You are on page 1of 5

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/49282400

Social Marketing: Principles & Practice

Article  in  Social Marketing Quarterly · March 2004


DOI: 10.1080/15245000490433389 · Source: OAI

CITATIONS READS

242 22,198

2 authors, including:

Robert Donovan
University of Western Australia
269 PUBLICATIONS   17,208 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Public health View project

ABCs of mental health View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Robert Donovan on 23 May 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


SMQ CENTERPIECE 31

SOCIAL MARKETING:
PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
By Robert Donovan and Nadine Henley

Book Review by R. Craig Lefebvre

This book, authored by two of Australia’s leading social


marketing researchers and practitioners, is a welcome
addition to the social marketing literature for at least three
reasons. First, it provides a showcase of social marketing
projects conducted in Australia and other international
venues that are not covered in other texts on the subject.
Second, it may be the best presentation yet of an integra-
tion of theory, research, and practice in describing social
marketing that reflects the authors’ experience at each of
these three levels. Finally, it is the first book since Manoff ’s
Social Marketing: New Imperative for Public Health (1985)
to firmly place its discussion of social marketing within a
public health philosophy and framework.
In and of itself, the latter point – addressed in the first
two chapters – makes this book required reading for anyone
using social marketing in public health contexts. The
authors position social marketing within a social change
context and use the social determinants literature to expand
its purview beyond just individual change models. They note
that target groups for social marketing include groups not
usually addressed by others – policymakers and legislators,
service providers, opinion leaders, and businesses – and
throughout the book provide examples of how these audi-
ences have been incorporated into programs. The distinc-
tions they draw between social marketing and other related
approaches (e.g., not-for-profit marketing, cause-related
marketing, corporate philanthropy, and others) are well
thought out and if widely read would likely put an end to the
fuzziness with which many often approach this task.

DONOVAN, R., & HENLEY, N. (2003).


SOCIAL MARKETING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE.
MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA: IP COMMUNICATIONS.

SMQ / VOL. X / NO. 1 / SPRING 2004


32 SMQ CENTERPIECE

Similarly, their discussion of the this chapter by observing that this ‘‘fun-
principles of social marketing in Chapter 2 damental shift in public health strategy’’
is a succinct presentation of the essentials to upstream issues is one that needs to be
within a framework of two fundamental understood and incorporated by social
concepts (consumer orientation and marketers as they work in this arena.
exchange), three overarching principles The next two chapters present
(customer value, selectivity and con- principles of communication and persua-
centration, and differential advantage), sion and models of attitude change. Their
and three defining features (use of market discussion covers little new ground for
research, integrated approach to imple- readers already familiar with communica-
mentation, and monitoring and influen- tion models and attitude-behavior change
cing environmental forces). The statement theories. What is surprising, given the
they make that ‘‘In social marketing the orientation of the first three chapters, is
product is often information designed to the lack of discussion of social change
bring about attitudinal and behavioural models. With the exception of a brief
change’’ (p. 33) is the first indication that review of diffusion theory, the authors
the authors may have a different view of conclude Chapter 5 with a ‘‘synthesis’’ of
social marketing than others, and I was models that is decidedly focused on indi-
reminded immediately of Manoff ’s asser- vidual behavior change. These authors are
tion that the ‘‘message is the product.’’ certainly not unique in adopting this
Indeed, one of the seeming incon- ‘‘default’’ position, but it does highlight
sistencies throughout the text is the the apparent lack of a ‘‘social change’’
interchangeable definitions of social theoretical model to guide social market-
marketing products – information, health ing efforts.
outcomes, behaviors, and benefits ‘‘Research and Evaluation’’ examines
(p. 240). Some of this inconsistency stems many of the customary qualitative
from the authors’ attempt to use the research methodologies and includes
nuances of core, augmented, and tangible some nice examples of how they can be
products to define products, and one used for cross-cultural research studies.
wonders if they are trying to force a The authors’ coverage of monitoring sys-
commercial model onto a much more tems and evaluation methodologies is
complex world of individual and social much more limited. The authors choose to
change. While these distinctions may have focus on one monitoring methodology
merit, the field will benefit from further adapted from advertising research –
exploring how these concepts apply to the continuous information tracking (CIT).
work of social change. While the methodology provides useful
Their third chapter, ‘‘Social Marketing monitoring information (as the case
and the Environment,’’ is the showcase for example demonstrates), it is designed for
the authors’ understanding of the many tracking mass communication campaigns
influences on behavior that must be and is fairly labor intensive (a typical
attended to by public health practitioners study conducts between 50–100 inter-
and researchers. They focus their atten- views each week with members of the
tion on the ‘‘upstream’’ of behavioral target audience for the duration of the
determinants, including political-legal, campaign). The CIT is certainly one
demographic-economic, social-cultural, approach to monitoring a social marketing
technological-physical, and the physical program, but the authors present no other
and social environments. They conclude models or alternatives to monitoring

SMQ / VOL. X / NO. 1 / SPRING 2004


SMQ CENTERPIECE 33

social marketing programs that may have The market segmentation and target
other components – or no mass media marketing chapter focuses on two specific
campaign at all. Similarly, their discussion strategies: stages of change segmentation
of evaluation is framed entirely within an (which they liken to consumer marketing’s
epidemiological approach with reference buyer readiness model) and behavioral
to observational studies, randomized segmentation using a model proposed by
trials, and odds-ratios and logistic Sheth and Frazier. This is a particularly
regressions. One would have welcomed a useful presentation of approaches to
more developed presentation of program audience segmentation and includes a
evaluation methodologies, a position that discussion of that most difficult of deci-
more social marketers are moving toward sions: selecting from among many poten-
(see the Evaluation discussion from the tial audiences. The authors introduce the
2003 Innovations in Social Marketing TARPARE model (with an illustrative
conference proceedings in Social Market- example) as a useful heuristic that many
ing Quarterly, Doner, 2003). social marketing practitioners should
Chapter 7 on ethics in social market- examine and incorporate into their own
ing briefly reviews several theories of thinking on the subject. Other important
ethical decision-making that make a good contributions in this chapter are the sec-
introduction for those social marketers tions on cross-cultural targeting and the
unfamiliar with this literature. The pow- use of tailoring in message design.
erful point the authors make is that ‘‘the The previous chapters set up Chapter
primary ethical issue in social marketing is 10. Here the authors discuss the marketing
the problem of power’’ (p. 173). The mix as a framework for planning a com-
authors again make excellent use of a case prehensive social marketing program. With
study to introduce a short series of ques- the use of numerous examples, the con-
tions to guide social marketers in ethical cepts of product, price, place, and people
decision-making. are covered (the latter ‘‘P’’ introduced by
The following chapter is devoted the authors when services marketing is
entirely to the concept of competition in part of the overall social marketing pro-
social marketing, an important topic in gram). The promotion ‘‘P’’ is covered in the
social marketing today. The authors note next two chapters. As given away in the
the importance of focusing on competitive first chapter’s title, ‘‘Using Media in Social
behaviors and benefits, yet focus most of Marketing,’’ the discussion is heavily
their discussion on industry competitors oriented toward mass media tactics,
such as tobacco and alcohol companies. although attention is also given to ‘‘edu-
The latter competitors are used to present tainment,’’ civic journalism, information
such tactics as media advocacy and media technologies, and media advocacy. It is to
education as a counterweight to their the authors’ credit that they so comfor-
influence. Important additions they make tably incorporate these latter techniques
to the list of potential competitors to into the social marketer’s tool box. The
social marketing programs are government second ‘‘promotion’’ chapter discusses a
and political party policies, which virtually variety of ways in which sponsorships have
all social marketers have likely encoun- been used in Australia by public health
tered. And while the authors call for using programs. This presentation is notable for
social marketing to ensure that such a review of several studies that have been
competitors be challenged, they offer little conducted on the reach and effectiveness
in the way of how. of sponsorship activities.

SMQ / VOL. X / NO. 1 / SPRING 2004


34 SMQ CENTERPIECE

One wonders if by Chapter 13 the known among North American readers is a


authors were running out of gas (or plus. But more importantly, it represents
space). Entitled ‘‘Planning and Developing the viewpoint of practitioners who are
Social Marketing Campaigns,’’ the expec- also well-schooled in commercial market-
tation was that the preceding work would ing thought and practice, the philosophy
have been pulled together into an inte- and culture of public health practice, and
grative model. Instead, what is encoun- the behavioral theories and research
tered is a quick (two pages including one models of the academic world. For that
devoted to an exhibit) review of standard, they deserve much credit and is why Social
iterative, and process planning models Marketing: Principles and Practice should
followed by an extended presentation of be on every social marketer’s bookshelf
the PRECEDE-PROCEED model. This model (but read it first!).
is presented with little attention given to
its implications for social marketing pro- ABOUT THE AUTHOR
grams. Given the authors’ experience with R. Craig Lefebvre, Ph.D., is currently an
conducting numerous social marketing independent consultant as Lefebvre Con-
programs over the years, one also hoped sulting Group. He is former Director of
for a discussion of the issues faced with Health Communications and Social Mar-
implementing a program. Alas, we will keting at the American Institutes for
have to wait. Research. He has spent over 19 years
The book concludes with three case developing and evaluating social market-
studies. The first two, Immunize Australia ing programs at the community, state,
and TravelSmart, present what are essen- and national level and is the author of
tially health communications campaigns over 65 articles in the fields of social
that are notable for the presence of out- marketing, community-based programs
come data. The third, Freedom from Fear, is and health promotion. Dr. Lefebvre served
a comprehensive effort aimed at male per- as the 2003 ISM Steering Committee Chair
petrators of domestic violence. This case and is co-editor of Social Marketing
study eloquently lays out the program and Quarterly.
touches key issues ranging from deter-
mining objectives and selecting target REFERENCES
audiences to creating the marketing mix DONER, L. (2003). Approaches to evaluating
and conducting the outcome evaluation. It social marketing programs. Social Marketing
Quarterly, 9(3), 18–26.
is a model for presenting social marketing
case studies that one would like to see MANOFF, R. K. (1985). Social marketing: New
more researchers and practitioners adopt. imperative for public health. Westport, CT:
Praeger.
With the book coming in at 368
pages, it is clear that the field of social
marketing is even larger than that, making
a truly comprehensive review a daunting
task. The authors clearly had to make
decisions about what to include and
exclude, and how much weight to give
specific subjects. Despite some of the
observations made earlier, their book is a
unique contribution to the body of work in
this area. Its focus on campaigns not well

SMQ / VOL. X / NO. 1 / SPRING 2004

View publication stats

You might also like