Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CarbonCarbon Ultracapacitor Equivalent Circuit Model
CarbonCarbon Ultracapacitor Equivalent Circuit Model
Ultracapacitor
Equivalent Circuit Model, Parameter
Extraction, and Application
John M. Miller Uday Deshpande Marius Rosu
• Model Validation
• Constant Current – Six Step Method
• Constant Power
• Applications
• Recuperator Systems
• Micro-hybrid
• Transit bus
• Conclusions
Ultracapacitors l Microelectronics l HighVoltage Capacitors Slide 3
Production Facilities
§ San Diego, CA
§ Rossens, Switzerland
Market Application
Transportation Trains, trams
Buses
Aerospace
Industry Pitch systems
Robotics
Telecom
Fork lift, ship yard cranes
Elevators
UPS/Power quality
AMR
Consumer Digital cameras, PDA’s, laptop, mobile phones
§ Target is the automotive market
§ Board net stabilization, distributed power, Hybrid drive trains, PHEV
Ultracapacitors l Microelectronics l HighVoltage Capacitors Slide 5
Ultracapacitor Cells
• Ultracapacitor cell design: Minimize ESR!
• Trends are for ESR*C = t <1s and PML > 10 kW/kg
50
Temperature, C Te mp
40
T .mod ( x )
30
24
20
3 4 4
0 5 ´ 10 1 ´ 10 1.5 ´ 10
0 time , x 4
1.44 ´ 10
Time, s
Current Response
Voltage Energy Energy Mass
Capacitor Type (pk/rms) Time
(V) (Wh/liter) (Wh/kg) 1 MJ (kg)
(A) (seconds)
Electrostatic
Polymer Film 200,000/300 900 0.03 0.024 12,000 10 9
Ceramic MLCC
Electrolytic
?/40 450 0.087 0.019 15,000 10 4
Aluminum electrolytic
Electrochemical
4,800/150 2.7 6.4 5.5 51 1
Carbon ultracapacitor
Electrochemical
2,000/150 3.8 286 123 2 10 3
LithiumIon
Modeling
Electrode
Grind fabrication
Activation Coating
Rolling/Kneading/Pasting
Activated carbon powder
Source: Prof. Katsuhiko Naoi, Institute of Symbiotic Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology,
Recent Advances in Capacitors and Hybrid Power Sources in Japan, presented to DOE Basic Energy Sciences Wkshp, 3-4 March 2007
1 1 1
= +
C eff C Helm C Diffuse
electrode, black; solvent, blue;cation, orange, anion, red)
electrode, black; solvent, blue;cation, orange, anion, red)
Source: B. Scrosati, M. Armand, W. Henderson, K. Lian, Capacitive Storage Science,” Basic Research Needs for
Energy Storage, meeting of the American Chemical Society, ACS, Aug. 2007.
0.0008 Ohm
0.4C(v) 0.44C(v) 0.16C(v) Rsd
560 Ohm
# #
ACR(Strap:Source,Strap:Source) [uOhm]
250.00
200.00
150.00
100.00
50.00
0.00
1.00 10.00 100.00 1000.00
Freq [kHz]
21.00
20.50
20.00
19.50
19.00
1.00 10.00 100.00 1000.00
Freq [kHz]
Model Validation
• Constant Current
• Maxwell’s Six Step Method
• Constant Power
• Linear voltage
changes (approx)
• Constant internal
power dissipation
• Available energy is
total stored minus
dissipated energy
TerminalVolts
Probe4 2.98
250.00
200.00
2.00
VM1.V...
0 DATA...
1.00
250.00 20.00m
Lab vs. Simulated BCAP2000P
3
Simulated
Measured
2.5
Cell Voltage
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
time (s)
C u rre n t (A )
2.1 150
Vexp (V) 60°C I(A) 60°C
1.7 100
1.3 50
0.9 0
0 10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40
Time (s) Time (s)
Source: G. Alcicek*, H. Gualous*, R. Gallay**, J. M. Miller**, A. Miraoui*, “Supercapacitor constant power discharge and
thermal behavior,” * L2ES Laboratory UTBM-UFC, Bat F-UTBM Rue Thierry-Mieg 90010 Belfort, France,
Hamid.gualous@univ-fcomte.fr, ** Maxwell Technologies Rgallay@maxwell.com , Jmiller@maxwell.com
3
Vexp
2.5
Vsim
Voltage (V)
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Time (s)
Source: G. Alcicek*, H. Gualous*, R. Gallay**, J. M. Miller**, A. Miraoui*, “Supercapacitor constant power discharge and
thermal behavior,” * L2ES Laboratory UTBM-UFC, Bat F-UTBM Rue Thierry-Mieg 90010 Belfort, France,
Hamid.gualous@univ-fcomte.fr, ** Maxwell Technologies Rgallay@maxwell.com , Jmiller@maxwell.com
n()
n(out)
UltracapacitorCell/Module P
BoostCAP2600
2600F Scaled to Module Level
Np
1.0
1.0
#, cells in series string. This input sets the operating
voltage for cell (=1.0) or module (= #)
#, strings in parallel. Default is (=1.0)
• Output table
• These outputs are sufficient to compute efficiency, SOC and stored
energy.
• All resistive elements couple to companion thermal model via calculated
power dissipation at each time step
Pdisp W Total internal power dissipated = Sum(Ix 2 *Rx), x=1,2,5
o
Top C Modeled cell/module operating temperature based on
specified ambient Ta and thermal parameters. Top is
directly available as an output
Q Coul Charge at the operating potential Uc and time step
Uc V Terminal voltage
Ic A Terminal current
Applications
• Recuperator System
• Exemplar for recuperative systems
14V
G Consumer
DC
DC
<2000W
The advantages in terms of fuel
Ultracaps reduction are shown in the following
~32V / 70F data, resulting from measurements
on basis of an Audi A4 with a 2 lit
12 V engine:
Battery City: 0.56 l/100 km
Highway:0.23 l/100 km
BAB: 0.17 l/100 km
NEFZ: 0.22 l/100 km
Ultracapacitors l Microelectronics l HighVoltage Capacitors Slide 30
Segue
Ultracapacitor P&E Evolution
Energy
9
Power
Specific Energy, Power
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
Year
• Ordered structures
• Binder free electrodes
• Higher power & energy
• Carbon Nanotube
From: B. Scrosati, M. Armand, W. Henderson, K. Lian, Capacitive Storage
Electrode structure: Science,” Basic Research Needs for Energy Storage, meeting of the American
Chemical Society, ACS, Aug. 2007.
• Vertically aligned CNTs
• High tube density: 1012 - 1013 CNT/cm2
• Nanometer spacing and diameter
• Tube length: 100 - 300 μm
• Dimensions comparable to chemical
lattice
Carbon nanotube active layer
• Binder free active layer 100 μm
• E~ 30->60 Wh/kg
Source: Joel Schindall, “Concept and Status of Nano-Sculpted Capacitor Battery,” 16th Annual Seminar on
Double Layer Capacitors and Hybrid Energy Storage Devices, Deerfield Beach, FL, 4-6 Dec. 2006
Top Current
Bottom Current Collector weld
Collector – to foil tab
Jelly-roll electrode
weld to foil tab assembly
Bottom Current Collector Lid – weld to
Welds to Inside of Can collector
Active Parallel HESS
CP Efficiency 3000F UC (0.1, 0.25, 0.4Pml)
1.00
0.90
Batt Power 0.80
Electronic
Eff
Converter 0.70
0.60
0.50
DLC
0.40
"ultracapacitor"
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00
Time, s
650F Scaled to Module Level
VM1.V (imaginary) [V]
C dl
5.00u VM1.V...
i(t)
R i (SOC,T) 68.00n
926.90u 940.00u 950.00u 959.20u
R e (SOC,T) U Li (t)
R_ionic DATAPAIRS1
R_elec 1.9 mOhm +
VM1 I_10C Y t
V
3.81 mOhm
E_lithiumIon
4.2 V
Power Dissipation Comparison
30000
25000
Power (W), Energy (J)
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
5000
time (s)
20.00
R_ESR.I [A]
C1.V [V]
C1.V [V]
R_ES...
10.00
Ib U b I L
Cdl
0
Energy M anagem ent Supervisory
0 20.00m 35.00m
Controller
Ri(SOC,T)
H1
Uc Ic
Re(SOC,T)
Ultracapacitor Pack Lithiumion Pack
Thank You!
• John M. Miller, Electrical and Thermal Performance of the Carbon-carbon Ultracapacitor Under
Constant Power Conditions, IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference VPPC2007, Arlington,
TX, 9-12 Sept. 2007
• Lijun Gao, Shengyi Lia, Roger A. Dougal, “Dynamic Lithium-ion Battery Model for System Simulation,”
IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technology, Vol. 25, Nr. 3, Sept. 2002
• Marius Rosu, John M. Miller, Uday Deshpande, “Parameter Extraction for ultracapacitor High Power
Modules,” to be presented at Power Electronics Technology Conference, PET2007, Dallas, TX., 30
Oct. 2007