Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Critical Analysis of 18th Amendment
Critical Analysis of 18th Amendment
Finally Eighteenth amendment was introduced and passed by the civilian parliament and
government unanimously. The eighteenth amendment was passed in April 2010; Senator Mian
Raza Rabbani was leading the Parliamentary committee on Constitutional reforms who also
proposed the draft of amendment before the parliament. It is said that this amendment regained
the original status or image of constitution of 1973. It is believed that 18th amendment was the
historical achievement of the parliament which passed it unanimously and on consent basis, and
surely 18th amendment had a great resemblance to the constitution of 1973. It is also said that for
the first time in history a president surrendered his powers to the prime minister willfully and
almost all politicians showed consensus, maturity and tolerance to each other’s view. It is very
true that this amendment brought 30% changes into the constitution and 102 out of 280 articles
were amended, inserted, added, substituted or deleted by the amendment.
2
For creating real affection with democracy the list of high treason acts further been expended by
inserting acts of mischief with the constitution, the suspension of constitution holding in
abeyance, abrogation or subversion. So that to hinder the possible ways of coup takeover. Even
then those would be held guilty of high treason who provided assistance either directly or
indirectly, so that to prevent every possible way of usurper.
To convert written theories into practical, it has been ratified that Non-Muslim communities
(Minority) will have 4 reserved seats in senate (upper house), after the eighteenth amendment for
the next election of senate one Non-Muslim from each province will be elected on reserved seat
for senate. Provinces which were neglected by the centre deliberately were supposed to be
compensated after enforcement of the amendment at any cost. The amendment provided more
autonomy and federal will have less involvement with affairs of the provinces.
3
The democratic institutions like Upper house (Senate) and lower house (National Assembly)
were given more authority power by the eighteenth amendment. This has been a remarkable
achievement of the said amendment. Authority like Prime minister’s referendum may be decided
by joint parliament, prior to this amendment parliament was only restricted for the procedure and
compiling of the referendum only. The legislation authority has also been limited to the
parliament only, which means that the sole authority to legislate any law would be parliament
only, especial care has also been created so that not to delay, which is the time for consideration
as any bill passed by the parliament in this context, the president would have only 10days to
consider, while previously president had 30days for consideration on any bill.
Besides exclusive powers on legislative sphere, parliament had been awarded further powers like
in case of emergency by president; the proclamation would be brought before both houses for
approval which indicates its impotency and worth. Along with such powers, parliament has also
a vital role in appointment of judges and election commission.
The senate’s role has also been enhanced, by doing this all units of federation will get proper and
equal importance. After enforcement of 18th amendment the President will have to submit report
on principles of policy not only before national assembly but also before Senate, as prior to this
amendment president was supposed to submit a report to national assembly only. The working
days of senate has been increased from 90 days to 110 days to make the institution more
effective and progressive. So to conclude this I may say that the powers, authorities and
jurisdictions of the democratic institutions have been enhanced a lot after the amendment, which
not only strengthen the institution but also the people indirectly.
The power of dissolution of national assembly by the President has also been limited, the
amendment restricted President’s power in this context, the President will have only power to
4
dissolve assembly when vote of no confidence has been passed by against the Prime minister,
and in the other situation, President can only dissolve national assembly when Prime minister
advises him to do so, and then President will have to announce a fix date of election within
90days and will appoint a care taker setup to run the affairs of the country. President will have to
appoint a care taker Prime minister and a care taker cabinet with the consultation of outgoing
Prime minister and opposition leader. The legislative powers of President have also been
minimized like the power for holding referendum on any issue of national importance been
transferred to Prime minister after the enforcement of the amendment. Prime minister will hold
any referendum with the approval of the joint sitting of the parliament.
Limitation of Cabinet;
Another highly mentionable work of eighteenth amendment is that it had restricted number of
federal cabinet; this was highly appreciated by the all as major developed countries of the world
have very limited ministers even having large governmental system with highly population. This
attitude of the amendment received warmed welcome by the mass. The amendment has
prescribed only 11% of the total number of the parliamentarians who can constitute a federal
cabinet. By limiting ministries the burden of expenditures on national accounts would surely be
reduced, prior to this amendment there were maximum strength of ministers who have nothing to
do but to hold a title and earn money unjustifiably but the amendment put serious restriction so
as to save national money which indeed have to be invested upon nationals directly rather to fill
bellies of the ministers.
The amendment had another admirable achievement that is it had also restricted advisors for
chief ministers of provinces to 5 numbers only, by this lot of money can be saved and can be
used in a better place. By restricting cabinet the amendment not only protected national accounts
to be vested but also reduced the chances of bribing to independent candidates of national or
provincial assemblies by offering ministries to them by the ruling government.
5
chances of any favoritism by the caretaker setup they have been deprived of participation in any
election until their time of office finishes.
It had also been remarkable that for elections of Prime minister for federal or Chief ministers for
provinces there would be open ballet system for voting rather than secret system so that to make
the elections more transplant and reduce every possibility of horse-trading or vote purchasing or
any factor of influence over any member to vote in his favor. This amendment has also been
appreciated and welcomed because it had prescribed a procedure for appointment of chief
election commission and other four members of the commission. The procedure is that the Prime
minister for the appointment of the election commission would first consult with the opposition
leader, and if the built a consensus then Prime minister would forward 3 names to parliamentary
committee which would have to announce or short list anyone of them.
Concurrent List;
The 18th amendment has also abolished concurrent list of legislation, the concurrent list is the list
of items where both federal and its units(Provinces) has jurisdiction for legislation but in case of
conflict of legislation on same matter or subject then federal legislation would have more
impotency and would prevail. Initially this list was added in government of Indian act 1935(pre
partition) era and was given by our British colonial masters, then this list was added and dropped
from Pakistani constitutions throughout, this list was part of the constitution of 1973, but now
after addition of 18th amendment this list has been removed. By this provincial autonomy has
risen to some extent.
It is worth full to know that a federation is a multi tier system of government where there is a
centre (Federal) and other units (Provinces), in this scenario both entities have jurisdiction to
legislate as there are almost 25 federal countries where both of governments have the jurisdiction
to legislate. In the constitution of 1973 there were 47 subjects in the concurrent legislative list
few like marriage and divorce, infant and minor adoption, arms, firearms and ammunition,
environmental pollution and ecology, population planning and social welfare, tourism and all
6
such subjects were included in the concurrent list where both federal and provinces had right to
legislate, but after 18th amendment federal has limited powers and it has surrendered its extra
jurisdictional authorities to its units that are provinces. After the implementation of the new
amendment the devolution of ministries like environment, health, education, agriculture, sports,
food, women development, minority’s affairs, labor and manpower are great steps to make
provinces more autonomous.
If we talk especially about province Balochistan then it would not be wrong to say that federal
government has more influence over the specific province more than other province. The federal
involvement had been caught continuously into affairs of the province like law and enforcement,
unlawful control over natural resources and political interference are clear evidence of
involvement where province has zero level of autonomy. If we shuffle the pages of history we
shall come to know that Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa endorsed the constitution of 1973
on condition that concurrent list would be removed not late than 10 years, but promise yet not
been fulfilled wholly as claimed.
The amendment proclaimed that the province with natural resources and minerals will share
50:50% of the total revenue with the federal government but its violation continuously exists,
and it was decided that natural resource producer province will first fill the needs of the province
and then will share with other province but we see that natural gas of Balochistan is not been
provided to the province but is unjustifiably distributed to other provinces which is clear
violation of the provisions . it is the biggest critic that federal keeping all revenue generating
ministries with itself and had only given non revenue generating ministries to provinces and
claims for awarding autonomy to provinces which is biggest lie indeed. The critics believe that
such all discrimination and unjust attitude of federal with provinces especially small and
deprived province are done deliberately so as to get benefits from them.
7
Ambiguity;
Some paradigm says about the 18th amendment that it possesses some ambiguity or vague
provisions which create room for confusion not only for commons but also for governments and
legal communities as well. The Planning Commission has inquired government to make clear
stance about jurisdiction and responsibility of province and federal on the oil and gas sector, so
to avoid any confliction. They say that with unclear rules and laws no company would be ready
to invest healthy amount with risk, they believe that there need to be mirror image rules to attract
multinational companies for heavy investment, the official of the Planning Commission said that
in the situation of ambiguity about laws both federal and provinces are giving their own versions
or interpretations of rules which male ground for confusion.
Conclusion;
Eighteenth amendment in its true picture is the biggest achievement and change in the
constitution so far after the dictatorship era. The positive attitude of the President for
surrendering his all executive powers to Prime minister is really admirable. The previous
amendments brought by military chiefs changed the message and essence of the constitution of
1973, but new addition of amendment in the shape of 18th amendment kicked out illegal and
unlawful changes into the constitution. It is said that the amendment if not wholly but brought
the real image of the constitution of 1973. It was noticed that for the first time in history political
parties and politicians showed real maturity and built consensus while keeping political
hatredeness aside.
The unanimous bill passed was welcomed by the majority although there has been a lot of
criticism on the other side, some say about its vagueness on few provisions, some say that its
only document with zero enforceability, some say provinces are still not autonomous and have to
take homework from the federation and federal is playing double game by keeping revenue
generating ministries with itself and giving lollipop to provinces on the name of autonomy, such
all views exist we have to see positivity and major changes brought by the amendment are really
enough for the start of democratic institution.
Bibliography;
The 18th Amendment in the 1973 Constitution
Fakhr-ul-Islam
8
The Lahore Journal of Economics 17 : SE (September 2012): pp. 387–424
The 18th Constitutional Amendment: Glue or Solvent for Nation Building and
Citizenship in Pakistan