Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Defining Moments
Defining Moments
5
<>
Defining Moments
54
Defining Moments 55
REVEALING
Not all defining moments take precisely the same form as Ste-
vens's. A choice may reveal little to others but a great deal to the
person who makes it. These moments of clarity are prívate and
personal. In other cases, a choice can reveal more to others, if they
are thoughtful and observant, than to the person who makes it.
Still other choices, like Stevens's, reveal a good deal to others. His
decision, like the rest of his life, was exceedingly deliberate, and he
gave Miss Kenton the reason for his decision. And, in alllikelihood,
staff of the house quickly learned what Stevens had done. His values
were there for the world to see .
Defining moments need not take place in a moment or a brief
episode . Stevens did have to react immediately, once he learned his
father had died. The young investment banker, Steve Lewis, had
only an hour or so to decide what to do about the St. Louis meeting.
In contrast, however, Peter Adario had several days to decide how
to resolve the conflict between Kathryn McNeil and Lisa Walters,
and Edouard Sakiz had much longer to decide how to proceed with
RU 486.
Although Stevens's decision isn't the template for all defining
moments, it does underscore several important aspects of these deci-
sions and what they reveal. There is, for examQle, no guarantee that
a defining moment will unveil a value or commitment that is morally
inspiring or elevating. Hitler, no doubt, had defining moments, as
do everyday scoundrels and humbugs . Many people react to Stevens's
defining moment by shaking their heads in sorrow.
Moreover, what is revealed in a defining moment is rarely a
startling new facet of an individual's personality. Long befare his
choice on the final evening of the conference, Stevens had revealed
his abiding values and commitments-through innumerable acts of
scrupulous, self-effacing attention to the minute details of household
management. These brief moments of self-disclosure confirmed the
observation of Michel de Montaigne, the great French essayist of
the sixteenth century, that a single gesture, if one observed it closely
enough, could reveal a person's entire character. Defining moments
reveal by crystallizing. They are sharper, more vivid, more intensified
versions of what a person has been revealing, usually in small ways,
almost every day.
Defining Moments 59
TESTING
Stevens's decisions on the evening of his father's death were also a test
of his values. This is the second crucial aspect of defining moments. lt
is also the most familiar. All moral choices, even the most obvious
cases of right versus wrong, test a person's values. They indicate
whether someone is really committed to particular values or only
gives them lip service.
60 DEFINING MOMENTS
SHAPING
For Stevens, the final evening of the conference was more than a
test. What mattered to him above all was that he had become (or
so he fervently hoped) a particular kind of person. He cared deeply
that his actions-and, much more importantly for him, his charac-
ter-truly embodied the highest ideals of self-sacrifice and profes-
Defining Moments 61
But what is the sen se in forever speculating what mig ht have happened
had such and such a moment turned out differently? One could presumably
drive oneself to distraction in this way. In any case, while it is all very
Defining Moments 63
well to talk of "turning points," one can surely only recognize such moments
in retrospect. Naturally, when one looks back to such instances today,
they may indeed take on the appearance of being crucial, precious moments
in one's lije; but of course, at the time, this was not the impression one
had. . . . There was surely nothing to indicate at the time that such
evidently small incidents would render whole dreams forever irredeemable.9
What Stevens lost was his dream of a life with Miss Kenton. The
end of the novel describes his brief visit with her and the end of
his hope that she will return to Darlington Hall. She chooses to
return to her estranged husband, and Stevens is left alone, contem-
plating the remains of his days.
~<v
.~s\DAD ----- <r
_....... y
3 -z
11 11 11 11
The phrases defining moments and revealing, testing, and shaping
are brief and seem simple. Y et they are valuable guides for reflecting
on personal decisions. In particular, they help people understand
what is at stake when they must choose between right and right.
These decisions compel people to reveal at least sorne of their basic
values . They test how strongly individuals are committed to the
values they espouse . And these decisions cast a shadow forward,
shaping the rest of a person's life.
But managers cannot think in purely personal terms about the
ethical dilemmas they face. In most cases, it would be naive, self-
indulgent, and reckless for them to do so. For managers, defining
moments are social as well as personal. Fortunately, the phrases
/ldefining moments" and /lrevealing, testing, and shaping" are also
powerful tools for understanding what right-versus-right decisions
mean for an organization and what they mean for the managers who
mtist make these decisions.
More importantly, the phrases call attention to one of the most
challenging and creative elements of the work of business leaders :
adapting, interpreting, and customizing basic human values in a way
64 DEFINING MOMENTS
that guides and shapes an entire company. This is the task of shaping
or creating a way of life, not for a person, but for an entire organiza-
tion .
Defining moments for organizations, like those for individuals,
can be subtle, quiet, and-examined one by one-seemingly incon-
sequential. Y et, whether managers intend it or not, their decisions
and actions send continuous cumulative messages to their organiza-
tions about how things really work and about how to get ahead.
Kremlinology-the intensive interpretation of all events, however
minor, in the Soviet government-may be waning at the U .S. State
Department now that the cold war is over, but it lives on in most
11
companies. As one manager told me, What many executives miss
is that there is a very tight, silent, observational relationship between
bosses and subordinates-because subordina tes want to be promoted
and get higher pay and status ."
'·
The Kremlinology intensifies when managers face right-versus-
right issues. These differ from decisions about job assignments or
budgeting, which everyone tries to decipher to get a sense of how
the game is played and who is winning and losing. Right-versus-
right issues differ in an important way: they offer everyone a glimpse
at the ethical priorities of the people running a company, sorne
clearer sense of what kind of people they really are.
These glimpses aren't merely a spectator sport; they influence
how much trust people feel they can place in their bosses . Are they
working for people who really care or who just pretend to care?
Can we trust them when they say they back ·our project, like our
work, or tell us that the layoffs are finally over?
At the organizational level, defining moments compel managers
to reveal, test, and choose the ethics of their organization . Defining
moments shape an organization because they cut through all of the
finely crafted pronouncements about what the company aspires to
do and reveal instead what it actually does . These episodes set
precedents and create expectations that shape a company for years
or even longer. They define the purpose of the organization and at
the same time how the organization will pursue its purpose . Defining
moments can matter as much to the life of an organization as they
do to the life and career of a manager.
Defining Moments 65