You are on page 1of 9
ALMukondis Nizar Al-Kurdt ALMIII Engineering Consultants wa BAe] idl Se, ell gh Bowie! esl Ladd l TESTING, EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE OF ABC MATERIAL lSource Of Material| Riyadh [Description |Aggr. Base Cours: [client oRAyl 9 Contractor distal dena 9 tal aga iS Project, 5 3) Sly! La ate e I(anstTo 1-176) Date of Sample _|19-01-2022 Date of Reporting 31-01-2022 Test Method Test Results Speciation Remarks [Passing Sieve 2” % 354 100 z \astw 06913) [Passing Sieve 10" 5 ora as Comply To Project (astm 06913) Specification Passing Sieve 3/4" 5 e 3080 Comply To Project (astm 06913) Specification Passing Sieve 378° _% 302 (ASTM 06913) 7 Passing Sieve Noa % aa 3060 Tamply To Project astm p6913) Specification assing Sieve No.40 5 Te 107 Campy To Project astm D6913) Specification [Material Finer Than No. 200% ae EST) = astm c-117) Liquid Limit a man 25 Comply To Project |(wastTo 1-89) Specification Plasticity Index 5 Wax 6 Comply To Project ((AasHTo 1-90) Speciation Comply To Project lHyoRomeTeR Test MAK. (5 6) LAY CONTENT Specification GRAVEL CONTENT-58.69 Modified proctor 7186 Comply To Project (astm 01557-126) Specification (California Bearing Ration COR % 700 Tain, 100 Camply To Project (astm p1883-16) Specification SSoundness of ABC material Wax 12 by use of Sodium Sulphate % - Under Testing [5 Cycles (AASHTO T-104) [Abrasion of ABC Material. % a0 Wax a5 Comply To Project 1500 Revolutions (AASHTO T-96) Specification [crushed particles (2+Faces)_% 980 Min. 80 Comply To Project stm 05621) Speciation [Sand Equivalent Value (Si) % 18.0 Min. 45 See the test result of Hydrometer [Marginal value [REMARKS : *Since the 9 of over size of material less than 5% it is considered comply to specification. I++ The % of material finer than Sieve No.200 exceed with 3.6% than the required , but test result of Li & P.L |with in the required limits & hydrometer test result indicated the % of clay less than 5% , So it Considered Lion Se Nall 301647 ol eal are : \waloll = a8 sat Say $a nln} Uiaibell For Al Muhandis Nizar Al Kurdi Al Mili Engineering AuMukurdis Nizar Al-Kurdi ALMAIL. Engineering Consultants @ udell Eee Lita ea as ole MATERIAL TESTING LABORATORY TEST REPORT ‘TEST METHOD si il Classifi ation & Moisture Content Determination (ASTM D6913/D6913M-17)(ASTM D4318-17)(ASTM D2216-10) Glient/Owner NHC oS Ask y) I) lob No. la2az/on/2022 Contractor alia Sealy Bil gl Test Number [108440 Project |s1 dlal lege ‘ample Number [10185 Location/Station Collected By Client. ‘Sampling Date 2022/01/19 Testing Date [pozz/ea/an Sample Description Aagr. Base Course Tested By |AMNKCrew Particle Size Distr (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve ‘Analysis (ASTM D6913/D6913M-17) SIEVE OPENING WT. OF SOIL PERCENT meercresae ea RETAINED PASSING ] A a 101.600 300.0 76.200) 63500 50.800 _ 38.100 25.400 19.050 9,500 4.760, 2.000, 0.420) 0.074 No. 200, TOTAL SOIL WT Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass (ASTM 0216-10) (Can No. 1 Wt. of Wet Soil + Can, gm 4372.0 \Wt. of Dry Soilt Can, gm 4085.7 ‘Wt. of Water, am 286.3 ‘Wt. of Can, gm 0.0 ‘Wt. of Dry Soil, gm 4085.7 ‘Moisture Content, _% 7.0 ATTERBERG LIMITS ‘Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils’ (ASTM 4318-17) u 2 Pl 5 SOIL CLASSIFICATION uscs (ASTM 02487) ‘AASHTO (ASTM 03282 /M-145) Sieving Method Manual Ada GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE 100 PERCENT PASSING % : ee 20 pb ee 10 of 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 PARTICLESIZE, mm. ze) Reviewed By{QA/QC Engineer) ‘Approved By Tal ‘Monday, January 31, 202: End of Report Eng Hamed Abdul Fattah yFethout witten approval of Al Muhandis Material Testing Laboratory Page loft Nizar AL-Kuedi ALMill Engineering Consultants UWApol] ell Neel Is tte! il Laie O 0164 Api y@T0 (082974 MATERIAL TESTING LABORATORY TEST REPORT ] TEST METHOD Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort : Moisture Density Relationship (ASTM D1557-12e) Glient/Owner NHC ORW Ash yI 5a Job No. ‘Contractor Wildes Retially Gea aga IS a Z Test Number _| Project 51 bby Blt ‘Sample Number Location/Station Collected By Sampling Date 2022/01/19 Testing Date [2022/01/21 ‘Sample Description Ager. Base Course Tested By [|AMNK Crew Vol. of Mold, cm* Mold No. 4 Weof Mold, g: 5038.0 2125.0 Method: Type of Rammer: Preparation Method : Tal No 1 i iH v v Wt of Mold + Wet of oll & 3517 o701 3987 3996 882 We of Wet soil ‘ 2479 753 4949 2958 ssa Wet Density en? 2.108 2237 2329 2333 2.280 an no Aa Ds ba cit Aas We of Wet Sil an | 2202 2863 308.4 m3 2793 Wt. of Dry Soil + Can zg | 285.0 275.3 291.0 251.5, 254.2 Wwe of Water cl 57 110 174 198 25:1 Wwe of Can é 20 23d 240 27 21.0 Wwe of ry Sol 8 2620 219 2670 2278 2332 Water Content «| 28 435 652 369 1076 Ory Density wen? 2.083 aaa 2187 2.1a6 2.058 MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS CURVE [| 2180 E Zo & 2060 Kt 2040 ac i co 10 20°30 40 80 60 70 80 90 wo no 120 ater Content. % Modified Maximum Dry Density: 2.186 gem? _ Modified Optimum MelstureConten remarks Monday, January 31, 2022 End of Report jpproved By (Lab Manager) ng. Hamed Abdul Fattah GF, without writen approval ofl Muhandis Matera Testing laboratory Page 1of 1 ALMunondis Nira AL-Kurdi ALMIL Enginee ing Consultants UAH] Slall 2! gh gaia il La I 301647 IDE, Mall Ko yeait SAT Seeell Agagll ila lh MATERIAL TESTING LABORATORY TEST REPORT ‘Standard Test Method for California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of Laboratory-Compacted Soils lrest METHOD ASTM D1883 - 16. SAF olay eS Dates 2710112022 SI ely Dt vat Eye [SAMPLE No: 1 [Material Description: AGG .BASECOURSE MATERIAL [Maximum Dry Density, g/cm”: 2.186 |Soil Classification, AASHTO: Al [Optimum Moisture Content % 652 Surcharge Weight. kg: 45 [Unt Weight Detemination Before Soating Motte Content Determination No.of Blows 10 [3 _[ & [No.of Biows 70 | 0 | © [Mould No. 6 5 4 [Can No. BL-2 | L-3 | A-7 Weight of Moule | Mae | 7200 | 7240 wi, of wel Soir Cong | 350.5 | 282.5 | 290.6 [volume of woul em | 2134 | 2137 | 2136 J of Dry Sot Cong [330.7] 268.5] 274.3 Weight of Mould + Sampre a _[11683] 11907] 12220 Ji of Con o | 23.8 | 225 | 234 Molding Wel Uni Weight ice | 2.115 | 2.203 [2.331 [aolding MG | 64s | 656 | 650 Iwoding Dry Unit Weight raise | 1987 | 2.067 | 2.169 Percent Compaction % [908 | 946 | 1001 [Aer Soaking Motive Content Determination No, of Blows i a Penetration | Dial Reading kN Toad Ka [Can No. 11215 Tnches|_mm No.of Blows No, of Blows wi. of welSol= Gang | 285.5 [2945 | 301.7 wo] a | a | 10 [9 | © [wi ofdrysol+Con 267.2 276.5 | 284 00] woo [00 [0.00 | 0.00] 0 [0 | 0 Jur. of Con To | 238 [23.4 [241 ‘02 | 050 | 040 | 050 | 080 | 41 | 51 | a2 [MC After Soaiing spas [7.1 [681 0.037 [-1.00-|-4.00_[4.10_[-3.00_|r02_| 113 |_08 Peers 0.057 [150] 440] 1.90 | s60_| 143| 104 | ari ‘079 | 200 | 470 | 290 | 020 | 173 | 206 | 636 0.088 | 250 [210 | 380 | 1090| 214 | 368 | 1112 ore | 300 | 230 490 | 13.00| 235 | soo | 1926 0.138 | 350 | 250 _| sea | 1490| 255 | 600 | 1519 o.1s7 | 400 | 260-| 6.80 | 16.40 | 205 | 603 | 1672 or] «50 | 270 | 790 | 17.60 | 275 | 606 | 1795 o.197| 500 | 290 | 9.00 | 1910 [ 296 | ore | 1098 0217 | 5s | 300 | 980 | 20.20 | 308 | 1070 | 2060 0.26 | 60 | 320 | 10.80 | 21.10[ 36 | 1101 | 2162 0.256 | 650 | 340 | 14.60 | 21.40 | 347 | 1183 | 2162 No.of Blows eS [Conected Load @ ZSmm Penetration | 214 | 600 | 1326 BR vs Dry Density (Conected Load @ 50mmPenetration | 296 [1010 | 2060] No.of Bows o> oa Ts] « [CBR @ 2.50mm Penetration = [iss[as|ws] , [CBR @ 50mm Penetration % L146 [#7 Loe | No. of Bows 1 | > | 6 |: * swell a | as Ome OUT 3 Maximum ry Density % [osoo Tsao] toro] Dy Densiy ye | 2.077 [2.142 | 2.186 car [ssa [ers [1000] i 7 f Ly By Deny lee Fare | ] 7. obi RuPuals KO wurieel Engineering Consultants Doom = Li {cR1o1019744 CC Na D1617 soteieet aioe. MATERIAL TESTING LABORATORY TEST REPORT ‘TEST METHOD Sand Equivalent Value of Soils and Fine Aggregates (ASTM D2419-14) - Client/Owner NHC oS 4abg) 35,21 Job No. (aza7/o1/2022 Contractor Dalkey deal SLaaU aga SS Test Number [108442 Project “Bid alex ‘Sample Number |10186 Location/Station Collected By [Client Sampling Date 2022/01/19 a im Testing Date [2022/01/2: I Sample Description Ager. Base Course Tested By _[ANINK Crew Test No. 2 AVC S.E. Sand Reading A= | 40 4.0 40 Clay Reading B= 2 23 2 Average :A/B* 100 18.2 17.4 18.2 17.92 KO) diraigel loll arte Dae PS Seat at Remarks Checked Reviewed By (QA/QC Engineer) Approved By (Lab Manager) Eng. Mohl Eng.Abdul ra Eng.Hamed Abdul Fatah ‘This report relafes ony tote tested item and shall not by Feithout written approval of Al Muhandis Material Testing Laboratory ‘Monday, January 31, 2022 End of Report Page 1 of 1 AiPungadis Nizar Al-Kurdi Al? Engineering Consultants CO MATERIAL TESTING LABORATORY TEST REPORT. TEST METHOD Abrasion of Coarse Aggregate By Use Of The Los Angeles Machine i MG (oul €131/C131 M-14) Gient/Owner NHC SW Aubg 35 [lobe __‘[azar/ox/z072 Contractor Del Arbaly Bina AN “Test Number 109443 Sampling Date 2022/01/19 Tsteb del alesae Sample Number 10387 Collected By MINK Crew Testing Date 2022/01/22 ‘Sample Description AGG BASE COURSE Tested By —|AMNK Crew SIEVE SIZE ‘WEIGHT AND GRADING OF TEST SAMPLE PASSING [RETAINED x T 3 t 3 15in Lin 1250 Lin 3/4in 1250 3/4in 1a 1250 2500 12in 3A8in 1250 2500 3/80 4/4in 7 2500 4/49 No.4 2500 No.4 No.8 5000 rorat 5000 5000 5000 5000 A- Weight Of Sample Before Test 5009 GM 8 - Weight Of Sample After Test (Retained on No. 12 Sieve) / 3306 GM C- Percentage Of Wear =(A-B)/A* 100 34.0 % Grade Used A, Remarks ‘Monday, January 31, 2022 VitDbal] 1010429744. t Rosell sbi 301647 digit Agatsaigll ail hicus tl Sle a eal Approved By (Lab Manager) Eng.Hamed Abdul Fattah fou wetten approval of Al Muhandis Material Testing Laboratory End of Report Page 1 of 1 Ieuan 7 yuasiboll Nizar Al-Kurdi ALM, Sb Soy 5h Engineering Consultants Cael il Livia ‘cnim019745 CC Na 01617 rad ATOR MATERIAL TESTING LABORATORY TEST REPORT TEST METHOD Percentage of Crushed Particles (1 + Faces) L ss (ASTM D5821) lient/owner NHC OSU Rubs iS Job No. [a2a7/o1/2022 ‘Contractor (cDgLEally Relialy 5 Lec aga 8552 Z - Test Number [108463 Project 51 pb) Jl) algae a oo ‘Sample Number |10188 \Location/Station Collected By |AMNK Crew Sampling Date 2022/03/19 = Testing Date [2022/03/31 iption Aggr. Base Course Tested By [AMNK Crew SIEVE SIZE aaa" | ayaa" | yaa" | 3/e-na Total ‘A: Total Weight os Sample tested, g 1552.6 | 1354.3 648.2 500.2 ] IB: Wtof Crushed Pieces (One Face), — eta te 492.0 ar C :%ofCrushed pieces (B/A"100 ===) =a87 «|= «|= «| ~S«OBA D :Original grading, %retained = = =| «49~«|~=«800—«| «ABO. 8.80 26.50 E : Weighted %Crushed(C*/100===SS=«)=SC«BO.S|ST.TA 469 | 866 2 F :% Total One Face Crushed Pieces (E/D)*100 Specifical % Remarks hed Reviewed By (@AQC Engineer) ‘Approved By (Lab Manager) Eng. Eng Abdul Eng Hamed Abdul Fattah ‘This eportfetates ony to he teste tem and shal not bere et Rithout writen approval of Al Muhandls Miter Testing Laboratory ‘Monday, January 31, 2022 End of Report Page 1of1 Nizar AbKurdi AL MGI Engineering Consultants MATERIAL TESTING LABORATORY TEST REPORT CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF AGGREGATE BASE COURSE [contractor CY gia agi 35 2 [sampling Date 2410112022 Project Deas oe I ISA! & ye lsampled by Client Location au Gt {Testing Date 25/01/2022 |sample Description ‘Aggregate Base Course Hested by Eng.Mustafa Element Test Result Project Specification PH Value @25°C 6.75 Chloride (Cl) 0.057 (%) 1(%) Sulphate (SO,) 0.141 (%) 0.5 (%) 1The test carried out in presence of representative of Consultant Remarks _ lp'rhe tested sample is Comply to project specification Us Nall Seyeit shi Reece arent pares) Reviewed By ALC iMustate Salah Eng. Abdul R ig. Hamed Abdul Fattah RX ALMungadis vs igell MapsSang Cte Seay (ASTM 02216), ATTERBERG LIMITS (ASTM D 423-424), CLASSIFICATION (ASTM D 2487) AND HYDROMETER ANALYSIS (ASTM D 422) Client, lay Heatly 5 pa pid A Date: 2710112022 Project! $1 dyed ua este Location: Material Description: Ag. Base Course SIEVE OPENING | WEIGHT PERCENT RETAINED |PASSING WEIGHT OF DRY SOIL, MOISTURE CONTENT inches_|_mm ie rt [Can No. FO a4 6 lWvt_of Wet Sol + Can a No.4 lWt. of Dry Soil + Can 9 No. 10 2.000 33.0 Wt of Water g No. 40 0.420 24.4 Wt. of Can, g INo.200 | 0.074 136 IW of Dry Soi Q 0.0407 10.3 Moisture Content % 0.0280 38 0.0186 92, ATTERBERG LIMITS 0.0108 87 i PI 0.0082 62 0.0058 45, ‘SOI CLASSIFICATION 0.0029, 40 USCS: AASHTO: 0.0013 29 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE PERCENT PASSING, % 001 ow 0.100 1.000 10000 100.000 PARTICLE SIZE, mm 278% 58.6 % 44% sand content 92%

You might also like