Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lean Six Sigma GB Exercises
Lean Six Sigma GB Exercises
chips
11
Create a distribution for the attached data
12
8
8
12
9
10
13
9
9
9 Q1
10
14
8
7
7 3.4
7
10
10
9
9
4
10
11
10
9
10
9
9
12
8
11
10
8
9
11
7
9
10
9
10
11
10
6
7
12
8
6
10
9
11
13
10
10
4
11
11
4
11
8
7
8
11
9
8
7
10
8
10
13
8
5
9
5
8
8
7
10
9
9
12
8
10
10
10
10
11
8
7
7
9
10
9
11
12
7
8
12
10
11
Q1- (1.5*IQR)
CAPA
Part Operator Response
1 1 0.65 0.05
1 1 0.6
2 1 1 An automotive supplier wants to know if the currently used measu
2 1 1 thickness of an engine par
3 1 0.85 Ten parts that represent the expected range of the process variatio
3 1 0.8 the thickness of each of the ten parts, two times pe
4 1 0.85
4 1 0.95
5 1 0.55
5 1 0.45
6 1 1
6 1 1
7 1 0.95
7 1 0.95
8 1 0.85
8 1 0.8
9 1 1
9 1 1
10 1 0.6
10 1 0.7
1 2 0.55
1 2 0.55
2 2 1.05
2 2 0.95
3 2 0.8
3 2 0.75
4 2 0.8
4 2 0.75
5 2 0.4
5 2 0.4
6 2 1
6 2 1.05
7 2 0.95
7 2 0.9
8 2 0.75
8 2 0.7
9 2 1
9 2 0.95
10 2 0.55
10 2 0.5
1 3 0.5
1 3 0.55
2 3 1.05
2 3 1
3 3 0.8
3 3 0.8
4 3 0.8
4 3 0.8
5 3 0.45
5 3 0.5
6 3 1
6 3 1.05
7 3 0.95
7 3 0.95
8 3 0.8
8 3 0.8
9 3 1.05
9 3 1.05
10 3 0.85
10 3 0.8
he currently used measurement system is precisely measuring the
ckness of an engine part.
74.015 20
74.015
74.015 15
74.015
10
74.015
74.017 5
74.018
0
74.019 73.96 73.97 73.98 73.99 74
74.02
74.021
74.024
74.03
ormal
Chart Title
Chart Title
Count Cumulative %
250 100%
217 90%
200 80%
70%
150 60%
112 50%
100 40%
67 30%
50 43 20%
23 18 10%
0 0%
Missing button Stitching errors Loose thread Hemming errors Fabric flaws Misaligned fabric
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
18 10%
0%
Misaligned fabric
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3
5.19 5.57 8.73
5.53 5.11 5.01
4.78 5.76 7.59 Your company makes plastic pipes, and you are concern
the consistency of their diameters. You measure ten pip
5.44 5.65 4.73 for three weeks.
4.47 4.99 4.93
4.78 5.25 5.19
4.26 7 6.77
5.7 5.2 5.66
4.4 5.3 6.48 UAL Q3+1.5IQR
5.64 4.91 5.2 LAL Q1-1.5IQR
plastic pipes, and you are concerned about
eir diameters. You measure ten pipes a week
for three weeks.
Durability Carpet Composition
18.95 1 A
12.62 1 B
11.94 1 A You want to examine the overall durability o
the carpet products are placed in four home
14.42 1 B 60 days. Create a boxplot to examine the
10.06 2 A
7.19 2 B
7.03 2 A
14.66 2 B
10.92 3 A
13.28 3 B
14.52 3 A
12.51 3 B
10.46 4 A
21.4 4 B
18.1 4 A
22.5 4 B
o examine the overall durability of your carpet products. Samples of
products are placed in four homes and you measure durability after
Create a boxplot to examine the distribution of durability scores.
Delivery - Mode B
6
You are attempting to assess the speed of delivery when ordering a sp
7 mode A has been traditionally assumed to generate the best response
Test the hypothesis on the mean delivery time at
3
6
7
8
5
3
2
5
3
9
5
5
4
6
4
5
6
3
2
2
4
3
4
6
4
7
4
4
1
4
7
3
4
9
livery when ordering a specific commodity via two different modes. Delivery via
nerate the best response; but we need to test that assumption against mode B.
he mean delivery time at 6 days and standard deviation is 2
Energy $
1211
1572
1668 Energy expenditure is measured for 15 randomly selected, upper-
income families in the United States to see if the mean expenditure
1250 differs from the published value of $1080.
1478
1307
1184
865
1162
1308
1188
1111
1747
1326
1142
1301.2667
Processor Before After Training
Training
1 23 21
2 17 11
3 8 6
4 9 10
5 7 5
6 25 22
7 16 11
8 11 16
9 12 10
10 9 5
A Green Belt conducted a study to determine if training was effective at reducing the time
it takes to process orders. The process is not automated and is highly dependent on the
knowledge and skill level of individual processors.
Blend 1 Blend 2 Blend 3 Blend 4
17 14.9 13 15
13.9 3.2 16.4 17.8
10.4 1.9 13.3 22.9 Investigators compared th
paint. Six samples of each pa
19.3 7.3 6.5 17.4 of metal, cured,
16.1 9.6 11.9 16.9
11.7 14.5 16.8 18.4
0.065
0.065
A university financial-aid office polled its undergraduate students to
determine if male or female students were more likely to obtain
summer employment. Of the 802 male students sampled, 725 were
employed during the summer, and, of the 712 female students
sampled, 573 were employed
Method Audited Number of errors Proportion defective
Standard Paper 80 12 0.150
Intranet form 80 5 0.063
Male Female
Employed 725 573
Samples 802 712
Gender Preference
Female Democrats
Male Democrats A researcher wants to assess if there is a
Female Democrats their candidate preference (Democrat
Female Democrats presidential election. Gender and candid
randomly selected
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Others
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Others
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Others
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Others
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Others
Female Democrats
Female Others
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Others
Male Republicans
Female Others
Female Others
Female Republicans
Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Others
Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Others
Female Republicans
Female Republicans
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Others
Female Republicans
Female Republicans
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Others
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Others
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Republicans
Male Others
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Others
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Others
Female Others
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Others
Female Others
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Others
Female Republicans
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Others
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Others
Male Others
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Others
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Others
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Others
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Others
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Others
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Republicans
Male Others
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Others
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Others
Female Others
Female Others
Female Democrats
Male Others
Female Others
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Others
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Others
Male Republicans
Female Others
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Male Others
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Others
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Others
Male Republicans
Male Others
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Others
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Others
Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Others
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Others
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Others
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Others
Male Others
Male Others
Male Others
Male Republicans
Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Others
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Republicans
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Others
Female Others
Male Others
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Others
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Others
Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Others
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Others
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Others
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Others
Female Republicans
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Others
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Others
Male Others
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Female Others
Male Others
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Others
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Others
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Others
Male Republicans
Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Republicans
Female Republicans
Male Others
Male Others
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
cher wants to assess if there is an association between gender and
andidate preference (Democrats, Republicans, and Others) in a
tial election. Gender and candidate preference is recorded for 400
randomly selected individuals.
X Y
Project Time Cost ($) 0.8193
1 14 80 58.794
2 29 111
3 26 76
4 10 27
5 18 55
6 11 51
7 34 150
8 26 140
9 24 80
10 21 120
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.8192950864
R Square 0.6712444385
Adjusted R Square 0.6301499934
Standard Error 24.445764906
Observations 10
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 9761.2366 9761.2366 16.334189 0.0037277
Residual 8 4780.7634 597.59542
Total 9 14542
RESIDUAL OUTPUT
140
f(x) = 4.13787054902649 x + 0.863357305735846
R² = 0.671244438533453
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
5 10 15 20 25 30
ignificance F
25 30 35 40
Salary Publication Years
88 4.5 11
77.3 7.8 6
75.3 4.3 7
96.4 8.8 20
87.7 5.1 8
58.1 2.1 3
63.1 2.4 4
58.5 2.6 2
95.4 8.2 16
92 8.8 14
94.5 6.6 12
103 8.4 18
94 5.8 14
64 3.2 5
77.3 3.7 10
83.7 5.3 8
74.8 6.4 7
92.5 5.6 17
79.7 5.9 8
64 2.5 5
94.3 6.8 14
100.2 7.9 19
87.7 4.3 13
71.3 3.3 6
97 4.7 21
83.4 7.9 8
90.8 5.5 12
78.5 5.8 5
97.3 4.7 19
61.6 4.3 3
65.3 5.5 2
89.7 6.6 10
83.8 5.8 7
104.5 8.5 18
78.6 5.6 7
Measurement
6.05
5.99
6.11 Measurement of a part is given in CMs. Plot a Control chart accord
6.13
5.87
6.05
6.23
6.49
6.15
5.89
5.87
5.99
6.07
6.17
5.86
6.07
6.01
5.87
5.66
5.58
5.62
5.89
6.02
5.93
6.05
Ms. Plot a Control chart accordingly.
Length
601.4
601.6
598
You work at an automobile engine assembly plant. One of the parts,
601.4 mm long to meet engineering specifications. There has been a chron
599.4 being out of specification, which causes poor-fitting assemblies, res
600 rates. Your supervisor wants to run X and R charts to monitor this ch
600.2 collect a total of 100 observations (20 samples of 5 camshafts each
the plant, and 100 observations from each of yo
601.2
598.4
599
601.2
601
600.8
597.6
601.6
599.4
601.2
598.4
599.2
598.8
601.4
599
601
601.6
601.4
601.4
598.8
601.4
598.4
601.6
598.8
601.2
599.6
601.2
598.2
598.8
597.8
598.2
598.2
598.2
601.2
600
598.8
599.4
597.2
600.8
600.6
599.6
599.4
598
600.8
597.8
599.2
599.2
600.6
598
598
598.8
601
600.8
598.8
599.4
601
598.8
599.6
599
600.4
598.4
602.2
601
601.4
601
601.2
601.4
601.8
601.6
601
600.2
599
601.2
601.2
601.2
601.2
601
601
601.4
601.4
598.8
598.8
598.8
598.2
601.8
601
601.4
601.4
599
601.4
601.8
601.6
601.2
plant. One of the parts, a camshaft, must be 600 mm +2
There has been a chronic problem with camshaft length
or-fitting assemblies, resulting in high scrap and rework
charts to monitor this characteristic, so for a month, you
les of 5 camshafts each) from all the camshafts used at
vations from each of your suppliers.
Weight
3.0469
3.0555
3.0627 A canning company wants to assess whether its can-filling pr
3.0412 collected 15 subgroups of 10 cans at 15-minute intervals ac
3.0473 production.
1
2.9739
3.0609
3.0023
2.9813
3.0430
3.0467
3.0465
3.0296
3.0701
2.985
3.0135
3.0308
2.9942
2.9724
3.0398
3.0532
3.0098
2.9927
3.0323
2.9549
3.0109
3.0142
3.0069
3.0436
3.0196
3.0232
3.0334
3.0352
3.0476
3.014
3.0077
2.9686
3.0354
2.989
3.0119
3.037
3.0111
3.0316
3.0774
3.0161
3.0188
3.0339
2.9885
3.0423
3.0182
3.0234
3.0749
3.0451
3.0165
3.0283
3.0432
3.0652
3.0331
3.0412
3.0218
3.0568
3.0373
3.058
3.0918
3.0156
3.0572
3.0775
3.0104
2.9942
3.0604
3.0703
3.0506
3.0102
3.0335
3.0248
3.0753
3.0023
3.0193
3.068
3.0674
3.0113
3.0469
3.0592
3.0604
3.0258
3.0646
3.0459
3.0532
3.0347
2.995
3.0322
3.0289
3.0165
3.0494
3.0399
3.024
3.0216
3.048
3.059
3.0135
3.0469
3.0558
3.0627
3.0412
3.0473
3.0545
3.0627
3.0231
3.0503
3.0498
3.0844
3.0368
3.0512
3.0263
3.0687
3.0726
3.0919
3.0237
3.0381
3.0495
3.0423
3.0515
3.0548
3.0437
3.089
3.0562
3.0544
3.0579
3.0127
3.0768
3.0162
3.0411
3.0971
3.0682
3.0555
3.0327
3.043
3.0372
3.0701
3.0371
3.0497
3.0746
3.0541
3.0664
3.0781
3.0881
3.0459
3.0524
3.0143
3.0713
assess whether its can-filling process is in control. The company
0 cans at 15-minute intervals across two shifts for a single day's
production.
Unanswered
Subgroups
Calls
250 25
257 27
A telephone service center wants
260 27 The total number of incoming call
256 27
259 28
259 22
250 21
260 30
254 24
253 27
251 15
254 20
251 24
256 31
255 22
249 21
257 22
252 21
258 20
252 30
249 27
A telephone service center wants to assess whether its call answering system is in control.
The total number of incoming calls and the number of unanswered calls were recorded for
21 days.
Sample Size Defectives
500 5 A manufacturer of light bulbs wants to assess whether or not i
500 8 taken every hour for three shifts (24 samples of 500 light bu
500 13 Defectives are light bulbs th
500 11
500 8
500 6
500 5
500 3
500 1
500 6
500 4
500 12
500 6
500 8
500 13
500 17
500 4
500 5
500 4
500 9
500 7
500 2
500 3
500 6
nts to assess whether or not its process is in control. Samples of light bulbs were
fts (24 samples of 500 light bulbs) and tested to see whether or not they light.
Defectives are light bulbs that do not light.
Wallpaper
24
28 A wallpaper manufacturer wants to assess the stability of its printing process.
Samples of 100 feet were taken from 25 wallpaper rolls and the number of
36 blemishes, which include print smears, pattern distortions, and missing ink,
47 were counted.
23
26
29
45
48
32
45
56
58
41
25
38
21
29
38
32
45
42
26
38
45
of its printing process.
s and the number of
ons, and missing ink,
Pages Typos
30 3
24 4 A stenographic company wants to assess the quality of its transcripti
They sampled 25 sets of pages and counted the number of typogr
23 2 errors for each set. Each set had a different number of pages, so th
25 6 size varies. Typographical errors are defects.
32 5
30 18
24 6
30 5
27 10
24 4
30 4
32 7
26 5
31 8
24 5
27 7
27 4
30 17
32 5
24 8
26 6
32 8
30 9
24 5
25 3
quality of its transcription service.
d the number of typographical
number of pages, so the sample
rors are defects.