Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Author(s): Marvin L. Meistrich, Nancy R. Hunter, Norio Suzuki, Patricia K. Trostle and H.
Rodney Withers
Source: Radiation Research, Vol. 74, No. 2 (May, 1978), pp. 349-362
Published by: Radiation Research Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3574894 .
Accessed: 20/06/2014 17:32
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Radiation Research Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Radiation
Research.
http://www.jstor.org
MEISTRICH,M. L., HUNTER, N. R., SUZUKI, N., TROSTLE,P. K., AND WITHERS,
H. R. Gradual Regeneration of Mouse Testicular Stem Cells after Exposure to Ion-
izing Radiation. Radiat. Res. 74, 349-362 (1978).
The regeneration of mouse testicular stem cells during 60 weeks after exposure
to 600 or 1200 rad of -y-radiationwas examined. Restoration of spermatogenesis de-
pended on stem cell survival, regeneration, and differentiation. Several assays were
employed to measure the number of stem cells and their ability to repopulate the
seminiferous epithelium as follows. Assay 1: The percentage of repopulated tubular
cross sections was determined histologically at various times after irradiation.Assay 2:
Mice were irradiated and, after given time intervals to allow for regenerationof stem
cell numbers, a second dose was given. The percentage of repopulated tubular cross
sections was determined5 weeks later. Assay 3: The ability of the stem cells to produce
spermatocytes and spermatids was assayed by the levels of the germ cell specific
isoenzyme, LDH-X. Assay 4: The ability of the stem cells to produce sperm was
assayed by the number of sperm heads in the testes. In addition, the ability of the
stem cells to produce functional spermatozoa was measured by the fertility of the
animals. The results obtained were as follows. All assays demonstrated that gradual
regeneration of stem cell number occurred simultaneously with repopulation of the
seminiferous epithelium by differentiating cells derived from stem cells. The regenera-
tion kinetics of stem cells followed an exponential increase approaching a dose-de-
pendent plateau below the level prior to irradiation. The doubling time for stem cells
during the exponential portion was about 2 weeks. After 600 rad of irradiation, the
number of stem cells assayed by sperm head counts or by LDH-X activity increased
from 5% of the unirradiatedlevel to a plateau of 80%. A greater proportionalincrease
in stem cell number, from 0.1 to 10% of control, was observed after 1200 rad, but
the plateau level was lower than after 600 rad. The regenerationof stem cell number
after depletion by irradiation was gradual and incomplete, and only partially restored
spermatogenesis. Correlation of regeneration with fertility data demonstrated that
fertility was reestablished when sperm production returned to about 15% of control
levels.
1This investigation was supported by Grants CA 17364, CA 06294, CA 11138, and CA 11430
awarded by the National Cancer Institute, DHEW, and by research Grant PCM 76-08836
awarded by the National Science Foundation.
349
0033-7587/78/0742-0349$02.00/0
Copyright ? 1978 by Academic Press, Inc.
All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
INTRODUCTION
Radiation produces sterility in male mammals which may be either tem-
porary or permanent (1). After irradiation, fertility is maintained for about
3 weeks because of the radioresistance of the spermatocytes, spermatids, and
spermatozoa (2). Then sterility occurs first because of production of dominant
lethal mutations in spermatids and spermatocytes (3, 4) and subsequently
because of the radiosensitivity of the differentiating spermatogonia (5) which
results in a depletion of sperm during the time interval when these sperma-
togonia would have become sperm. The spermatogonial stem cell is more radio-
resistant (6, 7). Surviving stem cells will differentiate to produce spermatozoa
which will, if produced in sufficient numbers, result in restoration of fertility.
The length of time prior to restoration of fertility (sterile period) has been
shown to be dose dependent (8, 9), and measurement of this time has been
proposed as an assay of stem cell survival (9). Although the length of the sterile
period is certainly related to stem cell survival, other factors such as the re-
generation of the numbers of stem cells and the kinetics of their differentiation
into functional spermatozoa must also be involved. The purpose of this study
was to measure the kinetics of regeneration of the numbers of stem cells after
irradiation and the repopulation of differentiated germinal cells from the sur-
viving stem cells and then to relate these data to the recovery of fertility.
The terms "regeneration" and "repopulation" are often used interchangeably.
However, in the context of these studies it will be useful to make a distinction
to describe two different processes. The term "regeneration" will be used to
describe the increase in the numbers of stem cells and the term "repopulation"
to describe the differentiation of the stem cells and the refilling of the tubule
by their progeny.
Until recently, methods have not been available for quantitative measure-
ment of stem cell survival. Conflicting models for the identity of the stem cell
have been proposed (7, 10-14), complicating any histological measurement of
stem cell survival. Using one model for stem cell survival, Erickson has ob-
tained a survival curve for stem spermatogonia in the rat (15).
An alternative approach has been to measure the survival of the stem cell
by its functional ability, i.e., the ability to sustain spermatogenesis. This func-
tional criterion has been used to assay stem cell survival by counting the frac-
tion of seminiferous tubular cross sections which are repopulated by colonies
of spermatogenic cells (6, 16, 17). In this study we have employed the colony
assay in two ways. In the first case, we irradiated mice with 1200 rad and
counted the fraction of repopulated tubular cross sections at various post-
irradiation times. One difficulty with this assay is that the proximity of several
stem cells in one region of the tubule, as happens during regeneration (18),
would result in an underestimation of stem cell numbers. In the second method,
we irradiated mice with 600 rad, waited a given time after irradiation for re-
generation of stem cell number to occur, gave a second "knock-down" dose
of 600 rad, and then counted the fraction of repopulated tubular cross sections
5 weeks later. The latter method has the advantages that most clusters of stem
cells are removed by the second dose and that by using a fixed time between
the final dose and the assay, the colony size is constant. The limitation is that
synchronization and redistribution of cells within their cycle continues for
a long time after the first dose, altering the radiosensitivity of the cells to the
second dose.
Because of the disadvantages of the colony assay, we have developed two
other assays for the survival of the stem cells based on their ability to produce
spermatocytes, spermatids, and spermatozoa. These assays consist of measuring
the levels of the enzyme, LDH-X, and the numbers of sperm heads in testic-
ular homogenates.
LDH-X, the X isozyme of lactate dehydrogenase, is found only in sperma-
tocytes, beginning at the mid-pachytene stage, spermatids, and spermatozoa
(19, 20). Since this isozyme can be specifically assayed using the substrate,
a-ketovalerate, the level of LDH-X can be readily determined in testicular
homogenates (21). This level is a measure of the numbers of spermatocytes
and spermatids which have developed from the surviving stem cells.
Sperm heads, identified in testicular homogenates after sonication, are nuclei
of steps 12 to 16 spermatids (22). Such preparations contain only distinctively
shaped sperm heads and quantitation is relatively easy and rapid by microscopic
counting. The numbers of sperm heads provide a measure of the number of
surviving stem cells and their ability to differentiate to produce sperm.
The results obtained using the various assays described indicate that re-
generation of stem cell numbers occurs very slowly after depletion by 600 or
1200 rad of y-radiation, and the restoration of spermatogenesis is incomplete.
2
Animals used in this study were maintained in facilities approved by the American Asso-
ciation for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care, and in accordance with current United
States Department of Agricultureand Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National
Institutes of Health regulations and standards.
__ 08- o 8 \
=006
-
E 046
0.4
/200rods
1 0?2 - H1
.- 0.1
cn -- 0.08-
0.06 -
10 20 30 40 50 60
TimeAfterIrradiation
(weeks)
FIG. 1. Stem cell survival index (SSI) as a function of time after irradiation. Each point
represents data obtained from 10 mice, irradiated with 1200 rad of y-radiationat 0 weeks and
sacrificedat the indicated times. Values are presented as means and standard errors.
curve, and t is the time. The increase factor (asymptotic value divided by
initial value) is given by eb. The doubling time during the exponential part
is given by 0.693/bk. The curves were fit by computer. Initial estimates of
the parameters were first obtained using linear regression to fit the initial part
of the rise. Subsequently, a nonlinear least-squares fitting routine was used
to obtain the best values of the parameters fit to the entire data set.
RESULTS
0.5-
.? - 600*600reds
CO
CO y ^/ :.\"A?
n
C ._c- 00 * V- ,/\
*
- (singledosecontro/)
i '- 0.01
0.005 \
0 2 4 6 8 10 13 17 21 30 44 58
TimeBetween
Radiation
Doses(weeks)
FIG. 2. Stem cell survival index as a function of time between 2 doses of 600 rad each. At
week 0, mice were irradiated with 600 rad, then at the indicated time, irradiated again with
another 600 rad and sacrificed 5 weeks later for determination of the SSI. For comparison,
separate groups of mice were irradiated with 1200 rad at the time of the second dose and those
points are plotted at that time along the abscissa. Each point represents the mean of data from
5 mice. The average standard errors are indicated by error bars. Duplicate points taken at each
time represent two separate experiments. The lines are drawn through the means of these
two points.
cross sections were counted 5 weeks later. As a control for an effect of the age
of mice or alteration in irradiation conditions, additional mice from the same
group were also irradiated with a single dose of 1200 rad at each time of irra-
diation and sacrificed 5 weeks later.
The data shown in Fig. 2 demonstrate that the killing of stem cells by
1200 rad is essentially independent of age from 9 to 32 weeks of age. At 39 weeks
_ ' - - a a----.- o
- 300
rods ' 600 rods
2 Ia
rod
a 120 d
lo-, ^
A
.4_
-T
2400 rods
(:F4 2i..--
105
0( 5 ' , ' , ' ,A ',, ' A ' ', ,& ', ,
10 20 30 40 50 60
TimeAfterIrradiation
(weeks)
FIG. 3. LDH-X activity per testis of irradiated mice. Mice were locally irradiated with 300,
600, 900, 1200, or 2400 rad (the latter given as two doses of 1200 rad spaced 1 week apart).
All values are expressed as a fraction of the activity in unirradiatedmice sacrificed at the same
time. Each point represents the activity of a homogenate prepared from 3 mice (control 100,
300, 900, and 2400 rad), 5 mice (600 rad), or 10 mice (1200 rad). Duplicate points taken at
each time represent two separate experiments.
and older, either the stem cell number decreases, the radiation sensitivity in-
creases, or their proliferative ability after radiation declines.
Fluctuations are observed in the numbers of stem cells surviving split doses
of radiation. The rapid rise in the SSI when the doses are separated by 4 to
24 hr is primarily due to repair of sublethal radiation injury. The fluctuations
in the SSI between 1 and 28 days are likely a result of synchronization of the
cells by the first dose into more resistant phases of their cycle and subsequent
progression and redistribution. If we assume that by 28 days these fluctuations
are over and cells are redistributed in the same state as prior to irradiation,
we can then attribute any increase which occurs after this time to regeneration
of stem cell number. Since the SSI rises from 0.049 at 4 weeks to 0.64 by 23
weeks, the stem cell number must undergo a 13-fold increase in this period.
Again it must be noted that the regeneration is still incomplete at 23 weeks
since the plateau level (SSI = 0.64) is lower than that which would be ob-
served with a single dose of 600 rad. A slight decline is also observed in this
curve with the older mice.
i a
,- ---_____-,---8 _---- ^
300 rods * ,/"-' 600 rods
10'0rt
7o 0_ - / / -A -d
900 rods d
0 o f
/
o
-2 r. 0
E 1? 1o
TABLE I
Parameters of Stem Cell Regeneration
Repopulated tubular
cross sections at
various times after
single dose (Assay 1) 1200 4-51 1.19" 14 5.0
Repopulated tubular
cross sections 5 weeks
after second dose
(Assay 2) 600 4-23 0.64a 13 0.6
LDH-X activity
(Assay 3) 600 7-51 0.76b 11 2.0
LDH-X activity
(Assay 3) 1200 7-51 0.10b 32 3.0
Sperm head counts
(Assay 4) 600 7-51 0.81b 21 1.6
Sperm head counts
(Assay 4) 1200 7-51 0.12b 185 1.9
a SSI.
b Fraction of unirradiatedcontrol.
TABLE II
Relationship between Radiation Dose, Duration of Sterility, and
Sperm Production in C3H Mice
of stem cell regeneration is between 10- and 20-fold after 600 rad (Assays 2, 3,
and 4) and between 30- and 200-fold after 1200 rad (Assays 3 and 4). The
lower amount of regeneration, 14-fold after 1200 rad measured in Assay 1,
is expected because of stem cell clustering. The time required for a doubling
of stem cell numbers is between 1.6 and 3.0 weeks (Assays 3 and 4). The shorter
time of 0.6 weeks measured by Assay 2 may be a result of the lack of complete
redistribution of stem cells 4 weeks after the first dose.
Fertility Tests
The time of return to fertility of the irradiated males was taken as the length
of the sterile period. The values for radiation doses of 600, 900, and 1200 rad
are given in Table II. It is seen that the length of the sterile period increases
with increasing doses; after 1200 rad the mice remained sterile throughout
the course of the experiment (i.e., 400 days).
DISCUSSION
In this study we have measured the regeneration of testicular stem cells
after doses of ionizing radiation which kill most of these cells. In the assays
used, we are counting the differentiated progeny of the stem cells. Hence, we
must consider the two processes acting; i.e., the regeneration of the depleted
stem cells, and the ability of the stem cells to differentiate to produce sperm.
We shall first review what is known about the normal pattern of stem cell
renewal and differentiation in untreated animals for comparison with what
happens after depletion. This is a steady-state process involving no change
in stem cell numbers and a continuous repopulation of the tubules with dif-
ferentiating cells. According to one recent model (13, 14), the stem cell is an
isolated undifferentiated type A spermatogonia, designated Ais. These cells
appear to be heterogeneous; some have a short cell cycle (about 40 hr) and
200-300rads i
<100ratds A
Ais Aa--
StemCell -5.3doys
Spermatozoa 16
> 60,000 rods \
i/4.' a d _ D,otiplofene
Secondorry
Step,jl'"-
4 2 k1,
I_d _q_e Y!7-6-
-\,
V"50 . .... Spermheads
I1 s~~,
SeOProQs I _LDH-X
FIG. 5. Kinetics and radiation sensitivities of spermatogenic cells in the mouse. Drawings
of the various cell types, modified from Clermont's work on the rat (11) are shown. The mode
of stem cell renewal is taken from Oakberg'smodel (13). The kinetics of spermatogenesisis also
taken from the work of Oakberg (13, 25, 26). Radiation sensitivities are given as LD50values.
The LD50 values for the differentiated mouse spermatogenic cells are taken from Refs. (2, 5,
and 27), those for A,a are estimated from Refs. (7, 28), and those for the Ais stem cell are esti-
mated from Refs. (7, 15) and our own unpublished data. The cell types during spermatogenesis
which contain LDH-X (19) are indicated by the solid bar. The stages of spermatogenesisduring
which the spermatid nucleus has the properties of a sperm head (22) are indicated.
others, probably the true stem cells, a much longer cycle (about 8.6 days)
(12-14).
The first apparent step in stem cell differentiation is division to produce
a pair of cells and then a syncytium of cells, designated Aai (14). These cells
yield A1 spermatogonia which continue through the differentiation sequence
(25) according to a rigid schedule as outlined in Fig. 5. An alternative model
of stem cell renewal proposes the existence of a resting radioresistant Ao sper-
matogonia, which only divides to repopulate the seminiferous epithelium after
depletion by a cytotoxic agent (10, 11). In the ensuing discussion, we shall
only utilize the first model discussed (13, 14).
The radiation sensitivities of the cells are also presented in Fig. 5. Practically
all of the differentiated spermatogonia, A1 through B, are killed by the radia-
tion doses employed, as are many of the Aai cells. The more mature spermato-
genic cells survive and progress through the developmental sequence with the
normal kinetics (29). Thus, 28 days after irradiation the only germinal cells
remaining in the testes must represent the progeny of the surviving stem cells.
The normal kinetics of differentiation also holds during repopulation. If all
the Ais spermatogonia that survived started differentiating immediately, it
would require 40.5 days to produce sperm. The repopulation of the seminiferous
epithelium after 100 rad occurs more quickly than this, indicating that Aai
spermatogonia also survive and begin the repopulation process (26). However,
higher doses, for example 300 rad, appear to kill these Aai spermatogonia (28).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank W. Larry Wilborn and his staff for the supply and care of the mice used in these
experiments. We also thank Marsha L. Frapart for excellent technical assistance and Dr. Howard
Thames for assisting with the analysis of the growth curves.
REFERENCES
1. A. M. MANDL,The radiosensitivity of sperm cells. Biol. Rev. 39, 288-371 (1964).
2. E. F. OAKBERGand R. L. DIMINNO, X-ray sensitivity of primary spermatocytes of the
mouse. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2, 196-209 (1960).
3. A. J. BATEMAN, Mutagenic sensitivity of maturing germ cells in the male mouse. Heredity
12, 213-232 (1958).
4. A. J. SEARLEand C. V. BEECHEY, Sperm-count, egg-fertilization and dominant lethality
after X-irradiation of mice. Mutat. Res. 22, 63-72 (1974).
5. E. F. OAKBERG, Gamma-ray sensitivity of spermatogonia of the mouse. J. Exp. Zool. 134,
343-356 (1957).
6. H. R. WITHERS, N. HUNTER, H. T. BARKLEY,JR., and B. 0. REID, Radiation survival
and regeneration characteristicsof spermatogenicstem cells of mouse testis. Radiat. Res.
57, 88-103 (1974).
7. E. F. OAKBERG, A new concept of spermtogonial stem-cell renewal in the mouse and
its relationship to genetic effects. Mutat. Res. 11, 1-7 (1971).
8. W. SHERIDAN, The effects of the time interval in fractionated X-ray treatment of mouse
spermatogonia. Mutat. Res. 13, 163-169 (1971).
9. B. M. CATTANACH, Spermatogonial stem cell killing in the mouse following single and
fractionated doses, as assessed by length of sterile period. Mutat. Res. 25, 53-62 (1974).
10. Y. CLERMONTand E. BUSTOS-OBREGON,Re-examination of spermatogonial renewal in
the rat by means of seminiferous tubules mounted "in toto." Am. J. Anat. 122, 237-248
(1968).
11. M. DYM and Y. CLERMONT,Role of spermatogonia in the repair of the seminiferous epithe-
lium following X-irradiation of the rat testis. Am. J. Anat. 128, 265-282 (1970).
12. C. HUCKINS, The spermatogonial stem cell population in adult rats. III. Evidence for a
long cycling population. Cell Tissue Kinet. 4, 335-349 (1971).
18. E. F. OAKBERG,Spermatogonial stem-cell renewal in the mouse. Anat. Rec. 169, 515-532
(1971).
14. C. HUCKINS,The spermatogonial stem cell population in adult rats. II. A radioautographic
analysis of their cell cycle properties. Cell Tissue Kinet. 4, 313-334 (1971).