Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2.1 Introduction
Since its inception, the home financing industry in India has gone through, the
home financing industry in India has gone through a fundamental transformation. In
India, the housing finance industry has gone through a structural upheaval that is
unprecedented since the beginning of its development. Until the mid 1980s, no
reliable financial system existed. By setting up of National Housing Bank, a wholly
owned subsidiary of RBI, the housing finance system has been institutionalized.
Banks, cooperatives and specialist housing finance organizations made up most of the
top institutions of the housing finance system in 1988. As banks and HFIs enter the
housing finance sector, it becomes a more competitive market. During this time, the
distribution of housing finance has grown rapidly and advanced in many ways.
There are five distinct phases of the Indian Housing Financing revolution:
They are as follows:
43
2.2 Phases of Housing Finance in India
Chart 2.1
• BEFORE 1970
PHASE 1 • GOVERNMENT DOMINATION
• 1970-1980
PHASE 2 • HUDCO AND HDFC ESTABLISHMENT
• 1980-1990
PHASE 3 • ESTABILSHMENT OF NHB
• 1990-2000
PHASE 4 • LIBERLIZATION OF INTEREST RATES
• 2000 TO PRESENT
PHASE 5 • HIGH GROWTH
During the 1950s and 1960s, housing provision for the lower income group
was dominated by the state. For industrial workers, members of the economically
disadvantaged sections of society and slum dwellers, the Indian government operated
several subsidized housing and loan programs. Rental housing programs were also
available for state government employees. Although they contributed to the MIG and
HIG, the private sector played a relatively minor role in the provision of home loans.
Government intervention focused on providing readymade housing units at very low
prices o without charges. As housing initiatives received a very small portion of the
country’s overall budget and were therefore costly and had little to provide.
44
Phase 2 (1970-80) HUCDO and HDFC Establishment
The second phase began in the mid-1970s, with the establishment of HUDCO.
It was created to encourage and advance housing and urban development initiatives of
government agencies. HUDCO is important for the implementations of government
programmes aimed at providing housing to those living below the poverty level.
HDFC, a renowned private player, was established in 1977. Its success shows that
house finance is a successful industry. It is one of the top provides of home loans in
India.
The third phase covers the 1980 to 1990s, which was distinguished by the
establishment of the NHB in 1987. It served as the country’s regulator of housing
financing. During this, the government sent instructions to several organizations
including LIC and Commercial Banks, which were responsible for disbursing funds as
per priority sector requirements. Similarity, mutual funds and provident funds were
allowed to allocate a part of their funding to real estate. Two insurance companies,
LIC and GIC, started helping the sector through recently established housing finance
companies and indirectly by allocating a part of their net growth to socially conscious
projects.
Urban local bodies (ULBs) participated heavily in the fourth phase throughout
the 1990s as a result of the 73rd Constitutional Amendment. However, there has not
been much housing development by ULBs due to limited funding; inadequate bank
credit and capacity issues. The cost of loans made prior to 1994 underwent significant
revisions throughout the era of liberalizations. NHB controls the cost of home loans
by setting different rates depending on the size of the loan. After being updated in
1994, these regulations allowed market rate to be charged for loans in excess of
Rs.25,000. The fourth phase saw the dominance of fixed interest rates. Convertible
offers began to emerge towards the end of the decade.
45
Phase 5 (2000 to Present) High Growth
There was a sharp increase in mortgage loan disbursements in the fifth phase.
Housing finance has become a successful industry due to the low interest rate
environment, rising disposal income, stable property values and financial incentives.
More private investment was encouraged by the government, which also launched
several PPP –based Public Private Partnership based programmes. To get more
private funding, it designated slum reconstructions as a Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) activity and allowed 100 percent FDI in the housing sector.
46
Chart 2.2
NHB
nt
Development Financial
Institutions
NABARD
Financial Institutions
Housing Finance
Non Banking Finance
Companies
Companies
Other NBFCs
P
U
Private Sector Banks B
Scheduled Commercial
L
Banks
Public Sector Banks I
C
Banks Scheduled Urban Co-
Operative Banks
Co-operative Banks
District Co-Operative
Banks
47
2.4 Housing development under Five Years Plans
The Housing Industry has been placed under Priority Sector Industry by the
Central Government. The Housing Finance Scheme was emphasized in the Five-Year
Plans, especially for the poor and weaker sections of society. In India, almost all the
expenditures are guided through plans and the housing sector is also not an
exemption. The Government of India allocated funds for Housing through various
Five Year Plans.
Housing is one of the basic needs of human beings, keeping this point in view,
the Government of India right from the First Five Year plan allocates funds to the
housing sector. To tackle the Housing problems in the country, the Central
Government has initiated its Housing programmes and policies from time to time over
various plans and the State Government implemented them. Five-year plans have
been formulated by the Government for the development of housing; these
developments undertaken from 1st to 12th Five Year Plans are given below:
The First Five Year Plan's main objective was to raise the minimum standard
of housing. It suggested reducing the construction cost of houses, especially labour
and material cost, by encouraging economical architectural and structural designs.
Due consideration was given to research in the field of construction materials and
techniques. The main thrust of the research was on optimum utilization of indigenous
inputs for the manufacturing of construction materials. The plan gave due attention to
the role of private participation in solving the problem of the housing shortage.
During this plan period, two social housing schemes, namely the Integrated
Subsidized Industrial Housing Scheme (1952) and the Low Income Group Housing
Scheme (1954) were launched during this plan period.
During the Second Five Year Plan, subsidized industrial housing schemes for
the low income group were further strengthened. Apart from the schemes for slum
clearance and slum improvement, new schemes like Plantation Labor Housing
Scheme (1956), Village Housing Scheme,(1956) Land Acquisition and Development
Scheme, and Middle Income Group Housing Scheme(1959) were introduced. Specific
48
housing schemes, handloom weavers and displaced, etc. were introduced in rural
areas for the benefit of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Backward Classes.
Housing programs for employees and workers of various State Government / Central
Government departments were carried out on a large scale. During the plan period,
the Government revised its policy of giving direct loans to the LIG category for
building houses. It also started assisting state governments and local authorities to
develop sites and plots for sale to beneficiaries belonging to the LIG category. Public
Financial Institutions have been associated with Government housing programs for
the Second Five Year Plan period.
The third Five Year Plan (1961-66) specified the need for land acquisition and
the control of the real estate market. The extent of finance provided was usually a
maximum of 80% of the cost of construction and this varied from plan to plan. In the
case of land acquisition and development plans, financial assistance was given to the
local bodies / urban Property Department. Towards the end of this plan, Housing
Boards started programs to eradicate the housing problems of low income groups and
slum categories. To find a solution to the housing shortage in the state, respective
state governments increased the number of State Housing Boards funds. City level
organizations like Development Authorities, Urban Improvement Trusts, and Slum
Clearance Board (SCB) were set up by many states.
In the Fourth Five Year Plan period, more emphasis was placed on low cost
housing schemes due to the high cost of construction of houses, inadequate
contribution from private and cooperative sectors to meet the growing needs of the
poorer sections and deteriorating condition of old slums into new slums. A special
public agency called Housing and Urban Development Corporation (HUDCO) was
started during this plan period. Various State Governments had funded Housing
Boards through state budgetary allocations and slum clearance schemes. State
Housing Boards began to issue debentures on State Government guarantees to
institutions such as nationalized banks funding. It provided financial assistance to
various Housing Boards and Cooperative Housing Societies across the country.
49
Fifth Five Year Plan (1974-1978):
The Sixth Five Year Plan (1980-85) focused on the provision of shelter and
services for the poor. The scheme seeks to utilize the resources of the public sector in
such a manner to achieve maximum results and provide the maximum possible houses
to the entire homeless population.
The Seventh Five Year Plan identified the problems faced by the urban poor
and introduced the Urban Poverty Alleviation Plan. The National Housing Policy
(NHP) was announced during this plan. The long term goal of the NHP was projected
to eliminate homelessness, improve inadequate housing conditions and provide a
minimum level of basic services and facilities to all. The plan called for the setting up
of fair and diversified institutional credit for housing development. It also stressed the
need for strengthening HUDCO and the creation of new cooperative building
societies.
During the Eighth Plan period, an enabling strategy was attempted to create an
enabling environment for the housing activities by removing various constraints and
providing direct assistance to the disadvantaged groups of poor, self-employed,
physically challenged widows, and single women. The new housing and housing
policy was unveiled in 1998 to ensure "shelter for all" and better quality of life for all
citizens by harnessing the untapped potential in the public, private and domestic
50
sectors. The main objective of the policy was to create strong public- private
partnerships to tackle housing problems. Under the New policy, the Government
proposed to give financial concessions, introduce legal and regulatory reforms and
create an enabling environment for the development of the housing sector. The policy
emphasized the role of the private sector as another participant in promoting
investment in land connectivity, housing construction and infrastructure. Ever since
additional emphasis has been placed on private initiatives in housing development.
Private investment in housing has grown rapidly, with the rise of real estate
developers, primarily in metropolitan cities and other rapidly growing townships.
During this period housing was prioritized as one of the seven principles of
development. Significant efforts were made to introduce a new institutional
mechanism to increase the resources base and increase the Housing distribution in
urban areas. The scope of Indira Awas Yojana was the kutcha houses were expanded
to convert them into pucca or semi pucca houses. Again the Credit cum subsidy
scheme for rural housing was launched to eradicate the shelter less from rural areas of
the country. Fiscal concessions were also introduced along with legislative measures
to encourage investment growth in Housing by Individuals and Corporate.
The National Common Minimum Program (NCMP) has said that housing for
the weaker sections in rural areas will be increased in a big way. Therefore, the Tenth
Plan had the suggested provision of free Housing only to landless SC / ST families
and shifted to credit-cum subsidy scheme for other BPL families. The repeal of the
Urban Land (Roofing and Regulation) Act, 1976 is an important step towards reform
of the urban land market. After the repeal of the Central Law, many State
Governments have also repealed the state level law.
To improve the quality of life in urban areas, the Eleventh Five Year Plan
(2007-2012) emphasizes the need for better housing stock through urban renewal, In-
situ slum improvement and the development of New Housing Stock in existing cities
as well as a new township. In addition, the Bharat Nirman Program has also given
51
priority to end the problem of need for shelter. The program targeted for construction
of 60 lakhs houses from 2005 to 2009. The housing component under the program
was implemented parallel to the Indira Awas Yojana. In Eleventh Five Year Plan, the
focus was on targeting the poorest of the poor, targeting the remaining housing
shortages, among other interventions.
Government investment during five year plan from 1st Five Year Plan to 12th Five
Year Plan:
52
Table 2.1
Graph 2.1
Percentage of Investment in Housing to Total Investment
80
70
60
50
40
Percentage
30
20
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Public and Private Investment in Housing during Five Year Plan period
The role of Government in both public sector and private sector investment in
Housing over the Five Year Plans is given in the following table:
Table 2.2
Investment in Housing in the Public and Private Sector
(Amount in crores)
Plan Period Investment in Housing
Public % Private % Total
st
1 Plan (1951-56) 250 21.74 900 78.26 1150
nd
2 Plan (1956-61) 300 23.08 1000 76.92 1300
rd
3 Plan (1961-66) 425 27.42 1125 72.58 1550
th
4 Plan (1969-74) 625 22.32 2175 77.68 2800
th
5 Plan(1974-79) 796 17.94 3,640 82.06 4,436
th
6 Plan( 1980-85) 1491 7.65 18,000 92,35 19,491
th
7 Plan(1985-90) 2,458 32.31 29,000 92,19 31,458
th
8 Plan(1992-97) 31,500 34.44 66,000 67.69 97,500
th
9 Plan(1997-02) 52,000 34.44 99,000 65.56 1,51,000
th
10 Plan (2002-07) 4,15,000 57.14 3,11,300 42.40 7,26,300
th
11 Plan(2007-12) 5,07,318.1 57.60 3,73,560 42.40 8,80,878.1
th
12 Plan (2012-17) 28,90,823 52.11 26,83,840 48.38 55,74,663
Source: 1 Report on Trend and progress of Housing Finance in India, 2003.p.79
2. Plan Documents X Plan (2002-07) and XI Plan (2007-2012)
3. Report of 22nd Standing Committee on Rural Development 2005-06
Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India, New Delhi,
August 2006, p, 17, * Estimation of X Plan Document.
4. Accommodation Times Research, Published on October 13, 2017
54
Table 2.2 gives the Total Investment for Public and Private Housing during
various plan periods, ie from the Ist Five Year Plan to the 12th Five-Year Plan. As we
can be seen from the table that the Total Investment for housing was Rs 1,150 crore in
the 1st Five Year Plan increased to Rs.55, 74,663. crore in the 12th Five Year Plan.
This shows that the Total Investment in Housing has increased by 4,848 times during
this period. If we check the data on private investment, it shows that it has increased
by 2,982 times i.e. from the Rs. 900 crores in the First Plan to Rs. 26,83,840 crores in
the 12th Plan. Similarly, Public investment figures for housing show that its level of
Rs. 250 crores during the First Five Year Plan raised to Rs. 28,90,823 crores in the
12th Plan, indicates that, it has increased by 11,563 times. Thus, there was a
tremendous increase in the Total Investment for Housing during the Five Year Plan
period. The ratio of private investment to housing from the First Plan to the Ninth
Plan was more than 65.56%, with the highest percentage being 92.35 during the 6th
plan. However, during the last two plans, namely, the 11th and 12th plans, the ratio of
Public Investment has increased compared to Private Investment which means that
during the last 3 Five Year Plans, Public Investment in Housing has become more
effective.
Housing in India has been the focus of planners since Independence. In each
the Five Year Plans specific funds allocated for the country's Housing needs.
However, especially from the Seventh Five Year Plan i.e. from 1985 onwards, the
urban housing shortage and slum development programs are getting special focus.
Broadly, the policy framework to be followed for housing in India can be summarized
as follows:
55
Table 2.3
1. Indira Awas Yojana (IAY) (1985-86): IAY launched in the year 1985-86, the
largest and most comprehensive rural housing program ever launched in the country.
It is a flagship scheme of the Ministry of Rural Development to provide financial
assistance for the construction of housing units to BPL families in rural areas. IAY
was started as a sub-scheme of RLEGP and thereafter continued as a sub-scheme of
the JRY scheme in 1989. The objective of the scheme is to help the weaker section
mainly in rural areas. This was the Government's proactive measure to solve
homelessness. This scheme has been renamed PMAY in the year 2015.
2. National Housing Policy (NHP) 1988: The March 1987 Preamble to the Draft
National Housing Policy (DNHP) recognized shelter as a basic human need for the
first time. This may be considered a first step towards recognizing the right to shelter
or the right to housing, but this particular emphasis was dropped from the draft. The
policy looked at the land, material, finance, technology and targeted poverty
alleviation as part of an integrated and comprehensive solution to Housing. The
Development of the Housing Sector as a whole was emphasized (NHP 1988).
3. National Housing and Habitat Policy (NHHP) 1998: The policy envisages and
emphasized on a major shift in the role of the Government to function more as a
facilitator than as a provider. The objective of the policy was to create surplus housing
56
stock in pursuance of the National Agenda for Governance and facilitate the
construction of two million housing units each year. It also sought to ensure that
housing with ancillary services is treated as a priority sector at the same level as
infrastructure. The Planning Commission suggested amendments to the housing
policy to include the Affordable Housing Program for the urban poor. During the
Ninth and Tenth Five-Year Plans, considerable efforts were made to increase the
resource base and initiate Innovative Institutional Mechanisms to Increase Housing
Distribution in Urban Areas (NHHP, 1998).
57
6. National Urban Housing and Housing Policy (NUHHP) 2007: The policy
emphasizes the housing and housing sector in the urban context and looks at housing
as a tool for productivity, equity, safe environment, pro-poor delivery of civic services
and shelter as well as employment opportunities and has emphasized bottom-up
planning. The policy has been designed keeping in mind the changing socio-economic
parameters of the urban area and the growing need for shelter and related
infrastructure. It seeks to promote a variety of public-private partnerships to realize
the goal of "Affordable Housing for All", with particular emphasis on the urban poor
(NUHHP, 2007).
7. Interest Subsidy Scheme for Housing of Urban Poor (ISHUP) 2008: This
scheme was launched by MoHUA (earlier Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty
Alleviation) on 26th December 2008 to improve the affordability of housing credit
among EWS/LIG areas in urban areas. Under the Scheme, an interest subsidy of 5%
p.a. was provided for the entire tenure of the loan (15-20 years) on loans up to ₹1 lakh
extended by Primary Lending Institutions (PLIs) to EWS/LIG beneficiaries. The
maximum loan amount was ₹1 lakh for EWS persons and ₹1.60 lakh for LIG
individuals. The interest subsidy was provided on NPV and upfront basis. The
Scheme was implemented through Banks and HFCs. This plan envisaged the
Appointment of State Level Nodal Agencies (SLNAs) by various States to facilitate
the identification and selection of eligible beneficiaries for effective implementation.
NHB and HUDCO were designated as Central Nodal Agencies (CNAs) for the
implementation of the Scheme. NHB as the Nodal Agency for the said Scheme had
taken various measures to create awareness through wide publicity, sensitization
programs, and coordination with various agencies to facilitate the effective
implementation of ISHUP. This scheme ended on 30-09-2013.
8. Rajiv Awas Yojana (RAY) 2009: To enable the provision of credit to the
Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) and LIG families and to encourage the States
to adopt policies for building a slum-free India. The RAY scheme emerged from the
vision statement of the President of India in 2009, which was placed in the Parliament
for "Slum Free" India". In May 2015, the Rajiv Awas Yojana (RAY) was included in
the Housing for All (HFA).
58
9. Affordable Housing in Partnership (AHP): The Government has set up a part of
RAY in 2013 to augment the affordable housing stock with an outlay of ₹5,000 crores
for the construction of one million houses for EWS/LIG/MIG with at least 25% for
the EWS category. This scheme facilitated the partnership between Various
Agencies/Governments/Parastatals/Urban Local Bodies/Developers to realize the goal
of affordable housing for all.
10. Rajiv Rinn Yojana (RRY): The Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty
Alleviation (MHUPA), the Government of India has revised the interest subsidy
scheme and renamed it as Rajiv Loan Scheme (RRY) as an additional means to
augment the housing needs of EWS/LIG sections in urban areas. Eligible housing
loan limit from 1 lakh to 5 lakh. Rajiv loan scheme is effective from 01-10-2013.
Under RRY, the loan amount has been revised up to 5 lakh for EWS and 8 lakh for
LIG beneficiaries. However, the interest subsidy is provided up to a maximum of Rs 5
lakh for both categories of beneficiaries.
11. Housing for All by 2022 – Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (Urban): Affordable
Housing Scheme, PMAY (U) announced that 50 million houses will be built for the
poor by 2022, of which 30 million will be in rural areas and urban areas. 20 crore in
the mission being implemented during 2015-2022 and provides central assistance to
Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) and other implementing agencies.
Through States/UTs:
b) The Credit Linked Subsidy Scheme is being implemented through PLIs and
monitored by Central Nodal Agencies such as NHB and HUDCO.
59
is defined as a residential unit with an annual income of ₹3,00,001 to ₹6,00,000 and a
carpet area of up to 60 square meters. The slum is defined as a compact area of at
least 300 populations or about 60–70 households with poor construction, overcrowded
houses in an unhygienic environment, usually inadequate infrastructure and a lack of
proper sanitation and drinking water facilities. The PMAY provides an interest
subsidy of 6.5% on housing loans up to 20 years for EWS and LIG and has also
recently included interest subsidy, Interest subsidy of 4% for MIG I (6 lakhs to 12
lakhs) at 3% for MIG II (12 lakhs above to 18 lakhs). It also envisages making all
statutory towns slum-free, i.e. preparation of the Slum Free City Plan of Action
(SFCPOA) for the in-site redevelopment of slums.1
Table 2.4
Investment (Central, State and Beneficiary) Approved Rs. 6.53 lakh crores
Central Assistance Committed Rs.1,71,738 crores
Central Assistance Released Rs.76,787 crores
Construction of Houses Completed 38.4 lakhs
Houses Grounded 66.94 lakhs
Beneficiaries under CLSS 12.26 lakhs
Interest Subsidy released under CLSS Rs.27,868 crores
Employment Generation in Jobs 196 lakh Jobs
Source: NHB Annual Report 2019-20
Given the magnitude of the housing shortage and the budgetary constraints of
both the Central and State Governments, it is quite clear that public sector efforts
alone will not be enough to meet the demand for rental housing. Due to this situation,
the National Urban Rental Housing Policy (NURHP), 2015 was enacted. It will
enable the legal and regulatory measures like encouraging participation of the private
sector, cooperative, non-government sector, industrial sector (for labor housing), and
services/institutional sector (for employee housing) for the promotion of rental
Housing, such as a multidisciplinary approach. The policy seeks to promote various
60
types of Public-Private Partnerships to promote rental housing in the country which
will act as a catalytic force to achieve the overall goal of housing for all by 2022.
As per the provisions of the National Housing Bank Act, 1987, the powers of
registration, regulation, and supervision of Housing Finance Companies (HFCs) were
vested in the National Housing Bank (NHB). However, in the context of amendments
made to the National Housing Bank Act, 1987 under the Union Budget
Announcements for 2019-20, the regulatory powers of the National Housing Bank
(including registration of HFCs) over Housing Finance Companies (HFCs) have
shifted to Reserve Bank of India (RBI) with effect from August 9, 2019. After the
above transfer, HFCs will be treated as one of the categories of Non-Banking
Financial Companies (NBFCs) for regulatory purposes. RBI had announced that it
will review the existing regulatory framework applicable to HFCs and come up with
revised rules in due course (draft guidelines announced on June 17, 2020). In the
meantime, until the RBI issues a revised framework, HFCs will continue to comply
with the directions and instructions issued by the NHB. The NHB continues to
supervise the HFCs and the HFCs continue to submit various returns to the NHB as
hitherto. The grievance redressal mechanism for HFCs also continues with National
Housing Bank. NHB's multi-pronged approach to institutional and market
infrastructure development has led to the expansion and sustainability of the housing
sector.
Mission of NHB: To harness and promote the market potential and to serve the
housing needs of all segments of the population with focus on low and moderate
income of housing.
61
Vision of NHB: “Promoting Inclusive Expansion with stability in the Housing
Finance Market.”
Objectives of NHB
The National Housing Bank (NHB) has been set up to achieve the following
objectives.
62
Table 2.5
Financial Highlights of NHB
(Rs in crores)
5 Years Average
2018-19i
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2019-20
Growth
rage
rage
amo
rate
Ave
Ave
unt
Capital 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450 1450
Reserve 5139.56 4776.52 6360.75 6824.52 7022.96 9.078 6024.86
(-7.06) (33.17) (7.29) (2.91)
Re-finance 21687 22759 24921 25177 31258 4.178 25160.4
Disbursements (4.94) (9.50) (1.03) (1.24)
Loans and 53573 54385 57684 69805 81750 11.43 63439.4
advanced (1.52) (6.07) (21.01) (17.11)
Total Assets 59262 58254 63273 75591 90160 11.42 69308
(-1.68) (8.62) (19.47) (19.27)
CRAR % 19 `17 19 16.01 12.74
Source: Annual Reports of NHB
Figures in parentheses indicate percentage growth over the previous years
Table 2.5 shows the Financial highlights of NHB, such as capital, reserves,
refinance disbursements, loans and advances, and NHB's total assets. It can be seen
from the table that, except for the capital and reserve, all items are showing an
increasing trend over the years. The capital of NHB remains the same (ie Rs.1450
crore) during the study period. The average rate of growth of various items is also
shown in the table. Among various heads, the 5-year average growth rate for the item
"Loans and Advances" of National Housing Bank is higher with an average growth of
11.43% (average amount is Rs 63,439.4 crores). The next highest growth rate is found
in NHB's total assets, with a 5-year average growth rate of 11.42% (the average
amount is Rs 69,308 crores).
As regards the refinance disbursements made by NHB, in 5 years with an
average growth rate of 4.178% with 5 years average amount of Rs. 25,160.4 crores.
Considering the reserves, have increased over the years except in the year 2016-17, It
was also showing an average growth rate of 9.078% over 5 years with an average
amount of 6024.86 crores. Both the values reflect the strong refinance disbursement
and reserve position of NHB. Keeping in view the capital to risk assets ratio, NHB
maintains a strong CRAR which stands at over 12%. NHB has the highest CRAR of
19% in the years 2015-16 and 2017-18. The CRAR stood at 12.74% in the year
(2019-20) respectively.
63
Considering the Individual items, the rate of increase of reserves is higher
during the year 2017-18, with an increase of 33.17% over the previous year and a
negative growth rate i.e 7.06 in the year 2016-17. The Refinance disbursements made
by NHB is increasing trend. The highest percentage of growth was in the year 2017-
18 with a percentage of 9.50%. During the year 2019-20, the re-finance disbursement
reached the highest amount of Rs.31258 crores. NHB is also providing loans and
advances to housing finance agencies for the development of housing stock in the
country. It can be seen from the table that, the amount of Loans and Advances are
increasing year by year, the percentage of increase in the year 2018-19 is higher with
an amount of 69805 crores (% change of 21.01%). In the year 2019-20, the amount of
Loans and Advances granted by NHB has reached a maximum of Rs 81750 crores. At
the end of 31 March 2020, NHB had total assets of Rs 90,160 crores. Overall, it is
understandable that, NHB has a very strong financial base and each item that reflects
the financial stability.
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
growth
ars
Average
Average
rate
Total 4518 4430 5262 5033
4213 4.93 4691.2
Income (7.24) (-1.95) (18.78) (-4.35)
PBT 1159.74 1305.8 1100.42 1226.47 536.67 -11.98 1065.82
(12.59) (-15.73) (11.45) (-56.24)
Provision 367.89
458.27 349.31 493.5 341 2.79 401.99
for tax 24.57 (-23.78) (41.28) (-30.90)
PAT 791.85 847.53 751,11 732.97 195.67 -14.33 663.81
(7.03) (11.38) (-2.42) (-73.30)
Source: Annual Reports of NHB
Figures in parentheses indicate percentage of growth over the previous years
64
Table 2.6 shows the profitability indicators of NHB over the last five years.
Profitability has been estimated by considering the items like total income, profit
before tax, and profit after tax, etc. The Average Growth of total income for 5 years is
Rs. 4691.2 crores with a growth rate of 4.93 as shown by the 5years average prices.
NHB has given a 5Years average PBT of Rs. 1065.82 crore (average negative growth
rate 11.98) and the 5Years average PAT is Rs. 663.81 crores (average negative
growth rate 14.33%) in the study period. Taking individual items into account, the
percentage of change in Total Income was higher in the year 2018-19 showing an
increase of 18.78% over the previous year, amounting to Rs 5262 crore. In the year
ended 30 June 2017, NHB posted the highest PBT and PAT amount of Rs. 1305.8
crores and Rs. 847.53 crores respectively.
National Housing Bank provides funds to the housing sector through its
refinance schemes for Banks, Housing Finance Companies, State Level Apex Co-
operatives and Housing Finance Societies. One of the objectives of NHB is to
provide refinance facilities to eligible Institutions in the country.
Table 2.7
Re-finance Disbursements of NHB
(Rs. in crores )
Sl.No Year Disbursements Percentage of Cumulative
Change Disbursements
01 2010-11 12035 -- 70,697
02 2011-12 14390 19.57 85,087
03 2012-13 17542 21.90 1,02,629
04 2013-14 17856 1.79 1,20,485
05 2014-15 21847 22.35 1,42,332
06 2015-16 21590 -1.18 1,63,922
07 2016-17 22684 5.07 1,86,606
08 2017-18 24921 9.86 2,11,527
09 2018-19 25177 1.03 2,36,704
10 2019-20 31258 24.15 2,67,962
Average 20,930 11.61
Source: Annual reports of NHB
65
Chart 2.3
30000
20000
10000
0
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20
66
Table 2.8
Institution wise Re-finance made by NHB
(Rs. in crores)
Primary Average Average
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
Total
lending Growth Growth
From the above Table 2.8, it is observed that the NHB refinanced to HFCs is
Rs 10,852 crores in 2015-16 and Rs. 27551 crores in 2019-20 with an average amount
of Rs.17685 crores and an average percentage of 70.39 of the total amount. In the case
of SCBs, it was refinanced from Rs.10,275 crores in 2015-16 and Rs 1550 crores in
2019-20, with an average amount of Rs.6821 crores and an average percentage of
27.15 of the total and others, NHB refinance was Rs 463 crores in 2015-16 to Rs.2157
crores in 2019-20, with an average amount of Rs.620 crores and average percentage
2.46 of the total during the study period.
67
The Housing Finance Companies are classified in to Public sector and Private sector
and Deposit accepting HFCs and Non deposit accepting HFCs.
The registered HFCs are classified into Public sector and Private sector
Table 2.9
Chart 2.4
Public Sector and Private Sector Housing Finance Companies
90
80
70
60
50 Public Limited
40 Private Limited
30
20
10
0
Source: Reports on Trends and progress of Housing in India
There has been a steady growth in the Housing Finance Industry. The number
of housing finance companies has been increased from 71 to 101, in the case of public
housing finance companies has been increased from 63 to 77 and in the case of the
private sector 8 to 24 companies. The overall increased of 142 percent during five
years period and average growth of 9.34 percent of HFCs during the study period.
68
Public Deposit Accepting and Non Deposit Accepting HFCs
Chart 2.5
120
100 Public Accepting Deposit
80 HFCs
60 Public Not Accepting
40 Deposit HFCs
20 Total
0
1 2 3 4 5
69
Market share in Retail Housing Loan
Graph 2.2
36 36 38 36 33
64 64 62 64 67
From the above Table 2.11 shows that the commercial banks increased 64
percent in 2015-16 to 67 percent in the year 2019-20 and the average market share of
commercial banks was 64.2 percent during the study period. HFCs decreased from 36
percent in the year 2015-16 to 33 percent in the year 2019-20 and the average market
share was 35.8 percent during the study period.
70
2.8 Commercial Banks and Housing Finance
Scheduled commercial banks have always been offering housing loans to their
customers but it was not until the late 1990s and early 2000s that they made a solid
footing in the industry. The market boomed due to the rapid increase in the number of
entities offering housing finance. This helped in deepening existing markets and
expanding into new markets, especially in Tier II and Tier III cities in the country. In
the late 1990s and early 2000s, the country witnessed good economic growth which
fueled the growth of the Housing industry and transformed the Housing Finance
Sector. This growth of the economy and the growth of the Housing stock through
private builders being active in the urban centers led to the overall development of
Housing Finance Industry in the country. Over the years, the housing loan portfolio of
SCBs has grown significantly, supported by the policies of the Government of India
and interventions by the Reserve Bank of India and the National Housing Bank.
However, at present Banks are the major lenders to the Housing Sector and
Institutional Housing Financing in India are dominated by Commercial Banks. As of
March 31, 2020, home loans outstanding by HFCs and Commercial banks stood at
₹20 lakh crore, of which nearly two-thirds (67%) were in bank accounts. The annual
growth of credit of scheduled commercial banks in India indicates the share of loans
for housing overall. As a result of the concerted efforts of NHB, RBI, and Central
Government towards the development of stable housing finance, banks now have a
very large housing loan portfolio and are quite optimistic about this product segment.
Also, banks have been able to manage overall NPA levels through their risk
monitoring and responsible lending, giving them a strong reason to continue lending
to the sector.
71
Co-operative Bank offers home insurance and is designed to ensure borrowers homes
are as simple as possible. Co-operative banks deploy funds from a shared pool of
resources to provide for the various needs of their members. In the Indian scenario, a
lot of reluctance has been seen by these Co-operative Banks, to provide loans for
housing finance. The main reason for this is that the high risk and irregularities in
giving housing loans from the general fund. Hence the role and importance of Co-
operative Banks are becoming non-existent in Housing Finance these days.
2.10 HUDCO
Objectives of HUDCO
72
2. To finance or work wholly or partly for the establishment of new or satellite
cities.
3. To subscribe to the bonds/debentures issued by State Housing Boards,
Development Authorities, Improvement Trusts etc., especially, for housing
financing and urban development programmes.
4. To use funds received from Government and other sources, in the form of
grants or otherwise, to finance and run housing and urban development
programmes.
5. To use funds in providing, assisting, setting up, assisting and providing
consultancy services for planning and designing works relating to housing and
urban development in India and abroad.
6. To finance or act for the establishment of Industrial enterprises of building
materials.
7. To undertake venture capital funding in the housing and Urban Development
Sectors, to facilitate innovations and to invest in and/or subscribe to
shares/units etc. of venture capital funds promoted by
Government/Government agencies.
8. For establishment of mutual funds for housing and urban development and/or
investment in and/or subscribe units of mutual funds promoted by
Government/Government Agencies.
HUDCO provides loans for projects related to water supply, roads and
transport, power, emerging sectors, commercial infrastructure (shopping centers,
market complexes, mall-cum-multiplexes, hotels, and office buildings), social
infrastructure, sewerage, drainage, and solid waste provides loans for Management
and Smart Cities. It also provides loans to Central and State Governments and
Agencies for residential development. As of December 2020, HUDCO had financed
the construction of 1.96,19,532 Housing units mainly for LIG, EWS, MIG, and HIG
categories.
The Table 2.12 shows the performance of HUDCO over the last five years.
The performance has been assessed by considering the items like; No of schemes,
Gross loan sanctioned, the amount released, and dwelling units. The number of
73
schemes has been decreased from 2015-16 i.e 202 to 50 in the year 2019-20. The
gross loan sanction was fluctuating from Rs. 30,774 crores in the year 2015-16 to
Rs.19,942 crores in the year 2019-20 during the study period. The amount released by
HUDCO was increased from 2015-16 to 2018-19 i.e Rs. 8,250 crores to Rs. 31,009
crores and again it was decreased in the year 2019-20 Rs. 10,121 crores and year-wise
dwelling units were also fluctuating from 4,57,879 units in the year 2015-16 to
3,07,277 units in the year 2019-20 during the study period
Table 2.12
(Amount in Crores)
Years No. of Schemes Gross loan Amount Dwelling
Sanctioned (Rs) Released (Rs) Units
2015-16 202 30,774 8,250 4,57,879
2016-17 178 31,862 9,145 2,71,498
2017-18 116 38,648 16,565 15,48,602
2018-19 77 34,452 31,009 20,68,151
2019-20 50 19,942 10,121 3,07,277
Source: Housing.com/news/HUDCO.
74
LIC Housing Finance Limited (LIC HFL)
75
Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited (DHFL)
The company was incorporated in the state of Maharashtra on April 11, 1984
in the name of Dewan Housing Finance & Leasing Company Limited and received
the Certificate of Commencement of Business on April 26, 1984. The name of the
company was changed to Dewan Housing Development Finance Limited and a new
certificate was obtained on 26th September. The company made provision for Housing
Finance Leasing of Commercial and Residential premises to Individuals, Co-operative
societies, Corporate Bodies or their nominated employees, group of persons, etc., and
to reputed companies. It is one of the largest Housing Finance Solution providers
spread across the country with an extensive network of 182 Branches, 99 Micro
Branches and there were 2179 permanent employees and 2,907 outsourced employees
are working as of March 31, 2020
Can Fin Homes Limited (CFHL): Can Fin Homes Limited is another large
company with a wide network in the Indian housing finance market. Can Fin Homes
Limited is a south based housing finance company, established in the year 1987. It
was established under the sponsorship of Canara Bank and around 70 percent of its
branches are located in the south part of the country. The company has 198 branches
and disbursed loan of Rs.5481 crores as on 31st March 2020 in different parts of the
76
country and offers housing loans and Non Housing Loans. It provides loans for
various purposes like construction of houses, renovation of house, extension of house
etc.
77
2.13 Conclusion
The various Housing Finance Institutions discussed above are doing well
according to their objectives in the field of Housing Finance. The demand for housing
is rising day by day. Due to Housing Finance, the housing shortage may come down
in near future but still the housing problem continues to exist, posing a challenge to
the Government. The prospects of the Housing Finance Sector to a large extent
depend on the policies and programs adopted. The growth prospects look promising
due to the necessity of the housing requirement, the velocity of growth will be
however, determined by the capability of the sector to adapt itself to the reforms
process and efficiency in the management of funds.
78
References
79