SPSS Worksheet

INDICATORS
Respondent Category A Category B Category C
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
1 4 3 4 4 1 4 4 3 4 1 2 4 2 4 4
2 1 3 2 2 3 3 2 4 2 1 4 3 4 1 3
3 4 1 2 4 2 4 4 4 4 1 4 4 1 2 4
4 2 2 4 3 2 2 4 2 4 1 2 3 3 1 4
5 1 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 3 1 4 4 4 4 1
6 3 2 3 2 1 1 4 3 2 4 1 3 4 4 3
7 3 4 4 1 4 2 1 2 4 3 3 4 1 3 3
8 4 2 2 2 2 4 1 2 4 4 1 2 4 4 4
9 3 4 4 4 1 1 4 4 3 2 3 4 1 2 3
10 4 4 4 3 1 4 4 4 2 3 1 4 4 4 4

Respondent #1 Category A
WAM = ∑ f w
n

Indicator #1 Category A
WAM = ∑ f w
n
Respondent Category A Category B Category C
1 2 3 4 5 Total WAM
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Table 1
indicate the title here for the WAM presentation
Indicators Frequency WAM Qualitative Index
4 3 2 1

Legend
SPSS Worksheet

Respondent Sex Age Civil Status Length of Service

Male Female 20 - 30 31 - 45 46 - 60 Single Married Separated Widowed 5yrs&below 6-10 yrs above 10
1 / / / /
2 / / / /
3 / / / /
4 / / / /
5 / / / /
6 / / / /
7 / / / /
8 / / / /
9 / / / /
10 / / / /
SPSS Variable View
SPSS Data View
Demographic Profile Data which will be presented in Chapter IV using the pie chart
Test of Normality

Mean and Standard Deviation

Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Age

Category Age Group Test of Normality Test of Homogeneity Parametric or

Of Variances Non-Parametric Test
Category A - Personal 20 – 30
31 - 45
46 - 60
Category B - Social 20 – 30
31 - 45
46 - 60
Category C - Emotional 20 – 30
31 - 45
46 - 60
Over-all 20 – 30
31 - 45
46 - 60
Length of Service

Category Age Group Test of Normality Test of Homogeneity Parametric or

Of Variances Non-Parametric Test
Category A - Personal 5 years and below
6 – 10 years
Above 10 years
Category B - Social 5 years and below
6 – 10 years
Above 10 years
Category C - Emotional 5 years and below
6 – 10 years
Above 10 years
Over-all 5 years and below
6 – 10 years
Above 10 years
Civil Status

Category Age Group Test of Normality Test of Homogeneity Parametric or

Of Variances Non-Parametric Test
Category A - Personal single
married
separated
widowed/er
Category B - Social single
married
separated
widowed/er
Category C - Emotional single
married
separated
widowed/er
Over-all single
married
separated
widowed/er
Sex

Category Age Group Test of Normality Test of Homogeneity Parametric or

Of Variances Non-Parametric Test
Category A - Personal male
female
Category B - Social male
female
Category C - Emotional male
female
Over-all male
female
ANOVA result for Category B, C and Over-all

Kruskal – Wallis for Category A

To determine which group contributed to the significant difference, look at
the sig values of the groups being compared and determine which group is
present on the group combinations with significant difference

Groups with sig values ( or p-values) less than 0.05 :

Category B
20 – 30 yrs old vs 31-45 yrs old
31 -45 yrs old vs 46-60 yrs old
Thus the group which contributed to the significant difference is
31 – 45 yrs old
Category C
20 – 30 yrs old vs 31-45 yrs old
If there is only one group combination with significant difference,
consider the WAM of each group to determine which
group contributed to the significant difference. It could be
the group with high or low WAM depending on the topic
that is being looked into
Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance ( W ) - for the Level of Agreement

Indicator Teachers Principal

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3 2 4 3 3 4 3 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 3 2 3 2 4
2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
3 3 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 3
4 4 3 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 4
5 2 3 3 2 4 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 3
6 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4
7 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4
8 3 4 2 3 2 4 3 2 3 2 3 4 3 2 3 2 3 4 3 2
9 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2
10 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4
 Percentage Rating

Title : Level of Knowledge of Junior High School Students on Hydro-meteorological Disasters

Indicator Respondent
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
1 / / / X / X / / / / / X X / / X X / / / X / / X
2 / / X X / / / X / / X X X / / / / / X / / / / /
3 X / X X / X X / / X X / / / / X / X / / X / X /
4 X / / / / / X / / / / / / / / / X / / / / X / /
5 / / X / X / / X / X / / / X / X X / X X / / X X
6 X / X / / / / / / X / X / / / / X / / / / X / /
7 / / / X / / / / X / / / X / X / X / X X / X / X
8 / X / X / X X / X / X / X X / X / / / / / / X /
9 / / / X / / / / X / / / / / / / / / X / / / / /
10 X / / / X / X / / X / X / X X X / X / X X X / X

Indicator Respondent
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
1 X / / X / X X / / / / X X / / X X / X X / X / X
2 X / X / X / / X / / X X X X / / / / X / / / X /
3 X X X X / X X / X X X / / / X X / X / / X / / X
4 X / / / / / X / / / X / X / / / X / / / / X / /
5 / / / / X X / X / X / / / X / X / X / X / / X /
6 X / X / / / / / / X / X / / / / X / / / / X / /
7 / / / X / / / / X / / / X / X / X / X / X / / X
8 / X / / / X X / X / X / X X / X / X / X / / X /
9 / / X X / / / / X / / / / / X / / / X / / / / X
10 X X / / X / X X / X / X / X X X / X / X X X / /

Respondent
SCORE

Respondent
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
SCORE

Respondent
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Percentage
Rating

Respondent
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Percentage
Rating

Table 1
Level of Knowledge of Junior High School Students on Hydro-meteorological Disasters
 Level of Knowledge Number of Percentage of
Students per Students per
level of Level of
knowledge Knowledge
Qualitative Index Continuum
Very Knowledgeable 90 – 100%
Knowledgeable 80 – 89%
Less Knowledgeable 75 – 79%
Least Knowledgeable below 75%

Table 2
Indicator Analysis on the Level of Knowledge of Junior High School Students on Hydro-meteorological Disasters
 No. Of Students % of Students
Qualitative
No Indicator with Correct with Correct
Index
Response Response
1 Reason for landslides
2 Aftershocks after a major earthquake
3 Earth movement which triggers the earthquake
4 Earthquake intensities which cause the greatest damage
Measures of earthquake's intensity based on the observed
5
effects on people and structures
6 Factors that trigger an earthquake
7 Type of faulting on transform faults
8 Destructive earthquake waves
9 Natural cracks that causes an earthquake.
10 Tsunami warning after an earthquake

Continuum Qualitative Index

96 – 100% Mastered
86 – 95% Closely Approximately Mastery
66 – 85% Moving Toward Mastery
35 – 65% Average Mastery
15 – 34% Low Mastery
5 – 14% Very Low Mastery
0 – 4% Least Mastery
Source : SHC Statistical Guide Revised Edition 2021