OIL FIELD TO REFINERY

New Orleans Charleston Seattle New site Supply

Texas 2 4 5 80
California 5 5 3 60
Alaska 5 7 3 100
Middle East 2 3 5 120

Demand 100 60 80 120

NEW SITE: LOS ANGELES

New Orleans Charleston Seattle Los Angeless Supply
Texas 2 4 5 3 80
California 5 5 3 1 60
Alaska 5 7 3 4 100
Middle East 2 3 5 4 120

Demand 100 60 80 120

New Orleans Charleston Seattle Los Angeless Shipped Supply

Texas 40 0 0 40 80 80
California 0 0 0 60 60 60
Alaska 0 0 80 20 100 100
Middle East 60 60 0 0 120 120
Recieved 100 60 80 120
Total cost
Demand 100 60 80 120 880

NEW SITE: GALVETON

New Orleans Charleston Seattle Galveton Supply
Texas 2 4 5 1 80
California 5 5 3 3 60
Alaska 5 7 3 5 100
Middle East 2 3 5 3 120

Demand 100 60 80 120

New Orleans Charleston Seattle Galveton Shipped Supply

Texas 0 0 0 80 80 80
California 0 20 0 40 60 60
Alaska 20 0 80 0 100 100
Middle East 80 40 0 0 120 120
Recieved 100 60 80 120
 Total cost
Demand 100 60 80 120 920

NEW SITE: ST. LOUIS

New Orleans Charleston Seattle St. Louis Supply
Texas 2 4 5 1 80
California 5 5 3 4 60
Alaska 5 7 3 7 100
Middle East 2 3 5 4 120

Demand 100 60 80 120

New Orleans Charleston Seattle St. Louis Shipped Supply

Texas 0 0 0 80 80 80
California 0 20 0 40 60 60
Alaska 20 0 80 0 100 100
Middle East 80 40 0 0 120 120
Recieved 100 60 80 120
Total cost
Demand 100 60 80 120 960

Los Angeless Galveton St. Louis

Phần 1 880 920 960
Phần 2 1570 1630 1430
Cố định 620 570 530

Tổng 3070 3120 2920

Câu 1: Chi phí vận chuyển từ oil field đến Los Angeless refinery là thấp nhất

Câu 2: Chi phí vận chuyển từ refinery đến St. Louis là thấp nhất

Câu 3: Chọn nhà máy lọc dầu Sr. Louis vì tổng chi phí thấp nhất
 REFINERY TO DISTRIBUTION CENTERS
Pittsburg Atlanta Kansas City San Francisco
New Orleans 6.5 5.5 6 8
Charleston 7 5 4 7
Seattle 7 8 4 3
New site

Demand

EW SITE: LOS ANGELESS

Pittsburg Atlanta Kansas City San Francisco
New Orleans 6.5 5.5 6 8
Charleston 7 5 4 7
Seattle 7 8 4 3
Los Angeless 8 6 3 2

Demand 100 80 80 100

Pittsburg Atlanta Kansas City San Francisco Shipped

New Orleans 80 20 0 0 100
Charleston 0 60 0 0 60
Seattle 20 0 0 60 80
Los Angeless 0 0 80 40 120
Received 100 80 80 100

Demand 100 80 80 100

NEW SITE: GALVETON

Pittsburg Atlanta Kansas City San Francisco
New Orleans 6.5 5.5 6 8
Charleston 7 5 4 7
Seattle 7 8 4 3
Galveton 5 4 3 6

Demand 100 80 80 100

Pittsburg Atlanta Kansas City San Francisco Shipped

New Orleans 100 0 0 0 100
Charleston 0 60 0 0 60
Seattle 0 0 0 80 80
Galveton 0 20 80 20 120
Received 100 80 80 100
 Demand 100 80 80 100

NEW SITE: ST. LOUIS

Pittsburg Atlanta Kansas City San Francisco
New Orleans 6.5 5.5 6 8
Charleston 7 5 4 7
Seattle 7 8 4 3
St. Louis 4 3 1 5

Demand 100 80 80 100

Pittsburg Atlanta Kansas City San Francisco Shipped

New Orleans 100 0 0 0 100
Charleston 0 60 0 0 60
Seattle 0 0 0 80 80
St. Louis 0 20 80 20 120
Received 100 80 80 100

Demand 100 80 80 100

S
Supply
100
60
80
120

Supply
100
60
80
120

Supply
100
60
80
120

Total cost
1570

Supply
100
60
80
120

Supply
100
60
80
120
Total cost
1630

Supply
100
60
80
120

Supply
100
60
80
120

Total cost
1430