Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Economics 011115
Economics 011115
A
Price Discrimination: With limited competition, dominant ISPs could engage in price
discrimination.
Higher Prices: Monopolistic firms have the power to set higher prices compared to competitive
markets.
Reduced Consumer Choice: Concentration in the ISP market could limit consumer choice. With
only a few dominant players, consumers might have limited options for service plans, speeds,
and features.
Innovation Incentives: Monopolistic firms may have less incentive to innovate and improve their
services. In a competitive market, firms strive to offer better products and services to attract
customers.
Barriers to Entry: High concentration can result in significant barriers to entry for new
competitors. If existing ISPs have already established strong market positions and infrastructure,
it becomes difficult for new entrants to compete.
B)
Market A: Prescription Drugs (Higher Consumer Harm)
In Market A, if there is high concentration among pharmaceutical companies, it could lead to
higher consumer harm due to monopoly power. Here's why:
Limited Competition: High concentration means that there are only a few dominant
pharmaceutical companies producing certain essential prescription drugs.
Price Manipulation: With monopoly power, dominant pharmaceutical companies could set
higher prices for essential medications, as consumers have limited alternatives.
Inelastic Demand: Many prescription drugs have inelastic demand, meaning consumers are less
responsive to price changes because they rely on these drugs for their health.
Market B: Smartphones (Lower Consumer Harm)
In Market B, even if there are only a few dominant smartphone manufacturers, the consumer
harm might be lower compared to Market A. Here's why:
Technological Innovation: Smartphone markets are characterized by rapid technological
advancements and innovation. Even with a few dominant players, the competitive pressure to
introduce new features and better products remains high.
Substitute Products: In the smartphone market, consumers have the option to switch to different
brands or operating systems, offering a level of substitutability.
Price Competition: The smartphone market tends to be more price-sensitive due to the presence
of alternative brands and models. Dominant firms cannot set excessively high prices without the
risk of losing customers to competitors
Q2
A
Example: Ride-Sharing App
Imagine a ride-sharing company called "Go-Trip " that implements price discrimination based on
location, time, and user behavior.
Implementation of Price Discrimination:
Go-Trip uses a dynamic pricing model where they adjust ride prices based on various factors.
1. Market Segmentation:
Go-Trip divides its customers into different segments based on their location, travel patterns, and
usage behavior. For instance, they identify users who frequently request rides during peak hours,
users who book rides in high-demand areas, and users who travel longer distances.
2. Price Variation:
For users in high-demand areas or during peak hours, Go-Trip charges higher prices. For
example, during rush hour in a busy city center, the price per ride might be higher due to
increased demand. Similarly, rides requested in remote areas with limited availability might also
have slightly elevated prices to balance supply and demand.
B)
Seller Profitability:
Price discrimination, as implemented by Go-Trip, can positively impact seller profitability.
In terms of class concepts, this aligns with the concept of price discrimination based on elasticity
of demand.
Consumer Surplus and Consumer Welfare:
Price discrimination can impact consumer surplus differently for various segments of
consumers.
For consumers who are less price-sensitive and value convenience or immediate availability,
their consumer surplus might decrease due to higher prices during peak times. However, for
consumers who are more price-sensitive, they might choose to travel during off-peak hours or to
areas with lower demand, resulting in a potentially higher consumer surplus.
In terms of consumer welfare, the impact is mixed. While some consumers might experience a
reduction in consumer surplus, others might benefit from more accessible and affordable options
during off-peak times, enhancing their welfare.
Consumer Benefit as a Whole:
Overall, price discrimination can have both positive and negative effects on consumer welfare,
depending on individual preferences and price sensitivities.
In this context, the class concept of segmented pricing or tiered pricing is relevant.
Q#3