Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Essential of Criminal Investigation (Cdi2)
Essential of Criminal Investigation (Cdi2)
(A.Y. 2021-2022)
IV. Course This course is designed as in how the student able to know the background of
Description: investigation and in the field of medical terms and legal medicine techniques.
The student must develop several skills and qualities to become an effective
investigator and solve cases in the future. The future criminologist must be
thorough, methodical and calm under pressure. This course focuses on solving
crimes and any cases by providing of proofs, collection of evidence and
analysis of information which all consist of reliable persons and things.
V. Module No. Midterm Module 2
A. Title: Essential of Criminal Investigation
D. Introduction: This lesson contains how criminal investigation is important in the field of
duties. This is also the most basic function in the police work which can
protect of the lives and properties of every individuals and for maintaining
peace and order. When the said function be failed investigation is always be
undertake.
E. Intended At the end of the activities, the future criminologist shall be able to learn the
Learning following:
Outcome/ILO: 1. To discuss the concept of Criminal Investigation.
2. Appreciate the significance of all cardinal points of criminal
investigation.
3. Every student can learn by sharing knowledge or can teach everyone
dealing with the process of criminal investigation and the
responsibilities of being a Criminal Investigator.
F. PRE-TEST:
Name:_____________________________Year :____________Level:___________________
Section:____________
1. Team leader
2. Communication skills
3. Street Knowledge
4. Observation skills
5. self-discipline
6. Reasoning Ability
7. Stability under pressure
8. Organizational abilities
9. Persistence
10. Investigative ethics
11. Legal knowledge
12. Good understanding of the characteristics of human nature
TOOLS OF INVESTIATION
The three types of I’s on Investigation
1. Information
2. Interview
3. Instrumentation
6. Investigation of subjects
SUSPECT OR SUSPECTS- Individual who is/are pointed to be the
victims and witness to have had committed the crime in issue. Subject person
is not considered as a criminal unless otherwise his/her conviction is
pronounced in the court.
FIRST RESPONDER(FR)
First Responders are the members of the police, military, fire, medical
team and other volunteer organization who are expected to be the first to
respond to calls for assistance in cases of incidents.
INVESTIGATOR-ON-CASE (IOC)
Refers to the duty investigator duly assigned or designated to conduct the
inquiry of the crime by following a systematic set of procedure and
methologies for the purpose of identifying witnesses, recovering evidence,
arresting and prosecuting perpetrators.
Information from people- is derived from people and may not always be
admissible in a court of law. Information consisting of rumors, tips, and
hearsay can often place an investigator on the right track to solve a crime, but
will probably never appear in the testimony. The collection of this information
requires the unique skill and ability to elicit facts that can be used to help
uncover the truth, whether it comes from the victim and eyewitness or a
suspect in the crime. Each source must be dealt with in a unique and skillful
manner in order to obtain the information desired. A good investigator must
be well-versed in conversational skills and be able to successfully draw out
information that may not be readily forthcoming.
Example. Hairs, fibers or minute specimen of blood may be the one item of
physical evidence that helps convict a criminal in the absence of eyewitness
identification. Familiarly with forensic science is essential to becoming a
successful investigator. Physical evidence cannot generally speak for itself. It
needs someone to identify it, interpret it and then present it for final
evaluation by court.
Balancing the scale- Verbal testimony must strike a balance with physical
evidence before a criminal investigation is considered complete. A case heavily
weighted in one direction or the other exclusively can result in a questionable
outcome.
This is not always the fault of the investigator, but many times a reflection of
the various individuals involved in the case, as well as the evidence
discovered. An investigator may fail to answer all of his questions for variety
of reason. Some of these are follows:
3. The suspect may confess to the crime, but leave out pieces of key
information in an attempt to downplay his/her premeditation or lessen the
role they played in the crime, particularly if there are accomplices.
Eyewitnesses to the crime may have left the area before the arrival of the
police and may never have come forward to offer their information.
The Motive (The reason that pushes the perpetrator to commit an act with a
definite result in mind);
The Opportunity (refers to the chance or the occasion to commit the act); and
Means (The capability of the perpetrator to commit the act using the available
tools at hand).
These three factors are so interdependent, that in the absence of one would
not result into a crime.
If an arrest is made in a case, it does not always mean that a good criminal
investigator has been conducted.
If the investigator does not develop all leads to a logical conclusion in any
major case, the defense (accused) will most assuredly point this out at trial or
7 | P a g e CDI-2 Special Crime Investigation with legal medicine (Midterm M o d u l e N o . 1 )
the dismissal of the case and subsequent acquittal of the respondent of the
charges.
The justification for making an arrest usually requires a degree of proof than
the deliberate, meticulous process required to convict and to commit a suspect
to prison. In the United States, the standard for conviction in a criminal case is
proof beyond reasonable doubt. Here in the Philippines conviction is rooted on
proving an accused as guilty beyond reasonable doubt.
Perpetrators can make mistakes during the crime and may leave some
evidences that will identify who they are; this way is due to carelessness,
emotional and mental stress, underestimation of law enforcer’s capabilities
and influence of illegal drugs or alcohol. For example, a burglar because of
panic he left his thumb marks on the furniture inside the house while escaping,
or a murderer who forgot to wash the sleeves of his shirt and there’s a blood
stain on it. Thus, the objective of criminal investigation by using the
information derived from these evidence are:
Trace evidence are tangible evidence like blood stained clothes, empty bullet
shells, finger prints or other visible and less visible evidence. This can
positively affect the success rate of an investigation, however not all crimes
has tangible evidences or trace evidence that can use to pinpoint the
perpetrators of the crime.
There are cases that there is no hard evidence found in the crime scene. For
example a burglar who wears gloves so there will be no finger prints left on
the things that he’ll be touching or a murderer who burned his victim to there
will be no trace of it. Such cases can be recognized as unsolvable, but only after
all leads are exhausted. The investigator must refer to the following
techniques;
This step of process may seem quite simple; however, stating the problem is
more than saying that the perpetrator of the crime needs to be identified and
arrested. A criminal investigator must identify and take into consideration the
entire problem. For example, let’s pretend that the criminal investigator has
been assigned a rape case. In this crime, the rapist broke into the victim’s
home while she was asleep and then raped her. Before leaving, the rapist stole
jewelry from the victim’s bedroom.
Identifying, locating and arresting the suspect through the use of illegal means
can result in justice not being served. To this end, the investigator must ensure
that every step taken is within the established legal guidelines and the
suspect’s rights are preserved. If these factors are not considered while stating
the problem, an accurate picture is not being painted.
In order for the judicial system to render justice, the investigation must be
conducted strictly within legal guidelines. Therefore, a more accurate
statement of the problem would be identify, locate and arrest the rapist and
recover the stolen property in a manner that is consistent to the requirements
of the legal system.
2. FORM A HYPOTHESIS
Apply Reasoning
This will create more problems for investigators more than any other. In
order to form a hypothesis, an investigator must be able to apply some type of
reasoning to formulate an idea about how the crime was committed, a
subject’s involvement, or some other aspect of the crime. An investigator must
be careful not to draw too narrow a hypothesis, or one that is so broad that
nothing meaningful can be derived from it. Care must also be exercised to
avoid allowing one’s personal bias to influence this process.
For example, nearly anyone could walk into a convenience store and
snatch cash from the hand of the clerk. The taking of the cash in and of itself is
not nearly as important an element as the others.
4. Interpret Data
While interpreting all of the data in the case, the investigator looks at
each interview conducted and determines what weight if any, each must be
given. For example, the witness statement of a person in the area that saw the
suspect on the evening of the rape and positively picked his photograph from a
photo lineup will weigh much heavier than the account of a roommate that
insists the suspect was at home when the crime occurred.
If this step of the process does not yield a strong indication of guilt, the
investigator may need to form another hypothesis and take a different
approach in the investigation. The investigator must be careful not to
stubbornly refuse to yield when the facts do not support his/her theory.
Sometimes things are not always the way they seem.
5. Draw Conclusions
The investigator must employ not only deductive reasoning, but more
importantly inductive reasoning to help reach final conclusions concerning the
witness, evidence and motivations in the case. By using proven truth , the
investigator should hopefully be able to draw some meaningful conclusions
concerning certain aspects of the case.
Here are the standards methods of recording investigative data as per PNP’s
2011 Revised Criminal Investigation Manual:
a. Photographs;
b. Sketching crime scenes;
c. Written notes (what you have seen or observed);
d. Developing and lifting fingerprints found at the crime scene;
10 | P a g e CDI-2 Special Crime Investigation with legal medicine (Midterm M o d u l e N o . 1 )
e. Gathering physical evidence;
f. Plaster cast;
g. Tape recording of sounds;
h. Video tape recording of objects; and
i. Written statements of subject and witnesses.
2. Form a hypothesis
Motive
Opportunity
Means
4. Interpret Data
Interpret Data results of final observations and
experimentation.
5. Draw Conclusions
Has the stated problem been answered?
Does evidence support hypothesis?
Has every facet of the investigation been conducted within
the law?
Do the fact of the case support prosecution?
Tools of Investigation
Follow up of a case
The investigator shall conduct police operation to identify and
apprehend suspect/s based on the results of the initial investigation
conducted.
2. This is the reason that pushes the perpetrator to commit an act with a
definite result in mind?
a. Opportunity
b. Means
c. Motive
d. None of these
8. This is a logbook with hard-bound cover that contains the daily register
of all crime incident reports?
a. Official Police Blotter
b. Blue blotter book
c. Red Blotter book
d. Pink Blotter book
13. This is refers to the functional capability of the PNP crime Laboratory
performed by its trained personnel through the recognition.
a. Scene of the events of crime
b. Scene of the crime procedures
c. Scene of the crime operation
d. All of these
14. He/she are members of police, military, fire, medical teams and other
volunteer who are expected to be the first respond to calls for assistance in
cases of incident.
a. Investigator
b. supervisor
c. first responder
d. None of these
Post-test 3. For items number 16-20 based your answers from the situation
below an shooting incidents
7. Motive is to be determined
Questions:
16. If you are the designated investigator, what is the specific case to be
filed against the perpetrators?
a. Homicide
b. Serious physical injury
c. Two counts of murder
d. Frustrated murder
19. If you are the first responder what should you do first at the crime
scene?
a. Cordoned the crime scene and preserved the evidence
b. Evacuate the killed person at the nearest hospital
c. Nothing to do more
d. You must standing at the crime scene and instruct the witness to
leave
20. If the perpetrator has been identified and has eyewitness about the
shooting incident, what should the investigator on case does?
a. The investigator must prepare for an affidavit of witness to file the
case.
b. The investigator on case shall be conducting a lie detection test.
c. The investigator on case shall report the witness at department of
justice.
d. The investigator on case shall discourage the witness to testify the
shooting incident.
(Scenario)
Upon receipt of information, team from this station led by PSMS Norman G
Reyes Jr. under close supervision of PCPT MAITHA P RAMIREZ, OIC onboard
PNP Mobile Patrol and immediately proceeded to the place of incident to verify the
veracity of report, conduct hot pursuit operation and investigation thereat;
Question.