©@ wcurner (jacciona ¢ HAZARD IDENI IFCATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT aa panes esGnATIN "| SiqAURES—[ BOVE TSK/ACHUT/HROCES NARS EALU TON TABLE Stitt et —| cone Mar =a ROTC | se | exetaes! an ara aan Ea een Ea DEPARTENT/AREA [Al [APPROVED BY:PROLECT DIRECTOR =e entify the hazard onthe gven task and conduct assessment of the actual site conditional dentiied isk should provide witha plan to eliminate or contol the risk ISK REDUCTION ACTION PLAN, = Rsk Ranking HAZARD IoeNTIFICATION ‘Consequences X iklhood Person Workplace/Aatvity Sood | Hl! B 8 alli geesem GEA 2 Process/ Hazan BZ) a | mere ammecommosy | 1) H) 9 | wtomtnmele [p23 ei cleo fg 2) ‘Sstmemscnmes (4) 8 sey 1 | a af Gian Permit vo Wor a | | | raseuctecordnaton 1 base cont proto f superar | yg, trae s|2 sl2|6 | } z Sap ees Prot Pr Ts]2 B]zp a] Seeniore a] i tga Bb + Toobin sould be condctes | supersor® | gy fr te wateonmenes L i at\acciona HAZARD IDENTIFIFCATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT = FICHTNER —sivtitniasespns ED Identity the hazard on the given task and conduct assessment ofthe actual site condition, all identified risk should provide with plan to eliminate or control the risk. ‘ACCIONA Revision 01 Date: $011 2018 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK REDUCTION ACTION PLAN ‘Consequences X Likelihood = Risk Ranking cae ance |] ] £ meroven cusrna connors ||| £ ai S| Work Activites HAZARD. Vessentname | EXISTING CONTROLS | eyposeu | 3|2| & IMPLEMENTING NEW 51 | own 2 HE controls 5|s[ 2 /¢ Wem algat 87/2 87) 2 = iment Foreman sal ate the adn sleton of be use sate protection and ete ed working codon speed by + nse proper postr snd ata competent son testing |* Unsecured tools, viv — einen saviment Statin bing weathercodtion + Uieand putin table scess 3 + Closed supervision bytheengneer, | v ve ose 4l2 a}a}e transporte testing equipment sestmanner 7 ]Revewat drawings and] > frgnomies ve as-built plane hove omega |e rs fonlvautorzd enone can enter the oe 7 ao ee 2)2)4 Engineer has documents s * Hand a viv 7 peed lecommissoning Engineer tal oy etn equpment |» ich pole fontsion . > caugminberween—_|seadinryorbruse ’ supervsor® | gg ane oe door Ergneer + Congest ase teavoi contact wth eachother von + Very tht equipment safe to open | Jag @cCcIOMA HAZARD IDENTIFIFCATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT = FICHTNER fed risk should provide with a plan to eliminate or control the risk "AGCIONA Revision 03 Date: 30-11-2010 RISK REDUCTION ACTION PLAN ‘Consequences X Likelihood = Risk Ranking [dentfy the hazard on the glven task and conduct assessment of the actual sito condi HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AA g],|2 at 3 % | proven exisrinc controis | §| 8) = | roiowupny (BES S| Work Activities HAZARD EXISTING CONTROLS | 220", i é IMPLEMENTING NEW g|2 be ae £25 posed | $15) 2 CONTROLS ils 85 5|z 82/2 E Seed trans nonerofpensoetese J] 2| 5 | a0 frat conduct vist mspecton plete mandatory PPE ven opening pane! card > Use andra ner when acne WT Condct housekeeping onthe area tobe Ispected day belore the a 2| 3) 6 Jeremove obstruction and unnecessary 2y2) 4 y reeretel ves "Ladder or working platform used in Laccuel neraed equipment salbe adequately jourded or earthed i > Benin v¥ Tbe nto aay before sual impairment inspection date be adequate to provide 7 eee superisor& | yyy ala ane used during inspectionto | 3| 3| 9 | *nsineer ed spaces 7 viv boundary before rom come dose eergted tral equipmentane 7 superior | yg, al2|6 3/2] 6 | tances lorh/crounding survey |» improper Fandingat |» Damage o aset ade sound te testng area || | = 6 fintestne aupment | and equipment provide adequate fey vie ia ves [© Handling of tools, |e Electric shock, skin “communicate activity and hazards involve wtGC acciona HAZARD IDENTIFIFCATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT «= FICHTNER —iitncssssesaan ES ‘dentity the hazard on the given task and conduct assessment of the actual site condition, all identified risk should provide with a plan to ellminate or control the risk. ‘ACCIONA Revision-0i Date: 30-11-2019 RISK REDUCTION ACTION PLAN eee eee Consequences XLikelhood = Risk Ranking g\, : 2 5 IMPROVED EXISTING CONTROLS | § a S| work actives | HAZARD gd JIMPLEMENTING NEW | | & i Fore z\2 ‘CONTROLS. ees om 5 & 8l3l2 & sfa}a seins 3131 89) earth spes ad wiring shall be andiedna manner to svld mage snd cured ny Srvc bovine v ive spanan auipment and vehi incense oF ein supersor® | yy, poutenances Se 2|3| 6 | “tuner equipment and personne wear property the high vty ‘Exposure to extreme of v [* Provide appropriate clothing. Superior v| [ofall az ee lias 4j218 eed a yy pie a) 3}3|9 2/3] 6 }* Opening of panel door | ~* Damage to panel gineer shall identify the v TI or backeover dor on cover fart etentof ¥ ve Opening wong __ Handi resiting tom| testinga A@cCCIONA HAZARD IDENTIFIFCATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT —FICHTNER inate or control the rik. [AEGIONA Revision 01 Date: 3012018 ‘Identify the hazard on the given task and conduct assessment of the actual site condition, all identified risk should provide with a plan to RISK REDUCTION ACTION PLAN HAZARD IDE TIFICATION Consequences X Likelihood = Risk Ranking rem Half bg 3 = | Proven existinc conrrots | § | 8 ie S| Work Activities HAZARD. (codon fect EXISTING CONTROLS | £300, | 8/2) § IMPLEMENTING NEW z\3 rea et : Exposed | 2 coer 5 Whom 3 erry Hels ROLS- 2/8) = Is a5 & siAlz = clerical equipment Pmproper use ofpane! — e On competent pe + Tookox meting shal be conducted oor ey panel board re bythe eampetent perionona Say Srproved tol sty rg panel board tobe open with slils > Fach ot 7] [a] 2] 6 prorenanor za] 4 ‘Caught in between panel v| fy mmisioning Engineer shal lsely supervise board door_—_ Jnontor the activities Engineer > Congested head Fad inuryorbise YT Ta]2fe vend haart leek sierra > Damage mat v Jrootoxmeeung shal be conducted by the inate v] fy oer a ave a)4 wdotherequipment | 5| 2) 10 : be nspecteaby competent person eforeusngtothe ste : v [eNotify affected personnel when performing, i v v Yes Damage to propery. | Perfo ockout/tagout onthe Fede tosterccreut_ |” equipment that might be enered ome cover teletralequpmestsy @CCIONMA HAZARD IDENTIFIFCATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT FICHTNER HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Identify the hazard on the given task and conduct assessment of the actual site condition, identified risk should provide witha plan to eliminate or control the risk RISK REDUCTION ACTION PLAN ‘ACCONA Revision-01 Date: 3032019 Consequences Xitalibood = Risk Ranking ; ee Bed ell lerreco stem corre B12 casowomy (BES S| wowaciviies | HAZARD EXISTING CONTROLS | /2| 8 | /iMPLeMENTINGNEW — | g| | 5 | Followupby |B BS posed | 8/5 | © Whom = [5 HE 5 ‘CONTROLS, ila Ba 5\ | AEE E Teter 3]2] 6 2T2] 4 cvipnent, cable or whe to ro potent Cay + Roem softy Se sa \ ~ v ‘© Lighting shall be installed day before mean pe efequae to prow lle to the pot ova snore | yo tre alas vows dugiosgeetonts [32] 6 seasons \ccident resulting serious v [© Commissioning Engineer shall be T furyorceumteather [rrte-dy bere te cea Ione «| |e ves alls 3l2| 6 = Fake 5 > Coop esd + Oreo naar Tigard alae peerae ee 3/4) 12 3/2) 6 oo cs v| fe ve a Telco ote cues oe hc stig iury iapected by competent vr before ewer hgubeaeS a @CCIOMA HAZARD IDENTIFIFCATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT = FICHTNER ri si on ge al ad ot anos a i ls cnn, ied Ha sal oa wa nS 6 Soa . | TTT LAZAI RISK REDUCTION ACTION PLAN 2 RD IDENTIFICATION Consequences X Likelihood = Risk Ranking —— Te Vecepawrncamaa fee le S| Work Activtios HAZARD. aperd EXISTING CONTROLS | Person || 2| § IMPLEMENTING NEW. | & | Fotiowupby | 2a & ott foes) fale CONTROLS Hale] (a? =) 5/3 bl5/2 = eet ee be used by one personnelat | | 6|2 al3lio Engineer 1ag @CCIONA HAZARD IDENTIFIFCATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT = FICHTNER "AGCIONA Revison-03 Date: 303-2038 |dentfy the hazard on the given task and conduct assessment ofthe actual site condition, all identified risk should provide with plan to eliminate or control the risk. RISK REDUCTION ACTION PLAN HAZARD IDENTIFICATION ‘Consequences X Likelihood = Risk Ranking 2 2 of aoe it & | IMPROVED EXISTING CONTROLS HP Alege alee S| Wor Activities HAZARD EXISTING CONTROLS 25 IMPLEMENTING NEW glz| 3 e & exposed | #5 LEMEHTNG) i s| 2) whom |p 58 BENE =|3 5 Peromel seposedtoa alot more tan i ‘9 (Check of batteries and v ‘© Workers involve | args document review and aja|a a|2|6 Fel hage forthe whole duration of seen | personnel [pAny source of naked flames and. — rou be probe, preverte font non spring tol mist be se nde [= Inappropriate tools: ‘© Using inappropriate v ining should be given to - Inadequate PPE tool could cause P Untrained personnel «hose supersion by engineer or foreman should be obsene 5/2] 10 3|2] 6 Plale supervisor | ye, eee L Fegatethejoo :Gq acciona HAZARD IDENTIFIFCATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT FICHTNER S [dently the hazard on the given task and conduct assessment ofthe actual site condition, HAZARD IDENTIFICATION lentiied risk should provide with a plan to eliminate or control the risk. RISK REDUCTION ACTION PLAN ‘Consequences X Likelihood = Risk Ranking "AGCIONA Revision 01 Date: 30112019 ik nse Bel 2 g\,|2 3 i {Possible incident) 3 | 8| = | proven existinc conrrois | §| 3| = gs S| Work actrities HAZARD | “esicragunse! | EXISTING CONTROLS | foo", | |= Se TimpLeMentiNe NEW g\z § Poke aay, bee en 3/8/2 CONTROLS a se sald 87/8 i rand deat aa af nding pitt to reach te battery for specie roy another esting Fe coniuted ftv shal be dvminaedtoaateded | —| 7 rer ay before the ata Ab “tence | TO 3/2) 6 2/)2/) 4 * > ck pe v + congested hens Jo Cerhend azar oor Ergonomic esas ety sprain orbackinry Frandaton PPE when opening areiboors || | yal 2/8 3] 2| 6) swveniore | reine improper Randingat |» Darsgeva wast | Ont competent and auld person sha | —] 7 snd equipment be sve onthe esting act Elbe superior | uy avioment 0 that other vo ined 3/3] 9 ala} a > Review ne dam and dais v [> -Aesess te aporosch boundary Betas cong ttn and pre File toning personel fom come supenitora |, ‘commissioning team to ensure that only. ‘loser to electrical equipment Engineer es soeciecabieswilbeenerped dng | |ag @CCIONA_ HAZARD IDENTIFIFCATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT = FICHTNER Identify the hazard on the given task and conduct assessment of the actual site condition, all identified risk should provide with a plan to eliminate or control the risk. ACCIONA Revision-01 Date: 30-11-2019 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RISK REDUCTION ACTION PLAN Consequences X Likelihood = Rik Ranking g\,|2 g\.|2 3 i, 3) = | proven existinc conrrors | §| 8| 2 gel S| Woraciviies | HAZARD EXISTING CONTROLS | 02", ie &| ‘IMPLEMENTING NEW He | Fotwupby |B 83) ia\¢ ‘CONTROLS, ialt B48 §/5/2 s\-|é 5 a Trang aT redwtestencraut te the afc 2/5) 10 smman understanding on | 4 | 2] 8 he ten tbe pce SReae 7 ual mparment ele swpertor | ag 23/6 teed duinginspectonta | 2 | 2| 4 Pee crete cn Taien ad ang v foudsoun sapere & cee the bung to aware other workers tnemeer | YE Sage oper a}a|a2 3}3|9 '® Accident resulting vl }© Conduct toolbox meeting and discuss 7 tberiry property domone . 15/2] 10 3/3) 9 Lad ‘i [Transformer site tes Me ‘resulting serious: ted to al affected /* Commissioning Engineer nd Shunt eae or death toother day before the ata testing rerponable on proper Inforntion ] Supeeor | yes her : dissemination eaieceerS a @CCIONA HAZARD IDENTIFIFCATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT ~—-FICHTNER Ideniy the hazard‘on the given task and conduct assessment ofthe actual site conditional eid isk should provide witha plan to eliminate or contol the risk ARGON Reon ate 30-2019 AZA RISK REDUCTION ACTION PLAN Hi RD IDENTIFICATION Consequences X Likelihood = Risk Ranking leks esue 8/.| 2 g]./2 3 (pon con) | = | mproveo existine controis | §| 8| 2 geal S| wonncomes | HAZARD | Seems | EXISTING CONTROLS | ,ferson,| 2| 2/5 |""""fmpLementinc new” | g|2) § | Folowupby |B Fa eoettaa ey pe sla|s e\sis om 83" Fl2 siFlz2 = alal2 2/3] 6 33/9 4}2|s Ae superiior® | yyy a v Energies electial feupmen/panal | Damage to popery recto shon crest v| |v Breed ive |© Notify affected personnel when eer erfoming tout nagout Jo Sacqute softy seal a/al9 2/al 6 thea cup + cor there : sting > wea ethan aaa 7] [E] a] 5 promewcnme datreaarete TZ] 2) a eathoperonne! | temperature vty wer ve _ ‘ear ore tan fo Aw rue neededa @CCIONA HAZARD IDENTIFIFCATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT = FICHTNER Identify the hazard on the given task and conduct assessment of the actual site condition, all identified risk should pr ‘a plan to eliminate or control the risk. RISK REDUCTION ACTION PLAN HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Consequences X Likelihood = Risk Ranking —— Hela ener resale sis S| Wom actvties | HAZARD EXISTING CONTROLS |e", |g] 2) § |"? "Pateuewennns new gle| 2 eae es|€ CONTROLS Eig) 2] wen 588 sale He E aa on os ee any eee : “ Engineer bocu) ae : ees Rad Engineer _ cose sla] 6] tas AG |e treated ee —_fppisant cot dot |S a @CCIONA HAZARD IDENTIFIFCATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT = FICHTNER sists OR anon TOTS [ Identity the hazard on the glven task and conduct assessment ofthe actual site condition, all identified risk should provide witha plan to eliminate or control the risk. RISK REDUCTION ACTION PLAN é a ag/f 2 2? ; (eons len) 8/8) = | mproven existinc conrroLs opty [BE S| Work Aetvties HAZARD | esicrhgeussi@! | EXISTING CONTROLS | fesen, ul i IMPLEMENTING NEW i ; SS waa eee pence Sls iSe> 37/8 3/3|8 E Tale dallbe oredr the ‘ondiion Us equipment, energized eauipment designated storage atthe end of each day cl equipment shall be propery secured, stibution board dosed and padlocked :