Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Top 10 Actuarial Technical Interview Topics For Freshers
Top 10 Actuarial Technical Interview Topics For Freshers
Top 10
Actuarial
Interview
Topics
Designed for College Graduates
1. Endowment vs Term
Both Term Insurance and Endowment plans are traditional life insurance plans.
Both offer comprehensive life coverage and are good tax-saving instruments.
Which one is better will be concluded at the end but note the differences:
If you buy a term plan, the beneficiaries will receive the guaranteed death
benefit only in case of your death within the stipulated time. But in case of
an endowment plan, you will receive the entire sum assured along with
bonuses that you have built over time, once the policy tenure is over. Under
Endowment if you died in between the time your beneficiary get the
payment. So Term is a pure life insurance policy an endowment plan, on the
other hand, is a combination of investment and insurance
Insurance agents are not much inclined to sell a term plan because the sales
of endowment plans get them higher profits. A term plan offers
comprehensive life coverage at very low premium rates. For the same
amount of coverage, an endowment plan will charge higher and if you add
riders with your basic plan, the premiums will increase.
Example: If you are 20 Year old , non smoker and earn between 3-5 Lacs
per annum then
Endowment plan- 24,000 annual premium for 30 years gives you sum assured of
24 lakhs (PNB Metlife )
Term Plan - you can get insurance for 2 crores for 40 year term at just rs.14000
per annum (ICICI PRUDENTIAL )
So, an endowment plan is more beneficial if taken mainly for the purpose of
saving, but the better alternative is to invest in mutual funds or any other
financial instrument. On the other hand, term plans are beneficial for those
4 championship races had been done between Mr. A and Mr. B. Out of which A
has won 3 races and B has won 1 race. SO, on whom are you going to bet your
money in the next race?
You will Say Mr. A because P(A) = 0.75 and P(B) = 0.25
So your initial estimate about B is P(B) = 0.25
Now I will give you additional information say, there was a rain when Mr. B won
and there was rain once when Mr. A won. And in the next match there will
definitely be a rain.
So now I ask you again on whom will you bet your money?
Let’s decode the answer:
1. P(R) = 0.50 (Because rain happened twice out of 4 matches)
2. P(R|B) = 1 (Because whenever Mr. B won there was a rain)
So I want to find out that what is probability that in the next race Mr. B will won if
it is given that there will be a rain:
P(B|R) = P(R|B)*P(B)/P(R) = 0.50
I hope you know how this formula comes up otherwise you can mention me in
comments I will tell you how.
Conclusion: Initially we comes up with an answer that P(B) = 0.25 which is my
prior estimate and then I give additional information about rain which we
incorporated in the form of conditional probability i.e. P(R|B) = 1 and then
ultimately we find P(B|R) which is my posterior probability.
So you see how with the help of Bayesian statistics I incorporated additional
information into my current study and how my value changes from 0.25 to 0.50.
Censored vs Truncated:
Censored data have unknown values beyond a bound on either end of the number
line or both. When the data is observed and reported at the boundary, the
researcher has made the decision to restrict the range of the scale.
An example of a lower censoring boundary is
The recording of pollutants in our water. The researcher may not care about (or
instruments may not be able to detect) the level of pollutants if it falls below a
certain threshold (e.g., .005 parts per million). In this case, any pollutant level
below .005 ppm is reported as “<.005 ppm.”
Truncation occurs when values beyond a boundary are either excluded when
gathered or excluded when analysed.
For example, if someone conducting a survey asks you if you make more than
$100,000, and you answer “yes” and the surveyor says “thanks but no thanks”,
then you’ve been truncated.
So, to summarize, data are censored when we have partial information about the
value of a variable—we know it is beyond some boundary, but not how far above
or below it.
In contrast, data are truncated when the data set does not include observations in
the analysis that are beyond a boundary value.
Yield To Maturity :
The Yield to Maturity for a Coupon Paying Bond has been defined as the effective
rate of interest at which the discounted value of proceeds of a bond equals the
price.
Now for simplicity, suppose interest rate will remain same throughout the term of a
security.
Effective Duration:
Duration:
For example, if a bond has a duration of five years and interest rates increase by
1%, the bond's price will decline by approximately 5%. Conversely, if a bond has a
duration of five years and interest rates fall by 1%, the bond's price will increase by
approximately 5%.
To find the modified duration, You have to take the Macauley duration and divide
it by 1 + (yield-to-maturity / number of coupon periods per year).
Notes to Remember:
First, as maturity increases, duration increases and the bond becomes more
volatile.
Second as a bond's coupon increases, its duration decreases and the bond
becomes less volatile.
Third, as interest rates increase, duration decreases and the bond's sensitivity
to further interest rate increases goes down.
Fourth, The duration of "n" year zero coupon bond is "n". Because there is
only one payment that must be the time of that cashflow
Other Notes:
The difference between modified duration and effective duration is that modified
duration assumes that the cash flows won’t change, while effective duration allows
that the cash flows might change. The cash flows could change because:
1. The bond has embedded options (call option, put option, conversion option,
prepayment option)
2. The bond has a floating interest rate
Now Zero-Coupon bond will have lower convexity because it consists of just
one payment. But in 3rd case convexity is high because payments are spread out
over a longer period of time.
In Technical Terms , let’s say X is the present value of all cashflows. So take
the double derivative of X with respect to change in interest rate and then divide
it by X will gives us the Convexity.
Now question will be that what exactly is the use of convexity.
It is the measure of change in Duration of the bond with respect to change in
interest rate.
Positive convexity implies that change in interest rate is inversely proportional
to change in bond, i.e. decrease in interest rate leads to increase in Duration of
bond.
(Convexity will always have a positive value in normal market condition.
But it can be negative also which means decrease in yields leads to decrease
in duration as in case of callable bonds.)
In our above example that if we decrease the interest rate in all of them , then
the change will be high in case 3 where convexity is high and will be low in
case of scenario 1.
Now from graph point of view, higher convexity will have a curved shape
whereas lower convexity will have flatter shape curve.
Note: Both DMT and effective duration measures the average life of an
investment. Investment with longer term will have more impact than with
shorter term when there is a change in interest rate.
3 conditions:
1)VA(i0) = VL(i0) which means Present Value of Assets = Present Value of
Liabilities.
Now as we know that decrease in interest rate leads to increase in Present Value
of Assets and Liabilities. Increase in interest rate leads to decrease in Present
Value of Assets and Liabilities.
But the question is which will have more impact. So we are saying here that
whatever be the change in interest rate, it will have same impact on both assets
and liabilities that’s why we are saying that volatility of both assets and
liabilities should be same.
So now present value of both is same and volatilities are also same. Now
question is what will happen if there is a cash outflow and then there is cash
inflow after some period of time and at the time of cash outflow we don’t have
enough money. Now, let’s see the third Condition.
Here we are saying that cash inflow series is more spread out than cash outflow
series.
It means that bonds will always have a higher value than the liability, even if the
interest rate changes. This means that our portfolio of bonds will always sell for
enough money to cover the liability.
Limitations of Immunization:
1. It is only valid for sufficiently small change in interest rate (as we ignored
third-order and higher-order derivatives)
2. The value of our portfolio of assets changes over time, so we need to
rebalance the portfolio to continue satisfying the conditions for Redington
immunization.
3. This theory assumes flat yield curve and requires same change in interest
rate at all terms, in practice it is rarely the case.
4. Immunisation removes likelihood of making profits.
1.Effective annual interest had interest paid once at the end of each
year.
2.Effective annual Discount had interest paid once at the start of
each year.
So, what will happen if interest paid is not once in a measurement
period, then there comes a Nominal Rate.
If you still didn’t get the above answer that here is the trick, use the
result given in point no.6 that the interest rate which will be in the
right , you will prefer that condition is that both rates should be same.
I am saying is that if d(2)=10% given and d(12)=10% is given than you
prefer which one is in the right in that equation i.e. d (12). Similarly for
i(2)=10% and i(12)=10% , I would prefer i(2) , because it is in the right.
Conclusion:
Effective interest: When paid once per measurement period
Nominal interest: When paid more(or less) than once per
measurement period
Force of interest: When paid very frequently in a measurement period.
IRR: also referred as “yield to redemption or yield per annum. The internal rate
of return for an investment project is the effective rate of interest that equates
the present value of inflows and outflows. Higher IRR represents a more
profitable project.
However, IRR need not be positive. Zero return implies investor receives no
return on investment. If the project has only cash inflows then the IRR is
infinity.
Now when IRR> cost of capital, then NPV will be positive
When IRR< cost of capital, NPV will be negative.
Advantages:
1.This approach is mostly used by financial managers as it is expressed in
percentage form so it is easy for them to compare to the required cost of capital.
For any query Email us at actuarysense@gmail.com
Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/actuarysense
Follow us on Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/actuarysense
2. IRR method gives you the advantage of knowing the actual returns of the
money which you invested today.
Disadvantages:
1.If an analyst is evaluating two projects, both of which share a common
discount rate, predictable cash flows, equal risk, and a shorter time horizon, IRR
will probably work. The catch is that discount rates usually change substantially
over time. Thus, IRR will not be effective.
2. IRR is the discount rate that makes a project break even. If market conditions
change over the years, this project can have two or more IRR. (we will justify
with the example).
So, why is the IRR method still commonly used in capital budgeting? Its because
of its reporting simplicity. The NPV method is inherently complex and requires
assumptions at each stage. The result is simple, but for any project that is long-
For any query Email us at actuarysense@gmail.com
Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/actuarysense
Follow us on Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/actuarysense
term, that has multiple cash flows at different discount rates, or that has uncertain
cash flows - in fact, for almost any project at all - simple IRR isn't good for much
more than presentation value.
Important Example: The value of fund on 1 JAN 2017 is Rs.800 and the value
on 31 DEC 2017 is Rs.1500. During the year 2017 following transactions occur:
But the fund manager performance cannot be judged through the MWRR
method because he does not control the timing and amount of cashflows
and this method is sensitive to the timing and amount of cashflows; fund
manager is merely responsible for investing the cashflows. To remove this
limitation there comes a TWRR.
What is happening in the above equation is that it tells us that the product of
these factors gives the notional income factor for single investment of Rs. 1 at
time t=0 invested until time T i.e 3 in this case.
· Can it be possible that the fund has negative MWRR and Positive TWRR?
o Yes, it can be possible. When the fund has growth factors where positive return
are more than negative returns at different time periods that TWRR will be
positive. On the other hand, if one large cashflow comes into the fund and it
generate negative returns in the fund then the MWRR may become negative.
The point is simple that MWRR is sensitive to amount of cashflows.
But the point is that both methods have disadvantages: TWRR requires
Fund Values at all Cashflow dates. MWRR may not have unique solution
and fund manager performance cannot be judged. If the fund performance
is reasonably stable in the period of assessment, the TWRR and MWRR
may give similar results. Then there comes LIRR
The three most popular explanations for the fact that interest rates vary
according to the term of investment (or the three central theories that attempt
to explain why yield curves are shaped the way they are)
1. Expectations Theory
2. Liquidity Preference
3. Market Segmentation
Actuary
Sense
Link is in Description