Title Pump Report Date 2023/08/12 14:04:00 Contents AIntroduction jure 1 Complete meridional view of the flow passage and blades 2. Performance Results 2.1, Overall Performance Results Table 1 Overall Performance Results Table 2.2, Stage Performance Results Table 2 Stage 1 Performance Results 3. Component Summary Data Table 3 Component 2 Summary Data Table Table 4 Component 3 Summary Data Table 4, Meanline 1-D Charts Chart 1 Chart showing streamwise, area averaged Cm versus averaged normalized M. 5. Stage Plots 5.1, Stage 1 Plots Figure 2 Stage 1 meridional view of the flow passage and blades Figure 3 Stage 1 contours of P at 50% span Figure 4 Stage 1 velocity vectors at 50% span Figure 5 Stage 1 contours of Ptr at 50% span Figure 6 Stage 1 contours of circumferentially area-averaged P Figure 7 Stage 1 contours of circumferentially area-averaged Cm 6. Component Charts 6.1, Blade Loading Charts Chart 2 Component 2 blade loading chart Chart 3 Component 3 blade loading chart ‘Spanwise Charts ‘Chart 4 Component 2 chart showing circumferentially averaged flow angle at the LE ‘Chart 5 Component 2 chart showing circumferentially averaged flow angle at the TE Chart 6 Component 2 chart showing circumferentially averaged Cm at the TE Chart 7 Component 3 chart showing circumferentially averaged flow angle at the LE Chart 8 Component 3 chart showing circumferentially averaged flow angle at the TE Component 3 chart showing circumferentially averaged Cm at the TE EE1. Introduction This report summarizes the results of a CFD analysis performed for the pump geometry shown in Figure 1. In the following sections both quantitative and qualitative results are presented in the form of tables, charts and plots. ‘igure 1. Complete meridional view of the flow passage and blades a2. Performance Results ‘The quantitative results are summarized in the following tables. The first table shows the overall performance. The next series of tables shows the performance results for each stage. 2.1, Overall Performance Results The following table gives the overall performance for the machine. Table 1. Overall Performance Results Table Inlet Volume Flow Rate 0.5246 | [m3 s*-1] Reference Density 997.0000 [kg m*-3] Head Rise ERROR in cell expression! [m] Input Power 50797.2000 [W] 2.2. Stage Performance Results The following table(s) give a summary of the performance results for each stage. Table 2. Stage 1 Performance Results Rotation Speed -101.0550 Inlet Volume Flow Rate 0.5246 Reference Density 997.0000 Reference Diameter 0.1569 Input Power 50797.2000 Capacity Coefficient 1.3433 Head Coefficient 0.2849 Power Coefficient 0.5189 Total-to-Total Head 7.3058 Total-to-Static Head 5.2408 Total-to-Total Efficiency % 72.1805 Total-to-Static Efficiency % 51.5978 Diffuser Loss Coef., Y1 0.0834 Diffuser Loss Coef., Y2 0.0910 Diffuser Loss Coef., ¥3 0.3502 Diffuser Loss Coef., ¥4 0.7769 Diffuser Cp 0.1990 [radian s*-1] [ma3 5-1] [kg m4-3] {m] (w] [m]3. Component Summary Data The table(s) below give a summary of the mass or area averaged solution variables and derived quantities computed at the inlet, leading edge (LE Cut), trailing edge (TE Cut) and outlet locations. The flow angles Alpha and Beta are relative to the meridional plane. Table 3. Component 2 Summary Data Table Quantity Inlet LECut = TE Cut Outlet TE/LE TE-LE Units Density 997.0000 997.0000 997.0000 | 997.0000 N/A N/A [kg ma-3] Pstatic 73950.2000 68930,8000 141341.0000 144912.0000 _N/A_72409.9000 [Pa] Ptotal 100172,0000 99737.8000 185554,0000 178706.0000 _N/A_85816.1000 [Pa] Ptotal (rot) 85341.6000 79958.8000 74404.4000 802443000 —_—-N/A_ -5554.3700 [Pa] Head 10.1138 10.0698 18.8327 18.6999 N/A 8.7629 [m] Static 7.1519 6.5889 14.3945 14.9124 N/A 7.8056 [m] Head u 12.3674 12.7047 15.8578 16,8625 1.2482 3.1531, [m st-1] cm 6.4537 6.8256 5.5910 5.5190 0.8191 -1.2346 [m sft] cu 1.1019 1.4325 6.8115, 5.6768 4.7552 5.3791 [m sA-1] c 7.0285 7.6198 9.1859 8.0498 1.2055 1.5661 [m sA-1] Wu “11.2655 11.2738 -9.0484-11,1857 0.8026 2.2254 [m st-1] w 13,1368 13.3387 10.7459 12.5424 0.8056 2.5928 [m sf-1] Distortion 1.1945 1.1764 1.1534 1.1435 0.9805 N/A Parameter Flow 3.2683 6.6161 39.2045 44.2616 N/A 32.5884 [degree] Angle: Alpha Flow -61.4042 59,9641 -60.2426 = 64.3425. N/A_—-0.2785_ [degree] Angle: Beta Table 4. Component 3 Summary Data Table Quantity Inlet LE Cut TE Cut Outlet TE/LE TE-LE Units Density 997.0000 997.0000 997.0000 997.0000 N/A N/A [kg mA-3] Pstatic __ 144733.0000 147390.0000 144840.0000 150138.0000 _N/A_-2550.6900 [Pa] Ptotal 178104,0000 174983.0000 171848.0000 170070.0000 _N/A_ -3134.8000 [Pa] Head 18.6503 18.5338 17.9960 17.4197, N/A__-0.5378 [m] Static 14,8863 15.1506 14,7662 15.3547, N/A|-0.3844. [m] Headcm 5.4945 5.0507 6.8482 6.1390 1.3559 1.7976 [m sh-1] cu 5.5678 4.7389 0.6779 1.0197 0.1431, -4,0610 [m sA-1] c 7.9700 7.0278 7.1100 6.3050 1.0117, 0.0823 [m sA-1] Distortion 1.1614 1.3385 1.2103 1.0174 0.9042 N/A Parameter Flow Angle 44,2699 33.7365 3.7183 10.0604 N/A__-30.0182 [degree]4. Meanline 1-D Charts The following charts show streamwise mass or area averaged quantities from the inlet to the outlet of the full machine. Chart 1. Chart showing streamwise, area averaged Cm versus averaged normalized M 7 ‘ i " om [m eA-4]5. Stage Plots The following plots show, for each stage, a meridional view of the geometry, blade-to-blade contour and vector views, and circumferentially averaged meridional views. 5.1. Stage 1 Plots Figure 2. Stage 1 meridional view of the flow passage and bladesFigure 4, Stage 1 velocity vectors at 50% spanjure 6, Stage 1 contours of circumferentially area-averaged P6. Component Charts The following charts show blade loading and spanwise-averaged quantities for each component. 6.1. Blade Loading Charts The following charts show the blade loading for each component. Chart 2, Component 2 blade loading chart 160,000 ‘ 140,000 | 120,000 | 100,000 +} & © so.000 4 60,000 4 40,000 20,000 0 02 04 0.6 os 1 Normalized M — component 259% span Chart 3. Component 3 blade loading chart 200,000 ‘ 180,000 | 160,000 | 140,000 +} & © 120,000 4 100,000 | £0,000 -} 0,000 0 02 04 0.6 os 1 Normalized M — component 3 59% span6.2. Spanwise Charts The following charts show circumferentially averaged quantities along hub-to-shroud lines located at the leading and trailing edges of the blade Chart 4. Component 2 chart showing circumferentially averaged flow angle at the LE 2 ‘ 5 3 a 04 i és a 2 6 80 0 02 04 06 08 1 Normalized Span “ete Be cee Component 2 chart showing circumferentially averaged flow angle at the TE 5 3 a & 2 SoA EL 0 02 04 0.6 08 1 Normalized Span “Abts Bb eeChart 6, Component 2 chart showing circumferentially averaged Cm at the TE ei % " 0 02 04 os 08 1 Normalized span Chart 7, Component 3 chart showing circumferentially averaged flow angle at the LE 60 i ‘ ‘i 2 4 Beta [degree] 49 60 Normalized spanChart 8, Component 3 chart showing circumferentially averaged flow angle at the TE 2 19 Beta [degree] -20 “30 Chart 0 02 oa 0.6 os 1 Normalized span 9, Component 3 chart showing circumferentially averaged Cm at the TE Normalized span