Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2.) Macalintal vs. Presidential Electoral T
2.) Macalintal vs. Presidential Electoral T
··o0o··
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 1 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:16 PM
_______________
* EN BANC.
784
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 2 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:16 PM
785
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 3 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:16 PM
786
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 4 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:16 PM
787
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 5 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:16 PM
788
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 6 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:16 PM
note. Although this Court has no control over contrary people and
naysayers, we reiterate a word of caution against the filing of
baseless petitions which only clog the CourtÊs docket. The petition in
the instant case belongs to that classification.
NACHURA, J.:
Confronting us is an undesignated petition1 filed by
Atty. Romulo B. Macalintal (Atty. Macalintal), that
questions the constitution of the Presidential Electoral
Tribunal (PET) as an illegal and unauthorized progeny of
Section 4,2 Article VII of the Constitution:
_______________
789
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 7 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:16 PM
_______________
790
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 8 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:16 PM
I
WHETHER x x x PETITIONER HAS LOCUS STANDI TO FILE
THE INSTANT PETITION.
II
WHETHER x x x THE CREATION OF THE PRESIDENTIAL
ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL FOR BEING
A VIOLATION OF PARAGRAPH 7, SECTION 4 OF ARTICLE VII
OF THE 1987 CONSTITUTION.
III
WHETHER x x x THE DESIGNATION OF MEMBERS OF THE
SUPREME COURT AS MEMBERS OF THE PRESIDENTIAL
ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL FOR BEING
A VIOLATION OF SECTION 12, ARTICLE VIII OF THE 1987
CONSTITUTION.6
_______________
791
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 9 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:16 PM
_______________
792
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 10 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:16 PM
_______________
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 11 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:16 PM
793
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 12 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:16 PM
794
_______________
13 Poe v. Macapagal-Arroyo, P.E.T. Case No. 002, March 29, 2005, 454
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 13 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:16 PM
SCRA 142.
14 Cruz, Philippine Political Law, 1998 ed., p. 263.
15 G.R. Nos. 161434, 161634, and 161824, March 3, 2004, 424 SCRA
277, 324-325. (Emphasis supplied.)
795
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 14 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:16 PM
796
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 15 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:16 PM
_______________
16 Id., at p. 363.
17 Id., at pp. 431-432.
18 Atty. Macalintal v. Commission on Elections, 453 Phil. 586; 405
SCRA 614 (2003).
797
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 16 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:16 PM
_______________
798
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 17 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:16 PM
_______________
799
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 18 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:16 PM
_______________
800
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 19 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
Sec. 1], and „[t]he judicial power shall be vested in one Supreme
Court and in such lower courts as may be established by law‰ [Art.
VIII, Sec. 1]. These provisions not only establish a separation of
powers by actual division but also confer plenary legislative,
executive and judicial powers subject only to limitations provided in
the Constitution. For as the Supreme Court in Ocampo v.
Cabangis pointed out „a grant of the legislative power
means a grant of all legislative power; and a grant of the
judicial power means a grant of all the judicial power which
may be exercised under the government.‰
The Court could not have been more explicit then on the
plenary grant and exercise of judicial power. Plainly, the
abstraction of the Supreme Court acting as a Presidential
Electoral Tribunal from the unequivocal grant of
jurisdiction in the last paragraph of Section 4, Article VII of
the Constitution is sound and tenable.
The mirabile dictu of the grant of jurisdiction to this
Court, albeit found in the Article on the executive branch of
government, and the constitution of the PET, is evident in
the discussions of the Constitutional Commission. On the
exercise of this CourtÊs judicial power as sole judge of
presidential and vice-presidential election contests, and to
promulgate its rules
_______________
25 G.R. No. 88211, September 15, 1989, 177 SCRA 668, 688-689.
(Emphasis supplied, citations omitted.)
801
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 20 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
_______________
802
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 21 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
_______________
803
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 22 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
804
Before the passage of that republic act, in case there was any
contest between two presidential candidates or two vice-
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 23 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
_______________
805
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 24 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
_______________
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 25 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
806
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 26 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
807
„FR. BERNAS.x x x.
x x x. So it became necessary to create a Presidential Electoral
Tribunal. What we have done is to constitutionalize what was
statutory but it is not an infringement on the separation of powers
because the power being given to the Supreme Court is a judicial
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 27 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
power.‰34
_______________
808
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 28 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
809
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 29 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
810
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 30 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
year.
MR. SUAREZ. In one year. Thank you for the clarification.35
_______________
811
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 31 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
_______________
812
MR. MAAMBONG. x x x.
My questions will be very basic so we can go as fast as we can. In
the case of the electoral tribunal, either of the House or of the
Senate, is it correct to say that these tribunals are constitutional
creations? I will distinguish these with the case of the Tanodbayan
and the Sandiganbayan which are created by mandate of the
Constitution but they are not constitutional creations. Is that a
good distinction?
xxxx
MR. MAAMBONG. Could we, therefore, say that either the
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 32 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
_______________
nal, 250 Phil. 390; 168 SCRA 391 (1988); Robles v. House of Representatives
Electoral Tribunal, G.R. No. 86647, February 5, 1990, 181 SCRA 780.
813
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 33 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
the case may be, and that, as such, he is entitled to assume the
duties attached to said office. And by providing, further, that the
Presidential Electoral Tribunal „shall be composed of the Chief
Justice and the other ten Members of the Supreme Court,‰ said
legislation has conferred upon such Court an additional original
jurisdiction of an exclusive character.
Republic Act No. 1793 has not created a new or separate court. It
has merely conferred upon the Supreme Court the functions of a
Presidential Electoral Tribunal. The result of the enactment may be
likened to the fact that courts of first instance perform the functions
of such ordinary courts of first instance, those of court of land
registration, those of probate courts, and those of courts of juvenile
and domestic relations. It is, also, comparable to the situation
obtaining when the municipal court of a provincial capital exercises
its author-
_______________
814
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 34 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
the same court when hearing the aforementioned cases which are
primary within the jurisdiction of courts of first instance. In other
words, there is only one court, although it may perform the
functions pertaining to several types of courts, each having some
characteristics different from those of the others.
Indeed, the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals and courts of
first instance, are vested with original jurisdiction, as well as with
appellate jurisdiction, in consequence of which they are both trial
courts and, appellate courts, without detracting from the fact that
there is only one Supreme Court, one Court of Appeals, and one
court of first instance, clothed with authority to discharge said dual
functions. A court of first instance, when performing the functions
of a probate court or a court of land registration, or a court of
juvenile and domestic relations, although with powers less broad
than those of a court of first instance, hearing ordinary actions, is
not inferior to the latter, for one cannot be inferior to itself. So too,
the Presidential Electoral Tribunal is not inferior to the Supreme
Court, since it is the same Court although the functions peculiar to
said Tribunal are more limited in scope than those of the Supreme
Court in the exercise of its ordinary functions. Hence, the
enactment of Republic Act No. 1793, does not entail an assumption
by Congress of the power of appointment vested by the Constitution
in the President. It merely connotes the imposition of additional
duties upon the Members of the Supreme Court.‰
815
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 35 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
_______________
43 Supra note 4.
44 Javellana v. Executive Secretary, et al., 151-A Phil. 36, 131; 50
SCRA 30 (1973).
816
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 36 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
_______________
817
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 37 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
_______________
818
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 38 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
Petition dismissed.
_______________
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 39 of 40
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 635 9/27/22, 9:17 PM
819
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/000001837f05b2d97e153ab0000d00d40059004a/p/AUB715/?username=Guest Page 40 of 40