Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wang2022-Determinants of Tourists Intention To Share Travel Experience On Social Media An FsQCA Application
Wang2022-Determinants of Tourists Intention To Share Travel Experience On Social Media An FsQCA Application
To cite this article: Guoquan Wang, Hanqin Qiu & Lianping Ren (2022): Determinants of tourists’
intention to share travel experience on social media: an fsQCA application, Current Issues in
Tourism, DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2022.2091428
Article views: 58
a
College of Tourism and Service Management, Nankai University, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China; bInternational
School of Cultural Tourism, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China; cMacao
Institute for Tourism Studies, Macao, People’s Republic of China
1. Introduction
In recent years, people are increasingly sharing their travel experiences on social media platforms
during and after trips (Lee et al., 2014; Wang, Kirillova, et al., 2017), and these contents exert an
influence on the information search and decision-making behaviours of potential travelers (Kang
& Schuett, 2013). According to statistics from a study conducted by Stackla (2019), 52% of consumers
said that they made plans to visit a specific destination based on an image or video that they saw on
the social media of friends, family, or peers. Social media differs from traditional media in that it facili-
tates communication and strengthens social interaction through shared content (Munar & Jacobsen,
2014). It has transformed the way that travelers search, access, and utilize tourism information
(Kumar et al., 2021; Oliveira et al., 2020), which has, in turn, influenced the marketing practices of
the tourism destinations and companies (Chen & Lin, 2020). Therefore, it is important to investigate
what motivates tourists to share their travel experiences.
Previous studies have attempted to identify the determinant factors, such as perceived enjoy-
ment, documentation, and personality traits (e.g. Li, 2020; Wang, Kirillova, et al., 2017), but most
of the conclusions that they reached were obtained through linear computation, which often
failed to capture a complete picture of the phenomenon. Besides, most of the extant work has inves-
tigated travel-experience sharing behaviour and its determinants on social media platforms from
stand-alone perspectives (e.g. motivations and personality traits). How various factors exert
an integrated effect on tourists’ sharing behaviour on social media remains scarcely investigated.
Tie strength is an important antecedent of tourists’ sharing behaviour on social media platforms
(Feng et al., 2021), and according to the strength level, social media can be divided into strong-tie
and weak-tie types (Chen & Lin, 2020). Strong-tie platform features bilateral interaction and
emotional connection, and its users’ relationships are intimate and enduring, such as Facebook
and WeChat (Chen & Lin, 2020; Okazaki et al., 2017). By comparison, weak-tie platform features infor-
mation dissemination with lower-frequency of interactions and higher group heterogeneity, such as
Twitter and Instagram (Narangajavana et al., 2019; Okazaki et al., 2017). Besides, the users’ sharing
motivations on the two types of platforms are also different. Individual-related motivations are
more significant on strong-tie social media, like social interaction and recognition gaining (Munar
& Jacobsen, 2014; Okazaki et al., 2017); Social-relevant motivations are more salient on weak-tie
social media, like preventing others from using undesirable products or helping others (Chen &
Lin, 2020; Okazaki et al., 2017). On the other hand, strong-tie social media is a crucial source of elec-
tronic word-of-mouth and powerful marketing tool for information shared here is perceived to be
more credible and could pose stronger influence on potential consumers (Narangajavana et al.,
2019). However, existing literature has failed to pinpoint tourists’ sharing behaviour on strong-tie
social media.
To fill these research gaps, the present study applies the complexity theory and adopts both linear
(i.e. structural equation modeling) and nonlinear (i.e. contrarian case analysis and fuzzy-set qualitat-
ive comparative analysis) techniques to explore how intrinsic motivations (i.e. perceived enjoyment,
altruism, and documentation), extrinsic motivations (i.e. recognition & status and social interaction),
and personality traits (i.e. extraversion and acquisitive face orientation) form causal configurations
that explain Chinese tourists’ intention to share their travel experiences on WeChat (hereafter
referred to as ‘sharing intention’). The findings broaden our understanding of the driving mechanism
of tourists’ travel-experience sharing intention on strong-tie social media platforms, and the dual
analysis approach provides supplementary and triangulated results in an innovative way. Practically,
this study also offers implications that could help destination marketers adopt effective marketing
strategies.
2. Literature review
2.1. UGC on social media
User-generated content (UGC) is a type of media content created or produced by the general public
instead of paid professionals and is primarily disseminated on the Internet (Daugherty et al., 2008).
With the advent and growth of Web 2.0, social media is gaining popularity among tourists who want
to share their travel experiences online during and after the trip and receive travel recommendations
from other users who experienced a destination first-hand (Lee et al., 2014; Wang, Kirillova, et al.,
2017). Compared with traditional organizational marketing communications, UGC is regarded to
be more accessible and reliable, for it is created by a network member and thus seems less
biased, more credible, and trustworthy (Kang & Schuett, 2013; Yoo & Gretzel, 2011), which makes
it an important reference for travel planning and travel decision-making. Previous studies suggested
that UGC on social media could positively influence consumers’ purchase intention, electronic word
of mouth (e-WOM), and brand’s attitudes (e.g. Narangajavana et al., 2019). Hence, UGC is also valued
by destination marketers for its ability to stimulate stronger destination awareness.
Not all social media platforms serve the same purpose, however. Okazaki et al. (2017) categorized
social media into public platforms (such as TripAdvisor) and personal platforms (such as Facebook)
according to intimacy and immediacy, and deemed interaction ties, homophily, and shared vision
different on the two types of social media. Narangajavana et al. (2019) considered that tourists
receive information through three sources of UGC in social media: strong-tie sources, weak-tie
sources, and tourism-tie sources. They also found that different social media sources exert
different effects on tourist satisfaction with the destination. Similarly, Chen and Lin (2020) classified
CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM 3
social media into strong-tie and weak-tie platforms and considered strong-tie platforms built on a
real-name system, bilateral interaction, and emotional connection. In addition, scholars also
noticed the moderating role of tie strength in tourists’ sharing behaviours on social media (e.g.
Feng et al., 2021).
live in a strong mianzi (face-saving) culture. Oliveira et al. (2020) suggested that both personal fulfil-
ment and self-actualization exert a significantly positive effect on tourists’ travel-experience sharing
intention. In China, the popularity of social media has made travel-experience sharing a common
practice. Under this condition, sharing travel-experiences can help individuals develop and maintain
interpersonal relationships and cope with social disconnection (Chen & Lin, 2020). For instance, Wu
and Pearce (2016) revealed that both ‘social status issues’ and ‘personal status and achievement’ can
drive Chinese tourists to share on social media. Based on this body of research, and the social attri-
bute of strong-tie media, two extrinsic motivational factors were included in the present study: rec-
ognition & status and social interaction.
2.3. Complexity theory and the application of the fsQCA approach in tourism
The theory of complexity stems from the former theory of chaos and focuses on complex systems. It
posits that systems with complex characteristics can be predicted by interactions of multiple com-
ponents (Anderson, 1999). As noted by Hoffmann and Riley (2002, p. 313), ‘Complexity theory is not a
new, or the only way, to do science, rather it is a set of concepts for modeling the world in a non-linear
fashion’. This theory emphasizes that employing traditional linear analysis might not provide true
and generalized results about consumer behaviour, which arises from complex decision-making pro-
cesses complicated by the heterogeneity and asymmetric associations of variables and behaviour
CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM 5
(Chuah et al., 2021; Olya et al., 2018). Because complexity theory can effectively deal with compli-
cated social phenomena, it has been widely utilized to explicate the heterogeneous, nonlinear,
and dynamic process of consumer behaviour in the tourism field (e.g. Shi et al., 2021).
In the present study context, it is expected that Chinese tourists’ sharing intention on WeChat
stems from complex interactions between various intrinsic motivations, extrinsic motivations, and
personality traits. Traditional regression analysis can only provide a limited understanding of this
‘black box’. Thus, it is appropriate to adopt complexity theory as the theoretical framework for
this research. Complexity theory builds on the principle of equifinality, suggesting that multiple
complex configurations of the same conditions can explain the same outcome (Woodside, 2014).
Besides, it is also grounded in the causal asymmetry principle, assuming complex causality and asym-
metrical relations (Chuah et al., 2021). Normally, in research that is related to complexity theory, the
term ‘tenet’ is used to refer to testable precepts due to the assumed nonlinear dynamics between
variables within a complex system (Pappas, 2019). This study thus puts forth the following tenets
based on the above discussion. Below, a Venn diagram shows the proposed model of this study, pre-
senting three sets of constructs and their intersections (Figure 1).
T1: An antecedent condition may be necessary but cannot sufficiently predict high sharing intention
T2: Single causal condition may be present or absent within configurations for high sharing intention, depend-
ing on their combination with other causal conditions.
T3: Alternative configurations of intrinsic motivations, extrinsic motivations, and personality traits could equally
lead to high sharing intention.
3. Methodology
3.1. Study context
This study concentrated on tourists’ travel-experience sharing behaviour on strong-tie social media –
WeChat. WeChat is an application for smart terminals that was launched by a Chinese-based
company called Tencent on January 21, 2011. After ten years of development, WeChat has
become one of the most popular social network sites (SNS) in China and is widely used across the
globe. According to a Tencent financial report, the number of monthly active accounts on
WeChat grew to 1.2682 billion at the end of 2021 (Tencent, 2021). Unlike Twitter and Instagram,
which are open to all Internet users, WeChat only connects acquaintances, and the connection is
subject to mutual agreement. Besides, it offers multiple features, including instant messaging,
moments, e-commerce, public accounts, and group chats. Among them, WeChat Moments provides
users with a platform for information sharing, including travel experiences (Li, 2020). WeChat is a
typical strong-tie social media platform for its prominent socialization property. Users can interact
with their friends through likes and comments when scanning the information shared in WeChat
Moments. Nowadays, WeChat is becoming an integral part of daily life for Chinese, and research
suggested that WeChat is one of the main Chinese social media platforms used for travel experience
sharing (Huang & Wei, 2019). The figure below demonstrates how Chinese tourists share their travel
experience in WeChat Moments (Figure 2).
3.2. Methods
This study adopted both symmetric (Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling, PLS-SEM)
and asymmetric (fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis, fsQCA) approaches for exploration.
Different from covariance-based SEM (CB-SEM), PLS-SEM is a variance-based approach, offering
greater flexibility in data assumptions. PLS-SEM has the following advantages: (i) it does not
require data to satisfy the assumption of normal distribution; (ii) it could work efficiently with
small sample sizes and complex models; (iii) it is more appropriate for exploratory research and
weak theory situation (Hair et al., 2014; Usakli & Kucukergin, 2018). In recent years, PLS-SEM has
been widely applied in tourism research (Usakli & Kucukergin, 2018). In this study, PLS-SEM was uti-
lized to test the reliability and validity of the constructs, and the causal relationships between deter-
minant factors and sharing intention.
QCA is a set-theoretic method proposed by Ragin (2000) that could identify the necessary and
sufficient conditions for an outcome. Rather than assuming the discrete effects of single variables,
fsQCA foresees the causal role of a single condition unfolding in combination with other conditions
(Olya & Gavilyan, 2017). Unlike traditional regression analyses that investigate the impact of the inde-
pendent variable on the dependent variable, fsQCA often examines the combination of factors that
leads to the outcome of interest (Rihoux & Ragin, 2009). In fsQCA, a specific combination of causal
variables that predicts a desired outcome is called the ‘configuration’ (Rihoux & Ragin, 2009). In this
study, fsQCA was employed to explore the configurational effect of seven determinant factors on
Chinese tourists’ sharing intention on WeChat.
This study follows a five-step procedure to perform analysis. Firstly, a questionnaire was designed
to measure relevant variables (seven determinant factors and sharing intention) and demographic
information (gender, age, education level, and monthly income). To ensure that the respondents
all came from China, a screening note was posted at the beginning of the questionnaire: ‘This ques-
tionnaire is designed to examine Chinese tourists’ intention of sharing travel experience on WeChat
and its determinants’. Secondly, convenient sampling and snowball sampling methods were
adopted to collect questionnaires. Thirdly, the data collected were initially analysed via Smart-PLS
3.0 software to test the reliability and validity of constructs, followed by a preliminary investigation
of the causal relationships between determinant factors and sharing intention. Fourthly, cross-tabu-
lation analysis was conducted to reveal the existence of contrarian cases utilizing SPSS 25.0 software.
Finally, fsQCA was performed to explore the configurations that predicted high sharing intention.
3.3. Measurement
A four-part questionnaire was developed. The first part dealt with the motivations of sharing travel-
experience on WeChat. To assess perceived enjoyment, three items were adapted from the work of
Kang and Schuett (2013). For altruism, four items were borrowed from a study by Munar and Jacob-
sen (2014). For documentation, three items were adopted from the research of Stoeckl et al. (2007).
For recognition & status, six items were extracted from the research of Munar and Jacobsen (2014).
For social interaction, five items were adopted from the work of Hsu et al. (2007). The second part of
the questionnaire dealt with personality traits. For extraversion, four items were developed from a
study by Yoo and Gretzel (2011), and for acquisitive face orientation, six items were used based
on the work of Wang et al. (2016). The third part dealt with Chinese tourists’ travel-experience
sharing behavioural intention on WeChat. Three items from the work of Lee and Ma (2012) were
adopted for this section. The fourth part dealt with demographic information, including gender,
age, education level, and monthly income. To ensure the external validity of the questionnaire,
the following screening question was designed to exclude the unqualified respondents: ‘Have you
ever shared your travel experience and other related information on WeChat Moments?’ This
research applied a back-to-back translation, whereby the instrument was initially designed in
English, translated into Chinese, and then translated back into English. In this study, two native
Chinese Ph.D. students majoring in tourism management carried out back-to-back translation
work independently. The final instrument was administered in Chinese. A note was posted at the
beginning of the questionnaire: ‘Please fill out this questionnaire if you have been frequently
sharing your travel experience on WeChat Moments’.
The questionnaires were distributed via two approaches through convenience sampling and
snowball sampling. To improve the representativeness and richness of sample resource, two most
widely used online survey platforms were selected. The first batch was distributed through
Credamo (https://www.credamo.com). From 6th to 8th December 2021, a total of 270 questionnaires
were distributed on Credamo, with each respondent receiving 2 Yuan (roughly, 1 USD = 6.4 yuan) as
8 G. WANG ET AL.
a material reward. The second batch was distributed through Wenjuanxing (https://www.wjx.cn).
Researchers posted the questionnaire link on their own WeChat Moments and within their
WeChat groups and invited WeChat friends to fill it in or forward it. 340 questionnaires were distrib-
uted in total from 6th to 14th December 2021. Ultimately, this study collected 610 questionnaires,
among which 99 were invalid because respondents reported that they did not have any previous
experience with sharing their travel experiences on WeChat. According to the simulation, the ques-
tionnaire should take no less than 100 seconds to complete. In the remaining 511 questionnaires,
128 were screened out based on this criterion. Therefore, 383 questionnaires were included for
analysis with the effective rate of 62.79%.
Table 1 presents the respondents’ demographic characteristics. The proportion of men (53.8%)
was slightly higher than women (46.2%). In terms of age, people in the age range of 30–39 and
20–29 accounted for the majority of the respondents at 30.8% and 30.3%, respectively. The
uneven age distribution is mainly because the Internet penetration rate for young people is much
higher than the middle-aged and senior groups in China. With respect to education level, more
than half of respondents held a bachelor’s degree (52.2%), followed by master’s degree or above
(24.5%). In terms of monthly income, 28.2% of the sample fell within the 6001–9000 RMB range.
4. Results
4.1. Measurement model
First, the reliability and validity analyses of the measurement model were conducted (Table 2). For
reliability, all indicators’ factor loadings were higher than the cutoff value of 0.7 (Hair et al., 2014),
demonstrating that the measurement scale possesses good reliability. Aside from documentation,
which had a Cronbach’s α coefficient that was slightly lower than 0.7, the Cronbach’s α coefficients
of all the constructs were higher than 0.7, meeting the acceptable level of 0.70 (Nunnally, 1978). All
constructs’ rho_A values were higher than 0.7, confirming that constructs in the measurement model
all have good internal consistency reliability (Dijkstra & Henseler, 2015). All of the constructs’ AVE and
CR values exceeded the threshold value of 0.5 and 0.7, respectively, indicating good convergent val-
idity (Fornell & Larcker, 1981). The Fornell–Larcker criterion was also adopted to examine the con-
structs’ discriminant validity. As shown in Table 3, the square roots of constructs’ AVE were higher
than the correlation coefficients between different constructs, reflecting good discriminant validity
(Fornell & Larcker, 1981).
9
10 G. WANG ET AL.
Table 5. Results of cross-tabulation between recognition & status and sharing intention.
positive contrarian cases, negative contrarian cases, and the main effect that predicted high scores
for Chinese tourists’ intention of sharing travel experiences on WeChat.
4.5. Calibration
Calibration was performed to transform interval-scale data values into fuzzy-set scores ranging from
0 to 1. Following the suggestion of Ragin et al. (2016), three thresholds were set in this study: full
membership (fuzzy score = 0.95), non-full membership (fuzzy score = 0.05), and the cross-over
point (fuzzy score = 0.5). Calibration was conducted on seven antecedent variables and one depen-
dent variable to transform the 7-point Likert scale into fuzzy-set scores in fsQCA 3.0.
Documentation ● ● ;
● ⊗
Recognition & status ⊗ ● ● ● ⊗
Social interaction ● ● ●
Extraversion ● ● ● ● ●
Acquisitive face orientation ● ● ● ⊗
Consistency 0.971 0.966 0.965 0.965 0.978
Raw coverage 0.287 0.306 0.437 0.454 0.228
Unique coverage 0.030 0.038 0.012 0.024 0.019
Solution consistency 0.955
Solution coverage 0.579
Note: ● indicates the existence of core conditions; ● indicates the existence of edge conditions; ⊗ indicates the absence of edge
conditions; the space indicates that the condition can either appear or be absent, which is irrelevant.
CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM 13
sharing intention, with documentation and AFO playing minor roles. Configurations 3 and 5 suggest
that when extraverted tourists share their travel experiences on WeChat out of a strong motivation
linked to perceived enjoyment and social interaction with altruism serving as peripheral condition,
their sharing intention is high, irrespective of the performance of documentation, recognition and
status, or AFO.
highlight the significance of extrinsic motivations in stimulating sharing willingness, which confirms
the findings of Chen and Lin (2020) in that Chinese people who share travel experiences on strong-
tie social media platforms highlight emotional connection and interpersonal interaction. This also
resonates the conclusion of Li (2020), who deemed that some Chinese tourists view the act of
sharing travel experiences on WeChat as an activity that enhances prestige. Since WeChat has
become a dominant social media platform in China, users are interlinked with one another on
this platform and form a self-centered network of acquaintances that stimulates them present them-
selves in front of others. Under these circumstances, people can receive emotional support and
maintain social connections by posting travel experiences and gain social status and recognition
through likes and comments.
The above results generated from fsQCA corroborate the results from SEM analysis on factors of
intrinsic motivations, extrinsic motivations and personality traits. Both approaches suggested that
perceived enjoyment, altruism, social interaction, extraversion and AFO are important determinants
of high sharing intention; on the other hand, fsQCA generated supplementary results on the factor of
recognition & status. While the SEM result suggested that recognition & status did not have a signifi-
cant influence on sharing intention, fsQCA result indicated that this factor could play an important
role when it was combined with perceived enjoyment and extroversion. This interesting finding
demonstrates the difference between SEM and fsQCA methods. SEM analysis highlights the linear
relationship between constructs, while fsQCA analysis emphasizes the collaborative effect of antece-
dent factors leading to the desirable outcome. Thus, the findings generated from the two methods in
this study not only supported each other but also provided complementary view in understanding
Chinese tourists’ travel-experience sharing behaviour on strong-tie social media. Notably, the SEM
result indicated that recognition & status did not influence sharing intention, which is inconsistent
with findings of prior studies (e.g. Oliveira et al., 2020; Wu & Pearce, 2016). A possible reason is that,
sharing individual tourism experience on social media has now become a common practice for
Chinese people, hence, some people did not deem it as a way of seeking recognition and status.
three dimensions: intrinsic motivations, extrinsic motivations, and personality traits. The joining of
these three sets of dimensions helps expand the scope and depth of our understanding of why
Chinese tourists share their travel experiences on social media.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
ORCID
Lianping Ren http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2095-9998
References
Acar, A. S., & Polonsky, M. (2007). Online social networks and insights into marketing communications. Journal of Internet
Commerce, 6(4), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332860802086227
Anderson, P. (1999). Perspective: Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216–232.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.3.216
Ardichvili, A., Maurer, M., Li, W., Wentling, T., & Stuedemann, R. (2006). Cultural influences on knowledge sharing
through online communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.
1108/13673270610650139
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 36(3), 421–458. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393203
Chen, Y., & Lin, D. (2020). Research on tourism sharing behavior of strong-tie network mobile social platform-data analy-
sis based on WeChat and QQ users. Tourism Tribune, 35(4), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2020.
04.011 (In Chinese edition)
Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S. F., Zhang, J., Leung, K., Leong, F., & Huiyeh, K. (2008). Relevance of openness as a personality
dimension in Chinese culture: Aspects of its cultural relevance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(1), 81–108.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022107311968
Choi, C. W. (2020). The impacts of consumer personality traits on online video ads sharing intention. Journal of
Promotion Management, 26(7), 1073–1092. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2020.1746468
Chou, M. L. (1996). Protective and acquisitive face orientations: A person by situation approach to face dynamics in social
interaction. The University of Hong Kong.
Chuah, S. H. W., Aw, E. C. X., & Yee, D. (2021). Unveiling the complexity of consumers’ intention to use service robots: An
fsQCA approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 123, 106870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106870
Daugherty, T., Eastin, M. S., & Bright, L. (2008). Exploring consumer motivations for creating user-generated content.
Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8(2), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2008.10722139
Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modelling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297–316. https://
doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.02
Feng, W., Irina, Y. Y., Yang, M. X., & Yi, M. (2021). How being envied shapes tourists’ relationships with luxury brands: A
dual-mediation model. Tourism Management, 86, 104344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104344
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement
error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. http://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
González-Rodríguez, M. R., Díaz-Fernández, M. C., Bilgihan, A., Shi, F., & Okumus, F. (2021). UGC involvement, motivation
and personality: Comparison between China and Spain. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 19, 100543.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100543
Hair, J. F., Hult, T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. A. (2014). Primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling
(PLS-SEM). Sage.
Han, K. H. (2011). The self-enhancing function of Chinese modesty: From a perspective of social script. Asian Journal of
Social Psychology, 14(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2011.01354.x
Hoffmann, M. J., & Riley Jr, J. (2002). The science of political science: Linearity or complexity in designing social inquiry.
New Political Science, 24(2), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393140220145289
Hossain, M. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Chan, C., Standing, C., & Olanrewaju, A. S. (2018). Sharing political content in online social
media: A planned and unplanned behaviour approach. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(3), 485–501. https://doi.org/
10.1007/s10796-017-9820-9
Hsu, M. H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C. H., & Chang, C. M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relation-
ship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(2),
153–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.09.003
Huang, Q., Davison, R. M., & Gu, J. (2008). Impact of personal and cultural factors on knowledge sharing in China. Asia
Pacific Journal of Management, 25(3), 451–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9095-2
Huang, S. S., & Wei, X. (2019). Offline versus online travel experience sharing: The national profile of China. International
Journal of Culture. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 13(2), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCTHR-05-2018-0058
CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM 17
Hur, K., Kim, T. T., Karatepe, O. M., & Lee, G. (2017). An exploration of the factors influencing social media continuance
usage and information sharing intentions among Korean travellers. Tourism Management, 63, 170–178. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.06.013
Kang, M., & Schuett, M. A. (2013). Determinants of sharing travel experiences in social media. Journal of Travel & Tourism
Marketing, 30(1-2), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2013.751237
Kumar, T. B. J., Goh, S. K., & Balaji, M. S. (2021). Sharing travel related experiences on social media-integrating social
capital and face orientation. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 27(2), 168–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/
1356766720975047
Lee, C. S., & Ma, L. (2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in
Human Behavior, 28(2), 331–339. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.002
Lee, H., Reid, E., & Kim, W. G. (2014). Understanding knowledge sharing in online travel communities: Antecedents and
the moderating effects of interaction modes. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 38(2), 222–242. https://doi.
org/10.1177/1096348012451454
Li, F. S. (2020). Understanding Chinese tourists’ determinants of sharing travel photos in WeChat. Tourism Management
Perspectives, 33, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.100584
Munar, A. M., & Jacobsen, J. K. S. (2014). Motivations for sharing tourism experiences through social media. Tourism
Management, 43, 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.01.012
Narangajavana, Y., Fiol, L. J. C., Tena, MÁM, Artola, R. M. R., & García, J. S. (2019). User-generated content sources in social
media: A new approach to explore tourist satisfaction. Journal of Travel Research, 58(2), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.
1177/0047287517746014
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
Okazaki, S., Andreu, L., & Campo, S. (2017). Knowledge sharing among tourists via social media: A comparison between
Facebook and TripAdvisor. International Journal of Tourism Research, 19(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2090
Oliveira, T., Araujo, B., & Tam, C. (2020). Why do people share their travel experiences on social media? Tourism
Management, 78, 104041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104041
Olya, H. G., & Gavilyan, Y. (2017). Configurational models to predict residents’ support for tourism development. Journal
of Travel Research, 56(7), 893–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287516667850
Olya, H. G., Gazi, Z. A., Aksal, F. A., & Altinay, M. (2018). Behavioral intentions of disabled tourists for the use of peer-to-
peer accommodations. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(1), 436–454. https://doi.
org/10.1108/IJCHM-08-2016-0471
Pappas, N. (2019). UK outbound travel and Brexit complexity. Tourism Management, 72, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
tourman.2018.11.004
Parra-López, E., Bulchand-Gidumal, J., Gutiérrez-Taño, D., & Díaz-Armas, R. (2011). Intentions to use social media in organizing
and taking vacation trips. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 640–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.022
Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A
critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://
doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Ragin, C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, C. C. (2009). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, C. C., Strand, S. I., & Rubinson, C. (2016). User’s guide to fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis. University of
Arizona.
Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related
techniques. Sage.
Shi, D., Yi, B., Shi, F., & Satta, S. (2021). Motivation configuration of bluxury tourism behavior: An fsQCA application.
Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 63(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/19389655211014472
Shi, Z., Wu, L., & Kuang, Z. (2018). How face consciousness reverse pro-self-behavior? A study on ecological consumption
from the perspective of social value orientation. Journal of Contemporary Marketing Science, 1(1), 117–144. https://
doi.org/10.1108/JCMARS-07-2018-0004
Stackla. (2019). Influencing travel: how to turn lookers into bookers. Retrieved 30 September, 2021, from https://static1.
squarespace.com/static/57224c16cf80a1be614f90d7/t/5cb25dfd4e17b62f29cd04c6/1555193410196/Travel-Ebook-
Digital-US.pdf
Stoeckl, R., Rohrmeier, P., & Hess, T. (2007). “Motivations to produce user generated content: differences between weblog-
gers and videobloggers”, Twentieth bled eConference on eMergence: merging and emerging technologies, pro-
cesses, and institutions, Bled, Slovenia, June 4–6.
Sun, N., Rau, P. P. L., & Ma, L. (2014). Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literature review. Computers in
Human Behavior, 38, 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.022
Tencent. (2021). Tencent announces 2021 fourth quarter and annual results. Retrieved 30 April, 2022, from https://static.
www.tencent.com/uploads/2022/03/23/cd1fcbdc7ba47fd0ac523ccc4f9daf7b.pdf
Usakli, A., & Kucukergin, K. G. (2018). Using partial least squares structural equation modeling in hospitality and tourism.
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(11), 3462–3512. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-
2017-0753
18 G. WANG ET AL.
Vila, M., Costa, G., & Ellinger, E. (2021). An ethnographic study of the motivations of foodstagrammer tourists. Journal of
Sustainable Tourism, 29(5), 813–828. http://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1811290
Wang, S., Kirillova, K., & Lehto, X. (2017). Travelers’ food experience sharing on social network sites. Journal of Travel &
Tourism Marketing, 34(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2016.1224751
Wang, S. S., & Stefanone, M. A. (2013). Showing off? Human mobility and the interplay of traits, self-disclosure, and
Facebook check-ins. Social Science Computer Review, 31(4), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313481424
Wang, X., Huang, Y., Li, X., & Peng, L. (2016). A moderated mediation model of sharing travel experience on social media:
Motivations and face orientations in Chinese culture. Journal of China Tourism Research, 12(1), 42–64. https://doi.org/
10.1080/19388160.2016.1151850
Wang, X., Peng, L., & Li, X. (2017). Behavior of sharing travel experiences in social media. Management Review, 29(2), 97–
105. https://doi.org/10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2017.02.009 (In Chinese Edition)
Woodside, A. G. (2014). Embrace •perform• model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities.
Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2495–2503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.07.006
Wu, M. Y., & Pearce, P. L. (2016). Tourism blogging motivations: Why do Chinese tourists create little “Lonely Planets”?
Journal of Travel Research, 55(4), 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287514553057
Yoo, K. H., & Gretzel, U. (2011). Influence of personality on travel-related consumer-generated media creation. Computers
in Human Behavior, 27(2), 609–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.002