
The recommendations of Table 1 are based on clinical experience, expert opinion, and extrapolated data from different studies in animals and humans. 130
Please cite this article in press as: Jochum F, et al., ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: Fluid and electrolytes,
Clinical Nutrition (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.948
YCLNU3499_proof ■ 26 June 2018 ■ 6/10
1 Table 2 66
2 Recommended parenteral fluid and electrolyte intake for neonates during the intermediate phase (phase II) e prior to the establishment of stable growth.a 67
3 Fluid (ml/kg/d) Na (mmol/kg/d) K (mmol/kg/d) Cl (mmol/kg/d) 68
4 Term neonate 140e170 2e3 1e3 2e3
69
5 Preterm neonate >1500 g 140e160 2e5 1e3 2e5 70
6 Preterm neonate <1500 g 140e160 2e5 (7) 1e3 2e5 71
7 a
The recommendations of Table 2 are based on clinical experience, expert opinions, and extrapolated data from different studies on animal and men. 72
8 73
9 74
10 6. Children and infants beyond the neonatal period d (1 ml/kg/h) per kg body weight above 20 kg [79,80]; (see 75
11 Table 4). 76
12 However, it is important to emphasize that there will be clinical 77
13 R 6.10 Requirements for fluid and electrolytes for infants and children situations with altered water and energy needs. Water re- 78
14 (beyond the neonatal period) on PN are mainly based on empirical quirements increase with fever, hyperventilation, hypermetabo- 79
15 evidence and lism and gastrointestinal losses and decrease in renal failure and 80
recommendations are presented in Table 5 (LoE 4, RG 0, strong
16 congestive heart failure. Water and energy requirements are also 81
recommendation, strong consensus)
17 R 6.11 The Holliday and Segar formula for calculating the maintenance decreased during critical illness, mechanical ventilation and in 82
18 water needs in children by determining caloric/water needs from temperature-controlled environments. It is beyond the scope of 83
19 weight this guideline to cover individual diseases, but it is obvious that 84
(see Table 4) is still regarded appropriate in the clinical setting parenteral water management should be adjusted according to
20 85
(GPP, strong recommendation, strong consensus)
21 R 6.12 Generally, an isotonic fluid should be used as intravenous fluid for
disease state. 86
22 “maintenance hydration” in sick children especially during the 87
23 first 24 h. 88
However, this should not delay the initiation of PN if PN is
6.2. Electrolytes
24 89
indicated (LoE 1þ, RG A, strong recommendation, strong
25 90
consensus) Electrolyte requirements for infants and children beyond the
26 R 6.13 It should be recognized that the needs of individual patients may 91
neonatal period are mainly based on empirical evidence and are
27 deviate markedly from the ranges of recommended fluid intakes 92
set at the level of 1e3 mmol for Na and 1e3 mmol of K required
28 depending on 93
clinical circumstances such as fluid retention, dehydration or per intake of 100 kcal [1,78,79,81e86]. This is close to the elec-
29 94
excessive water losses (GPP, conditional recommendation, strong trolyte composition of human breast milk or cow milk and is
30 95
consensus) probably appropriate in “healthy”, well hydrated children with
31 96
physiological growth (i.e patients on parenteral nutritional
32 97
support).
33 98
34 6.1. Fluid 99
35 6.3. Maintenance of hydration 100
36 Total water requirements in children and infants beyond the 101
37 neonatal period mainly consist of maintenance needs, replacement Fluid and electrolyte management is an essential part of sup- 102
38 of ongoing losses (urinary and stool losses) and replacement of portive care in the acutely ill child and in children in the operative 103
39 deficits. Insensible water loss from the skin and lungs is an energy setting. Traditionally, maintenance parenteral fluids have been 104
40 costly process that consumes a quarter of the overall caloric administered as hypotonic saline (Na 35e77 mmol/L in 5% dextrose 105
41 expenditure, 0.5 kcal per 1 ml of water lost. in water), but a number of publications have addressed the risk of 106
42 Urine osmotic load results from protein catabolism and elec- hospital-acquired hyponatremia (<135 mmol/L) and potentially 107
43 trolyte excretion, but is little affected by carbohydrate and fat fatal hyponatremic encephalopathy with this fluid and electrolyte 108
44 metabolism which produce metabolic water and CO2. Electrolytes, regimen if the free water intake is not adapted to individual needs 109
45 urea and other substances constitute urine osmotic load. High ni- [87,88]. 110
46 trogen and energy supply with PN require sufficient water supply In postoperative and critically ill children a large meta-analyses 111
47 as the vehicle for nutrient delivery. documented an increased risk of hyponatremia with the adminis- 112
48 Generally, water requirements parallel energy needs with tration of hypotonic “maintenance fluids” compared to the use of 113
49 1 kcal per 1 ml water [78]. With increasing age and decreasing isotonic (Na 140 mmol/L) fluids [89,90]. This was further under- 114
50 metabolic activity, maintenance water and energy requirements lined in the randomized, double-blind, controlled trial by McNab 115
51 fall. In 1957, Holliday and Segar provided a simple-to-use formula et al. [91] confirming a lower risk of hyponatremia with the use of 116
52 for calculating the maintenance water needs in children by isotonic fluid (Na 140 mmol/L) as compared with a hypotonic fluid 117
53 determining caloric/water needs from weight alone. Fluid re- (Na 77 mmol/L) in a large heterogenous population of hospitalized 118
54 quirements can be fulfilled by infusing 100 ml/kg//d (4 ml/kg/h) children [91]. There is substantial evidence supporting the use of 119
55 for every kilogram of body weight < 10 kg plus 50 ml/kg/d (2 ml/ isotonic fluid as intravenous fluid for maintenance hydration in 120
56 kg/h) per kg body weight between 10 and 20 kg plus 25 ml//kg/ hospitalized children in addition to PN if needed. 121
57 122
58 123
59 Table 3 124
Recommended parenteral fluid and electrolytes intake for neonates during the first month of life with stable growth (phase III).a
60 125
61 Fluid (ml/kg/d) Na (mmol/kg/d) K (mmol/kg/d) Cl (mmol/kg/d) 126
62 Term neonate 140e160 2e3 1.5e3 2e3 127
63 Preterm neonate >1500 g 140e160 3e5 1e3 3e5 128
64 Preterm neonate <1500 g 140e160 3e5 (7) 2e5 3e5 129
65 a
The recommendations of Table 3 are based on clinical experience, expert opinions, and extrapolated data from different studies on animal and men. 130
Please cite this article in press as: Jochum F, et al., ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: Fluid and electrolytes,
Clinical Nutrition (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.948
YCLNU3499_proof ■ 26 June 2018 ■ 7/10
Please cite this article in press as: Jochum F, et al., ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: Fluid and electrolytes,
Clinical Nutrition (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.948
YCLNU3499_proof ■ 26 June 2018 ■ 8/10
Please cite this article in press as: Jochum F, et al., ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: Fluid and electrolytes,
Clinical Nutrition (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.948
YCLNU3499_proof ■ 26 June 2018 ■ 9/10
1 [30] Baumgart S. Reduction of oxygen consumption, insensible water loss,and [58] Jamin A, D'Inca R, Le Floc'h N, Kuster A, Orsonneau JL, Darmaun D, et al. Fatal 66
radiant heat demand with use of a plastic blanket for low-birth weight in- effects of a neonatal high-protein diet in low-birth-weight piglets used as a
2 67
fants under radiant warmers. Pediatrics 1984;74:1022e8. model of intrauterine growth restriction. Neonatology 2010 Jun;97(4):
3 [31] Sosulski R, Polin RA, Baumgart S. Respiratory water loss and heat balance in 321e8. 68
4 intubated infants receiving humidified air. J Pediatr 1983;103:307e10. [59] Cooke RWI. Factors associated with periventricular haemorrhage in very low 69
5 [32] Lane AT, Drost SS. Effects of repeated application of emollient cream to birth weight infants. Arch Dis Child 1981;56:425e31. 70
premature neonates' skin. Pediatrics 1993;92:415e9. [60] Jadhav P, Parimi PS, Kalhan SC. Parenteral amino acid and metabolic
6 [33] Nopper AJ, Horii KA, Sookdeo-Drost S, et al. Topical ointment therapy ben- acidosis in premature infants. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2007 JuleAug;31(4): 71
7 efits premature infants. J Pediatr 1996;128:660e9. 278e83. 72
8 [34] Conner JM, Soll RF, Edwards WH. Topical ointment for preventing infection [61] Kermorvant-Duchemin E, Iacobelli S, Eleni-Dit-Trolli S, Bonsante F, 73
in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;(1):CD001150. Kermorvant C, Sarfati G, et al. Early chloride intake does not parallel that of
9 [35] Edwards WH, Conner JM, Soll RF, Vermont Oxford Network Neonatal Skin sodium in extremely-low-birth-weight infants and may impair neonatal
74
10 Care Study Group. The effect of prophylactic ointment therapy on nosoco- outcomes. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2012 May;54(5):613e9. 75
11 mial sepsis rates and skin integrity in infants with birth weights of 501 to [62] Peters O, Ryan S, Matthew L, Cheng K, Lunn J. Randomised controlled trial of 76
1000 g. Pediatrics 2004 May;113(5):1195e203. acetate in preterm neonates receiving parenteral nutrition. Arch Dis Child
12 [36] Meyer MP, Payton MJ, Salmon A, et al. A clinical comparison of radiant Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997 Jul;77(1):F12e5.
77
13 warmer and incubator care for preterm infants from birth to 1800 grams. [63] Iacobelli S, Kermorvant-Duchemin S, Bonsante F, Lapillonne A, Gouyon JB. 78
14 Pediatrics 2001;108:395e401. Chloride balance in preterm infants during the first week of life. Int J Pediatr 79
[37] Neville MC, Keller R, Seacat J, Lutes V, Neifert M, Casey C, et al. Studies in 2012:931597. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/931597.
15 80
human lactation: milk volumes in lactating women during onset of lactation [64] Engelke SC, Shah BL, Vasan U, et al. Sodium balance in very low birth-weight
16 and full lactation. Am J Clin Nutr 1988;48:1375e86. infants. J Pediatr 1978;93:837e41. 81
17 [38] Neville MC, Allen JC, Archer PC, Casey CE, Seacat J, Keller RP, et al. Studies in [65] Asano H, Taki M, Igarashi Y. Sodium homeostasis in premature infants during 82
human lactation: milk volume and nutrient composition during weaning the early postnatal period: results of relative low volume of fluid and sodium
18 83
and lactogenesis. Am J Clin Nutr 1991;54:81e92. intake. Pediatr Nephrol 1987;1:C38.
19 [39] Macdonald PD, Ross SR, Grant L, Young D. Neonatal weight loss in breast and [66] Costarino AT, Gruskay JA, Corcoran L, et al. Sodium restriction versus daily 84
20 formula fed infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal 2003;88(6):472e6. maintenance replacement in very low birth weight premature neonates: a 85
21 [40] Wright CM, Parkinson KN. Postnatal weight loss in term infants: what is randomized, blind therapeutic trial. J Pediatr 1992;120:99e106. 86
“normal” and do growth charts allow for it? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal [67] Ekblad H, Kero P, Takala J, et al. Water, sodium and acid-base balance in
22 2004;89:254e7. premature infants: therapeutical aspects. Acta Pediatr Scand 1987;76: 87
23 [41] Adamkin DH. Issues in the nutritional support of the ventilated baby Clin 47e53. 88
24 Perinatol 1998;25:79e96. [68] Engle WD, Magness R, Faucher DJ, et al. Sodium balance in the growing 89
[42] Bell EF, Acarregui MJ. Restricted versus liberal water intake for preventing preterm infant. Infant Pediatr Res 1985;19:376a.
25 morbidity and mortality in preterm infants (Cochrane Review). In: The [69] Lorenz JM, Kleinman LI, Kotagal UR, et al. Water balance in very low-birth-
90
26 Cochrane library. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2004. Issue 1. weight infants: relationship to water and sodium intake and effect on 91
27 [43] Moltu SJ, Blakstad EW, Strømmen K, Almaas AN, Nakstad B, Rønnestad A, outcome. J Pediatr 1982;101:423e32. 92
et al. Enhanced feeding and diminished postnatal growth failure in very- [70] Shaffer SG, Meade VM. Sodium balance and extracellular volume regulation
28 low-birth-weight infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2014 Mar;58(3): in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr 1989;115:285e90.
93
29 344e51. [71] Al-Dahhan J, Jannoun L, Haycock GB. Effect of salt supplementation of 94
30 [44] Senterre T, Rigo J. Reduction in postnatal cumulative nutritional deficit and newborn premature infants on neurodevelopmental outcome at 10e13 95
improvement of growth in extremely preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 2012 years of age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal 2002;86:120e3.
31 96
Feb;101(2):e64e70. [72] Catzeflis C, Schutz Y, Micheli JL, et al. Whole body protein synthesis and
32 [45] Moltu SJ, Strømmen K, Blakstad EW, Almaas AN, Westerberg AC, Brække K, energy expenditure in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Res 1985;19: 97
33 et al. Enhanced feeding in very-low-birth-weight infants may cause elec- 679e87. 98
trolyte disturbances and septicemia e a randomized, controlled trial. Clin [73] Day GM, Radde IC, Balfe JW, et al. Electrolyte abnormalities in very low
34 99
Nutr 2013 Apr;32(2):207e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2012.09.004. birthweight infants. Pediatr Res 1976;10:522e6.
35 Epub 2012 Sep 21. [74] Polberger SK, Axelsson IA, Raiha NC. Growth of very low birth weight in- 100
36 [46] Senterre T, Rigo J. Optimizing early nutritional support based on recent fants on varying amounts of human milk protein. Pediatr Res 1989;25: 101
37 recommendations in VLBW infants and postnatal growth restriction. 414e9. 102
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011 Nov;53(5):536e42. [75] Ziegler EE, Fomon SJ. Major minerals. In: Fomon SJ, editor. Infant nutrition.
38 [47] Christmann V, Visser R, Engelkes M, de Grauw AM, van Goudoever JB, van Philadelphia: Saunders, WB; 1974. p. 267e97. 103
39 Heijst AF. Yes, we can e achieve adequate early postnatal growth in preterm [76] Gross SJ. Growth and biochemical response of preterm infants fed human 104
40 infants. Acta Paediatr 2013 Dec;102(12):e530. milk or modified infant formula. N Engl J Med 1983;308:237e41. 105
[48] Maggio L, Cota F, Gallini F, Lauriola V, Zecca C, Romagnoli C. Effects of high [77] Butterfield J, Lubchenco LO, Bergstedt J, et al. Patterns in electrolyte and
41 versus standard early protein intake on growth of extremely low birth nitrogen balance in the newborn premature infant. Pediatrics 1960;26:
106
42 weight infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2007;44:124e9. 777e91. Q2 107
43 [49] Heimler R, Bamberger JM, Sasidharan P. The effects of early parenteral amino [78] Darrow DC, Pratt EL. Fluid therapy; relation to tissue composition and the 108
acids on sick premature infants. Indian J Pediatr 2010 Dec;77(12):1395e9. expenditure of water and electrolyte. J Am Med Assoc 1950 May 27;143(4):
44 [50] Hartnoll G, Betremieux P, Modi N. Randomised controlled trial of postnatal 365e73.
109
45 sodium supplementation on body composition in 25 to 30 week gestational [79] Chesney CR. The maintenance need for water in parenteral fluid therapy, by 110
46 age infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2000;82:F24e8. Malcolm A. Holliday, MD, and William E. Segar, MD, Pediatrics, 1957;19: 111
[51] Al-Dahhan J, Haycock GB, Nichol B, et al. Sodium homeostasis in term and 823e832. Pediatrics 1998 Jul;102(1 Pt 2):229e30.
47 112
preterm neonates. III. Effect of salt supplementation. Arch Dis Child 1984;59: [80] Holliday MA, Segar WE. The maintenance need for water in parenteral fluid
48 945e50. therapy. Pediatrics 1957 May;19(5):823e32. 113
49 [52] Baraton L, Ancel PY, Flamant C, Orsonneau JL, Darmaun D, Roze ! JC. Impact of [81] Allison ME, Walker V. The sodium and potassium intake of 3 to 5 year olds. 114
changes in serum sodium levels on 2-year neurologic outcomes for very Arch Dis Child 1986;61:159e63.
50 115
preterm neonates. Pediatrics 2009;124(4). [82] Kanarek KS, Williams PR, Curran JS. Total parenteral nutrition in infants and
51 [53] Christmann V, de Grauw AM, Visser R, Matthijsse RP, van Goudoever JB, van children. Adv Pediatr 1982;29:151e81. 116
52 Heijst AF. Early postnatal calcium and phosphorus metabolism in preterm [83] Liappis N, Reimnitz P. Reference values of sodium, potassium, calcium, 117
53 infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2014 Apr;58(4):398e403. chloride and inorganic phosphate excretion in 24-hour urine of healthy 118
[54] Ichikawa G, Watabe Y, Suzumura H, Sairenchi T, Muto T, Arisaka O. Hypo- children. [Article in German]. Klin Pediatr 1984;196:367e9.
54 phosphatemia in small for gestational age extremely low birth weight in- [84] Jochum F, Krohn K, Kohl M, Loui A, Nomayo A. Koletzko B und das DGEM 119
55 fants receiving parenteral nutrition in the first week after birth. J Pediatr Steering Committee Parenterale Erna €hrung in der Kinder- und Jugend- 120
56 Endocrinol Metab 2012;25(3e4):317e21. medizin S3-Guideline of the German Society for Nutritional Medicine 121
[55] Bonsante F, Iacobelli S, Latorre G, Rigo J, De Felice C, Robillard PY, et al. Initial (DGEM) in Cooperation with the GESKES, the AKE, the DGKJ and the GNPI.
57 amino acid intake influences phosphorus and calcium homeostasis in pre- Parenterale Nutrition in Paediatrics Aktuel Ernahrungsmed 2014;39:
122
58 term infants e it is time to change the composition of the early parenteral e99e147. 123
59 nutrition. PLoS One 2013 Aug 15;8(8):e72880. https://doi.org/10.1371/ [85] Jochum F, Krohn K, Kohl M, Loui A, Nomayo A, Koletzko B, und das DGEM 124
journal.pone.0072880. eCollection 2013. Steering Committee. Parenterale Ern€ ahrung von Kindern und Jugendlichen:
60 [56] Bonsante F, Iacobelli S, Chantegret C, Martin D, Gouyon JB. The effect of Empfehlungen und Experten-Statements. Essentials der S3-Leitlinie der
125
61 parenteral nitrogen and energy intake on electrolyte balance in the preterm Deutschen Gesellschaft für Erna €hrungsmedizin (DGEM) in Zusammenarbeit 126
62 infant. Eur J Clin Nutr 2011 Oct;65(10):1088e93. mit der Gesellschaft für Klinische Erna €hrung der Schweiz (GESKES), der 127
[57] Elstgeest LE, Martens SE, Lopriore E, Walther FJ, te Pas AB. Does parenteral €
Osterreichischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Klinische Ern€ ahrung (AKE), der
63 128
nutrition influence electrolyte and fluid balance in preterm infants in the Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin (DGKJ), sowie der
64 first days after birth? PLoS One 2010 Feb 3;5(2):e9033. https://doi.org/ Gesellschaft für Neonatologie und P€ adiatrische Intensivmedizin (GNPI). 129
65 10.1371/journal.pone.0009033. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 2015;(2):150e63. 130
Please cite this article in press as: Jochum F, et al., ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: Fluid and electrolytes,
Clinical Nutrition (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.948
YCLNU3499_proof ■ 26 June 2018 ■ 10/10
1 [86] Vakrilova L, Sluncheva B, Jarukova N, Pramatarova T, Shishkova R, Emilova Z. [100] Buchman AL, Scolapio J, Fryer J. AGA technical review on short bowel 33
Guidelines for parenteral nutrition in high risk newborn babies. Akush syndrome and intestinal transplantation. Gastroenterology 2003;124:
2 34
Ginekol (Sofia) 2010;49(2):61e4. 1111e34.
3 [87] Moritz ML, Ayus JC. Intravenous fluid management for the acutely ill child. [101] Kett K, Aadland E, Berstad A. Inhibition of gastric secretion in man with a 35
4 Curr Opin Pediatr 2011;23:186e93. new H2-receptor antagonist, ranitidine. Scand J Gastroenterol 1980;15: 36
5 [88] Moritz ML, Ayus JC. Prevention of hospital-acquired hyponatremia. Pediat- 249e51. 37
rics 2003;111:227e30. [102] Dammann HG, Simon B. The new histamine H2-receptor antagonist raniti-
6 [89] McNab S, Ware RS, Neville KA, Choong K, Coulthard MG, Duke T, et al. dine. Duration of action. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1981;69:39e43. 38
7 Isotonic versus hypotonic solutions for maintenance intravenous fluid [103] Holloway RH, Kuljian B, Eshelman F, McCallum RW. Effects of ranitidine and 39
8 administration in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014 Dec 18;12: of cimetidine on pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion. Clin Phar- 40
CD009457. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858. CD009457.pub2. macol Ther 1984;35:203e7.
9 [90] Foster BA, Tom D, Hill V. Hypotonic versus isotonic fluids in hospitalized [104] Thompson JC, Walker JP. Indications for the use of parenteral H2-receptor
41
10 children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr 2014 Jul;165(1): antagonists. Am J Med 1984;77:111e5. 42
11 163e169.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.01.040. Epub 2014 Feb 28. [105] McFadden MA, DeLegge MH, Kirby DF. Medication delivery in the short- 43
[91] McNab S, Duke T, South M, Babl FE, Lee KJ, Arnup SJ, et al. 140 mmol/L of bowel syndrome. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1993;17:180e6.
12 sodium versus 77 mmol/L of sodium in maintenance intravenous fluid [106] Hyman PE, Garvey TQ, Harada T. Effect of ranitidine on gastric acid hyper-
44
13 therapy for children in hospital (PIMS): a randomised controlled double- secretion in an infant with short bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol 45
14 blind trial. Lancet 2015 Mar 28;385(9974):1190e7. https://doi.org/ Nutr 1985;4:316e9. 46
10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61459-8. Epub 2014 Dec 1. [107] Bullock L, Parks RB, Lampasona V, Mullins RE. Stability of ranitidine hydro-
15 47
[92] D'Antiga L, Goulet O. Intestinal failure in children: the European view. chloride and amino acids in parenteral nutrient solutions. Am J Hosp Pharm
16 J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2013;56:118e26. 1985;42:2683e7. 48
17 [93] Windsor CW, Fejfar J, Woodward DA. Gastric secretion after massive small [108] Walker SE, Bayliff CD. Stability of ranitidine hydrochloride in total parenteral 49
bowel resection. Gut 1969;10:779e86. nutrient solution. Am J Hosp Pharm 1985;42:590e2.
18 50
[94] Cortot A, Fleming CR, Malagelada JR. Improved nutrient absorption after [109] Williams MF, Hak LJ, Dukes G. In vitro evaluation of the stability of ranitidine
19 cimetidine in short-bowel syndrome with gastric hypersecretion. N Engl J hydrochloride in total parenteral nutrient mixtures. Am J Hosp Pharm 51
20 Med 1979;300(2):79e80. 1990;47:1574e9. 52
21 [95] Murphy JP, King DR, Dubois A. Treatment of gastric hypersecretion with [110] Baumgartner TG, Henderson GN, Fox J, Gondi U. Stability of ranitidine and 53
cimetidine in the short-bowel syndrome. N Engl J Med 1979;300:80e1. thiamine in parenteral nutrition solutions. Nutrition 1997;13:547e53.
22 [96] Williams NS, Evans P, King RF. Gastric acid secretion and gastrin production [111] Allwood MC, Martin H. Stability of cocarboxylase in parenteral nutrition 54
23 in the short bowel syndrome. Gut 1985;26:914e9. mixtures stored in multilayer bags. Clin Nutr 1998;17:231e4. 55
24 [97] Hyman PE, Everett SL, Harada T. Gastric acid hypersecretion in short bowel [112] Baptista RJ. Cimetidine and parenteral nutrition in the ICU patient. Clin Ther 56
syndrome in infants: association with extent of resection and enteral 1986;8(Suppl. A):34e8.
25 feeding. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1986;5:191e7. [113] Nightingale JM, Walker ER, Farthing MJ, Lennard-Jones JE. Effect of omep-
57
26 [98] Nightingale JM, Lennard-Jones JE, Walker ER, Farthing MJ. Jejunal efflux in razole on intestinal output in the short bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol 58
27 short bowel syndrome. Lancet (London, England) 1990;336:765e8. Ther 1991;5:405e12. 59
[99] Jacobsen O, Ladefoged K, Stage JG, Jarnum S. Effects of cimetidine on jeju- [114] Jeppesen PB, Staun M, Tjellesen L, Mortensen PB. Effect of intravenous ra-
28 nostomy effluents in patients with severe short-bowel syndrome. Scand J nitidine and omeprazole on intestinal absorption of water, sodium, and
60
29 Gastroenterol 1986;21:824e8. macronutrients in patients with intestinal resection. Gut 1998;43:763e9. 61
30 62
31 63
32 64
Please cite this article in press as: Jochum F, et al., ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: Fluid and electrolytes,
Clinical Nutrition (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.948