Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering: Haitao Liu, Xiecheng Tang, Hao Lu, Wenguang Xie, Yanmin Hu, Qiannan Xue
Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering: Haitao Liu, Xiecheng Tang, Hao Lu, Wenguang Xie, Yanmin Hu, Qiannan Xue
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Available online xxxx To address the need for the on-site measurement of aging oil, in this paper, we propose an impedance-based mi-
crosensor for analyzing the moisture content in engine oil. Using a microfabrication process, we fabricated an in-
terdigitated microelectrode and integrated it with a 3D-printed microcontainer to produce a microsensor that
Keywords: can detect changes in the permittivity of oil. When the moisture content in oil increases, this sensor can detect
Complex permittivity the resulting change in the oil impedance, which is related to its permittivity, and then determine the degree
Oil detection to which the oil has aged. The test results show that the proposed microsensor has the advantages of being
Microsensor small and having high sensitivity, good accuracy, and the ability to be combined with hand-held instruments.
Moisture content The proposed method is expected to be used for the rapid, low cost, on-site determination of oil aging.
Impedance sensor Copyright © 2020 Tianjin University. Publishing Service by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npe.2020.04.001
2589-5540/Copyright © 2020 Tianjin University. Publishing Service by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Please cite this article as: H. Liu, X. Tang, H. Lu, et al., An interdigitated impedance microsensor for detection of moisture content in engine oil,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npe.2020.04.001
2 H. Liu et al. / Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering xxx (xxxx) xxx
accuracy. In this paper, we discuss the performance of the sensor, in- If the oil is mixed with impurities, the complex permittivity is εmix .
cluding its sensitivity, accuracy, and consistency. εimpu is the equivalent complex permittivity of the impurity and εe is
the complex permittivity of the base medium. α is the ratio of the vol-
2. Design of the microsensor and hand-held system ume of the medium to the total volume of the mixed solution.
2.1. Detection principle kðε mix −εe Þ ¼ α k0 εimpu −εmix ð3Þ
When oil deteriorates, water is the primary pollutant, and as the oil
where k and k’ are parameters associated with the intrinsic properties of
mixes with the water it generates microbial growth, increased acidity,
the sensor.18,19 The above formula is used to indicate the change in the
and turbidity. The incorporation of moisture in oil causes a large change
complex permittivity when fresh oil is mixed with impurities.
in its permittivity, which can be converted into impedance information
by the microsensor and then be captured by the circuit. The permittivity
2.2. Sensor design and fabrication
reflected by the impedance carries frequency information.16
The real part of complex permittivity is based on the ability of the
The microsensor, the front end of the whole system, makes contact
liquid to accommodate the induced polarization charge by the action
with the oil sample to be tested to obtain impedance information
of the electric field. The imaginary part can be understood as the loss
from the oil. The sensor is produced using a microfabrication process
caused by the relative displacement of the internally induced electric di-
in which the microelectrodes are screen printed and a microcontainer
pole moment of the liquid.17
is produced using 3D printing technology. These two parts are then
bonded together. An immersion gold technique is used to obtain a rela-
ε0 ε00
εr ¼ −i ð1Þ tively smooth sensing surface. The advantage of microfabrication tech-
ε0 ε0
nology is that it can be customized to obtain sensing structures with
00 excellent sensing performance. Another advantage is that it can be
ε mass produced, has good consistency, and is in low cost. Therefore,
δe ¼ acrtg 0 ð2Þ
ε the microsensor is replaceable to prevent changes in impedance due
to long-term use.
Here, ε0 (= 8.85 × 10−12 F/m) is the vacuum permittivity. The com- The microsensor in this study comprised an interdigitated micro-
plex permittivity is εr , with ε′/ε0 representing the real part of the rela- electrode, the structure of which is shown in Fig. 1. We used FR4 (ε =
tive permittivity, ε′′/ε0 the imaginary part of the relative permittivity, 4.4 F/m20) as the substrate material, the dimensions of which are a
and δe is the loss angle. 13.4 mm, b 20.8 mm, and a thickness of 0.6 mm. The line width W1
Please cite this article as: H. Liu, X. Tang, H. Lu, et al., An interdigitated impedance microsensor for detection of moisture content in engine oil,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npe.2020.04.001
H. Liu et al. / Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering xxx (xxxx) xxx 3
(a) (b)
Fig. 3. (a) Electric field distribution when measuring oil; (b) potential distribution when measuring water.
and line gap W2 are both 0.3 mm, L1 = 8 mm, W4 = 7.4 mm. The feed 3. Results and discussion
length L2 is 10 mm and the feed width W3 is 3 mm. The working area
of the microsensor is limited to that of the 3D-printed container, 3.1. Sensor simulation
which has a cylindrical inner groove 4 mm in height and a radius of
3.5 mm. Using this container, the volume of the oil sample that can be Oil is a weak electrolyte whose molar conductivity increases with di-
tested is limited to 150 μL. Maintaining a constant volume can prevent lution. As the moisture content increases, the permittivity of the solu-
impedance measurement errors due to changes in the sample volume. tion increases, which reduces the resistivity and, correspondingly, the
impedance. The impedance of the designed sensing probe in oil was
simulated using COMSOL software. Fig. 3a and b show the electric
2.3. Design of the hand-held system field distributions of the sensor in oil and water, respectively. We can
see that the electric field strength of the sensor in oil is significantly
The change in the oil impedance due to the moisture content is con- higher than that in water, which means that it is feasible to use the
verted into a digital signal, which is then sent to the core control circuit impedance-based sensor to detect the moisture content in oil. The rela-
for real-time data processing. The data are then transferred to the PC tive permittivities of water and fresh oil2 are 80 and 2, respectively, and
and displayed in real time. Fig. 2 shows the hand-held system frame- that of contaminated oil is somewhere in between. We simulated the in-
work. An STM32 microcontroller is used as the microcontroller unit of terdigitated microelectrode in contact with three kinds of samples and
the core control circuit, and an LCD12864 is used as the liquid crystal set the relative permittivity of the contaminated oil to 4. The simulated
display module. The function of the impedance analysis circuit is to ex- impedance values are shown in Table 1. The results show that the im-
tract impedance information from the microsensor. As the core chip of pedance values of the sensor decrease as the permittivity of the oil sam-
the impedance analysis circuit, the AD5933 can achieve stable measure- ple increases, which proves that the permittivity of the oil sample can be
ment of the impedance values at a typical frequency range of reflected by measuring the impedance of the sensor.
1–100 kHz.21 The impedance analysis circuit includes a detection chip,
a voltage stabilization circuit, an amplification circuit, and an interface,
the structure of which is shown in Fig. 2. 3.2. Oil sample test
The calculations steps are as follows.22,23 The first step in impedance
measurement is to calculate the amplitude A and phase angle φ of the As shown in Fig. 4, we connected the hand-held device with the mi-
Fourier transform at each sweep point: crosensor to the computer via a serial port, and uploaded impedance in-
formation to the computer, which displays the moisture information in
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi real time. Oil samples (0.0–0.45%) containing different moisture con-
A¼ R2 þ I 2 ð4Þ tents were injected into the microcontainer for testing. The test was
performed at a room temperature of 20 °C. As shown in Fig. 5a, the im-
pedance curves clearly indicate oil samples with different moisture con-
I tents. The responses based on the moisture contents exhibit significant
φ ¼ arctan ð5Þ differences in the test frequency range. In Fig. 5b, the impedance value
R
at 50 kHz is shown for each moisture content (n = 3). Although the
test values differ slightly from the simulated values, the trend in the
The calculation result is generally a complex number, the real part of test results is consistent with that of the simulation, which accords
which is represented by R, and the imaginary part by I. The digital signal with the theoretical expectations. This shows that the impedance values
output by the AD converter directly enters the digital signal processor have a linear relationship with the moisture contents, with a linearity of
for discrete Fourier transform. The Fourier transform process is per- R2 = 0.98 and a sensitivity of 8.6 MΩ / (wt%) (Fig. 5b).
formed at each scanning frequency point.
Table 1
2.4. Materials and devices
Relationship between permittivity of oil sample and corresponding impedance value.
The oil used in this study was Aviation Hydraulic Oil No.10 (Kunlun, Sample Relative permittivity Impedance
|Z| (kΩ)
China), and its purity was analytical-grade. In the portable impedance
analyzer, we use a STM32-stm32f103rct6 chip as the main control cir- Fresh oil 2 3429
cuit chip, an LCD12864 display module, and an AD5933 impedance Polluted oil 4 1054
Water 80 120
analysis chip.
Please cite this article as: H. Liu, X. Tang, H. Lu, et al., An interdigitated impedance microsensor for detection of moisture content in engine oil,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npe.2020.04.001
4 H. Liu et al. / Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering xxx (xxxx) xxx
Fig. 5. (a) Impedance curves for oil with different moisture contents; (b) test results of the relationship between moisture content and impedance value.
3.3. Accuracy and repeatability of the oil-moisture-content detection where Z0 is the impedance value of the fresh oil and Zd is the imped-
ance value of the tested oil. The results show that the index η measured
In the experiment, standard oil samples A1, A2, A3, A4, and A5 were by the sensor increases with increases in the moisture content, and the
configured with moisture contents of 0.05%, 0.15%, 0.25%, 0.35%, and difference is clearly distinguishable. The permittivity of the pure oil, as
0.45%, respectively. Each oil sample was tested three times by the pro- measured using the standard titration method, is 2.1, and changes in
posed portable instrument. The index η was used to evaluate the mois- the permittivity can be calculated based on the changes in impedance.
ture level of the oil samples, the formula for which is as shown in As shown in Fig. 6, with increases in the moisture content of the oil sam-
Eq. (6): ple, the impedance value increases, and the dielectric constant also in-
creases. As shown in Table 2, the test results for the five oil samples
η ¼j Z 0 j = j Z d j; ð6Þ exhibited a good recovery of 99.31%–100.57%.
The same oil sample A1 (moisture content is 0.05%) was tested ten
times by two microsensor chips, respectively, the results of which are
shown in Table 3. We can see that the microsensor chips show very
slight deviation and high accuracy for the 20 measurements in the
two groups. The aging tests of the five groups of oils also showed good
accuracy with an error b0.5%, as shown in Table 3.
The above results confirm that the proposed interdigitated imped-
ance microsensor for oil-moisture content has good linearity and accu-
racy, as well as good repeatability and stability. Table 4 lists the
detection range, linearity, and device size of the existing methods. Com-
pared with existing methods, including the standard method,5 industri-
alized method,24 optical method,25 and electrochemical method,26 the
proposed sensor is smaller and its performance is comparable in detec-
tion range and linearity.
Table 2
Recovery of five sample groups for oil detection.
A1 100.32
A2 100.29
A3 100.22
Fig. 6. Test results for oil permittivity and moisture content η based on the detection of
A4 99.31
standard moisture contents of 0.05% (1#–3#), 0.15% (4#–6#), 0.25% (7#–9#), 0.35%
A5 100.57
(10#–12#), and 0.45% (13#–15#).
Please cite this article as: H. Liu, X. Tang, H. Lu, et al., An interdigitated impedance microsensor for detection of moisture content in engine oil,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npe.2020.04.001
H. Liu et al. / Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering xxx (xxxx) xxx 5
Please cite this article as: H. Liu, X. Tang, H. Lu, et al., An interdigitated impedance microsensor for detection of moisture content in engine oil,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npe.2020.04.001
6 H. Liu et al. / Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering xxx (xxxx) xxx
Please cite this article as: H. Liu, X. Tang, H. Lu, et al., An interdigitated impedance microsensor for detection of moisture content in engine oil,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npe.2020.04.001