Broken

chips
11
Create a distribution for the attached data
12
8
8
12
9
10
13
9
9
9 Q1
10
14
8
7
7 3.4
7
10
10
9
9
4
10
11
10
9
10
9
9
12
8
11
10
8
9
11
7
9
10
9
10
11
10
6
7
12
8
6
10
9
11
13
10
10
4
11
11
4
11
8
7
8
11
9
8
7
10
8
10
13
8
5
9
5
8
8
7
10
9
9
12
8
10
10
10
10
11
8
7
7
9
10
 9
11
12
7
8
12
10
11
Q1- (1.5*IQR)

CAPA
Part Operator Response
1 1 0.65 0.05
1 1 0.6
2 1 1 An automotive supplier wants to know if the currently used meas
2 1 1 thickness of an engine pa
3 1 0.85 Ten parts that represent the expected range of the process variatio
3 1 0.8 the thickness of each of the ten parts, two times p
4 1 0.85
4 1 0.95
5 1 0.55
5 1 0.45
6 1 1
6 1 1
7 1 0.95
7 1 0.95
8 1 0.85
8 1 0.8
9 1 1
9 1 1
10 1 0.6
10 1 0.7
1 2 0.55
1 2 0.55
2 2 1.05
2 2 0.95
3 2 0.8
3 2 0.75
4 2 0.8
4 2 0.75
5 2 0.4
5 2 0.4
6 2 1
6 2 1.05
7 2 0.95
7 2 0.9
8 2 0.75
8 2 0.7
9 2 1
9 2 0.95
10 2 0.55
10 2 0.5
1 3 0.5
1 3 0.55
2 3 1.05
2 3 1
3 3 0.8
3 3 0.8
 4 3 0.8
4 3 0.8
5 3 0.45
5 3 0.5
6 3 1
6 3 1.05
7 3 0.95
7 3 0.95
8 3 0.8
8 3 0.8
9 3 1.05
9 3 1.05
10 3 0.85
10 3 0.8
o know if the currently used measurement system is precisely measuring the
thickness of an engine part.

ected range of the process variation were selected. Three operators measured
each of the ten parts, two times per part, in a random order.
Diameter
73.967
73.982
73.982
Please check if the data is normal
73.983
73.984
73.984
73.984
73.984 1s 68
73.985 2s 95
73.985 3s 99.73
73.986
73.988
73.988
73.989
73.989
73.99
73.99
73.99
73.99
73.992
73.992
73.992
73.993
73.993
73.993
73.993
73.994
73.994
73.994
73.994
73.994
73.994
73.995
73.995
73.995
73.995
73.995
73.995
73.996
73.996
73.996
73.996
73.997
73.997
73.997
73.998
73.998
73.998
73.998
73.998
73.999
73.999
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
74.001
74.001
74.002
74.002
74.002
74.002
74.002
74.003
74.003
74.003
74.003
74.004
74.004
74.004
74.004
74.005
74.005
74.005
74.005
74.005
74.005
74.005
74.006
74.006
74.006
74.006
74.007
74.007
74.007
74.007
74.007
74.008
74.008
74.008
74.009
74.009
74.009
74.009
74.009
74.01
74.01
74.01
74.01
74.011 Chart Title
74.012 45
74.012
74.012 40
74.013
35
74.013
74.014 30
74.014
74.014 25

74.015 20
74.015
74.015 15
74.015
10
74.015
74.017 5
74.018
0
74.019 73.96 73.97 73.98 73.99 74
74.02
74.021
74.024
74.03
ormal
 Chart Title

3.98 73.99 74 74.01 74.02 74.03 74.04

Diameter Diameter 2
74.03 75.03
74.002 75.002 An engine manufacturer uses a forging process to produce piston
74.019 75.019 rings. The forging process is in control, and now the quality
engineers want to assess the process capability. They collect
73.992 74.992 twenty-five samples of five piston rings. The specification limits for
74.008 75.008 piston ring diameter are 74.0 ± 0.05.
73.995 74.995
73.992 74.992
74.001 75.001 USL 74.05
74.011 75.011 LSL 73.95
74.004 75.004
73.988 74.988
74.024 75.024
74.021 75.021
74.005 75.005
74.002 75.002
74.002 75.002
73.996 74.996
73.993 74.993
74.015 75.015
74.009 75.009
73.992 74.992
74.007 75.007
74.015 75.015
73.989 74.989
74.014 75.014
74.009 75.009
73.994 74.994
73.997 74.997
73.985 74.985
73.993 74.993
73.995 74.995
74.006 75.006
73.994 74.994
74 75
74.005 75.005
73.985 74.985
74.003 75.003
73.993 74.993
74.015 75.015
73.988 74.988
74.008 75.008
73.995 74.995
74.009 75.009
74.005 75.005
74.004 75.004
73.998 74.998
 74 75
73.99 74.99
74.007 75.007
73.995 74.995
73.994 74.994
73.998 74.998
73.994 74.994
73.995 74.995
73.99 74.99
74.004 75.004
74 75
74.007 75.007
74 75
73.996 74.996
73.983 74.983
74.002 75.002
73.998 74.998
73.997 74.997
74.012 75.012
74.006 75.006
73.967 74.967
73.994 74.994
74 75
73.984 74.984
74.012 75.012
74.014 75.014
73.998 74.998
73.999 74.999
74.007 75.007
74 75
73.984 74.984
74.005 75.005
73.998 74.998
73.996 74.996
73.994 74.994
74.012 75.012
73.986 74.986
74.005 75.005
74.007 75.007
74.006 75.006
74.01 75.01
74.018 75.018
74.003 75.003
74 75
73.984 74.984
74.002 75.002
74.003 75.003
74.005 75.005
73.997 74.997
74 75
74.01 75.01
74.013 75.013
74.02 75.02
74.003 75.003
73.982 74.982
74.001 75.001
74.015 75.015
74.005 75.005
73.996 74.996
74.004 75.004
73.999 74.999
73.99 74.99
74.006 75.006
74.009 75.009
74.01 75.01
73.989 74.989
73.99 74.99
74.009 75.009
74.014 75.014
74.015 75.015
74.008 75.008
73.993 74.993
74 75
74.01 75.01
73.982 74.982
73.984 74.984
73.995 74.995
74.017 75.017
74.013 75.013
 Defect Count Cumulative count Cumulative %
Missing button 217 217 45%
Stitching errors 112 329 69%
Loose thread 67 396 83%
Hemming errors 43 439 91%
Fabric flaws 23 462 96%
Misaligned fabric 18 480 100%
A clothing manufacturer has had numerous returns due to various quality complaints.
The manufacturer wants to correct the problems but isn't sure where to begin. They
decide to track the number and type of defects in their clothing line. Identifying the
sources of their most common problems will help them to target their improvement
efforts.

Chart Title
Count Cumulative %
250 100%
217 90%
200 80%
70%
150 60%

112 50%
100 40%
67 30%
50 43 20%
23 18 10%
0 0%
Missing button Stitching errors Loose thread Hemming errors Fabric flaws Misaligned fabric
 100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
18 10%
0%
Misaligned fabric
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3
5.19 5.57 8.73
5.53 5.11 5.01
4.78 5.76 7.59 Your company makes plastic pipes, and you are concerne
consistency of their diameters. You measure ten pipes a
5.44 5.65 4.73 three weeks.
4.47 4.99 4.93
4.78 5.25 5.19
4.26 7 6.77
5.7 5.2 5.66
4.4 5.3 6.48 UAL Q3+1.5IQR
5.64 4.91 5.2 LAL Q1-1.5IQR
lastic pipes, and you are concerned about the
iameters. You measure ten pipes a week for
three weeks.
Durability Carpet Composition
18.95 1 A
12.62 1 B
11.94 1 A You want to examine the overall durability o
the carpet products are placed in four home
14.42 1 B 60 days. Create a boxplot to examine the
10.06 2 A
7.19 2 B
7.03 2 A
14.66 2 B
10.92 3 A
13.28 3 B
14.52 3 A
12.51 3 B
10.46 4 A
21.4 4 B
18.1 4 A
22.5 4 B
o examine the overall durability of your carpet products. Samples of
products are placed in four homes and you measure durability after
Create a boxplot to examine the distribution of durability scores.
Delivery - Mode B
6
You are attempting to assess the speed of delivery when ordering a sp
7 mode A has been traditionally assumed to generate the best response
Test the hypothesis on the mean delivery time at
3
6
7
8
5
3
2
5
3
9
5
5
4
6
4
5
6
3
2
2
4
3
4
6
4
7
4
4
1
4
7
3
4
9
livery when ordering a specific commodity via two different modes. Delivery via
nerate the best response; but we need to test that assumption against mode B.
he mean delivery time at 6 days and standard deviation is 2
Energy $
1211
1572
1668 Energy expenditure is measured for 15 randomly selected, upper-
income families in the United States to see if the mean expenditure
1250 differs from the published value of $1080.
1478
1307
1184
865
1162
1308
1188
1111
1747
1326
1142

1301.2667
 Before
Processor After Training
Training
1 23 21

2 17 11
3 8 6
4 9 10
5 7 5
6 25 22
7 16 11
8 11 16
9 12 10
10 9 5
A Green Belt conducted a study to determine if training was effective at reducing the time
it takes to process orders. The process is not automated and is highly dependent on the
knowledge and skill level of individual processors.
 Blend 1 Blend 2 Blend 3 Blend 4
17 14.9 13 15
13.9 3.2 16.4 17.8
10.4 1.9 13.3 22.9 Investigators compared th
paint. Six samples of each pa
19.3 7.3 6.5 17.4 of metal, cured,
16.1 9.6 11.9 16.9
11.7 14.5 16.8 18.4

Formulation A Formulation B Formulation C

338.2 340.4 344.4

331 328.2 338.5
323 338.5 348.9 Suppose you are testing to
317.9 333.7 326.6 average stiffness am
327.9 332.8 342.6
328.1 323.4 355.4
308.3 335.3 337
312.8 326.2 339.2
324 344 331.3
342.4 310.3 336.3
326.2 317.5 342.3
328.1 322 338.6
337.6 321.2 323.9
320.3 321.4 345.7
311 342.6 333.1
328.1 334.7 331.3
 Investigators compared the hardness of four different blends of
paint. Six samples of each paint blend were applied to a small piece
of metal, cured, and measured for hardness.

Suppose you are testing to see if there is a significant difference in

average stiffness among three foam formulations
A direct-mail firm chooses 1000 households at random to receive
advertisements for a new laundry detergent. Of the 1000
households that receive the mailing, 87 purchase the detergent.
The firm wants to determine if this success rate is different from
their average of 6.5%.

0.065

0.065
A university financial-aid office polled its undergraduate students to
determine if male or female students were more likely to obtain
summer employment. Of the 802 male students sampled, 725 were
employed during the summer, and, of the 712 female students
sampled, 573 were employed
 Method Audited Number of errors Proportion defective
Standard Paper 80 12 0.150
Intranet form 80 5 0.063

Male Female
Employed 725 573
Samples 802 712
Gender Preference
Female Democrats
Male Democrats A researcher wants to assess if there is a
Female Democrats their candidate preference (Democra
Female Democrats presidential election. Gender and candid
randomly selected
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Others
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Others
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Others
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Others
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Others
Female Democrats
Female Others
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Others
Male Republicans
Female Others
Female Others
Female Republicans
Male Others
Female Democrats
 Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Others
Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Others
Female Republicans
Female Republicans
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Others
Female Republicans
Female Republicans
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Others
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Others
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
 Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Republicans
Male Others
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Others
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Others
Female Others
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Others
Female Others
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Others
Female Republicans
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Others
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Others
Male Others
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Others
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Others
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Others
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Others
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Others
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Republicans
Male Others
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Others
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Others
Female Others
Female Others
Female Democrats
Male Others
Female Others
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Others
Female Democrats
 Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Others
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Others
Male Republicans
Female Others
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Male Others
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Others
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Others
Male Republicans
Male Others
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Others
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Others
Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Others
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Others
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Others
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Others
Male Others
Male Others
Male Others
Male Republicans
 Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Others
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Republicans
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Others
Female Others
Male Others
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Others
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Others
Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Others
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Others
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Others
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Others
Female Republicans
Female Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Female Others
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Others
Male Others
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Female Others
Male Others
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Others
Female Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Republicans
Male Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Female Others
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Female Democrats
Female Others
Male Republicans
Male Others
Female Democrats
Male Democrats
Male Republicans
Female Republicans
Female Republicans
Male Others
Male Others
Male Republicans
Male Republicans
Male Democrats
Male Democrats
cher wants to assess if there is an association between gender and
candidate preference (Democrats, Republicans, and Others) in a
tial election. Gender and candidate preference is recorded for 400
randomly selected individuals.
 X Y
Project Time Cost ($) 0.8193
1 14 80 58.794
2 29 111
3 26 76
4 10 27
5 18 55
6 11 51
7 34 150
8 26 140
9 24 80
10 21 120

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.8192950864
R Square 0.6712444385
Adjusted R Square 0.6301499934
Standard Error 24.445764906
Observations 10

ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 9761.2366 9761.2366 16.334189 0.0037277
Residual 8 4780.7634 597.59542
Total 9 14542

Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%

Intercept 0.8633573057 23.137213 0.0373147 0.9711484 -52.49115
X Variable 1 4.137870549 1.0238306 4.0415578 0.0037277 1.7769129

RESIDUAL OUTPUT

Observation Predicted Y Residuals

1 58.793544992 21.206455
2 120.86160323 -9.861603
3 108.44799158 -32.44799
4 42.242062796 -15.24206
5 75.345027188 -20.34503
6 46.379933345 4.6200667
7 141.55095597 8.449044
8 108.44799158 31.552008
9 100.17225048 -20.17225
10 87.758638835 32.241361
 Cost ($)
160

140
f(x) = 4.13787054902649 x + 0.863357305735846
R² = 0.671244438533453
120

100

80

60

40

20

0
5 10 15 20 25 30

ignificance F

Upper 95%Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%

54.217865 -52.49115 54.2178654962487
6.4988282 1.7769129 6.4988281727921
)

25 30 35 40
Salary Publication Years
88 4.5 11
77.3 7.8 6
75.3 4.3 7
96.4 8.8 20
87.7 5.1 8
58.1 2.1 3
63.1 2.4 4
58.5 2.6 2
95.4 8.2 16
92 8.8 14
94.5 6.6 12
103 8.4 18
94 5.8 14
64 3.2 5
77.3 3.7 10
83.7 5.3 8
74.8 6.4 7
92.5 5.6 17
79.7 5.9 8
64 2.5 5
94.3 6.8 14
100.2 7.9 19
87.7 4.3 13
71.3 3.3 6
97 4.7 21
83.4 7.9 8
90.8 5.5 12
78.5 5.8 5
97.3 4.7 19
61.6 4.3 3
65.3 5.5 2
89.7 6.6 10
83.8 5.8 7
104.5 8.5 18
78.6 5.6 7
Measurement
6.05
5.99
6.11 Measurement of a part is given in CMs. Plot a Control chart accord
6.13
5.87
6.05
6.23
6.49
6.15
5.89
5.87
5.99
6.07
6.17
5.86
6.07
6.01
5.87
5.66
5.58
5.62
5.89
6.02
5.93
6.05
Ms. Plot a Control chart accordingly.
Length
601.4
601.6
598
You work at an automobile engine assembly plant. One of the parts
601.4 mm long to meet engineering specifications. There has been a chron
599.4 being out of specification, which causes poor-fitting assemblies, re
600 rates. Your supervisor wants to run X and R charts to monitor this ch
600.2 collect a total of 100 observations (20 samples of 5 camshafts each)
plant, and 100 observations from each of you
601.2
598.4
599
601.2
601
600.8
597.6
601.6
599.4
601.2
598.4
599.2
598.8
601.4
599
601
601.6
601.4
601.4
598.8
601.4
598.4
601.6
598.8
601.2
599.6
601.2
598.2
598.8
597.8
598.2
598.2
598.2
601.2
600
598.8
599.4
597.2
600.8
600.6
599.6
599.4
598
600.8
597.8
599.2
599.2
600.6
598
598
598.8
601
600.8
598.8
599.4
601
598.8
599.6
599
600.4
598.4
602.2
601
601.4
601
601.2
601.4
601.8
601.6
601
600.2
599
601.2
601.2
601.2
601.2
601
601
601.4
601.4
598.8
598.8
598.8
598.2
601.8
601
601.4
601.4
599
601.4
601.8
601.6
601.2
 e assembly plant. One of the parts, a camshaft, must be 600 mm +2
ecifications. There has been a chronic problem with camshaft length
h causes poor-fitting assemblies, resulting in high scrap and rework
un X and R charts to monitor this characteristic, so for a month, you
(20 samples of 5 camshafts each) from all the camshafts used at the
100 observations from each of your suppliers.
 Weight
3.0469
3.0555
3.0627 A canning company wants to assess whether its can-filling p
3.0412 collected 15 subgroups of 10 cans at 15-minute intervals ac
3.0473 production.
1
2.9739
3.0609
3.0023
2.9813
3.0430
3.0467
3.0465
3.0296
3.0701
2.985
3.0135
3.0308
2.9942
2.9724
3.0398
3.0532
3.0098
2.9927
3.0323
2.9549
3.0109
3.0142
3.0069
3.0436
3.0196
3.0232
3.0334
3.0352
3.0476
3.014
3.0077
2.9686
3.0354
2.989
3.0119
3.037
3.0111
3.0316
3.0774
3.0161
3.0188
3.0339
2.9885
3.0423
3.0182
3.0234
3.0749
3.0451
3.0165
3.0283
3.0432
3.0652
3.0331
3.0412
3.0218
3.0568
3.0373
3.058
3.0918
3.0156
3.0572
3.0775
3.0104
2.9942
3.0604
3.0703
3.0506
3.0102
3.0335
3.0248
3.0753
3.0023
3.0193
3.068
3.0674
3.0113
3.0469
3.0592
3.0604
3.0258
3.0646
3.0459
3.0532
3.0347
2.995
3.0322
3.0289
3.0165
3.0494
3.0399
3.024
3.0216
3.048
3.059
3.0135
3.0469
3.0558
3.0627
3.0412
3.0473
3.0545
3.0627
3.0231
3.0503
3.0498
3.0844
3.0368
3.0512
3.0263
3.0687
3.0726
3.0919
3.0237
3.0381
3.0495
3.0423
3.0515
3.0548
3.0437
3.089
3.0562
3.0544
3.0579
3.0127
3.0768
3.0162
3.0411
3.0971
3.0682
3.0555
3.0327
3.043
3.0372
3.0701
3.0371
3.0497
3.0746
3.0541
3.0664
3.0781
3.0881
3.0459
3.0524
3.0143
3.0713
 assess whether its can-filling process is in control. The company
0 cans at 15-minute intervals across two shifts for a single day's
production.
 Unanswered
Subgroups
Calls
250 25
257 27
A telephone service center wants
260 27 The total number of incoming call
256 27
259 28
259 22
250 21
260 30
254 24
253 27
251 15
254 20
251 24
256 31
255 22
249 21
257 22
252 21
258 20
252 30
249 27
A telephone service center wants to assess whether its call answering system is in control.
The total number of incoming calls and the number of unanswered calls were recorded for
21 days.
Sample Size Defectives
500 5 A manufacturer of light bulbs wants to assess whether or not i
500 8 taken every hour for three shifts (24 samples of 500 light bu
500 13 Defectives are light bulbs t
500 11
500 8
500 6
500 5
500 3
500 1
500 6
500 4
500 12
500 6
500 8
500 13
500 17
500 4
500 5
500 4
500 9
500 7
500 2
500 3
500 6
nts to assess whether or not its process is in control. Samples of light bulbs were
fts (24 samples of 500 light bulbs) and tested to see whether or not they light.
Defectives are light bulbs that do not light.
Wallpaper
24
28 A wallpaper manufacturer wants to assess the stability of its printing process.
Samples of 100 feet were taken from 25 wallpaper rolls and the number of
36 blemishes, which include print smears, pattern distortions, and missing ink,
47 were counted.
23
26
29
45
48
32
45
56
58
41
25
38
21
29
38
32
45
42
26
38
45
of its printing process.
s and the number of
ons, and missing ink,
Pages Typos
30 3
24 4 A stenographic company wants to assess the quality of its transcripti
They sampled 25 sets of pages and counted the number of typograp
23 2 for each set. Each set had a different number of pages, so the sam
25 6 varies. Typographical errors are defects.
32 5
30 18
24 6
30 5
27 10
24 4
30 4
32 7
26 5
31 8
24 5
27 7
27 4
30 17
32 5
24 8
26 6
32 8
30 9
24 5
25 3
 assess the quality of its transcription service.
d counted the number of typographical errors
erent number of pages, so the sample size
aphical errors are defects.