This book enaazes with the polities of social and environmental justice. and
seeks new ways to think about the future of urbanization inthe twenty-first
Century. Tt establishes foundational coneepts for understanding how space,
time, place ard natare~ the material frames of daily life ave constituted and
represented through socal practices, not as separate elements but in relation to
cachother,Itdescribes how geographical differences are produced, and shows
hhow ther then become fundamental to the exploration of politcal, economic
and ecological altenatves to contemporary lit.
“The book is divided into fur pats, Part I describes theprblematic nature
of action and analysis at different scales of time and space, and introraes the
reader to the modes of dialectical thinking and discourse which are used
throughvut the remainder of the work, Port I examines how “nature” and
“environment” have been understood and valued in relation to processes of
social change and seeks, from this basis, to make sense of contemporary
‘environmental ise,
at Ill in wide ranging discussion of history, geography and culture,
explores the meaning ofthe social “production” of space and time, and clarifies
problems related to “atherness” and “lilference”. The final part ofthe book
deploys the foundational arguments the author has established to consider
cantemporary problem af social justice that have resulted fom cece changes
in geographical divisions oflabor, in the envionment, and in the pace and
quliy of wbanization
“Jastce, Nature and the Geography of Difference speaks toa wide readership
of students of social, cultural and spatial theory and of the dynamics of
‘contemporary life, Its » convincing demonstration that tis both possible and
necessary t0 vale difference and to seck aust socal order.
Justice, Nature
& the Geography
of Difference
| KEAIOH |
Joleyiq Jo AUdOIB085)
pg SINJON ‘eousne
David Harvey is Professor of Geography atthe Johns Hopkins University
From 1987-1993 he was Halford Mackinder Professor of Geography at
Osxford University. He received the Outstanding Contributor Award from
the Association of American Geographers in 19805 the Anders Revins Gold
Medal from the Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geosraphy in 1989s
the Patron's Medal of the Royal Geographical Society in 1995, and the
‘Voautrin Lud Prize in France i the same year. His books include Explanation
in Geography (1969); Social Justice and the City (1973, new edition 1988)";
The Limits 0 Capital (1982)*; The Urban Experience (1988)*, and The
Condition of Postrodernity (1989)". "Published by Blackwell
Cor imi se tyes Hag Hen Pt Chip Yo
ion Brive
David Harvey
,
TPES olaihe/aboas
PBSLACKWELL | | |Justice, Nature and the
Geography of Differencefir Pelfina Justice, Nature and the
Geography of Difference
David Harvey
BLACKWELLCopyighe ® David Have 1996
“he ght of David Harney te iden ahr his work as been ase inane
with th Cope De Pn ho 18
ine puoi 1996
2AGE WoT S54
Bledel Publier Ie
238 Main Sa
Cumboige, Machen 242
USA
‘Baal Plies a
108 Comey Road
Oxon OX JE
UK
Alig seed, ergot gan of sh peng fe ppc af i
seen spr af hap a ees so er po one
{any fo: by any means, rani, porepyeg ing oor
hou he pie pean fh aloes
‘Sucy iat Unie Sas of America tisbok wi subg thevi ht eal ee
bray af ede aresherie, be le, seal oun, shen ocr who tbe
ters ro conses nay fem abiding oc es than hat nw phd
snl wihout a imi coodon ice dn conn ting ingen on he sepa
picaser
eof Con Can i Pain Date
sy, Daiy 1935
Jess na, ah eran ifeacsDarl Hare
fe
Indie big eonce sd nds
ISBN 1.55740 ale pp) — ISBN 195796481. ph ale pape)
1 Sol tie, 2. Soul change, Soc alae
4 Gla avon came, Cua len 6, Space ad tie. Tie
BNataHa6 18
aoas72-aaa 96961
cw
But iow Calpine Paces Dat
[AG ctsegue rete hic bk valle om che Bish Liney
“Type 1 0912p aria
Prada Gest Brain by Hana Lin, Bodin, acai
This books peed emai Fe paper
PARTI
PART I
PART Itt
9
10
"1
PARTIV
2
3
“4
Contents
“Thoughts fora Prologue
Acknowledgments
Tawoduetion
ORIENTATIONS
Militant Parcicularism and Global Ambition
Dialoctice
The Laibnizian Conesit
‘The DialesticsoE Discourse.
Fintorical Agency and the Loci of Social Change
THE NATURE OF ENVIRONMENT
Pare I Prologue «
The Domination of Navate snd is Discontents
Valuing Nature = trove c 8) eb
The Dialecties of Social and Eavioncoetal Change
‘SPACE, TIME, AND PLACE
Pact Il Prologue
The Social Construction of Space and Time
The Currency of Space-Time
From Space to Place and Back Again
JUSTICE, DIEFERENCE, AND POLITICS
Pare IV Prologue
‘Class Relasions, Social Justice, and the Political
Geography of Dierence
‘The Environment of Justice
Possible Urban Worlds
v
46
9
77
ny
120
150
176
207
21D
248,
291
329
334
366
403vi Contents
"Thoughts for an Bplogue 489
Bibliography 440 Thoughts for a Prologue
Index 456
Here is « map of ous country:
haere is che Sea of Indifference, glazed with salt
This is che haunted sivce flowing from brow to groin
wwe dare nor taste its water
"This ie the desere where missiles ae planted like corms
“This is the breadbasket of foreclosed farms
This isthe birchplace of the rockabilly boy
This i the cemetery ofthe poor
who died for democracy hiss 2 baulefietd
from a nineteenth-centary war the skzine is famous
‘This is te sea-town of mych and story when the fishing fleets
‘went bankrupt hete is where the jobs were on the pier
processing frozen fishsicks hourly wages and no shares
‘These are ocher batedelds Centralia Detroit
here ate the forests primeval the copper the silver lodes
“These are the suburbs of acquiescence silence rising famelike
from the streets
This isthe capital of money and dolor whose spires
fae up through air inversions whose bridges are crumbling,
whose children ate drifting blind alleys pent
becween coiled ras of rarar wire
promised to show you 2 map you say b
then yes lec itbe these are small distinct
where do we see it from isthe question
his iva ur
Adcienne Rich An Atlas of she Difficde World‘Acknowledgments
‘The lines ftom ‘An Atlas of the Diffcn's World,” from An Aular ofthe Difficult
World: Poems 1988-1991 by Advienne Rich. Copyright @ 1991 by Adrienne
Rich Reprinted wih pemision of heanorand WH! Norn & Company,
Introduction
In recent years T have frequently found myself speaking 2t conferences on
“plobalization.” The conlerence at Duke University in November, 1994, was
by far the most interesting. Ie brought together diverse people not only from
‘many disciplines and walls of life but also from soany different countries. Ie
wwasa welcome change co listen to academics, activists, and representatives from
the arts from countries like South Korea, China, India, Russia, and Egypt as
opposed co the eather sepetitive and sterile discussions of globalization
(increasingly dubbed by cynics “plobaloney”) chat all too often occur in
university secsings in the United States or Europe. But the atmosphere of the
conference war frequently tense and arguments often hard 0 follow,
ilhwtraive of the invoads thar hypercical currents of thought like
ponstructuralism, postmodernism, deconstruction, and the like have made
throughout the world.
‘But what uly tendered the eccasion memorable for me was my stayin the
(Omni Hlotel in Durham, North Carolina. The hotel was full of families — of
very distincsve sore. The men wore either slightly baggy suits, or blazers axd
‘annels, usualy embellished with ajlly necktie. The childzen were remarkably
well behaved, the hoys typically dressed in blazers and fannels and che gitls
forthe most part in filly dresses. And the women all wore ankle-length dresses
and, most distinctive of all, had long hair, the only permsisible deviation
apparently being ro loop it up ica a bun, This was definitely not Levi, Calvin
Klein of even Benetton territory (though Laura Ashley coul! have nade it) =
rota pair of jeans in sight, And everyone was remarkably fiienly, bestowing.
beaming “hellos’ and “ood days" ro obvious deviants from the sartorial norm
ssuch as myself
[was curious enough t0 follow this distinctive crowed whither ie was headed
and soon found myelin the mids ofthe Southeasten Regional Meeting of
Bvangelical Penrecottal Preachers. Iwas intrigued enough w stay. An evening,
of participant observation taught me lot. I could not help contrasting, for
sample, che incredible enthusiasm, joy, and vigor of the Pentecostal mecting,2 Introduesion
vith the angst and compedcive rension a he globalization confetence. While
the Pentecostal meeting was very much led from the front by white male
preachers (no concern lees to balance the program according to criteria of
gender or race), the levels and deptee of enthusiastic audience parccipation
‘were cxtcaordiarly highs, compared tothe heard-it-all-hefare inceedlity and
reseneful pasivny of the campus audience. Furthermore for the Pentecostal,
it was an orchestration of emotions and passions rather than of intellect that
‘was being sough and the ends and objectives of the ofchestration were clear
wondered what the parallel objecive of the globalization conference might
be. I hada hard time finding any strong or coherent answer to that question,
The preacher who opened the ceremonies that evening did sa with che
following invocation. “Fhrough these four days,” he said, "we have come to
tundetstand the foundational beliefe dhat keep us firmly on the rock.”
Foundational belief! | wondered what on earth would happen if started to
talk about foundarional beliefs in che glabaliation conference. The decon-
structionists would gp ro work with icy precision, the elaivists would calously
sneer the eitical cheorsts would rub their hands and say “this simaply will not
ddo® and che pomodernists would exclaim “what a dinosaur!” And I myselE
agree that al foundational beliefs should be serutinized and questioned, But
whac coubled me was the thought thae when a pelitcal group armed wich
svong and unambiguous foundational belie conironts a bunch of douhting,
Thomases whose only foundational bli is skepticixn towards all foundational
beliefs, chen i is racher easy to predice who will win, Which led me to the
following reflection: the task of critical analysis is not, surely, to prove che
impossibility of foundational balef (or truths), but co find a more plausible
and adequate bass for the foundational belief chat make ineeepretation and
politcal action meaningful, creative, and possible.
In this book, I cry co define a set of workable fonndational concepts for
understanding space-time, place and environment (nature). The critical search
for such foundational concept is, of course, no trivial or easy task, I requires
nothing shore of establishing 4 metaphysical basis for enquiry. But it is
dangerous in academia these day ro confess to being meta about anything, for
to do so is ro suggest a longing for something myrtcally outside of us (ot
Sometimes within us) o which we can appeal co stabilize the food of chaotic
images, ephemeral representations, contorted postionings, and multiple
ragmentations of knowledge within which we now have ouf collective heing,
[Burt metaphysics in its traditionel sense is precisely abou the kine of ertical
enquiry that allows for che fee interplay of passions, emotions, rationality, and
intellect racher than their restricive compartmentalizations. That balance is
‘not always easy co strike. If, for example, the Pencecostals were unduly high
‘on charged emotions anc the collective orchestration af passions and desires
for highly restrictive ends, chen we academics surely er in being far too highly
captivated by the cecal and highly disciplined (in every sase, both posivve
Insraduction 3
and nga of thar wad quali of ow on individ profeonlly
Soe gente, and fen egal driven enterprises, Metaphysics 3
is ao sea gener princes to undttand but never epee the cident
complexity of physical loi and soc ie, Eng of this ont sever
cay ping an during the wring of as book Ihave on found mys
Too forthe cay ples of ith of the Pentcnta the cere of
postive or the abst of dogmatic Mann
‘As the evening withthe Penecxals Woon
was 4 ery par pl fargt forthe ocean. And tha get was
Tic The blod of Je it war sl, wll wach saya sign of race
Sto Racal diminish wen cnroabar
tothe egpasion ofits pow andin the is of cxrsrdnary cnet ahr
ther pretchetexorel te asembled white o enbrace ther black been
wir oy mil and undasaning Ando wa hat an aene an
the content ofthe US south woud bc dol hough Bole orci
Inerson came to erbrace (on the suc ac lest) not only the black
Drtren presen ra the de of al euliy nthe eer ofthe eh
thdefthe Lard. Now happen bein favor lose ayn hee
the door, degrading sn diting graces of rim in he United
Stas and i cera eee ome that mem ave Ban scoped
on tat score in one fvning of Benes pesching han in eve decees of
Efpsrie pid nny oom niverty oe ofaiematve action, Thete was,
fowers ¢ hth bil as, appandy, to teide somewhere and the