Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Introduction - The Role of Geochemistry
1 Introduction - The Role of Geochemistry
For
Prepared by
ioGlobal
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Guide to the Program
Day 1 am Overview – “The Role of Geochemistry”
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Guide to the Program
Day 3 am Exploratory Data Analysis 2
Allow ½ a session to look at and discuss any data that individuals may have
brought along (encouraged to do so).
Bring any data you like (along with map data) during the week, eg any
field duplicate data & lab dup data from a soil program
In te ra c tio n is k e y . W e w ill e n d e a v o u r to a p p ly a ll th e E D A te c h n iq u e s
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
ioGlobal Overview
Established in 2000
15 to 20 technical staff
Operate globally
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
ioGlobal Overview
ioDigital Consulting
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Dr Dave Lawie
Dave is a graduate from the University of New England. Dave has extensive
international experience in exploration geochemistry. Prior to starting
ioGeochemistry, Dave was Chief Geochemist with Pasminco Exploration, then
joined Anglo American, initially as coordinator of multi-commodity geochemical
research conducted globally, then as Coordinator of Geochemistry based out
of Vancouver. One area that Dave has worked on extensively is the
application of robust multivariate techniques to the interpretation and
integration of geochemical data. Currently, Dave is the General Manager of
ioGeochemistry, a new geochemical consultancy division of ioGlobal. Dave is
responsible for the strategic development and daily operations of
ioGeochemistry. Dave is also a Director of ioGlobal, and has significant input
into the development of the ioDigital data management division.
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Dr Mike Whitbread
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Mr Steve Sugden
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Dr Nigel Brand
Nigel worked for WMC Resources for eleven years until 1999. During his
time at WMC he worked throughout the Norsman-Wiluna Greenstone belt on
various regional Au & Ni exploration programs and at WMC operations at
Norseman, Kambalda, Kalgoorlie, Leinster and Mt Keith. He completed his
PhD in 1997 on discriminating weathered mineralized from barren komatiites
and has published widely on the subject. After leaving WMC, Nigel joined
Anglo American for four and a half years as their geochemist in the Asian-
Pacific region, including India. Philippines and Australia exploring for Zn, Ni
and Cu-Au deposits. In July 2004, Nigel and Dr David Lawie co-founded
ioGeochemistry, a global independent geochemical consulting group based
in Perth, Western Australia.
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Example 12 month’s Activity
Campbell
Musselwhite Timan
Toronto
Shandong
Iran
Mexico
Vancouver
Eskay Creek Surigao
Mount Milligan
North Mara
Reno
Cortez Brisbane
Getchell Indee
Turquoise Ridge Johannesburg
Bald Mountain
Lima Perth
Goiana Kalgoorlie
Murrin Murrin
Santiago
Olympic Dam
Melbourne
Sams Creek
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Global Experience - Geochemistry
Worked in: Australia, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Canada, Chile, China, Cote D’lvoire,
Cuba, Eritrea, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Mongolia, Namibia, New Caledonia, Peru,
Philippines, Russia, South Aftica, UK.
Worked on Data: Ethiopia, Finland, Ghana, Laos, Liberia, Mexico, PNG, Sweden,
Tanzania, Thailand, USA, Vietnam
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
ioGeochemistry – Clients (post-July 2004)
Geoinformatics Exploration Pioneer Nickel Gold Fields
Western Nickel Titan Resources Vital Metals
Anglo American Polaris Metals Barrick
(London, Perth, Philippines, Canada) Red 5 Newcrest
BHPB (Aust & Canada) Gryphon Minerals Queensland Ores
Zinifex SXR Uranium 1 Harmony
Sir Samuel Mines Falconbridge
Mincor Goldstar
Minara Resources Asia Gold
Oceana
Mawson Resources
Analytical Solutions
Teckcominco
St Barbara Mines
Breakaway Resources
CRC-LEME
Falcon Minerals
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
ioGeochemistry – Research Partners
Commercialisation of R&D
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
General Overview of Exploration Geochemistry
The Role of
Geochemistry in
Mineral Exploration
Thoughts on Strategy
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Key Roles
Design & implementation of programs
Conduct & evaluate orientation work
Establish sampling & QAQC protocols
Initiate data compilations & appraisals
Processing and interpretation for targeting
R&D evaluation and implementation
Technical ‘filter’, disaster mitigation (esp. case for blind
deposits)
Training of staff
Provide informed opinion on all things geochemical!
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Program design, procedures and QAQC
Varying requirements whether surface sampling or drilling
Spatial arrangement of sampling
Sample prep protocols (Au nugget effect)
How to analyse it; ‘total’, aqua regia, ?partial leach
What lab?
The range of elements (fixed suites preferred)
QAQC protocol – ‘fit for purpose’
How to store the data for subsequent retrieval
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
“The Role” – Facilitate this process
Theoretical Knowledge
Lithogeochemistry
Regolith Processes
Previous Work
Orientation
Data Integration
Geochemical Decisions
Information +ve and -ve
GIS
Magnetics Etc.
Structure Lithology
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Sampling, QAQC and
analytical best practice
Ensure sampling, sub-sampling, sample
preparation and the quality and appropriateness
of the assay and laboratory procedures meet
your company and stock exchange reporting
requirements.
1 2
O O
1a 1b 2a 2b 1a 1b 2a 2b 1 2
A A A A B B B B O O
A - First split B - Second split O - Current protocol
20
18
16 Coarse
TARGET
% Relative Difference
14 Pulps
12
1kg split
10
1kg split
8 1kg split
1kg split
6 Tot Pulv
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Percent of Samples Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
QAQC and Certified Reference
Materials
Ensure that your quality control program
is cost effective and 'fit for purpose'.
Arrange commercial and mine
laboratory auditing. Round robin
assessment of in-house and
commercial laboratories.
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Splitting
Chute widths/numbers
even?
Chute feeding
suitable?
General
contamination risk
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Examples of poor
quality equipment
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Modelling Standards
to cover dynamic
range of data
from exploration
to mine
Selection of
target grades
for Matrix-
Matched
CRMs
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Precision
Benchmarks
JBM Benchmarks
50
45
Absolute Relative Difference
40
35
30
25
Field Duplicates 20% ARD for 90% of population
20
Course Rejects 15% ARD for 90% of population
15
Pulp Duplicates 10% ARD for 90% of population
10
Lab Duplicates and CRM's 5% ARD for 90% of population
5
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Percentage of Samples
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Method Comparison
(Bottle Roll CN Au 300g-1000g)
Quantile-Quantile Plot
Au(1000g) - Au(300g)
Au Method Comparison 5
5
4
4
Au_ppm_1000g
Au_ppm_1000g
3
3
2
2
1
1
0
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
0 1 2 3 4 5
Au_ppm_300g Au_ppm_300g
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Quantity Formula Formula Formula 1 sd relative error
(CV) equivalent*
(simple) (per pair) (average)
Coefficient of x −x x −x CV
CV = s CV =
2 1 2
CV =
2 N
∑ ( + )
1 2
Variation
(usually times 100 for %)
x 2 (x + x )
1 2
N 2 1
x x1 2
Precision 4 x −x x −x CV2
P = 2s P= 1 2
P=
4 N
∑ ( + ) 1 2
2 (x + x )
(usually times 100 for %)
1
x 1 2 N 2 x x 1 2
Relative****
RV = s
2
(x1− x2) 2
2 N
RV = ∑1
(x1− x2) 2
(CV)2
Variance x
2 RV = 2
(x1+ x2) 2 N (x1+ x2) 2
(x − x ) ( − )
Rel. NOT RELEVANT CV√2
Diff = Diff = 2 x x (note absolute
(x + x )
1 2 1 2
Difference X differences cancel on
*if absolute
1 2
(usually times 100 for %)
summation**)
HARD x −x x −x CV√2/2
1 x −x HARD = HARD =
1 N
∑ 1 2
(x + x )
1 2
HARD =
(x + x )
1 2
* multiply CV by [factor] to obtain quantity ** Useful for studying bias in other applications
Introduction
* Bongarcon
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd- Parameters that are NOT additive – Use RMS
R&D: New Plot type for testing sampling error
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
S2 = relative variance
S2pulp = S2pulp
<2mm <2mm <2mm
Pulp & Analytic al
Provides the raw material for many of the techniques that follow
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Data Compilation
ZOOM 2
ZOOM 1
Levelled Cu Data – Nth America
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Data Compilations –
Ni in lake sediment
Southern Ontario
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Data Compilations - NURE Stream Sediments
500Km wide field of view
Image of
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Geochemical Data Compilations – CSIRO, GSWA + Open File
Cu Ni
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Ni Residuals – 80th, 90th, 96th percentiles
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
RGB Thresholded Images
90th Percentile
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Data Analysis & Interpretation
Required to deal with large volumes of geochemical and supporting
data
Must be competent with a variety of statistical, imaging, and GIS
tools
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
What is an Outlier/Anomaly
Various Definitions
Rare events, deviant objects and exceptions
Outliers are atypical observations that are
“well” separated from the bulk of the data
An outlier is a sample which differs
sufficiently from a great majority of the
other samples
In the exploration context – usually the
result we are looking for (comment model
background better as well)
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
2D - OUTLIERS
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Exploratory Data Analysis
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Advanced Data Processing - Canonical Variate Analysis
0.20
0.25
Pb Pb
Mo Pb
Mo Mo
0.30 Au Pb
Se
Bi
Au
Se
Bi
Au
Se
Mo
Au
Pb
Mo Pb Elements most diagnostic
Group Separation
As Bi Se Au Mo Pb
0.35 As
Cu
Li
Mn
Cu
Li
As
Cu
Li
Bi
Rb
As
Se
Bi
Te
Au
Se
Bi
Mo
Au
Se
Pb
Mo
of groups
0.40 Mn Au
Te
Pb
0.45 Mo
0.50
0.55
Pb
0.60
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Number of Elelements in Each Subset Tested
All Ferruginous
Samples
Cu
K PC Mo
W oA As
Ba gN UZ
i n
Automated Allocation
Non-Gossans Gossans
into Groups
Au
Cu
Cu Mo Bi Ba P
Bi
(Low W Co)
) (L Se
Mo P Ag ow P
Zn W
b Ba Zn M
o P) Co
P bS K Bi
Mn Ba Ag
ow M
(L o
High style
BHT Bimba
Introduction Stratiform Stratabound Epigenetic
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Advanced Data Processing
Sb
0.2 Mn
Zn
Pb
Fe
0.0 P
K
Ba
-0.2 Strataform/bound
Syngenetic
RQ2
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Analysis & Interpretation
Often regolith maps need work to make them most useful for exploration
MOOLEULOOLOO Aeolian
Transported
Outcrop
Simplified Regolith
Landform Map
KALABITY With
Emphasis on Suitability
For Surface Sampling
TRIANGLE HILL BOOLCOOMATA
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Data Analysis & Interpretation
(Allocate samples to catchments they plot within)
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Catchment analysis & Interpretation – Modelling Anomaly
Dilution in Stream Sediments
(Allocate catchments to samples - better)
CmAm = (Cc-C0)Ac
Assume:
Anomaly is 100m by 500m
Am = 0.05 km2
Cm = 10,000ppm Zn
C0 = 43ppm (median)
Substitution gives
Cc = 500/Ac + 43
ie if the catchment is
50km2 the anomaly will be
53ppm, background is
43ppm!!
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Catchment analysis – Modelling Anomaly Dilution
Catchments thematiced by
productivity (P), ie, outlet
concentration weighted by
catchment size and
expected background (only
catchments < 50km2)
P = (Cc-C0)Ac
Ac from GIS
Cc from data
C0 = 43ppm (median)
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Analysis & Interpretation
Cosmos: Ni & Cu Cross section in relation to a regolith model
Weathering
Front
Ni Cu
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Levelling Geochemical Data
Effects to level to;
Geology
Regolith
Analytical method
Sample type (soil rock, ssed, till, moss mats)
Map sheet
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Data Analysis – Strategy - Levelling data for Targeting
Co – Raw Data – Note Level shift – due to analytical method
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Data Analysis – Strategy - Levelling data for Targeting
Co – Levelled – Analytical method effect removed
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Data Analysis – Levelling for Orientation Evaluation
6000
5000
Cu Aqua Regia
Cu Partial Leach
4000
Proportion Recovered (partial leach/aqua regia)
100%
3000
90%
Cu ppm
80% 120
2000
Proportion 70% Cu Aqua regia
60%
100 Cu Partial leach
1000
50%
80
0%
Zn Ni Bi Cu
Ag La Au U Pb Ce Co Cd Cu Zn As Th
20
-20
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Data Analysis – Strategy - Levelling data for Targeting
“ANOVA” Levelling
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Data Analysis – Strategy - Levelling data for Targeting
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Lithogeochemistry
10 km
– Element Mapping Ni
Anomaly 1
Zoom – 3D
Prospero
Introduction
© ioGlobalData
Pty Ltd
from Jubilee Mines NL 2.5 km
Data Analysis - Lithogeochemistry – Classification
Jenson Cation Plot
Molecular formulation
Provides a classification
scheme for subalkaline
volcanic rocks
Particularly useful for
komatiites
Resistant to alkali loss
Source Rollinson (1993)
and Rickwood (1989)
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Data Analysis - Lithogeochemistry - Classification
Winchester and Floyd Plot
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Data Analysis - Lithogeochemistry –
Classification
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Data Analysis - Lithogeochemistry - Fertility
Global Ni-MgO
Anomalous? Background
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Data Analysis - Lithogeochemistry - Fertility
Sudbury
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Fertility
Assessment
-
Model/Process
Driven http://www.ga.gov.au/ausgeonews/ausgeonews200509/gold.jsp
Application of
Sulphur Isotopes to
assessing Fertility of
‘Sulphide’
Discoveries
Simple to apply,
robust IF adequate
orientation carried
out
Poster: IGES 2005 - “Application of sulphur isotopes to discriminate Cu-Zn VHMS mineralization from barren Fe sulphide
mineralization in the greenschist to granulite facies Flin Flon – Snow Lake – Hargrave River region, Manitoba, Canada.” by Paul
Polito1,2, Kurt Kyser1, David Lawie3, Steven Cook4, Chris Oates5
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
δ34S values in Sulfides
710
9
9 Paloma (prospect 10
8
6 km N of MV)
8 HEMATITE Pirula (Mt and
7
5 MAGNETITE ASSOCIATEDCalcite)
7 MEAN: 5‰Berta (Cu-Au Vein
6 ASSOCIATED
MEAN: +0.7‰ δ34SFluid= +25 deposit)
‰
FREQUENCY
6
Frequency
4
δ34SFluid= +1 ‰ (evaporites) Palmira (Hematite
Frequency
5
5 (magmatic) Breccia) Py
Hematite
34 Cpy
Magnetite
Cerro Negro
4 (Hematite Breccia)
3
2 Manto Verde
3
(Hematite Breccia)
2
1
2 Manto Verde
(Magnetite)
1
1
0
00-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
-7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
34 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
δ
-7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 34 4 5
δ 34SS(‰,
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
‰CDT)
δ S, ‰(CDT)
(CDT)
At a regional
Manto
Sulfides with aascale,
Verde: heavy
wide range heavyinisotopic
isotopic isotopic
composition values are are
composition associated
associated
from -6‰ with up with
S tage
to
hematite
+12‰.
III, specular in economically
Processes hematiteof fluid andmixingimportant could deposits
Cu mineralization. cause such (i.e.
Calculated
a wide Manto 34S Verde,
δcompositional
values
Cerro
variation.
indicate Negro)
© ioGlobal the
Pty Ltd incursion
Slide courtesyof evaporite
Kurt Kyser -sourced
Introduction
Queens University, sulfur.
from a PhD Project by Jorge Benevides, sponsored by Anglo American
17.0
Other Ironstones
16.8
(derived from the weathering
of unmineralised rocks.)
16.6
16.4
Pb207/204
16.2
16.0
15.8
15.6
Gossanous Ironstones
15.4 (Derived from the weathering of
base metal sulphide mineralisation)
15.2
14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Pb206/204
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Data Analysis – Lithogeochemistry - Alteration
• completely • partly • entirely
• mostly • relatively • wholly
• partially • kind of • extreme
Why Quantify
• none • sort of • severe metasomatic
• intense • reminiscent of • feeble
• strong • somewhat • patchy effects??
• moderate • persistent • speckled
• weak utterly • mottled
• pervasive • totally • dappled
• incipient • fully • flooded
• absent • absolutely 5 • salt &
peppered spotted • unaltered •
fresh
4
Sericitization Intensity (0 - 5)
A
B
Normal situation!
3 C
D
E
2 F
M
S
0
2 1 1 5 OQ 1 O 2 1 2 3 3 5 5 3 3 2 5 1 1 5 1 OQOO 1 OS S 2 Q 1 O 5 1
Data: Cliff Stanley Lithology
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Lithogeochemistry – Alteration Modelling
Separate chemical variations due to
fractionation from those due to
alteration
Avoid closure
Pearce Element Ratio Plot - Displacement Vectors
14
12
K Bearing Phases with no Al
EXAMPLE GER DIAGRAM
Potassic and Structural Water Controls 10
1.0 K-Feldspar Control Line
K-Feldspar Biotite
8
K/Ti
2
0.4 Goethite (vector)
Muscovite
0
0 4 8 12 16 20 24
0.2
Al/Ti
Chlorite (4,0)
Albite, Anorthite Kaolinte
0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
OH/Al
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
EXAMPLE GER DIAGRAM
Potassic and Structural Water Controls
1.0
K-Feldspar Biotite
0.8
0.6
K/Al
Muscovite
0.2
Chlorite (4,0)
Albite, Anorthite Kaolinte
0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
OH/Al
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Trace element pathfinders can be overlain on lithogeochemical diagrams to
further refine ranking of samples, or to assess mineral hosts (next slide)
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Trace element pathfinders can be overlain on lithogeochemical diagrams to
further refine ranking of samples, or to assess mineral hosts (next slide)
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Lithogeochemistry –
Quantification of Alteration
2.5
Clinochlore
[0,5/2]
2.0
(Fe+Mg)/Al (molar)
1.5
1.0 Muscovite
[1/3,0]
0.5 Alkali
Feldspar
[1,0]
0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
(Na+K)/Al (molar)
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Spatial Context - Alteration
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Application of Geochemistry – Thoughts on Strategy
Geochemisty’s role in the search for the ‘undercover method”…
Groundwater
Biogeochemistry
Soil Gas
Varieties of partial leach geochemistry
Geochemistry at the end of a drill rig
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Financials of Undercover Exploration
Question
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Assumptions
Target: 400m long, ratio of long to short axis of 0.2 i.e. flattened
ellipse
Search area: 10 by 5 km, i.e. 50,000,000 squ. m, contiguous or not
Grid: triangular
Angle of target to grid – assume not known
Assay cost: $20/sample
Sampling cost: $10/sample @ surface
Drilling costs RC: $65/m, DDH $130/m
Depths tested: surface, 100m, 200m, 300m
Probability of hitting target: 90%
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Assumptions
100% probability of
correct identification
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Key Results
Per Sample
Depth (m)
Cost
One sample per location, including drilling
Surface 20 costs for samples at depth
100 6,500
200 13,000
300 19,500
Sample
Long Size of Number of
Spacing
Axis (m) Target Samples …required to have at least one
(m)
sample in the target zone with a
400 25000m2 136 3030 90% probability
1260 250000m2 430 305
2500 980000m2 850 78
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Costs
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
The number of samples required and sampling costs combine to produce the total
costs shown here..
$5,000
Cost ('000$)
1 Million Dollars
$500
$50
$5
0 100 200 300
Is a good thing!
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Geochemistry at the End of a Drill Rig
Enlarging the size of the target by quantitatively measuring alteration and/or
searching for palaeo-dispersion at the cover - host-rock uc, ie interface sampling
With sensible use of the above, drill spacing can be enlarged to the extent that
many undercover areas can be prospected with a sufficient degree of reliability
cover
+ve Traces +ve Traces +ve
indications
ORE Bulk alt +ve Bulk alt -ve
in scout
drilling
gw? uc
ORE
n
Alteratio
Veins, Fractures etc.
Alteration Vector
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Sampling…not just soils, stream seds, rock chips
etc…
Well
For example:
Open feed channel
Well water (in India)
Pump
(ox) Manual Pump
Pump handle
Outlet
Bucket
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Suggested Ref: Carey, M., et al, 2003.Groundwater flow in playa lake environments: impact on gold and
pathfinder element distributions in groundwaters surrounding mesothermal gold deposits, St. Ives area,
Eastern Goldfields, Western Australia. GEEA, Volume 3, Number 1, 2003, pp. 57-71(15)
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Groundwater Geochemistry Challenges
Sampling protocol
Filter or not, acidify in field or lab, hardware, contamination
Analysis
Good quality data essential (but hard to get)
Interpretation
Take into account controlling parameters (pH, Eh, aquifer, host
materials)
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Biogeochemistry
Sophisticated abilities to select elements that they
need
Tolerate other metals
Store those they don’t need (often in extremities such
as bark and twig ends and tree tops)
Can be used for:
•Delineating stratigraphy
•Delineating structure/faulting
•Outlining concealed mineralization
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Biogeochemistry: Gold within bark
60500
1.4 17.5 9.8 65.4 3.9 13.9 Mo (ppm)
130
60000 120
7.8 11.1 4.3 10.9 0.3 0.2 110
9.6 50.0
14.3 100
90
59500
7.8 39.0 137.6 1.5
1.4 0.4 0.8 80
70
60
59000 0.5 50
2.1 44.8 36.9 2.7 3.1 0.7 40
30
58500 20
10
0
58000
1.2 0.3 0.1 0.1
metres 0.3
Courtesy Colin Dunn 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Biogeochemistry: Treetop sampling
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Biogeochemistry: Treetop sampling
431
274
ROTTENSTONE 193
DEPOSIT
132
5 kms
0
Courtesy Colin Dunn 0 5000 10000
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Biogeochemistry: Sap sampling
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Biogeochemistry
There are situations where it is advantageous
But, limited by: seasonal factors, availability of same species over the
survey area, lack of data etc
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Termite Mounds
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Termite Mounds
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Soil Gas (SDP)
Species identified
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Re-visiting Old Data
Opportunity for re-interpretation – Commonly after identification of 2nd and
3rd order anomalies e.g. the surface expression of a larger but more subtle
footprint
− Levelling
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Various ‘Reliable’ Methods Available to
Exploration
Methods commonly used to reduce the search area:
‘Fertility’ and endowment filters
Isotopic screening
Use of historic data
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Impediments
• The method must be ‘known’ to be used (ignorance is not bliss!)
• Data of insufficient quality (analyses of trace elements to their
crustal abundance – you can’t define an anomaly unless you
measure background)
• Not enough samples collected to properly test the concept e.g.
not enough background or lack of 3D constraints in drilled
prospects
• Inappropriate sample collection protocols (of concern in many
historical compilations)
• Constantly changing analytical suites
• Lack of good orientation work
• Lack of systematic approach
• Lack of a track record – circular argument
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd
Geochemistry is best applied in combination with other methods!
Introduction
© ioGlobal Pty Ltd