You are on page 1of 4

901

A SHORT HISTORY OF WESTERN


LEGAL THEORY BY JM KELLY
Sandra Petersson *

J M Kelly A Short History of Western Legal Theory (reprint, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997)
(466 + xvi pages, $75).

First published in 1992, JM Kelly's A Short History of Western Legal Theory is not, strictly
speaking, a new book. However, as evidenced by five reprintings in its first five years, it is a
book that continually attracts new readers and rightly so. It is a masterfully readable book, a
quality often neglected in the area of legal theory. Though published posthumously, the
manuscript was virtually complete when Kelly died in 1990. Tony Honoré took on the task of
checking the text prior to publication, with missing references supplied by Ernest Metzger.

In the Foreword, Ronan Keane notes that Kelly's "primary concern … was to make us see
jurisprudence in its historical setting" and he achieves this goal with relative ease. 1 Kelly takes
Bertrand Russell's History of Western Philosophy as his model and ably constructs "a simple,
chronological account of the legal theories produced by, and in their turn influencing, the main
epochs of Western history." 2

As Kelly explains, the book is "divided into ten chapters dealing with ten slices of the time
separating Homer's world from that of Gorbachov." 3 Kelly follows the usual manner of
carving this 2,500 year period into manageable portions. Chapter One addresses the Greeks,
while Chapter Two turns to the Romans. Chapters Three and Four divide the early and the

* Lecturer in Law, Victoria University of Wellington.

1 J M Kelly A Short History of Western Legal Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992) vi.

2 Kelly, above n 1, xii.

3 Kelly, above n 1, xiii.


902 (2000) 31 VUWLR

high Middle Ages at 1100. Chapter Five combines the Renaissance and Reformation, bringing
the survey up to 1600. The 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries are the subject of the next three
chapters. Chapters Nine and Ten take on "the profusion of new legal theory" produced in the
20th century. 4

Kelly traces a number of key themes through each of these eras, although the lack of a more
detailed Table of Contents conceals the elegant structure of his chronology. Each chapter
begins with a general historical introduction, presenting the reader with the overall political,
social, and cultural context of the period. Kelly then examines how the period's legal theory
approached and influenced certain key themes. The key themes he traces are: Theory of the
State, Validity of Law, Rule of Law, Nature and Purpose of Law, Natural Law, Equality,
Property, Equity, Criminal Law and Punishment, and International Law. This structure is of
great assistance to the reader who wishes to trace the 2,500 year evolution of a particular theme
such as Natural Law. However, Kelly's survey of each period is not restricted to these themes
to the exclusion of other significant developments, such as the need for specific comments on
the Emergence of New Constitutional Themes in the 18th century. Kelly also allows for the
natural substitution of themes over time; while Slavery is a key theme followed in earlier
chapters, it gives way to a discussion of Natural Rights from the 17th century onwards.

Kelly's work is notably non-Anglocentric, a bias found in many other English language
surveys of jurisprudence. He gives due weight to both common law and civilian theorists. As
such, the book also operates as a bridge for both common lawyers and civilians seeking to
expand their understanding of the other tradition.

Kelly's treatment of two legal theories warrants specific comment. The first is his treatment
of positivism. Positivism is almost entirely dealt with as an aside to natural law theory, rather
than as a separate conception of law. Though intended as a student textbook, the novice reader
is likely to miss the full context and significance of positivism, which has not even been
granted an entry in the index. 5 While Kelly does discuss positivism, though somewhat
inaccessibly, he omits all mention of feminist legal theories. A single passing reference to John
Stuart Mill's The Subjection of Women (1869) is an inadequate history of feminist theories
emerging in the late 19th century and throughout the 20th century. Kelly's omission of feminist

4 Kelly, above n 1, 358.

5 Though no doubt beyond Kelly's control, the index is often inadequate. For example, it does not refer
to Coke or Bracton, though both are discussed at several points.
A SHORT HISTORY OF WESTERN LEGAL THEORY 903

legal theories also creates a misleading summary of 20th century jurisprudence by not noting
serious challenges to modern theories such as rights analysis or law and economics.

At the juncture of the 20th and 21st centuries, we live in a culture that increasingly views
knowledge as consumable product. The Nutshell Nineties have served up all manner of
intellectual fast foods to meet the craving for quick comprehension. The field of jurisprudence
has been no exception, though so far we have been spared such titles as Legal Theory for Lay-
Abouts, Natural Law for Ninnies, and Positivism for Posers. Kelly's Short History of Western Legal
Theory does not belong to this category of instant mental make-overs. It is a book that demands
the reader's sustained attention but it is also a book that rewards such attention.
904 (2000) 31 VUWLR

You might also like