Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2015 Pereira
2015 Pereira
www.elsevier.com/locate/jmbbm
Research Paper
ar t ic l e in f o abs tra ct
Article history: Several rotary instruments have been daily employed on clinic to promote cut aiming to adjust
Received 30 December 2014 the length of fiber posts to the radicular conduct, but there is no information on the literature
Received in revised form about the effects of the different rotary instruments and its impact on the micromorphology of
6 April 2015 surface and mechanical properties of the glass fiber post. This study aimed the impact of rotary
Accepted 7 April 2015 instruments upon fiber-matrix integrity, micromorphology and flexural-strength of glass-fiber
Available online 17 April 2015 posts (GFP). GFP (N¼ 110) were divided into 5 groups: Ctrl: as-received posts, DBc: coarse
Keywords: diamond-bur, DBff: extra-fine diamond-bur, CB: carbide-bur, DD: diamond-disc. Cutting proce-
Fiber post dures were performed under abundant irrigation. Posts exposed to rotary instruments were
Flexural strength then subjected to 2-point inclined loading test (compression 451) (n¼10/group) and 3-point
Micromorphology flexural-strength test (n¼10/group). Fiber-matrix integrity and micromorphology at the cut
Root post surface were analyzed using a SEM (n¼2/group). Cutting procedures did not significantly affect
Rotary instruments the 2-point (51.774.3–56.775.1 MPa) (p¼0.0233) and 3-point flexural-strength (671.5735.3–
709.1733.1 MPa) (p¼0.0968) of the posts (One-way ANOVA and Tukey's test). Fiber detachment
was observed only at the end point of the cut at the margins of the post. Cut surfaces of the CB
group were smoother than those of the other groups. After 3-point flexural strength test, fiber-
matrix separation was evident at the tensile side of the post. Rotary instruments tested with
n
Correspondence to: Federal University of Santa Maria Faculty of Odontology, MDS-PhD Graduate Program in Oral Science,
Prosthodontics Unit, R. Floriano Peixoto, 1184, 97015-372, Santa Maria, Brazil. Tel.: þ55 55 3220 9276; fax: þ55 55 3220 9272.
E-mail address:
lfvalandro@hotmail.com (L.F. Valandro).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.04.008
1751-6161/& 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 48 (2015) 192 –199 193
simultaneous water-cooling did not affect the resistance of the tested fiber posts but caused
disintegration of the fibers from the matrix at the end of the cut, located at the margins.
& 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
loading test, 10 fiber posts with a length of 15 mm were was calculated using the following formula (Wandscher et al.,
produced by the manufacturer, since the posts were not 2015):
cut, they had the same length as the fiber posts from the Ç
other groups after those posts had been cut. τ ¼ 16 Fmax cos 45=3 π D
DBc: coarse diamond bur (3216 KG Sorensen, Cotia, SP, Brazil).
Where, Fmax ¼Maximum force (N) for fracture of the speci-
DBff: extra-fine diamond bur (3216FF KG Sorensen).
men; cos45¼cosine of the angle 451 (in this case, Fmax.cos45
CB: carbide bur (558 KG Sorensen).
refers to the component Fy of the original Fmax, Fig. 2a–b),
DD: diamond disc (double-sided, Ø ¼ 22 mm, thickness ¼
π ¼3.14; D¼ Diameter ( ¼ 2 mm) of the specimen at the deflec-
0.1 mm, ref. 7020; KG Sorensen).
tion point (fulcrum).
As depicted by Wandscher et al. (2015) the fiber posts are
produced with parallel fibers and thus submitted to 451
Cutting in groups DBc, DBff, and CB were performed at fracture load for shear stress (maximum in the center of the
high speed (Kavo Extra Torque 605C – 380.000 rpm, Kavo specimen). Accordingly, the load was applied perpendicularly
Factory Ind. Ltd., Joinville, SC, Brazil), while group DD was at the cut surface, leading this portion subject to shear stress.
sectioned with a handpiece at low speed (Kavo handpiece
INTRAmatic ABN 10 181 1:1 and Micromotor INTRAmatic DBN
– 20.000 rpm, Kavo Factory Ind.). All of the cutting procedures 2.3. Three-point flexural strength test
were performed under water-cooling.
The cylindrical fiber posts were tested in the Universal
Testing Machine (EMIC DL 2000) according to ISO 10477:1992
2.2. Two-point inclined loading test (compression at 451) (Lassila et al., 2002, 2004; Grandini et al., 2002; Galhano et al.,
2005) (Fig. 1b). The 3-point flexural strength test (σ in MPa)
Specimens (fiber posts embedded in the acrylic resin) were was calculated using the following formula: (Galhano et al.,
placed at 451 relative to the horizontal plane (Fig. 1a) in the 2005; Lassila et al., 2004; D'Arcangelo et al., 2007)
Universal Testing Machine (EMIC DL 2000, Sao Jose dos
σ ¼ 8 Fmax L=π D3
Pinhais, PR, Brazil) and a metallic jig induced load at a speed
of 1 mm/min to the incisal surface of the post until fracture of where Fmax ¼ maximum force (N) applied for the fracture of
the specimen. The stress (τ in MPa) at the moment of fracture the specimen; L¼ distance (in mm) between the lower
Table 1 – Experimental groups according to the rotary instruments used and the test methods.
Fig. 1 – a and b Experimental set up of a) 2-point, and b) 3-point flexural strength test.
journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 48 (2015) 192 –199 195
Table 2 – Mean, standard deviations (SD) (MPa) and coefficient of variation (CV) for 2-point flexural strength and 3-point
flexural strength.
Fig. 3 – a–d Representative images under stereomicroscope from the specimens submitted to 3-point flexural test. a) note the
compression zone at the load application point, b) the opposite side showing the failure, c) final failure at the center of the
specimen, d) as a result of tensile stresses.
Fig. 4 – A and B. Representative micrographs (50 and 100 ) from the end point of the cut at the margins of the post
demonstrating that the defects introduced by grinding were restricted at this particular region of the post; it was not observed
fiber detachment at the main body of the post.
Fig. 5 – a–j Representative SEM micrographs of the cross-sectional the glass fiber post surfaces after cutting with different
rotary tools (left to right: 45, 150, 150); a and b) control; c and d) coarse diamond bur; e and f) extra-fine diamond bur; g
and h) carbide bur; i and j) diamond disc. Note separation of the fiber from the matrix at the end of the cut ( ).
the inherent characteristics of the cutting tool as a multi- The material tested is classified as a composite produced
laminated bur. by combining two or more distinct components to form a new
When the fiber post is cut after the core reconstruction material with improved properties. The most common engi-
(Fig. 6), detachment of fibers/matrix did not occur, (Fig. 5c–h). neering composites are composed of strong fibers retained by
However, if the cut was performed prior to cementation with a matrix (Barbero, 2010; Dyer et al., 2004). Some important
instruments, that could cause fiber/matrix detachment. Thus, it factors influencing the mechanical properties of the fiber
is necessary to fill the detachment area with some core material posts include intrinsic properties, such as the elastic and
in order to avoid air zones inside the restoration and to prevent flexural moduli, surface treatment of the fibers and their
failures. Future studies are necessary to test this hypothesis. impregnation in resin, bonding between the fibers and the
journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 48 (2015) 192 –199 197
Fig. 6 – A and B. Representative micrographs from the cross-sectional surface of the glass fiber post and resin composite build-
up after cutting with coarse diamond bur. The cut was made after the core reconstruction procedure with composite resin.
The white-circle (A) and -line (B) correspond to the interface between resin composite ( ) and fiber post ( ) approximately. It
notes the protective effect for detachment of the glass fibers (none detachment of fibers from the matrix).
Isidor, F., Odman, P., Brondum, K., 1996. Intermittent loading of Smith, T.W., Grove, R.A., 2002. Failure analysis continuous fiber
teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int. J. reinforced composites. In: Shipley, R.J., Becker, W.T. (Eds.),
Prosthodont. 9, 131–136.
ASM Handbook Volume 11: Failure Analysis and Prevention.
Kim, M.J., Jung, W.C., Seunghan, O.H., Hattori, M., Yoshinari, M.,
ASM International, Ohio, pp. 731–743.
Kawada, E., et al., 2011. Flexural properties of three kinds of
Söderholm, K.J.M., Shang, S.W., 1993. Molecular orientation of
experimental fiber-reinforced composite posts. Dent. Mater. J.
30, 38–44. silane at the surface of colloidal silica. J. Dent. Res. 72,
Lanza, A., Aversa, R., Rengo, S., Apicella, D., Apicella, A., 2005. 3D 1050–1054.
FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary Vallittu, P.K., 1999. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers
incisor. Dent. Mater. 21, 709–715. reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. J.
Lassila, L.V., Nohrstrom, T., Vallittu, P.K., 2002. The influence of
Prosthet. Dent. 81, 318–326.
short-term water storage on the flexural properties of
Wandscher, V.F., Bergoli, C.D., Oliveira, A.F., Kaizer, O.B., Borges, A.
unidirectional glass fiber-reinforced composites. Biomaterials
L.S., Lindberguer, I.F., Valandro, L.F., 2015. Fatigue surviving,
23, 2221–2229.
Lassila, L.V., Tanner, J., Vallittu, P.K., 2004. Flexural properties of fracture resistance, shear stress, and finite element analysis
fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent. Mater. 20, 29–36. of glass fiber posts with different diameters. J. Mech. Behav.
Monticelli, F., Osorio, R., Sadek, F.T., Radovic, I., Toledano, M., Biomed. Mater. 43, 69–77.
Ferrari, M., 2006. Post-surface conditioning improves Wandscher, V.F., Bergoli, C.D., de Oliveira, A.F., Kaizer, O.B., Souto
interfacial adhesion in post/core restorations. Dent. Mater. 7,
Borges, A.L., Limberguer Ida, F., Valandro, L.F., 2015. Fatigue
602–609.
surviving, fracture resistance, shear stress and finite element
Obukuro, M., Takahashi, Y., Shimizy, H., 2008. Effect of diameter
of glass fibers on flexural properties of fiber-reinforced analysis of glass fiber posts with different diameters. J. Mech.
composites. Dent. Mater. J. 27, 541–548. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 43, 69–77.